CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03739086Updated Nov 15, 2018

Retrospective Evaluation of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks

An observational study in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Maltepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-15.

Sponsored by Maltepe University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
182
Ages
Up to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Retrospective Evaluation of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks

Read the detailed description

in our institue; we use erector spinae plane block as a part of multimodal analjesia. we want to evaluate block failures and complications related erector spinae plane block. In all patients performed regional anesthesia techniques, we use a regional anesthesia follow chart.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 182 is above the median of 102 across 608 observational studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Maltepe University is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

all of the patients performed erector spinae plaen block

Inclusion criteria

  • patient performed erector spinae plane block

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
182 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Procedureerector spinae plane block

    unilateral or bilateral or bilevel erector spinae plane block performance for postoperative pain or acute pain

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. complication rate

    Time frame: 14 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. block failure rate

    Time frame: 14 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maltepe University faculty of medicine
    Istanbul, 34090, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3. PubMed 30292068 ↗
  • Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2. PubMed 29980005 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03739086
Lead sponsor
Maltepe University
Responsible party
Asst. Prof. Serkan Tulgar, M.D. (assoc professor in anesthesiology department, Maltepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2018
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2018
Completion
Nov 14, 2018
Last update
Nov 15, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion