CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03801304VinMetAtezoUpdated Jun 30, 2026

Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Vinorelbine With Metronomic Administration in Combination With Atezolizumab as Second-line Treatment for Patients With Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Atezolizumab and Vinorelbine in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Brest. Completed at 13 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Brest · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The majority of patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC are treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy regimens, except those harboring specific oncogenic drivers such as epidermal growth-factor-receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. In the second-line setting, response rates remain low and median survival rarely exceeds 10 months.

Over the past few years, several checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1) or its ligand (PDL1) used as second-line therapies generated evidence of improving survival and, more recently, as first-line NSCLC treatment.

Although pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) was recently approved as first-line treatment for patients with at least 50% of their NSCLC cells expressing PDL1, many patients are still not benefiting from this first-line agent.

For patients with relapsed NSCLC, atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) prolonged survival compared to docetaxel in the phase II POPLAR and phase III OAK trials. Novel concepts of synergic action between immunotherapy and chemotherapy have emerged recently. However, those types of treatments are given for different durations: chemotherapy is allowed for only a short period (rarely exceeding 6 cycles), while anti-PDL1 can be continued for several months until loss of its clinical benefit.

Metronomic chemotherapy is defined as low-dose and frequent chemotherapy administration, without prolonged drug-free breaks. Metronomic administration of oral vinorelbine has been tested against breast cancer and advanced refractory NSCLC. The combination could have immunostimulatory effects: induction of immunogenic cancer-cell death, enhancement of antigen presentation through dendritic cell modulation, increased cancer-cell immunogenicity, preferential depletion of regulatory T cells, modulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, enhancement of the cytotoxic activity of immune-effector cells.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • immunotherapy
  • second line of chemotherapy
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

6,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,632 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 62 across 5,213 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest is the lead sponsor of 594 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed NSCLC;
  • Locally advanced and/or metastatic stage IV NSCLC (according to American Joint Committee on Cancers) or recurrent NSCLC);
  • Patients without activating EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement and ROS1 fusions.
  • Subject has provided a formalin-fixed tumor-tissue sample of a tumor-lesion biopsy, either at the time of or after metastatic disease was diagnosed AND from a site not previously irradiated to assess for PDL1 status. Archived tissue may be acceptable or PDL1 status known;
  • Progressive disease after first-line platinum-doublet-based chemotherapy according to RECIST V.1.1 with measurable lesion (RECIST V1.1);
  • Age ≥18 years, either sex;
  • Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group Performance status (ECOG PS) 0, 1 or 2;
  • Life expectancy exceeds 12 weeks;
  • No history of other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell or spinocellular carcinoma of the skin;
  • Adequate organ function, demonstrated by the following laboratory results within 3 weeks prior to teatment: Normal hepatic function: bilirubin \<1.5 × normal (N), Alanine aminotransferase and Aspartate aminotransferase \<2.5 × N or \<5 × N if liver metastasis is present;
  • Normal renal function (calculated creatinine clearance ≥45 mL/min);
  • Normal calcemia;
  • Normal hematological function (polynuclear neutrophils >1.5 G/L, platelets >100 G/L and hemoglobin>8g/dl);
  • Women of child-bearing potential must use effective contraception;
  • Men might be surgically sterile or accept to use an effective contraceptive procedure during and until 6 months after the treatment;
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patient with social insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG PS >2;
  • Known hypersensitivity to immunotherapy;
  • Small-cell lung cancer, bronchioloalveolar cancer, neuroendocrine cancer;
  • Tumor harbors EGFR-sensitizing (activating) mutations or ALK translocations or ROS1 fusions and that justify treatment with targeted therapy ;
  • Chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, immunotherapy or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors within the past 4 weeks prior to treatment with the trial drug;
  • Radiotherapy (except bone or brain) within the past 3 months prior to baseline imaging;
  • Medical contraindication to oral vinorelbine;
  • Persistence of clinical adverse events with a grade > 2 related to prior treatment;
  • Active brain metastases (e.g. stable for \<4 weeks, no adequate previous radiotherapy, symptomatic, requiring anticonvulsants or corticosteroids)
  • Concurrent radiotherapy, except for palliative bone irradiation.
  • Other concurrent severe illnesses (congestive heart failure, unstable angina, significant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction \<12 months before study entry);
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders;
  • Active B hepatitis, HIV infection …;
  • Psychiatric or neurological disorders preventing the patient from understanding the nature of the trial;
  • Grade-3 peripheral neuropathy;
  • Uncontrolled infection;
  • Interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis requiring steroid management;
  • Corticosteroid therapy exceeding 10 mg/day;
  • Other severe organic disorders not allowing inclusion in the trial;
  • Malabsorption syndrome;
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding;
  • Follow-up not possible; and incarcerated or institutionalized patients.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Atezolizumab associated with vinorelbine

    * Atezolizumab will be administered with IV infusions. The first one will be a 60-min IV infusion; the subsequent infusions will last 30 minutes when well-tolerated at the dose of 1200 mg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. * Vinorelbine capsules are taken orally on days 1, 3 and 5 of each week of the 21-day cycle. Vinorelbine will be administered at the dose of 40 mg per day on days 1, 3 and 5 of each week of the 21-day cycle. In case of toxicity, the dose will be decreased to 30 mg.

    Drug: Atezolizumab · Drug: Vinorelbine

Interventions

  • DrugAtezolizumab

    Atezolizumab in IV infusions

  • DrugVinorelbine

    Vinorelbine capsules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of death or progression of the disease

    To evaluate the occurrence of death or progression of the disease

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Emergence of adverse events (Safety and tolerability)

    To evaluate the safety outcomes, tolerability, adverse events frequency

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Occurrence of death

    To evaluate the occurrence of death over 12 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Objective Response Rate

    To evaluate the objective Response Rate and Disease Control Rate

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Following of the quality of life

    The scale EuroQol 5 dimensions (EDQ5) is used to evaluate the quality of life. The EQ-5D scale is a standardised measure of health status to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, whih is divided by the EQ-5D descriptive system (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). Each dimension has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems).

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Following of the quality of life

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire with 30 questions developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. An essential aspect of the "modular" approach to QOL assessment adopted by the EORTC Quality of Life Group is the development of modules specific to tumour site, treatment modality, or a QOL dimension, to be administered in addition to the core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

13 sites
  • CH Aix en Provence
    Aix-en-Provence, France, France
  • CHRU de Brest - Hôpital Morvan
    Brest, France 29609, France
  • CLCC Caen
    Caen, France, France
  • CH de Créteil
    Créteil, France 94010, France
  • Ch La Roche Sur Yon
    La Roche-sur-Yon, France 85000, France
  • CHU de Limoges - Hôpital DUPUYTREN
    Limoges, France 87042, France
  • CH MEAUX
    Meaux, France, France
  • CH Pringy
    Pringy, France, France
  • CH Quimper
    Quimper, France, France
  • CHU de Rennes
    Rennes, France 35033, France
  • CHU Rouen
    Rouen, France, France
  • CH Saint-Brieuc
    Saint-Brieuc, France, France
  • Hia Saint Anne
    Toulon, France 83041, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vergnenegre A, Monnet I, Ricordel C, Bizieux A, Curcio H, Bernardi M, Corre R, Guisier F, Hominal S, Le Garff G, Bylicki O, Locher C, Geier M, Chouaid C, Robinet G; GFPC team. Safety and efficacy of second-line metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: An open-label phase II trial (VinMetAtezo). Lung Cancer. 2023 Apr;178:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Feb 27. PubMed 36868180 ↗
  • Vergnenegre A, Monnet I, Bizieux A, Bernardi M, Chiapa AM, Lena H, Chouaid C, Robinet G. Open-label Phase II trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of second-line metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination for stage-IV non-small-cell lung cancer - VinMetAtezo trial, (GFPCdouble dagger 04-2017). Future Oncol. 2020 Feb;16(4):5-10. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0730. Epub 2020 Jan 2. PubMed 31894704 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All collected data that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03801304
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Brest
Collaborators
Groupe Francais De Pneumo-Cancerologie, Roche Farma, S.A, Pierre Fabre Medicament
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
Start date
Jan 24, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 4, 2021
Completion
Feb 23, 2022
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion