CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03766906Updated Feb 8, 2023Results posted

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) Familia Talk

An interventional study of Talk STEM Familia app in Language Development, sponsored by Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-08.

Sponsored by Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

After development of the Talk Stem Familia (TSF) smart-speaker application prototype, the study will evaluate the prototype's efficacy in a within-subjects pre-post design study. The sample will contain 50 parent-student/child dyads who will use the Alexa skill app for 6 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Participants will receive an Echo Dot device enabled with the application prototype using a research Amazon account created for each dyad. The Echo Dot devices will be preconfigured by project staff onto research Amazon accounts. Parents will come to one of several orientation sessions to obtain their device and set-up instructions; staff will provide follow-up phone support as needed. Usage data will show how much the device is used by each dyad. To ensure exposure to TSF, parents will be asked to engage at least 3 times per week; project staff will prompt parents bi-weekly (via text, email, device notification, phone) during the 6-week intervention to encourage usage and provide needed technical support.

02

Conditions studied

  • Language Development
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Latino parents and their children who are students in grades 3 through 6.
  • Parents have Spanish as primary home language.
  • Family has wi-fi in the home.
  • No age limits for parents. Their child must be in grades 3 through 6.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents and their children who are students in grade levels below grade 3 or above grade 6.
  • Parents do not have Spanish as primary home language.
  • Family does not have wi-fi in the home.
  • Children younger than 8 (or in grade levels below grade 3).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Talk STEM Familia App

    This arm will test the feasibility of the Talk STEM Familia app to improve English language acquisition and family engagement and promote long-term educational and health outcomes among first- and second-generation Latino families.

    Behavioral: Talk STEM Familia app

Interventions

  • BehavioralTalk STEM Familia app

    The Talk STEM Familia app will be used to improve access to sound instruction in scientific academic vocabulary through the development of a technology-enhanced, culturally responsive smart-speaker tool that engages Latino families in culturally responsive academic language acquisition and practice in the home setting.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Student Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in English

    The Student Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in English measure includes 18 multiple choice questions on the 18 words taught in the TSF app. The student chooses the correct word meaning from among four (4) possible responses. Students receive one point for each word correctly identified and points are summed across the 18 items. Scores can range from 0-18 and a higher score indicates greater vocabulary knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

  2. Parent Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in Spanish

    The Parent Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in Spanish measure includes 18 multiple choice questions on the 18 words taught in the TSF app. The parent chooses the correct word meaning from among four (4) possible responses. Parents receive one point for each word correctly identified and points are summed across the 18 items. Scores can range from 0-18 and a higher score indicates greater vocabulary knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

  3. Student Academic Vocabulary Usage in English

    The Student Academic Vocabulary Usage in English measure includes 18 true/false questions testing student knowledge of correct usage of the 18 academic vocabulary words taught in the TSF app.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

  4. Parent Academic Vocabulary Usage in Spanish

    The Parent Academic Vocabulary Usage in Spanish measure includes 18 true/false questions testing student knowledge of correct usage of the 18 academic vocabulary words taught in the TSF app.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Student Engagement Instrument

    The Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) consists of three subscales (future aspirations and goals, 5 items, r = .80, family support for learning, 6 items, r = .79, and control and relevance of school work, 9 items, r = 70). The SEI scale for each item ranges from 1-"Strongly disagree" to 5- "Strongly agree" with 5 indicating greater self-efficacy (more positive). A sum score was computed for each subscale. For future aspirations the scores can range from 5 to 25 and a higher score indicates a more positive outcome; greater self-efficacy for future aspirations. For family support for learning the score can range from 6 to 30 and a higher scores indicates a more positive outcome; greater self-efficacy for family support for learning. For control and relevance of school work the scores can range from 9 to 45 and a greater score indicates a more positive outcome; greater self-efficacy for control and relevance of school work.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

  2. The Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance Subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale

    The Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001) (completed in Spanish) to measure useful factors that reflect parents' perceptions of whether they can influence their child's academic performance. The PSES consists of 8 items on a 9-point scale ranging from 1 = "nothing" to 9 = "a great deal" . The measure has an internal reliability of .87. A mean composite score was computed and the scores can range from 1 to 9 with a higher score indicating a more positive outcome; greater levels of self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

  3. Student Academic Language Learning Behaviors

    The Student Academic Language Learning Behaviors measure includes 11 items asking students to estimate the frequency of discrete learning behaviors such as saying "scientific" words out loud in English and using "scientific" words in sentences. The measure uses a 4-point scale of frequency with 1 being "Not at all" and 4 being " 3-4 times a week." A sum score for the 11 items was computed and the scores could range from 11 to 44. Higher scores indicate a more positive outcome; greater frequency of behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

  4. Parent Academic Enabling Behaviors

    The Parent Academic Enabling Behaviors measure includes 13 items asking parents to estimate the frequency of their discrete academic enabling behaviors, such as helping their child learn the meaning of "scientific" words and using "scientific" words in a conversation with their child. The measure uses a 4-point scale of frequency with 1 being "Not at all" and 4 being " 3-4 times a week." A sum score including all 13 items was computed and can range between 13 and 52. Higher scores indicate a more positive outcome; greater frequency of behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)

07

Results

Posted Dec 23, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTalk STEM Familia App
Started50
Completed44
Not completed6
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6

Outcome measures

PrimaryStudent Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in English

The Student Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in English measure includes 18 multiple choice questions on the 18 words taught in the TSF app. The student chooses the correct word meaning from among four (4) possible responses. Students receive one point for each word correctly identified and points are summed across the 18 items. Scores can range from 0-18 and a higher score indicates greater vocabulary knowledge.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · Number of correct responses
Student Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in English
Number of correct responsesTalk STEM Familia App
Pretest9.36 ± 3.71
Posttest11.39 ± 3.87
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .003 · Mean difference (final values): 2.03Investigators tested whether pretest to posttest change was significantly greater than 0 at P \< 0.05.
PrimaryParent Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in Spanish

The Parent Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in Spanish measure includes 18 multiple choice questions on the 18 words taught in the TSF app. The parent chooses the correct word meaning from among four (4) possible responses. Parents receive one point for each word correctly identified and points are summed across the 18 items. Scores can range from 0-18 and a higher score indicates greater vocabulary knowledge.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · Number of correct responses
Parent Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in Spanish
Number of correct responsesTalk STEM Familia App
Pretest12.40 ± 3.36
Posttest13.58 ± 3.11
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .022 · Mean difference (final values): 1.18Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than zero at P\<0.05.
PrimaryStudent Academic Vocabulary Usage in English

The Student Academic Vocabulary Usage in English measure includes 18 true/false questions testing student knowledge of correct usage of the 18 academic vocabulary words taught in the TSF app.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of correct responses
Student Academic Vocabulary Usage in English
percentage of correct responsesTalk STEM Familia App
Pre-test12.14 ± 3.01
Post-test13.48 ± 2.95
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .016 · Mean difference (final values): 1.34Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
PrimaryParent Academic Vocabulary Usage in Spanish

The Parent Academic Vocabulary Usage in Spanish measure includes 18 true/false questions testing student knowledge of correct usage of the 18 academic vocabulary words taught in the TSF app.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of correct responses
Parent Academic Vocabulary Usage in Spanish
percentage of correct responsesTalk STEM Familia App
Pre-test14.08 ± 2.58
Post-test15.03 ± 1.96
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .002 · Mean difference (final values): 0.95Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
SecondaryStudent Engagement Instrument

The Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) consists of three subscales (future aspirations and goals, 5 items, r = .80, family support for learning, 6 items, r = .79, and control and relevance of school work, 9 items, r = 70). The SEI scale for each item ranges from 1-"Strongly disagree" to 5- "Strongly agree" with 5 indicating greater self-efficacy (more positive). A sum score was computed for each subscale. For future aspirations the scores can range from 5 to 25 and a higher score indicates a more positive outcome; greater self-efficacy for future aspirations. For family support for learning the score can range from 6 to 30 and a higher scores indicates a more positive outcome; greater self-efficacy for family support for learning. For control and relevance of school work the scores can range from 9 to 45 and a greater score indicates a more positive outcome; greater self-efficacy for control and relevance of school work.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Student Engagement Instrument
score on a scaleTalk STEM Familia App
Relevance to schoolwork pre-test35.68 ± 5.93
Relevance to schoolwork post-test36.06 ± 5.17
Future aspirations pre-test21.78 ± 2.94
Future aspirations post-test21.73 ± 2.76
Family support pre-test25.18 ± 3.88
Family support post-test25.11 ± 3.66
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .626 · Mean difference (final values): 0.38Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .909 · Mean difference (final values): 0.05Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .905 · Mean difference (final values): 0.07Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
SecondaryThe Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance Subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale

The Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001) (completed in Spanish) to measure useful factors that reflect parents' perceptions of whether they can influence their child's academic performance. The PSES consists of 8 items on a 9-point scale ranging from 1 = "nothing" to 9 = "a great deal" . The measure has an internal reliability of .87. A mean composite score was computed and the scores can range from 1 to 9 with a higher score indicating a more positive outcome; greater levels of self-efficacy.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance Subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale
score on a scaleTalk STEM Familia App
Parental Self-Efficacy at pre-test7.26 ± 1.19
Parental Self-Efficacy at post-test7.62 ± 1.08
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = .054 · Mean difference (final values): 0.36Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
SecondaryStudent Academic Language Learning Behaviors

The Student Academic Language Learning Behaviors measure includes 11 items asking students to estimate the frequency of discrete learning behaviors such as saying "scientific" words out loud in English and using "scientific" words in sentences. The measure uses a 4-point scale of frequency with 1 being "Not at all" and 4 being " 3-4 times a week." A sum score for the 11 items was computed and the scores could range from 11 to 44. Higher scores indicate a more positive outcome; greater frequency of behaviors.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Student Academic Language Learning Behaviors
score on a scaleTalk STEM Familia App
Student academic language learning behavior at pre-test23.53 ± 7.65
Student academic language learning behavior at post-test27.01 ± 8.51
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = <.001 · Mean difference (final values): 3.48Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.
SecondaryParent Academic Enabling Behaviors

The Parent Academic Enabling Behaviors measure includes 13 items asking parents to estimate the frequency of their discrete academic enabling behaviors, such as helping their child learn the meaning of "scientific" words and using "scientific" words in a conversation with their child. The measure uses a 4-point scale of frequency with 1 being "Not at all" and 4 being " 3-4 times a week." A sum score including all 13 items was computed and can range between 13 and 52. Higher scores indicate a more positive outcome; greater frequency of behaviors.

Time frame:
Baseline (pretest) and 6 weeks (posttest)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parent Academic Enabling Behaviors
score on a scaleTalk STEM Familia App
Parent academic enabling behavior at pre-test18.24 ± 7.45
Parent academic enabling behavior at post-test25.76 ± 9.47
Statistical analysis
  • Talk STEM Familia App · t-test, 2 sided · p = <.001 · Mean difference (final values): 7.52Investigators tested whether pre-test to post-test change was significantly greater than 0 at P\<0.05.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Talk STEM Familia App———

Baseline characteristics

Latinx, English-learner, parent/student dyads.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Talk STEM Familia App
<=18 years50
Between 18 and 65 years50
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Talk STEM Familia App
Student participants — Female29
Student participants — Male21
Parent participants — Female44
Parent participants — Male6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Talk STEM Familia App
Parent race/ethnicity — Euro American/Caucasian7
Parent race/ethnicity — African American/Black2
Parent race/ethnicity — American Indian or Alaskan Native1
Parent race/ethnicity — More than one race28
Parent race/ethnicity — Prefer not to disclose12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.
    Eugene, Oregon 97403, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 6, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Nov 6, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03766906
Lead sponsor
Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2019
Completion
Sep 30, 2019
Results posted
Dec 23, 2022
Last update
Feb 8, 2023

Study contacts

David R. Smith, PhD
study chair · Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion