CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03744884Updated Jan 3, 2020

Movement Characterization in Spastic/Dystonic Cerebral Palsy Using Haptic Feedback in Virtual Reality

An interventional study of Force efforts with haptic feedback in virtual reality. in Cerebral Palsy, Mixed and Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 17 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-03.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This game-like intervention using virtual reality will provide an objective and quantitative characterization of dystonia and spasticity presentations in cerebral palsy, even if combined, through the process of motor learning. This intervention could have a therapeutic benefit in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy.

Read the detailed description

Cerebral palsy is the most common developmental motor disorder in children. Individuals with cerebral palsy demonstrate abnormal muscle tone and motor control. Within the population of children with cerebral palsy, between 4% and 17% present dystonic symptoms and between 80% to 95% of cases present spasticity. In many cases spasticity and dystonia are present in the same child and accurate diagnosis may be challenging.

This study consists of a randomized controlled trial that uses a virtual reality game-based intervention incorporating fully-automated robotic haptic feedback to aid the the objective, quantitative diagnosis of spasticity and dystonia u=in CP. The study consists of face-to-face assessments of movement before, after, and one-month following the completion of the six-session game-based intervention. Children with spastic/dystonic cerebral palsy and typically developing children between the ages of 7 and 17 will be recruited for this study. The investigators anticipate to recruit a total of 68 participants, 34 with cerebral palsy and 34 typically developing. Both groups of children will be randomly allocated into an intervention or control group using a blocked randomization method. Movement outcomes will be examined for changes in quantitative and clinical measures in children with spastic/dystonic cerebral palsy and typically developing children to aid on the classification of movement disorders. Pair t-tests will be conducted on movement outcomes for both groups of children independently. Positive and negative results will be reported and addressed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy, Mixed
  • Cerebral Palsy, Spastic

Keywords

  • Virtual reality
  • Haptic feedback
  • Robotic
03

In context

Muscle Spasticity

704 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Spasticity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 68 is above the median of 36 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Muscle Spasticity.

Browse Muscle Spasticity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is the lead sponsor of 188 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Between ages 7 and 17
  • Have been diagnosed with dystonic or spastic/dystonic cerebral palsy, for the cerebral palsy groups, or have no neuromuscular conditions, for typically developing groups
  • Have mild to no difficulty understanding conversations compared to others of the same age
  • Communicates age appropriately or with some difficulty but a new listener can understand
  • Have no uncorrected vision
  • Have hearing without the need of a hearing aid
  • Have no other neural, neuromuscular, or musculoskeletal conditions
  • Participation in stable school and/or private physical or occupational therapy with a frequency no greater than two sessions per week, for cerebral palsy groups
  • Have no changes in medication for the six months previous to enrollment in the study
  • Be medically stable
  • Have no other concurrent illness
  • Have not received any Botox treatment within three months previous to the initiation of the study
  • No use of cardiac pacemakers, hearing aids, or another electronic implanted device
  • Absence of allergy to silver or skin adhesives
  • Have never had seizures
  • Have Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) score I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting ALL inclusion criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
68 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CP intervention group

    Force efforts with haptic feedback in virtual reality for participants with CP.

    Behavioral: Force efforts with haptic feedback in virtual reality.

  • No intervention
    CP control group

    Regular activity control group, for participants with CP.

  • Experimental
    TD intervention group

    Force efforts haptic feedback in virtual reality. The intervention will be the same as the CP intervention group but for typically developing participants.

    Behavioral: Force efforts with haptic feedback in virtual reality.

  • No intervention
    TD control group

    Regular activity control group, same as CP no intervention group, but for typically developing participants.

Interventions

  • BehavioralForce efforts with haptic feedback in virtual reality.

    A virtual reality game-based intervention incorporating fully-automated robotic haptic feedback. The study consists of face-to-face assessments of movement before, after, and one-month following the completion of the six-session game-based intervention. Children with spastic/dystonic cerebral palsy between the ages of 7 and 17 will be recruited for this study along with a group of typically developing children in the same age range. Both groups of children will be randomly allocated into an intervention or control group using a blocked randomization method.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Smoothness Index

    The smoothness index will be measured by analyzing the the integrated accelerometry signals of sensors placed on the upper limbs. Accelerometry data will be integrated to calculate the smoothness index on the velocity profile of the trajectories. The maximum value is 0, being the greatest level of smoothness that can be measured, and the minimum is minus infinity. A value closer to 0 is desired.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surface electromyography

    Surface electromyography (sEMG) data will be collected during the execution of a first port de bras. The first port de bras will follow the format from the Royal Academy of Dance as demonstrated (Figure 1). Data will be analyzed changes in muscle activity patterns as a secondary outcome measure. The sEMG data will also be acquired during maximum voluntary efforts. For calibration of game-playing.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions and on the first and last day of gameplay spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  2. Forces and torques against force sensor during gampeplay and in robotic zero-force channel

    This involves a force/torque sensor mounted in the end effector of the robot. A pre-determined zero-force path has been programmed by the research team to allow the robot to move through straight lines connected to five points on a vertical plane. The participants will hold a gripper mounted on the force transducer and attempt to move the end effector of the robot along the zero-force path. The force transducer will measure the forces exerted by the participant as they do so. Force and torque signals will be collected during all game-playing sessions. The calibration for game playing involves a maximum voluntary effort by the participant's dominant arm against the sensor mounted on a sturdy table. Participants will also be assessed with the force sensor in fourteen different directions at 30% ± 10% of the maximal voluntary effort across all directions.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions and on the first and last day of gameplay spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  3. Montreal Spasticity Rating Test (MSRT)

    The MSRT is a quantitative measure the onset of the stretch reflex that that correlates with clinical spasticity and shows good test re-test reliability

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  4. Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS)

    The Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) measures the severity of dystonia and choreoathetosis when an individual is at rest or moving. It was found to show good to excellent reliability and validity. Scores range from 0 to 4 for both duration and amplitude of each criterion. A score of 0 most corresponds to movement of healthy people without movement disorders. The highest score possible score is 576 indicating the most server level of impairs,ent. There are two sub scales: Dystonia and Choreoathetosis that have a range of 0-288 each. The total score is obtained by addition of the two subscores.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  5. Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale (SCUES)

    The Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale (SCUES) is a video-based tool to measure selective control of upper limb tasks. Psychometric analysis shows "comparable validity to other accepted video-based clinical assessment tools for the upper extremity in children with CP " with content validity ratio values indicating substantial agreement for most items. Scores are assigned for each assessed joint and can be rated as M3, M2, M1, or M0 with M3 representing normal selective motor control and M0 representing no selective motor control.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  6. Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST)

    The QUEST is 36 items in length and measures upper limb movement, hand function, and cooperativeness in children with CP. It has been found to be reliable to assess children with CP between 18 months and 8 years of age, with increased reliability in children up to 12 years of age \[30\]. It has also been found to show adequate to excellent validity. Initial scores range from 50 to 100, which are then standardized to be between 0 and 100. The initial score is summed by scoring the ability to complete an item according to specification as 2 points, not being able to, not willing to, or not administerable as 1 point, and minus 1 point for abnormal movement in the posture section of the assessment. The standardized score is found by dividing the sum of scores for each section tested by the total number of sections tested.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  7. Tardieu scale

    The Tardieu scale examines spasticity with quantified measures of the responses of stretch reflexes. This scale shows high test retest and poor to moderate inter-rater reliability; the Tardieu scale performs better than other similar measures, indicating it may be more reliable. Scores of quality of muscle reaction range from 0 to 5 with 0 being no resistance throughout passive movement and 5 being an immobile joint.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  8. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 Children and Youth (WHODAS II - CY)

    The WHODAS II - CY is a self-report 36 item document that assesses daily issues surrounding health conditions such as illnesses, injuries, and problems with mental health. In a validity study, it was found to show good reliability; however, limitations regarding options for those without significant disabilities were present. Each item can be scored from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating none and 5 indicating extreme or cannot do. Each item is scored, summed within the domain it is in, and the average is taken for each domain. The averages are summed and converted to a metric ranging from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicating severe disability.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

  9. Qualitative Feedback Module

    Multiple choice patient satisfaction questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 5 for each item similar to the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale with 0 indicating highest satisfaction and 5 indicating highest dissatisfaction.

    Time frame: Tested during the assessment sessions spanning over a 6 to 7 week period.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Christensen D, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg NS, Maenner MJ, Arneson CL, Durkin MS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Wingate MS, Fitzgerald R, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Prevalence of cerebral palsy, co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, and motor functioning - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, USA, 2008. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jan;56(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12268. Epub 2013 Oct 1. PubMed 24117446 ↗
  • Paneth N. Establishing the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;51(4):742-8. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318187081a. PubMed 18981799 ↗
  • Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, Dan B, Jacobsson B. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14. Erratum In: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jun;49(6):480. PubMed 17370477 ↗
  • Liptak GS. Health and well being of adults with cerebral palsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Apr;21(2):136-42. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f6a499. PubMed 18317270 ↗
  • Rice J, Skuza P, Baker F, Russo R, Fehlings D. Identification and measurement of dystonia in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Dec;59(12):1249-1255. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13502. Epub 2017 Aug 8. PubMed 28786476 ↗
  • Sanger TD, Delgado MR, Gaebler-Spira D, Hallett M, Mink JW; Task Force on Childhood Motor Disorders. Classification and definition of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. Pediatrics. 2003 Jan;111(1):e89-97. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.1.e89. PubMed 12509602 ↗
  • Sanger TD. Arm trajectories in dyskinetic cerebral palsy have increased random variability. J Child Neurol. 2006 Jul;21(7):551-7. doi: 10.1177/08830738060210070201. PubMed 16970842 ↗
  • Sellier E, Platt MJ, Andersen GL, Krageloh-Mann I, De La Cruz J, Cans C; Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy Network. Decreasing prevalence in cerebral palsy: a multi-site European population-based study, 1980 to 2003. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Jan;58(1):85-92. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12865. Epub 2015 Aug 28. PubMed 26330098 ↗
  • Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Dan B, Lin JP, Damiano DL, Becher JG, Gaebler-Spira D, Colver A, Reddihough DS, Crompton KE, Lieber RL. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jan 7;2:15082. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.82. PubMed 27188686 ↗
  • Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, O'Brien C, Sanger TD, Trojanowski JQ, Rumsey JM, Hicks R, Cameron J, Chen D, Chen WG, Cohen LG, deCharms C, Duffy CJ, Eden GF, Fetz EE, Filart R, Freund M, Grant SJ, Haber S, Kalivas PW, Kolb B, Kramer AF, Lynch M, Mayberg HS, McQuillen PS, Nitkin R, Pascual-Leone A, Reuter-Lorenz P, Schiff N, Sharma A, Shekim L, Stryker M, Sullivan EV, Vinogradov S. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain. 2011 Jun;134(Pt 6):1591-609. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr039. Epub 2011 Apr 10. PubMed 21482550 ↗
  • Sukal-Moulton T, Clancy T, Zhang LQ, Gaebler-Spira D. Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application: does it translate to practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 2. PubMed 24792141 ↗
  • Beveridge B, Feltracco D, Struyf J, Strauss E, Dang S, Phelan S, Wright FV, Gibson BE. "You gotta try it all": Parents' Experiences with Robotic Gait Training for their Children with Cerebral Palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;35(4):327-41. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.990547. Epub 2014 Dec 20. PubMed 25529412 ↗
  • Chen K, Ren Y, Gaebler-Spira D, Zhang LQ. Home-based tele-assisted robotic rehabilitation of joint impairments in children with cerebral palsy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5288-91. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944819. PubMed 25571187 ↗
  • Krebs HI, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, Fragala-Pinkham M, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N. Motor learning characterizes habilitation of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Sep;26(7):855-60. doi: 10.1177/1545968311433427. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PubMed 22331211 ↗
  • Fasoli SE, Fragala-Pinkham M, Hughes R, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Stein J. Robotic therapy and botulinum toxin type A: a novel intervention approach for cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;87(12):1022-5. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817fb346. PubMed 18617860 ↗
  • Sanger TD, Kaiser J, Placek B. Reaching movements in childhood dystonia contain signal-dependent noise. J Child Neurol. 2005 Jun;20(6):489-96. doi: 10.1177/088307380502000604. PubMed 15996397 ↗
  • Jankovic J. Treatment of dystonia. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Oct;5(10):864-72. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70574-9. PubMed 16987733 ↗
  • Damiano DL, DeJong SL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of treadmill training and body weight support in pediatric rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009 Mar;33(1):27-44. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31819800e2. PubMed 19265768 ↗
  • Scianni A, Butler JM, Ada L, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Muscle strengthening is not effective in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70037-6. PubMed 19463078 ↗
  • Deon LL, Gaebler-Spira D. Assessment and treatment of movement disorders in children with cerebral palsy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;41(4):507-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.06.001. PubMed 20868881 ↗
  • Bertucco M, Sanger TD. Current and emerging strategies for treatment of childhood dystonia. J Hand Ther. 2015 Apr-Jun;28(2):185-93; quiz 194. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 15. PubMed 25835254 ↗
  • Fehlings D, Brown L, Harvey A, Himmelmann K, Lin JP, Macintosh A, Mink JW, Monbaliu E, Rice J, Silver J, Switzer L, Walters I. Pharmacological and neurosurgical interventions for managing dystonia in cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Apr;60(4):356-366. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13652. Epub 2018 Feb 6. PubMed 29405267 ↗
  • Bird BL, Cataldo MF. Experimental analysis of EMG feedback in treating dystonia. Ann Neurol. 1978 Apr;3(4):310-15. doi: 10.1002/ana.410030406. PubMed 666271 ↗
  • Neilson PD, McCaughey J. Self-regulation of spasm and spasticity in cerebral palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;45(4):320-30. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.45.4.320. PubMed 7077341 ↗
  • Deepak KK, Behari M. Specific muscle EMG biofeedback for hand dystonia. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 1999 Dec;24(4):267-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1022239014808. PubMed 10789003 ↗
  • Lopez-Ortiz C, Gladden K, Deon L, Schmidt J, Girolami G, Gaebler-Spira D. Dance program for physical rehabilitation and participation in children with cerebral palsy. Arts Health. 2012 Feb 1;4(1):39-54. doi: 10.1080/17533015.2011.564193. Epub 2011 Jun 13. PubMed 25431617 ↗
  • Yamada K, Yamada Z, Nakazawa S, Matsuoka S. [Determination of FDP by staphylococcal clumping test and the significance of the method in consumption coagulopathy]. Rinsho Ketsueki. 1972 Jun;13(3):411-4. No abstract available. Japanese. PubMed 4674971 ↗
  • Jobin A, Levin MF. Regulation of stretch reflex threshold in elbow flexors in children with cerebral palsy: a new measure of spasticity. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Aug;42(8):531-40. doi: 10.1017/s0012162200001018. PubMed 10981931 ↗
  • Monbaliu E, Ortibus E, De Cat J, Dan B, Heyrman L, Prinzie P, De Cock P, Feys H. The Dyskinesia Impairment Scale: a new instrument to measure dystonia and choreoathetosis in dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Mar;54(3):278-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04209.x. PubMed 22428172 ↗
  • Stewart K, Harvey A, Johnston LM. A systematic review of scales to measure dystonia and choreoathetosis in children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Aug;59(8):786-795. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13452. Epub 2017 May 9. PubMed 28485494 ↗
  • Wagner LV, Davids JR, Hardin JW. Selective Control of the Upper Extremity Scale: validation of a clinical assessment tool for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Jun;58(6):612-7. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12949. Epub 2015 Nov 3. PubMed 26526592 ↗
  • Thorley M, Lannin N, Cusick A, Novak I, Boyd R. Reliability of the quality of upper extremity skills test for children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 12 years. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Feb;32(1):4-21. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2011.602389. Epub 2011 Aug 15. PubMed 21838618 ↗
  • Law M, Cadman D, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, DeMatteo C. Neurodevelopmental therapy and upper-extremity inhibitive casting for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991 May;33(5):379-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14897.x. PubMed 2065824 ↗
  • Klingels K, De Cock P, Desloovere K, Huenaerts C, Molenaers G, Van Nuland I, Huysmans A, Feys H. Comparison of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test in hemiplegic CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Dec;50(12):904-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03123.x. Epub 2008 Sep 20. PubMed 18811701 ↗
  • Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange C, Koch R, Pohl M. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Oct;19(7):751-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr889oa. PubMed 16250194 ↗
  • Wolf AC, Tate RL, Lannin NA, Middleton J, Lane-Brown A, Cameron ID. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):747-55. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1016. PubMed 22854805 ↗
  • Young SJ, van Doornik J, Sanger TD. Finger muscle control in children with dystonia. Mov Disord. 2011 Jun;26(7):1290-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.23534. Epub 2011 Mar 29. PubMed 21449015 ↗
  • Frascarelli F, Masia L, Di Rosa G, Cappa P, Petrarca M, Castelli E, Krebs HI. The impact of robotic rehabilitation in children with acquired or congenital movement disorders. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;45(1):135-41. PubMed 19293759 ↗
  • Weightman A, Preston N, Levesley M, Holt R, Mon-Williams M, Clarke M, Cozens AJ, Bhakta B. Home based computer-assisted upper limb exercise for young children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study investigating impact on motor control and functional outcome. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Mar;43(4):359-63. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0679. PubMed 21347508 ↗
  • Chen YP, Howard AM. Effects of robotic therapy on upper-extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2016;19(1):64-71. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2014.899648. Epub 2014 Apr 11. PubMed 24724587 ↗
  • Gilliaux M, Renders A, Dispa D, Holvoet D, Sapin J, Dehez B, Detrembleur C, Lejeune TM, Stoquart G. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in cerebral palsy: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Feb;29(2):183-92. doi: 10.1177/1545968314541172. Epub 2014 Jul 11. PubMed 25015650 ↗
  • Tong LZ, Ong HT, Tan JX, Lin J, Burdet E, Ge SS, Teo CL. Pediatric rehabilitation with the reachMAN's modular handle. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:3933-6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319254. PubMed 26737154 ↗
  • Preston N, Weightman A, Gallagher J, Holt R, Clarke M, Mon-Williams M, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Feasibility of school-based computer-assisted robotic gaming technology for upper limb rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(4):281-8. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.932020. Epub 2014 Jun 25. PubMed 24964205 ↗
  • Kluzik J, Fetters L, Coryell J. Quantification of control: a preliminary study of effects of neurodevelopmental treatment on reaching in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 1990 Feb;70(2):65-76; discussion 76-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.2.65. PubMed 2296614 ↗
  • Volman MJ, Wijnroks A, Vermeer A. Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis. Clin Rehabil. 2002 Sep;16(6):684-92. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr540oa. PubMed 12392345 ↗
  • Johansson AM, Domellof E, Ronnqvist L. Short- and long-term effects of synchronized metronome training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a two case study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(2):160-9. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2011.635608. Epub 2012 Feb 1. PubMed 22296344 ↗
  • Lebiedowska MK, Gaebler-Spira D, Burns RS, Fisk JR. Biomechanic characteristics of patients with spastic and dystonic hypertonia in cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):875-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.032. PubMed 15179639 ↗
  • Gordon LM, Keller JL, Stashinko EE, Hoon AH, Bastian AJ. Can spasticity and dystonia be independently measured in cerebral palsy? Pediatr Neurol. 2006 Dec;35(6):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2006.06.015. PubMed 17138005 ↗
  • Kim Y, Bulea TC, Damiano DL. Children With Cerebral Palsy Have Greater Stride-to-Stride Variability of Muscle Synergies During Gait Than Typically Developing Children: Implications for Motor Control Complexity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Sep;32(9):834-844. doi: 10.1177/1545968318796333. PubMed 30223739 ↗
  • Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Thompson PD, Manfredi M, Marsden CD. The pathophysiology of primary dystonia. Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1195-212. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.7.1195. PubMed 9679773 ↗
  • Tedroff K, Knutson LM, Soderberg GL. Synergistic muscle activation during maximum voluntary contractions in children with and without spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Oct;48(10):789-96. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001721. PubMed 16978457 ↗
  • Quartarone A, Rizzo V, Morgante F. Clinical features of dystonia: a pathophysiological revisitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Aug;21(4):484-90. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328307bf07. PubMed 18607211 ↗
  • Mink JW. Special concerns in defining, studying, and treating dystonia in children. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):921-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.25548. PubMed 23893449 ↗
  • McNish RN, Chembrammel P, Speidel NC, Lin JJ, Lopez-Ortiz C. Rehabilitation for Children With Dystonic Cerebral Palsy Using Haptic Feedback in Virtual Reality: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 14;8(1):e11470. doi: 10.2196/11470. PubMed 31344678 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03744884
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Collaborators
OSF Healthcare System, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
Responsible party
Citlali Lopez-Ortiz (Assistant Professor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 16, 2018
Start date
Dec 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 3, 2020

Study contacts

Citlali Lopez-Ortiz, PhD
Contact
lopezort@illinois.edu
217-300-1022
Reika McNish, BA
Contact
rmcnish2@illinois.edu
217-244-9336
Citlali Lopez-Ortiz
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion