ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07732049MU-NS-PEYTON26Updated Aug 7, 2026

"EFFECTS OF PEYTON'S MODEL"

An interventional study of Peyton Four-Step Teaching Model and Traditional Demonstration-Based Teaching in Nursing Education and Clinical Skills Training, sponsored by Maltepe University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Maltepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of three educational approaches in improving nursing students' knowledge, clinical skill performance, and self-efficacy regarding sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter. The study will be conducted during the Spring semester of the 2025-2026 academic year in the Nursing Skills Laboratory at Maltepe University.

The study population will consist of first-year nursing students enrolled in the Fundamentals of Nursing course. Students aged 18 years or older who voluntarily agree to participate will be eligible. Students who have previously received training or have experience in collecting sterile urine specimens from an indwelling urinary catheter will be excluded from the study.

Phase 1: Selection and Training of Peer Educators

Peer educators will be selected from volunteer fourth-year nursing students who have previous mentoring experience with first-year students and a grade point average above 3.0. Before the intervention, peer educators will receive standardized training from the principal investigator using Peyton's Four-Step Teaching Approach. The training will focus on sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter and will be based on a validated procedural checklist with excellent reliability. During the training, peer educators will complete all four stages of Peyton's model, including demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension, and performance with structured feedback to ensure standardized instruction throughout the study.

Phase 2: Theoretical Education, Baseline Assessment, and Randomization

All eligible first-year nursing students will receive a four-hour theoretical lecture delivered by the course instructor before practical training. The theoretical content will include urinary system anatomy and physiology, urinary elimination and assessment, urinary catheterization, sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter, and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Following the theoretical session, participants will complete baseline assessments consisting of a Demographic Information Form, a Knowledge Test, and the Student Self-Efficacy Scale.

Participants will then be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three study groups:

Peyton Four-Step Teaching delivered by the course instructor. Peyton Four-Step Teaching delivered by trained peer educators. Traditional demonstration-based instruction delivered by the course instructor (control group).

Randomization will be performed by an independent researcher who is not involved in participant recruitment, intervention delivery, or outcome assessment. A computer-generated block randomization sequence (block size = 6) created using Randomizer.org will be used to ensure balanced allocation among groups. Allocation concealment will be maintained using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. The researcher responsible for outcome assessment will remain blinded to group allocation throughout the study.

Phase 3: Practical Skills Training

Following randomization, students will receive practical training according to their assigned group. The two intervention groups will be taught using Peyton's Four-Step Teaching Approach by either the course instructor or trained peer educators. This approach consists of demonstration, deconstruction with step-by-step explanation, comprehension through learner-guided instruction, and independent performance with structured feedback. The control group will receive conventional demonstration-based instruction in which the instructor demonstrates and explains the procedure before students independently perform the skill.

All practical sessions will be conducted individually in the nursing skills laboratory using simulation manikins. Student performance during training will follow the same validated procedural checklist to ensure standardization across groups.

Phase 4: Post-Intervention Assessment

After completing the practical training, participants will complete the Knowledge Test, Student Self-Efficacy Scale, and a Student Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by the researchers. Clinical skill performance will be evaluated by a blinded assessor using the validated procedural checklist employed throughout the intervention. Statistical analyses will be performed by an independent researcher who is not involved in the intervention or assessment process.

This study is designed to determine whether Peyton's Four-Step Teaching Approach, delivered either by faculty members or trained peer educators, provides superior educational outcomes compared with conventional demonstration-based instruction. Participation in the study is entirely voluntary. The assessments are conducted solely for research purposes and will not contribute to students' course grades, academic achievement, or formal performance evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nursing Education
  • Clinical Skills Training

Keywords

  • Peyton's Four-Step Approach
  • Nursing Education
  • Clinical Skills Training
  • Sterile Urine Specimen Collection
  • Simulation-Based Education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Maltepe University is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • First-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Fundamentals of Nursing course- Aged 18 years or older
  • No previous formal training in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter
  • Able to communicate in Turkish- Willing to participate in the study and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous clinical experience involving sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter
  • Prior participation in similar educational or simulation training related to the study skill- Failure to attend the theoretical or practical training sessions
  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage- Incomplete study data
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Faculty-Led Peyton Model

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive practical training in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter using the Peyton Four-Step Teaching Model delivered by the course instructor. The intervention consists of demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension, and independent performance with structured feedback. Training will be conducted individually in the nursing skills laboratory using simulation manikins and a standardized procedural checklist.

    Behavioral: Peyton Four-Step Teaching Model

  • Experimental
    Peer-Led Peyton Model

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive practical training in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter using the Peyton Four-Step Teaching Model delivered by trained peer educators. Peer educators will be fourth-year nursing students who have successfully completed the relevant course and received standardized training from the course instructor before the intervention. The training will follow the four sequential steps of the Peyton model: demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension, and independent performance with structured feedback. All training sessions will be conducted individually in the nursing skills laboratory using simulation manikins and a standardized procedural checklist.

    Behavioral: Peyton Four-Step Teaching Model

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Demonstration (Control)

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive practical training in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter using the traditional demonstration-based teaching method delivered by the course instructor. The instructor will explain and demonstrate the procedure according to the standardized skills checklist, after which participants will practice the procedure individually under supervision and receive feedback. All training sessions will be conducted in the nursing skills laboratory using simulation manikins and the same standardized procedural checklist used in the intervention groups to ensure consistency in educational content and outcome assessment.

    Behavioral: Traditional Demonstration-Based Teaching

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeyton Four-Step Teaching Model

    Participants will receive practical training in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter using the Peyton Four-Step Teaching Model. The intervention consists of four sequential steps: demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension, and independent performance with structured feedback. Depending on study group allocation, the training will be delivered either by the course instructor or by trained peer educators. All training sessions will be conducted individually in the nursing skills laboratory using simulation manikins and a standardized procedural checklist to ensure consistency of the educational content and skill assessment

  • BehavioralTraditional Demonstration-Based Teaching

    Participants will receive practical training in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter using the traditional demonstration-based teaching method. The course instructor will explain and demonstrate the procedure according to the standardized procedural checklist. Following the demonstration, participants will practice the procedure individually under supervision and receive structured feedback. All training sessions will be conducted in the nursing skills laboratory using simulation manikins and the same standardized procedural checklist used in the intervention groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Skill performance in sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter

    Skill performance will be evaluated using the Urine Specimen Collection from an Indwelling Urinary Catheter Skills Checklist. Higher scores indicate better procedural skill performance.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the training intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge level regarding sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter

    Knowledge level will be assessed using a researcher-developed knowledge test. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge regarding sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter.

    Time frame: Before the intervention and immediately after completion of the training intervention

  2. Self-efficacy

    Self-efficacy will be assessed using the Student Self-Efficacy Scale. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in performing sterile urine specimen collection from an indwelling urinary catheter.

    Time frame: Before the intervention and immediately after completion of the training intervention

  3. Student satisfaction with the educational intervention

    Student satisfaction with the educational intervention will be assessed using a researcher-developed satisfaction questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the educational method received.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the training intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) collected during this study will not be shared because the study involves educational data collected from undergraduate students, and no data-sharing plan has been established.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 3 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07732049
Lead sponsor
Maltepe University
Responsible party
Ebru Caliskan (Assistant Professor, Maltepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Ebru Çalışkan, PhD
Contact
ebrucaliskan@maltepe.edu.tr
+90 5052641381
Tuğba Bozdemir, PhD
Contact
tugbabozdemir@maltepe.edu.tr
+90 5520978860
Ebru Çalışkan, pHd
principal investigator · Maltepe University, Faculty of Nursing
Tuğba Bozdemir, PhD
study director · Maltepe University, Faculty of Nursing
Adife Ahsen ÇETİN
study director · Maltepe University, Faculty of Nursing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion