ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03738904Updated Dec 18, 2023Results posted

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Anorectal Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of ERAS and Standard of care in Anorectal Disorder, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-18.

Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
111
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether being randomized to an aggressive postoperative non-narcotic pain regimen that treats pain from multiple different pathways may decrease postoperative pain levels, decrease constipation, and decrease the dependency on opioid medications after anorectal surgery versus the standard of care for managing pain. This use of a more aggressive pain regimen is considered an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol because it is theorized to improve or "enhance" postoperative recovery by both decreasing the use of narcotics and their detrimental effects as well as increasing the benefit of using additional non-narcotic pain medication.

Read the detailed description

Although pain is a predictable part of the postoperative experience, inadequate management of pain is common and can have profound implications Most patients who undergo surgical procedures experience acute postoperative pain, but evidence suggests that less than half report adequate postoperative pain relief. Many preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions and management strategies are available for reducing and managing postoperative pain. Mostly, pain is treated with opioids which are narcotics. medically they are primarily used for pain relief and these are historically considered "safe" drugs as they do not impose an increased risk of bleeding, kidney, or stomach problems. However, many patients taking high dose opioids have a higher risk of constipation. Unrelieved postoperative pain may result in economic and medical implications such as extended lengths of stay, readmissions, and patient dissatisfaction with medical care. With the rising concern over narcotic use, physicians are increasingly seeking alternative ways to help patients manage pain throughout their hospital stay and beyond However, few studies in anorectal surgery have shown that using an aggressive postoperative non-narcotic pain regimen (ERAS) can help reduce postoperative pain and decreased returns to emergency care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anorectal Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rectal Diseases

87 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Diseases; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 111 is close to the median of 114 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Diseases.

Browse Rectal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 456 studies on the registry; 107 are open to participants now.

Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to freely give written to participate in the study and have signed the Informed Consent Form;
  • Males or females, age 18 to 70 years old at the time of study screening;
  • (ASA) Class I-III (Appendix III) undergoing elective anorectal surgery
  • Patients undergoing the following hemorrhoid surgeries will be included:
  • Excisional single column or multiple column hemorrhoidectomy including internal and external component
  • Stapled hemorrhoidpexy (aka procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids with or without excision of external hemorrhoid or skin tag)
  • Trans anal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy (THD) with or without excision of external hemorrhoid or skin tag
  • Patients undergoing the following anal fistula surgery will be included:
  • Anal fistulotomy or fistulectomy of intersphincteric or tran-sphincteric fistula with wound > 1 cm
  • Endorectal or an cutaneous advancement flap for anal fistula re-pair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide or comply with study procedures
  • (ASA) Class IV or V; emergency surgeries
  • Children \<18
  • Patients over age 70 due to small risk of altered mental status with gabapentin in elderly6
  • Patients with impaired renal clearance (baseline creatinine 1.5mg/dL, \< 60ml/min or known renal dysfunction)
  • Patients with known liver dysfunction (Childs class A, B, or C)
  • Patients with prior liver or kidney transplant
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients requiring emergency surgery
  • Patients taking narcotics or at the time of surgery
  • Patients having external hemorrhoidectomy or skin anal tag excision only
  • Patients having anal abscess drainage, seton placement without definitive fistula repair, or ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, subcutaneous fistulotomy or fistulotomy with wound \<1 cm
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
111 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1 (multimodal ERAS)

    Arm1 (Multimodal ERAS): Preoperative: oral gabapentin 600mg and oral acetaminophen 1,000mg Postoperative pain control: 1. Gabapentin oral 300 mg TID (#42, refill #1) 2. Acetaminophen oral 1000mg TID (#42, refill #1) 3. Ketorolac oral 10 mg TID (#15, refill #0) 4. Oxycodone oral 5 mg PRN every 6 hours (#30, refill #0) Postoperative laxative regimen: 1. Daily MiraLAX 1 scoop in 1 glass of water for 15 days 2. Daily milk of magnesia 1 tablespoon if no bowel movement by POD2 until regular bowel movements 3. Daily mineral oil 1 table spoon if no bowel movement by POD2 until regular bowel movements

    Combination Product: ERAS

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2 (control)

    Postoperative pain control: 1. Oxycodone oral 5 mg PRN every 6 hours (#30, refill #0) 2. Patients will be allowed to take oral acetaminophen and ibuprofen over the counter if needed but active narcotic-sparing pain management regimen will not be implemented Postoperative laxative regimen: 1. Daily MiraLAX 1 scoop in 1 glass of water for 15 days 2. Daily milk of magnesia 1 tablespoon if no bowel movement by POD2 until regular bowel movements Daily mineral oil 1 table spoon if no bowel movement by POD2 until regu-lar bowel movements

    Combination Product: Standard of care

Interventions

  • Combination productERAS

    Gabapentin Acetaminophen Ketoroloac IV (intraop) and PO Dexamethasone (included with benzocaine in local anesthesia) Oxycodone PO Polyethylene glycol

  • Combination productStandard of care

    Oxcodone PO Ketorolac IV only (intraop)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Narcotic Use Postoperatively in Oral Morphine Equivalents

    Total amount of narcotics used

    Time frame: 1 week postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median Postoperative Pain Scores

    Level of pain measured on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being the lowest level of pain and 10 being the highest level of pain as reported by the participant

    Time frame: 1 week postoperatively

  2. Complications

    Number of participants who experienced complications

    Time frame: 1 month postoperatively

07

Results

Posted Dec 18, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)
Started5455
Completed4544
Not completed911

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Narcotic Use Postoperatively in Oral Morphine Equivalents

Total amount of narcotics used

Time frame:
1 week postoperatively
Reported as:
Median · Oral morphine miligram equivalents
Total Narcotic Use Postoperatively in Oral Morphine Equivalents
Oral morphine miligram equivalentsArm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)
Total Narcotic Use Postoperatively in Oral Morphine Equivalents8 (0 to 390)79 (0 to 600)
SecondaryMedian Postoperative Pain Scores

Level of pain measured on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being the lowest level of pain and 10 being the highest level of pain as reported by the participant

Time frame:
1 week postoperatively
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Median Postoperative Pain Scores
score on a scaleArm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)
Median Postoperative Pain Scores4 (0 to 10)6 (0 to 10)
SecondaryComplications

Number of participants who experienced complications

Time frame:
1 month postoperatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complications
ParticipantsArm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)
Complications42

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days postoperatively. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)4/45 (8.9%)
Arm 2 (Control)0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)2/44 (4.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)
Adverse event not resulting in significant morbidity or mortalitySurgical and medical procedures4/452/44

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years444488
>=65 years101
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)Total
Median38 (20 to 67)38 (23 to 59)38 (20 to 67)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)Total
Female251641
Male202848
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Arm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm 1 (Multimodal ERAS)Arm 2 (Control)Total
United States454489
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cedars Sinai
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 45 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2023, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 8, 2018
First posted
Nov 13, 2018
StartActual
Oct 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
Aug 18, 2022
CompletionActual
Aug 18, 2022
Results first posted
Dec 18, 2023
Last update
Dec 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03738904
Responsible party
Karen Zaghiyan (Principal Investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2018
Start date
Oct 26, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 18, 2022
Completion
Aug 18, 2022
Results posted
Dec 18, 2023
Last update
Dec 18, 2023

Study contacts

Karen Zaghiyan, MD
principal investigator · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion