A Phase 4 interventional study of Loxoprofen sodium hydrogel patch and Loxoprofen sodium tablet in Ankylosing Spondylitis, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-11.
Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
To assess the efficacy and safety of loxoprofen sodium hydrogel patch (LX-P) versus loxoprofen sodium tablet (LX-T) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis(AS). The trial includes 70 patients who are randomly assigned to either the LX-P group (LX-P 100 mg per day) or LX-T group (LX-T 60 mg t.i.d.) for 4 weeks.
This is a 4-week randomized, open-label trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of loxoprofen sodium hydrogel patch (LX-P) versus loxoprofen sodium tablet (LX-T) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis(AS). The trial includes 70 patients who are randomly assigned to either the LX-P group (LX-P 100 mg per day) or LX-T group (LX-T 60 mg t.i.d.) for 4 weeks.
507 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylitis, Ankylosing; 91 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 84 across 281 interventional studies indexed under Spondylitis, Ankylosing.
Browse Spondylitis, Ankylosing studies →Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,680 studies on the registry; 609 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
loxoprofen sodium hydrogel patch (LX-P) 100 mg per day for 4 weeks
Drug: Loxoprofen sodium hydrogel patch
loxoprofen sodium tablet (LX-T) 60 mg t.i.d. for 4 weeks
Drug: Loxoprofen sodium tablet
100 mg per day
Also known as: Loxoprofen hydrogel patch
60 mg t.i.d.
Also known as: Loxoprofen tablet
the proportions of patients reaching Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20% response (ASAS20)
ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and absolute improvement of ≥1 unit (0-10-cm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (mean of total and nocturnal pain scores), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)
Time frame: week 4
ASAS5/6 response
defined as 20% improvement in 5 of the following 6 domains: PTGA, pain assessment, BASFI, clinical inflammation, spinal mobility, and C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time frame: week 4
ASAS20 response
ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and absolute improvement of ≥1 unit (0-10-cm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (mean of total and nocturnal pain scores), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)
Time frame: week 2
ASAS5/6 response
defined as 20% improvement in 5 of the following 6 domains: PTGA, pain assessment, BASFI, clinical inflammation, spinal mobility, and C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time frame: week 2
Ran from May 2015 to primary completion in Dec 2015, 6 months.
Of 18 phase 4 interventional studies under Spondylitis, Ankylosing, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 36. This study's 6 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.