CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03800940Updated Mar 28, 2023

Trans-drain Occlusion for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula- A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

An interventional study of Fistulography and trans-drain occlusion and Fistulography in Pancreatic Fistula, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-28.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, investigator initiated, prospective, superiority, parallel-group, randomized, double-blinded trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of trans-drain occlusion followed by gradual withdrawal of drain versus gradual withdrawal of drain alone for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) that persists for longer than 21 days.

Read the detailed description

The most common major complication after pancreatic resection is postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), which is defined as a drain output of any measurable volume of fluid on and after postoperative day 3 with an amylase content > 3 times the upper limit of normal serum level. Gradual withdrawal of surgically placed drains in patients who are clinically stable and tolerate a diet is generally adopted to hasten closure of POPF. For high-output fistulas (> 150-200 mL of amylase-rich fluid per day), patients are initially managed with fasting and enteral or parenteral nutrition. If fistula output decreases substantially with these measures and the patient remains clinically well, drain withdrawal is initiated and oral intake is slowly restarted. If the patient remains well despite high fistula output, drains are slowly withdrawn in an attempt to decrease the output and close the fistula. When the output decrease to less than 10 mL per day, the drains are removed.

However, the current standard practice of gradual drain withdrawal is time consuming. Although clinically stable can be discharged with the drain, the drainage tube often remains in place for a prolonged period, with patient discomfort and increased medical cost. In a pilot study by the investigators, 32.5% (37/114) of POPF patients required drainage for longer than 21 days. Besides, there is also considerable risk of recurrent fluid collection along the drain tube tract after drain removal.

The investigators' experience has shown that trans-drain occlusion of the drain tract achieves fistula closure, enabling immediate removal of the drain. In a pilot study, 20 patients underwent trans-catheter occlusion for POPFs that persisted for more than 3 weeks after placement of drainage tubes. No subjective symptoms or abnormalities in blood tests were noted in 17 patients after the procedure. Three patients had abdominal pain without signs of infection, and the pain spontaneously subsided after conservative treatment. POPF healed immediately after occlusion in all of the 20 patients without recurrence during follow-up. This multicenter, investigator initiated, prospective, superiority, parallel-group, randomized, double-blinded trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of trans-drain occlusion followed by gradual withdrawal of drain versus gradual withdrawal of drain alone for POPF that persists for longer than 21 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Fistula
03

In context

Pancreatic Fistula

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Fistula; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 110 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Fistula.

Browse Pancreatic Fistula studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who undergo pancreatectomy (including pancreatoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation, distal pancreatectomy, and central pancreatectomy) and develop POPF that persists for 3 weeks after its occurrence.
  • With POPF that persists for 3 weeks after occurrence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 20 years of age
  • Active infection not adequately controlled [body temperature ≧38.5℃ and/or eukocytosis (WBC count >15,000 /uL)/leukopenia (WBC count \<4,000 /uL)], have residual intra-abdominal fluid collection (largest diameter > 4cm) despite tube drainage on CT scan (with or without contrast, performed when the patient meet inclusion criteria).
  • Current or history of severe heart, lung, kidney, or liver failure
  • Karnofsky Performance Score \<60
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Have received somatostatin or its analogue in the index admission
  • Decline to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fistulography and trans-drain occlusion

    Fistulography is performed to assess the condition of the fistula, and trans-drain occlusion is performed by injecting glue (NBCA and Lipiodol) through the drain to occlude the tract.

    Procedure: Fistulography and trans-drain occlusion

  • Sham comparator
    Fistulography

    Fistulography is performed to assess the condition of the fistula, without trains-drain occlusion.

    Procedure: Fistulography

Interventions

  • ProcedureFistulography and trans-drain occlusion

    1. Fistulography: an 18G needle is inserted into the tube and diluted contrast medium is slowly injected into the tube. 2. Trans-drain occlusion: a 0.035-inch guidewire is inserted via the puncture needle. The drain tube is removed, cut at 4 cm proximal to the skin fixation site, and preserved for reinsertion. After inserting a 40cm 5Fr KMP catheter over the guidewire, the guidewire is removed. Afte rinsing the KMP catheter with 3ml 5% glucose water, withdraw the catheter and simultaneously inject glue (33%, 1:2, 0.5ml of NBCA + 1ml Lipiodol) into the catheter until the proximal 5cm of the catheter remains inside the tract. The guidewire is re-inserted through the catheter, and then the original drain tube is re-inserted over the guidewire. The guidewire is removed and the drain is fixed.

  • ProcedureFistulography

    Fistulography: an 18G needle is inserted into the tube and diluted contrast medium is slowly injected into the tube.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Days to fistula closure

    Days from the randomly allocated treatment to fistula closure

    Time frame: The date of fistula closure is the date on which the drain is removed after an output of ≦ 10 mL during 48 hours, without recurrence of fistula within the next 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30-day fistula closure rate

    Proportion of patients in whom the drain can be removed by 30 days after occurrence of fistula, without recurrence within the next 3 months

    Time frame: From enrollment to 4 months after fistula occurrence

  2. Rate of persistent or recurrent POPF after initial drain removal

    Proportion of patients with fluid collection on follow-up CT, which is to be performed at 3 months after removal of drain or when recurrence of fistula is suspected clinically.

    Time frame: From drain removal to 3 months after drain removal or recurrence of fistula, whichever occurs first

  3. Length of hospital stay after the assigned treatment

    Days from the assigned treatment to discharge

    Time frame: From treatment to discharge from the index admission, an average of 2 weeks

  4. Hospital costs after the assigned treatment

    Costs from the assigned treatment to discharge

    Time frame: From treatment to discharge from the index admission, an average of 2 weeks

  5. Rate of fistula-related complications

    Proportion of patients who develop fever/infection, ileus, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage from the assigned treatment to end of follow-up.

    Time frame: From occurrence of fistula to 3 months after drain removal

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Fever/infection or pain that develops within 48 hours after the allocated treatment, or any adverse events judged to be related to the treatment

    Time frame: From treatment to discharge from the index admission, an average of 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 100, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M, Piso P. Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2002 Oct;89(10):1245-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02202.x. PubMed 12296891 ↗
  • Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):391-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391. PubMed 11296108 ↗
  • Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Ord SE, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Zahurak ML, Grochow LB, Abrams RA. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):248-57; discussion 257-60. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004. PubMed 9339931 ↗
  • Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Erratum In: Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):988-989. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.043. PubMed 28040257 ↗
  • Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001. PubMed 16003309 ↗
  • Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP, Marudanayagam R, Hodson J, Isaac J, Muiesan P, Navarro A, Patel K, Jah A, Napetti S, Adair A, Lazaridis S, Prachalias A, Shingler G, Al-Sarireh B, Storey R, Smith AM, Shah N, Fusai G, Ahmed J, Abu Hilal M, Mirza DF. Scoring System to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A UK Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1191-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997. PubMed 25371115 ↗
  • El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1405-18. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5. PubMed 23494109 ↗
  • Veillette G, Dominguez I, Ferrone C, Thayer SP, McGrath D, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch Surg. 2008 May;143(5):476-81. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476. PubMed 18490557 ↗
  • McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston M, Callery MP, Christein JD, Dixon E, Drebin JA, Castillo CF, Fisher WE, Fong ZV, House MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Kunstman JW, Malleo G, Miller BC, Salem RR, Soares K, Valero V, Wolfgang CL, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk-adjusted Outcomes of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Model for Performance Evaluation. Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):344-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001537. PubMed 26727086 ↗
  • Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Buchler MW. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7. PubMed 21529927 ↗
  • Tjaden C, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Fritz F, Fritz S, Grenacher L, Buchler MW, Hackert T. Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jan;18(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 18. PubMed 26776849 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 27, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03800940
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
Start date
Jan 11, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2022
Completion
Mar 27, 2023
Last update
Mar 28, 2023

Study contacts

Yu-Wen Tien, MD, PhD
principal investigator · National Taiwan University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion