ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03780309Updated May 13, 2024

Postexercise Hypotension and Exercise Adherence

An interventional study of Exercise Self-Monitoring and Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring in Hypertension, sponsored by University of Connecticut. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-13.

Sponsored by University of Connecticut · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2016, registered Dec 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sedentary (n=24) adults ≥18 yr with elevated BP to established hypertension were enrolled into this randomized clinical trial entitled, 'Blood Pressure UtiLizing Self-Monitoring after Exercise study or PULSE'. Participants were randomly assigned to either an exercise only (EXERCISE; n=12) or exercise plus BP self-monitoring (EXERCISE+PEH) (n=12) group. All participants participated in a 12 wk supervised moderate intensity aerobic exercise training program 40 min/d for 3 d/wk. In addition, they were encouraged to exercise at home ≥30 min/d for 1-2 d/wk. All participants self-monitored exercise with a traditional calendar recording method and heart rate (HR) monitor. In addition to traditional exercise self-monitoring (EXERCISE), individuals in the EXERCISE+PEH group were given a home BP monitor to assess home BP twice daily (in the morning upon awakening and in the evening) and prior to and after voluntary home exercise sessions. Resting BP, peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), physical activity, dietary and salt intake, and antihypertensive medication adherence were measured before and after the 12 wk supervised exercise training program. In addition, integrated social-cognitive predictors of exercise that included questionnaires on exercise self-efficacy, barriers self-efficacy, outcome expectations for exercise, exercise intention, and affective responses to exercise were measured before and after the 12 wk supervised exercise training program. Four weeks following the completion of exercise training, self-reported exercise levels were assessed during a telephone interview in both groups. Among EXERCISE+PEH only, self-monitoring of BP was also self-reported during this telephone interview.

Read the detailed description

A sub-study following the completion of the PULSE clinical trial investigated the reliability and time course of change of PEH during the 12-week exercise training program. Participants (n = 10) were PEH responders from the EXERCISE + PEH control arm who underwent 12 wk of supervised aerobic exercise training, 40 min/session at moderate-to-vigorous intensity for 3 d/wk. BP was assessed via a home BP monitor. PEH was calculated as post- minus pre-exercise BP for 36 sessions. To quantify the reliability of PEH, RMANCOVA and GRMANCOVA adjusted for pre-exercise BP derived the between-participant and measurement error variability that were used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) compared the goodness-of-fit of the PEH models for each week of training.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • antihypertensive lifestyle therapy
  • positive outcome expectations
  • postexercise hypotension
  • self-efficacy
  • self-management
03

In context

Hypertension

6,114 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 912 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 100 across 4,575 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Connecticut is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 yr
  • SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥80 mmHg or taking antihypertensive medication regardless of BP with a SBP \<160 mmHg and DBP \<100 mmHg
  • Free of diagnosed cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, metabolic, or other chronic diseases or depression
  • Non-smokers for at least 6 mo prior to entry
  • Consumed \<2 alcoholic drinks daily
  • Physically inactive defined as engaging in formal exercise ≤ 2d/wk.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking medications that influenced blood pressure such as inhaled or oral , nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, aspirin, and nutritional supplements with the exception of a 1-a-day vitamin, cold medications, and herbal supplements
  • Osteoarthritis and orthopedic problems that compromised ability to exercise.
  • Past medical history of cancer-related lymphedema
  • Seeking to gain or lose weight
  • Pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant.
  • Hormone-altering administered in a bolus
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    EXERCISE

    Participants participated in a the exercise training program and engaged in exercise self-monitoring.

    Behavioral: Exercise Self-Monitoring

  • Experimental
    EXERCISE+PEH

    Participants participated in the exercise training program and engaged in exercise self-monitoring and blood pressure self-monitoring (daily and before and after exercise).

    Behavioral: Exercise Self-Monitoring · Behavioral: Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise Self-Monitoring

    Participants engaged in exercise self-monitoring utilizing a traditional calendar recording method and heart rate monitor.

  • BehavioralBlood Pressure Self-Monitoring

    Participants engaged in blood pressure self-monitoring by measuring blood pressure twice daily and before and after exercise.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Exercise Adherence

    Exercise adherence to the 12 wk supervised portion of the aerobic exercise training program was calculated as the percent of supervised exercise sessions completed divided by the total number of supervised sessions possible (# of supervised sessions performed ÷ total number of possible supervised sessions X 100%). In this calculation, the total number of possible sessions was calculated as: 3 supervised exercise training days per wk for 12 wk = 36 sessions with a maximum possible adherence of 100% (e.g., 36÷36 X 100% =100%).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Blood Pressure Response to Exercise Training

    The BP response to aerobic exercise training was calculated in two ways and in units 'mmHg': (1) in the laboratory (post training resting BP - pre training resting BP) during the control visits (Visits 1 or 2 vs. Visit 4 or 5); and (2) under ambulatory conditions (post training ambulatory BP - pre training ambulatory BP) following the control visits (Visits 1 or 2 vs. Visit 4 or 5) over the awake, sleep, and 19 hr.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Blood Pressure Response to Each Exercise Training Session

    In the sub study analysis, the difference in post- minus pre-exercise resting BP from three weekly exercise sessions per participant for each week of training was calculated for both SBP and DBP (in units of 'mmHg')

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Relative Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline for Each Exercise Session

    The relative percent change in BP for each exercise session was calculated as post- minus pre-exercise BP divided by pre-exercise BP x 100%, for each exercise training session for both SBP and DBP. A negative percent change in SBP and/or DBP from baseline was deemed that postexercise hypotension occurred.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Reliability of Postexercise Hypotension

    To quantify the reliability of postexercise hypotension, RMANCOVA and GRMANCOVA adjusted for pre-exercise BP derived the between-participant and measurement error variability that were used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (unit-less)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Time Course of Change in the Magnitude of Postexercise Hypotension

    The Akaike Information Criterion (unit-less) was calculated to compare the goodness-of-fit of the postexercise hypotension models for each week of training and to determine the week of exercise training after which the the magnitude of reductions in SBP and DBP ceased to differ week-to-week.

    Time frame: 12 wk

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exercise Training Characteristics: Frequency

    Exercise training frequency (d/wk) was recorded for supervised, unsupervised, and supervised plus unsupervised exercise training over the course of 12wk.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Exercise Training Characteristics: Intensity

    Exercise training intensity (%heart rate reserve) was recorded for supervised, unsupervised, and supervised plus unsupervised exercise training over the course of 12wk.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Exercise Training Characteristics: Time

    Exercise training time (min) was recorded for supervised, unsupervised, and supervised plus unsupervised exercise training over the course of 12wk.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Exercise Training Characteristics: Type

    Exercise training type (treadmill, cycle ergometer, elliptical) was recorded for unsupervised, and supervised plus unsupervised exercise training over the course of 12wk.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Integrated social-cognitive predictor of exercise

    Participants were administered a validated questionnaire packet to assess whether EXERCISE and EXERCISE+PEH self-monitoring favorably modulated measures of integrated social-cognitive predictors of exercise (unitless).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Self Reported Physical activity

    Participants were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle habits throughout study participation and were administered a validated questionnaire to assess self reported. physical activity (min).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Dietary Intake

    Participants were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle habits throughout study participation and were administered a validated questionnaire to assess dietary intake (kcal/d).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Salt Intake

    Participants were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle habits throughout study participation and were administered a validated questionnaire to assess salt intake (mg/d).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Antihypertensive Medication Adherence.

    Participants taking antihypertensive medication were administered a validated questionnaire to assess antihypertensive medication adherence (%).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD data will be made available upon request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: All IPD data will be available upon request with no time limit.

Access criteria: All IPD data will be shared and emailed to whoever requests it.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2016 to primary completion in May 2018, 18 months.

Of 1,403 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypertension, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,498 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 11, 2018
First posted
Dec 19, 2018
StartActual
Oct 28, 2016
Primary completionActual
May 1, 2018
CompletionActual
May 29, 2018
Last update
May 13, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03780309
Collaborators
Hartford Hospital
Responsible party
Linda Pescatello (Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor, University of Connecticut) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2018
Start date
Oct 28, 2016
Primary completion
May 1, 2018
Completion
May 29, 2018
Last update
May 13, 2024

Study contacts

Linda S Pescatello, PhD
principal investigator · University of Connecticut

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion