ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03765814PREMORENCEUpdated Jul 7, 2026

The Anticipated Organ Donation Approach

An observational study in Brain Death, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer. Completed at 4 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
83
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to make a paramedical evaluation of a selection procedure of serious brain-injured patient in therapeutic abstention to a brain death state within 48 hours.

Read the detailed description

In 2016 in France, 5891 organs have been transplanted. All the transplant's sources are developed (brain death, Maastricht III, living organ donor).

However, the French Transplant's plan 2017-2021 require always more transplant, the aim is to reach 7800 transplants in 4 years.

To increase the number of transplants, one of the strategies is to actively identify the donors in brain death state and the donors with wider criteria. It's mainly serious brain-injured patients.

The procedure of early announcement of organ donation consists in beginning or pursues intensive care on serious brain-injured patient, for whom a decision of abstention of therapeutic active was decided. The only purpose of the medical care is to notice the brain death state that lead to donation.

In 2010, an expert group of the "Société de reanimation de langue Française" established guidelines to manage organ's donation in serious brain-injured patient after a stroke. The interest, to admit these serious brain-injured patients in intensive care unit, is to increase the number of donors in state of brain death and so the number of transplants.

However the guidelines remain little practised and little known in France. The number of bed in intensive care unit is limited and requires a selection of the potential organ donors. To hospitalised serious brain-injured patients in intensive care unit, there are no validated selection criteria that make difficult the implication of the transplant coordination in this anticipated announcement's approach.

In Toulon hospital, a standardize selection procedure was initiated and applied systematically by the transplant coordinator for each serious brain-injured patients. The selected patients will evolve in brain death state in 48 hours and could be organ donors.

The aim of this study is to validate a paramedical procedure to increase the number of organ donors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Death

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • organ donation
  • serious brain-injured patient
  • anticipated approach
03

In context

Brain Death

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Death; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is close to the median of 80 across 33 observational studies indexed under Brain Death.

Browse Brain Death studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Seriously brain-injured patient with therapeutic abstention

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female over 18 years-old
  • Patient with serious brain damages
  • Medical decision of withdrawing life sustaining treatment
  • Signed and dated by trusted person, or family
  • Patient covered by social security regimen
  • Patient eligible for organ donation according to organ donation hospital co-ordination
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) :

    • Seriously brain-injured patient without confounding factors, head trauma, brain anoxia or ischemic stroke : GCS\<5 and loss of bilateral corneal reflex or GCS\<5 and loss of three brain stem reflexes
    • Seriously brain-injured patient with confounding factors and without head trauma, brain anoxia or ischemic stroke : at least one of the following scanographic sign of gravity : deletion of subarachnoid cisterns, more than 15 mm deviation of the median line, hematoma volume > 65 cm3 or hydrocephalus due to intra-ventricular bleeding with V3 or V4 flood, and, if documented, a GCS\<7.
    • Patient with head trauma, brain anoxia or ischemic stroke, reliable clinical examination required (no confounding factor) : GCS\<5 and loss of bilateral corneal reflex or GCS\<5 and loss of three brain stem reflexes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No trusted person or family present
  • Seriously brain-injured patient because of head trauma, brain anoxia or ischemic stroke with confounding factors
  • Absolute to organ donation known at the moment of inclusion (, rabies, active cancer, active tuberculosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Study of the evolution to brain death state within 48 hours of seriously brain-injured patients selected by a standardized procedure and hospitalised in intensive care unit.

    Rate of patients evolving to brain death state during the first 48 hours following the examination which validates patient's eligibility

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of call rate to transplant coordination that don't result in a procedure of anticipated announcement

    Ratio between the number of non-eligible patients and the total number of calls

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  2. Evaluation of close family refusal rate for pursuit of care during 48h in intensive care unit

    Ratio between the number of family refusal and the total number of patients for whom the anticipated announcement procedure was started.

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  3. Number of refusal causes in the population

    Number of refusal causes will be presented globally

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  4. Evaluation of the delay between eligibility validation and the passage in brain death state.

    The passage delay between eligibility validation and brain death state is defined by the time in hours between the examination which validates patient's eligibility and the diagnosis of brain death state.

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  5. Evaluation of the rate of patients with organ removal in enrolled patients.

    Ratio between the number of patient who performed organ donation and the total number of patients included.

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  6. Number and type of organ harvested by patient.

    Number of organs collected will be presented globally, by patient and by type of organ transplanted.

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  7. Number of transplants performed.

    The number of transplants performed will be presented globally, by patient and by type of organs.

    Time frame: 10 days

  8. Number of patient enrolled by type of service.

    The number of patient enrolled in the intensive care unit, the Emergency or Neurovascular intensive care unit will be described globally

    Time frame: 48 hours after validation of eligibility

  9. Non harvested organs which have been suggested for transplant

    The proportion of suggested non harvested organs will be determined as the number of suggested non harvested organs divided by the total number of non harvested organs. Reasons of suggested organs refusal will be presented.

    Time frame: 10 days

  10. Number of patients who performed Maastricht 3 organ donation among patients who didn't evolve to brain death state

    The rate of patients with Maastricht 3 organ donation will be determined as the number of patients having performed Maastricht 3 organ donation divided by the number of patients who didn't evolve to brain death state after 48hours

    Time frame: 10 days

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • CH Annecy Genevois
    Pringy, Haute Savoie 74374, France
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, Loire-Atlantique 44093, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
    Toulon, Var 83200, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Départemental de Vendée Les Oudairies
    La Roche-sur-Yon, Vendée 85000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — no plan

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2019 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 59 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 22, 2018
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
StartActual
Sep 29, 2019
Primary completionActual
Sep 23, 2024
CompletionActual
Oct 3, 2024
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03765814
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
Start date
Sep 29, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 23, 2024
Completion
Oct 3, 2024
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Valérie Arsonneau
study director · Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion