ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03765060STCUUpdated Jan 13, 2021

The Efficacy and Security of the Small Stitch Technique in Emergency Surgery

An interventional study of Monomax® 2/0 HR26 and Monomax® 1 HR48 in Abdominal Wall Defect, Abdominal Wall Hernia and Eventration, sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-13.

Sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the abdominal closure technique in emergency surgery. Half of participants will be perform the classic Large Stitch technique, while the other half will undergo the Small Stitch technique.

Read the detailed description

The closure of laparotomy is one of the most important challenges facing the surgeon.

The classic technique of wall closure is the Large Stitch technique that uses monofilament double-strand sutures with a SL/WL (Suture Lengh/Wound Lengh) 4:1 ratio, with a distance to the alba line and between each stitch of 1 cm.

Nowadays, the Small Stitch technique is accepted as the technique of choice for closure of laparotomies in programmed surgery. It is based on a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 2/0 with HR (Half-circle Round body) 26 needle. Stitches should be given with a distance to the alba line of 0'5cm and 0'5 cm of separation between stitches.

There are very few studies about the role of Small Stitch technique in the field of Emergency Surgery where the increased morbidity of the patient and the higher rate of surgical wound infection can play a fundamental role, and could be improved with the use of new abdominal wall closure techniques.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Wall Defect
  • Abdominal Wall Hernia
  • Eventration
  • Evisceration; Operation Wound
03

In context

Hernia, Abdominal

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Abdominal; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 105 is above the median of 90 across 48 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Abdominal.

Browse Hernia, Abdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla is the lead sponsor of 120 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients over 18 years of age and who provide to participate in the study.
  2. Patients requiring an urgent midline laparotomy with a minimum size of 8 cm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior midline laparotomy.
  2. Patients with > 45 kg / m2
  3. Patients with ASA ()> IV.
  4. Patient with an advanced terminal illness with an expectation of life \<1 year.
  5. Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.
  6. Patients with coagulopathy: patient previously diagnosed with von Willebrand disease, hemophilia or Immune thrombocytopenic purpura.
  7. patient: patients in the AIDS phase, chronic or immunosuppressive treatment.
  8. Patients with collagen pathology: patient previously diagnosed with Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, homocystinuria and scleroderma.
  9. Chemotherapeutic treatment 2 weeks before surgery.
  10. Radiotherapy treatment 6 weeks before surgery.
  11. Diffuse peritonitis with hemodynamic instability, defined by non-response to fluids prior to surgery or during the surgical process.
  12. Pregnant or potentially fertile women, breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant, or those who do not wish to use effective (hormonal contraceptives (implantation, patches, oral), and double barrier methods (any double combination of: IUD (intrauterine device), male or female prophylactics with spermicidal gel, diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, cervical cap).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
105 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Small Stitch

    Patients requiring an urgent emergency laparotomy. The Small Stitch closure technique will be perform using a Monomax® 2/0 HR26 (Half-circle Round body): * It will be use a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 2/0 with HR 26 needle (Half-circle Round body). * In the technique should be given at least 2 points for each wound cm, with a distance to the alba line of 0'5cm and 0'5 cm of separation between stitches. The closure starts from both ends, ending in the middle of the laparotomy with an overlap of at least 2 cm. The ratio between the length of the suture and the length of the wound should be at least 4:1.

    Procedure: Monomax® 2/0 HR26

  • Active comparator
    Large Stitch

    The intervention will be the classic large Stitch closure technique using a Monomax® 1 HR48 (Half-circle Round body). * It will be use a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 1 with HR 48 needle (Half-circle Round body). * In the technique should be given 1 point for each wound cm, with a distance to the alba line of 1 cm and 1 cm of separation between stitches. The closure starts from both ends, ending in the middle of the laparotomy with an overlap of at least 2 cm. The ratio between the length of the suture and the length of the wound should be at least 4:1.

    Procedure: Monomax® 1 HR48

Interventions

  • ProcedureMonomax® 2/0 HR26

    It will be use a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 2/0 with HR 26 needle. In the technique should be given at least 2 points for each wound cm, with a distance to the alba line of 0'5cm and 0'5 cm of separation between stitches. The closure starts from both ends, ending in the middle of the laparotomy with an overlap of at least 2 cm. The ratio between the length of the suture and the length of the wound should be at least 4:1.

    Also known as: Suture

  • ProcedureMonomax® 1 HR48

    It will be use a very long-term monofilament absorbable synthetic suture of Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (Monomax) 1 with HR 48 needle. In the technique should be given 1 point for each wound cm, with a distance to the alba line of 1 cm and 1 cm of separation between stitches. The closure starts from both ends, ending in the middle of the laparotomy with an overlap of at least 2 cm. The ratio between the length of the suture and the length of the wound should be at least 4:1.

    Also known as: Suture

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by eventration rate

    To determine the efficacy of the "Small stitch" technique versus the "Large Stitch" technique in the closure of midline laparotomy with respect to the production of eventration in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by local complications rate

    To determine whether the closure of midline laparotomy with the "Small Stitch" technique in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery reduces the local complications of the surgical wound defined by hematoma, seroma or wound infection.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by evisceration rate

    To determine if the closure of the midline laparotomy with the "Small Stitch" technique in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery reduces the rate of evisceration.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Efficacy of the small stitch technique defined by improvement of quality of life

    To determine if the closure of a midline laparotomy with the "Small Stitch" technique in patients undergoing urgent abdominal surgery improves the quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Security of the small stitch technique

    To determine the safety of the Small Stitch technique versus the "Large Stitch" technique in the closure of the midline laparotomy with respect to the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, the incidence of side effects related to the treatment and the incidence and the reasons for premature withdrawal of premature patient from the study.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1201-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-1019-4. Epub 2012 Nov 11. PubMed 23143146 ↗
  • Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches. Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0775-8. Epub 2011 Jan 30. PubMed 21279664 ↗
  • Millbourn D, Wimo A, Israelsson LA. Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions. Hernia. 2014;18(6):775-80. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1135-2. Epub 2013 Jul 10. PubMed 23839330 ↗
  • O'Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA. Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon. 2003 Feb;1(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(03)80004-5. PubMed 15568420 ↗
  • Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1284-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801020. PubMed 8242299 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2021, 38 months after the start.

Of 31 interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Abdominal, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 38 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 8, 2018
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
StartActual
Oct 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2021
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2021
Last update
Jan 13, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03765060
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 13, 2021

Study contacts

Tamayo López María Jesús, PhD
Contact
mtamayolopez@gmail.com
686589986
Tallón Aguilar Luis, MD
Contact
ltallona@hotmail.com
653393951
Tamayo López María Jesús, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Padillo Ruiz Francisco Javier, PhD
study director · Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion