An interventional study of Combined ABMT and CBT and Combined Sham ABMT and CBT in Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorder of Childhood and Separation Anxiety Disorder of Childhood, Early Onset, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-05.
Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Anxiety disorders are the most common childhood psychiatric disorders, with prevalence rates as high as 15% to 20%. Success rates of the first choice treatment strategy (i.e. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CBT) are around 50%. Non-response increases the risk for other psychiatric disorders, school dropout, social isolation, alcoholism, and suicide attempts. These negative consequences endorse the urgent need to develop more effective and accessible treatments that enhance effectiveness of current treatment options. A promising new treatment for childhood anxiety disorders is Attention Bias Modification Treatment (ABMT). ABMT is based on evidence that anxiety-disordered individuals selectively allocate their attention toward threatening information (i.e. attention bias). This bias in early and automatic attention processes starts a cascade of subsequent biases in information processing and memory, resulting in heightened anxiety. Attention bias is an underlying mechanism of anxiety. Thus ABMT, which implicitly trains individuals to attend away from threatening information should alleviate anxiety. In contrast to ABMT, CBT explicitly targets later stages of information processing that are under volitional control. Meta-analyses of studies in adults have shown that ABMT indeed results in increased recovery rates and clinically significant changes in anxiety, compared to so-called "sham" attention training (control condition). Imaging studies have shown that ABMT modifies lateral prefrontal cortex activity to emotional stimuli. Despite its promising results, fewer studies have examined ABMT in anxiety-disordered children. The aim of this trial is to enhance treatment effectiveness by combining web-based ABMT with CBT in a large sample of anxiety-disordered children. The primary aim is to compare ABMT-augmented CBT with CBT as monotherapy on recovery rates for anxiety disorders and changes in anxiety. The secondary aim is to compare ABMT with sham attention training on anxiety disorder recovery rates and changes in anxiety. We hypothesize that (1) ABMT-augmented CBT will result in a significantly better treatment success than CBT alone, and (2) ABMT will result in a significantly better treatment success than sham attention training. The design will be a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial.
Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, occurring in among 15% to 20% of children. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is currently the first-choice treatment for anxiety-disordered children. Despite proven efficacy, almost half of them do not respond, causing prolonged suffering. Children with persistent anxiety have an increased risk for other psychiatric disorders, school dropout, social isolation, alcoholism, and suicide attempts. Another concern is that only a small proportion of anxiety-disordered children actually receive treatment. These negative consequences in combination with the limited accessibility of treatment endorse the urgent need to develop more effective and accessible treatments that can enhance effectiveness of current treatment options.
A newly emerging and promising childhood anxiety treatment is Attention Bias Modification Treatment (ABMT). ABMT is build upon evidence that anxious children tend to selectively focus their attention on threatening information in the context of other non-threatening information, and that attention bias is related to development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Children with an attention bias scan their environment for potential threat or danger thereby starting a cascade of subsequent processing biases in interpretation and memory, resulting in heightened anxiety.
Hence, as attention bias is an underlying mechanism of anxiety, treatment that diminishes attention bias toward threat in anxiety-disordered individuals should alleviate anxiety. Subsequently, several researchers began to examine the effect of ABMT, which implicitly trains anxiety-disordered individuals to attend away from threat toward neutral information. This is a different approach than CBT, which does not target early and automatic information processes, but addresses later stages of information processing that are under volitional control. Several studies highlighted the potential of ABMT in reducing anxiety levels in adults. A meta-analysis revealed that ABMT in adults produces significantly greater reductions in anxiety than sham control training, with a large effect size in clinical populations. A previous study found that 72% of the adults were free from their primary anxiety disorder after ABMT as compared to 11% after sham attention training, which is far more than CBT. These training effects were maintained at 4-month follow-up. Importantly, ABMT also modifies neural systems that are involved in the control of attention to emotional stimuli, in particular the lateral prefrontal cortex.
Despite the promising results in adults, ABMT has been scarcely examined in children. A few studies demonstrated a significant anxiolytic effect of ABMT, but not of the sham control condition. A major limitation of previous studies is that sample sizes were quite low and that a limited number of training sessions were provided. It has been shown that more training sessions enhance the magnitude of treatment effect. This is the first study that examines the effectiveness of a 9-session web-based ABMT in a large sample of anxiety-disordered children as well as examines the additive effect of web-based ABMT on CBT.
As reviewed above, childhood anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and debilitating, and there is an urgent need for improvement of current treatment strategies. An innovative, but scarcely examined, treatment option for childhood anxiety disorders is ABMT. A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind trial of web-based Attention Bias Modification Treatment for childhood anxiety disorders will be conducted. One hundred twenty-eight children will be randomly allocated to a 9 session internet-delivered ABMT or sham attention training. The primary aim is to compare ABMT-augmented CBT with CBT as monotherapy on recovery rates for anxiety disorders and changes in anxiety. The secondary aim is to compare ABMT with sham attention training on anxiety disorder recovery rates and changes in anxiety.
7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
9 sessions of Attention Bias Modification Treatment (dot-probe based of 160 trials) followed by individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via FRIENDS program
Behavioral: Combined ABMT and CBT
9 sessions of Sham Attention Bias Modification Treatment (dot-probe based of 160 trials) followed by individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via FRIENDS program
Behavioral: Combined Sham ABMT and CBT
ABMT: A trial begins with a fixation cross (+) for 500 ms, immediately followed by a stimuli pair consisting of a neutral and threatening stimulus that is centred horizontally. Stimuli pairs consist of two faces, pictures or words. After presentation of the stimuli pair, a probe (: or ..) always appears on the location of the neutral stimulus. The probe remains on the screen until the participant presses the corresponding key (: or ..), after which the next trial begins. Each session, participants see 160 trials of which 128 trials include one neutral and one threatening stimulus. The remaining 32 trials include a neutral-neutral stimuli pair. CBT: FRIENDS program individual
ABMT: A trial begins with a fixation cross (+) for 500 ms, immediately followed by a stimuli pair consisting of a neutral and threatening stimulus that is centred horizontally. Stimuli pairs consist of two faces, pictures or words. After presentation of the stimuli pair, a probe (: or ..) always appears on the location of the neutral stimulus. The probe remains on the screen until the participant presses the corresponding key (: or ..), after which the next trial begins. Of the 160 trials, the probe appears with equal frequency on the location of the neutral and threatening stimulus (128 trials). The remaining 32 trials include a neutral-neutral stimuli pair. CBT: FRIENDS program individual
Anxiety disorder status
Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
Time frame: After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT
Anxiety disorder status
Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
Time frame: After 10 weeks of CBT
Anxiety disorder status
Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
Time frame: 6 months follow-up (from last CBT session)
Number of anxiety disorders
Number of anxiety disorders according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
Time frame: After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up
Anxiety symptoms
Total scale anxiety symptoms according to the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-R), 69 items, range 0-138, higher score represents more symptoms
Time frame: After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up
Depression symptoms
Total scale depression symptoms according to the Child Depression Inventory (CDI), 27 items, range 0-54, higher score represents more symptoms
Time frame: After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up
Number of anxiety disorders
Number of anxiety disorders according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
Time frame: After 10 weeks of CBT
Anxiety symptoms
Total scale anxiety symptoms according to the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-R), 69 items, range 0-138, higher score represents more symptoms
Time frame: After 10 weeks of CBT
Depression symptoms
Total scale depression symptoms according to the Child Depression Inventory (CDI), 27 items, range 0-54, higher score represents more symptoms
Time frame: After 10 weeks of CBT
Number of anxiety disorders
Number of anxiety disorders according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
Time frame: 6 months follow-up (from last CBT session)
Anxiety symptoms
Total scale anxiety symptoms according to the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-R), 69 items, range 0-138, higher score represents more symptoms
Time frame: 6 months follow-up (from last CBT session)
Depression symptoms
Total scale depression symptoms according to the Child Depression Inventory (CDI), 27 items, range 0-54, higher score represents more symptoms
Time frame: 6 months follow-up (from last CBT session)
Ran from Oct 2013 to primary completion in Feb 2017, 40 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.