CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03741075Updated Jan 10, 2019

Topical Tranexamic Acid Plus Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation During Cesarean Delivery

An interventional study of BUA and topical tranexamic acid in Cesarean Section Complications, sponsored by Aswan University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-10.

Sponsored by Aswan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Placenta previa (PP) is an obstetric condition that is closely linked with massive obstetric hemorrhage with a varied incidence about once in every 200 live births. It is considered one of the causes of the increased need for blood transfusion and cesarean hysterectomy. PPH due to PP typically starts during cesarean section (CS) in the placental bed, at the lower uterine segment mostly after placental separation. Proceeding for cesarean hysterectomy can be the only effective line of management in spite of the associated high morbidity rate.

Various conservative measures have been developed to avoid hysterectomy and preserve fertility in patients with PP. Bilateral Uterine artery ligation (BUAL) is one of the reported surgical procedures carried out in these cases as it is easy and quick. It can be used alone or with adjunctive measures with a fair success rate. The aim is to reduce the blood supply to the uterus and to prevent postpartum hemorrhage.

Tranexamic acid is a lysine analog which acts as an antifibrinolytic via competitive inhibition of the binding of plasmin and plasminogen to fibrin. The rationale for its use in the reduction of blood loss depending on the implication of the coagulation and fibrinolysis processes implicated in the control of PPH. However, concerns about possible thromboembolic events with parenteral administration of TA have stimulated increasing interest in its topical use.

Read the detailed description

Study inclusion criteria will be women undergoing elective cesarean delivery for complete placenta previa which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures Eligible participants were allocated to one of two groups. Group (I): patients managed by bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) after delivery of the fetus which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures. Group (II): patients received 1 gm TA (2 ampoules of Capron® 500 mg /5 ml; Cairo, Egypt) topically applied to the placental bed plus BUA when not respond to uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section Complications

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • placenta previa
  • tranexamic acid
  • uterine artery ligation
03

In context

Placenta Previa

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Placenta Previa; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Placenta Previa.

Browse Placenta Previa studies →

Lead sponsor

Aswan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • women undergoing elective cesarean delivery for complete placenta previa which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with the high possibility of morbid adherent placenta
  • those presented with severe antepartum hemorrhage
  • Patients with cardiac, hepatic, renal, or thromboembolic disease;
  • hypersensitivity or contraindications of use of tranexamic acid
  • patient refuses to consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    BUAL plus placebo

    bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) after delivery of the fetus which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures plus 200 ml saline topical application to placental bed

    Procedure: BUA · Drug: placebo

  • Experimental
    BUAL plus topical tranexamic acid

    bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) after delivery of the fetus which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures plus topical application of 20ml saline contains 2 gm tranexamic acid

    Procedure: BUA · Drug: topical tranexamic acid

Interventions

  • ProcedureBUA

    bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) after delivery of the fetus which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures

    Also known as: Active Comparator

  • Drugtopical tranexamic acid

    topical application of 200ml saline contains 2 gm tranexamic acid to the placental bed after delivery of the fetus which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures

    Also known as: active comparator

  • Drugplacebo

    topical application of 200ml saline to the placental bed after delivery of the fetus which not respond uterotonic and simple hemostatic maneuvers like placental bed hemostatic sutures

    Also known as: Placebo to tranexamic acid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with postpartum hemorrhage

    number pf participants with blood loss \> 1000ml

    Time frame: 6 hours post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. intraoperative blood loss

    amount of blood loss during cesarean section

    Time frame: during the operation

  2. The number of participant needed for blood transfusion

    Calculation of the number of participant needed for blood transfusion

    Time frame: 24 hours post operative

  3. The number of participant needed of extra surgical maneuvers

    Calculation of the number of participant needed of extra surgical maneuvers like internal iliac artery ligation

    Time frame: 24 hours post operative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03741075
Lead sponsor
Aswan University Hospital
Responsible party
hany farouk (Principal Investigator, Aswan University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2018
Start date
Dec 1, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 10, 2019

Study contacts

hany f sallam, md
Contact
hany.farouk@aswu.edu.eg
01022336052 ext. 002
hany f sallam, md
principal investigator · Aswan University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion