CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03736707HFOV for ARDSUpdated Oct 6, 2025

High-Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Very Preterm Infants With Perinatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Multicenters Randomized Controlled, Superiority Trial

An interventional study of HFOV and CMV in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Preterm, sponsored by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 1 Minute to 1 Hour. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Sponsored by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Minute to 1 Hour
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a complex disorder and remains the most common complication in very preterm infants. Its incidence is increased with gestational age from 95.5% among infants born at 22 weeks' gestation to 22.2% among those born at 29 weeks' gestation. BPD is associated with the increased risks of delayed neurodevelopment and pulmonary impairment. High incidences of BPD and morbidities indicate inadequacy of current management guidelines of BPD.3 Caffeine reduces the development of BPD by lowering the duration of intubation.4 How to further reduce the risk of BPD and the duration of invasive ventilation remain the key focus for neonatologists.

Read the detailed description

Before 2017, the management guideline of pediatric and adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exclude perinatal triggers-induced ARDS. Moreover, there is insufficient evidence to recommend high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) as the preferred fist-line therapy in pediatric and adult ARDS. In contrast, HFOV may benefit preterm baboons with acute pulmonary dysfunction-typically due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)-by using low tidal volume, supra-physiologically higher respiratory rate, and lower peak inspiratory pressure to enhance oxygenation and gas exchange. The team also reported that use of HFOV is associated with a modest reduction referring to BPD. However, European consensus guideline of RDS only recommend HFOV being a reasonable alternative to CMV when high pressure is needed to achieve adequate lung inflation. Because randomized controlled trials in humans have yielded inconsistent findings.

These differences between animal models-where RDS was induced and treated with surfactant alone-and clinical scenarios, where preterm birth often involved complex etiologies requiring both surfactant and antibiotics for placental insufficiency or intrauterine infection, may be the diagnosis of RDS and ARDS or the mixture of RDS and ARDS. Such findings highlighted the lack of robust evidence for optimizing ventilation strategies in preterm infants born \<32 weeks with perinatal ARDS, and the need for well-designed multi-center randomized controlled trials in this high-risk population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation
  • Preterm
  • Conventional Mechanical Ventilation
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University is the lead sponsor of 115 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Minute to 1 Hour
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. GA was between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks.
  2. Preterm neonates were admitted to NICU within 1 hours after birth, diagnosed with perinatal ARDS using Montreux guidelines and stable supported by CMV.
  3. Stabilization for 2 hours before randomization: FiO2 0.40, mean airway pressure (MAP) 10-14 cmH2O, ≤ 40 bpm of respiratory rate, 90%-94% of SpO2, pH > 7.20, PaCO2 60 mmHg, tidal volume of 5 ml/kg and > 35% of hematocrit (these may be evaluated by arterial blood gas analysis).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Neonates were not included if any of the following criteria were met:

  1. Parents or guardians' decision not to participate.
  2. Major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities
  3. Need for surgery or more than grade 2nd of IVH before randomization.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    high frenquency oscillation ventilation (HFOV)

    HFOV + volume guarantee (VG) as the intervention group HFOV was provided only with piston or membrane oscillators capable of delivering true oscillatory pressure with an active expiratory phase (i.e., Acutronic FABIAN-III, SLE 5000, Löwenstein Med LEONI+, or Sensormedics 3100A). Other machines offering high frequency ventilation were excluded. The lung recruitment maneuver was performed as previously described,15 and lung volume was assessed by chest radiography or lung ultrasound, targeting the right diaphragm at the level of 8th-9th rib (or 7th-8th rib in case of air leak). Crossover between HFOV and CMV This study allowed infants who failed to respond to their assigned ventilation mode to receive a trial of the alternate mode. Crossover criteria for HFOV-assigned neonates included failure for 3 hours to maintain SpO2 ≥ 50% despite FiO2 of 1.0, PaCO2 \> 60 mmHg for 3 hours, or signs of ventilator-induced cardiac output reduction. Non-responders to HFOV were switched to CMV.

    Device: HFOV

  • Active comparator
    conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV)

    CMV was delivered by time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilators. Only pressure regulated volume control (PRVC) will be provided by any type of neonatal ventilator. Crossover criteria for CMV-assigned neonates included failure for 3 hours to maintain SpO2 ≥ 50% despite FiO2 of 1.0, PaCO2 \> 60 mmHg for 3 hours, or requiring \> 30 cm H2O PIP to sustain ventilation. Non-responders to CMV were switched to HFOV. in both groups, ventilator settings were adjusted at the discretion of the attending clinician to maintain a SpO2 between 90%-94%, a PaO2 between 50 and 80 mm Hg and a PaCO2 between 35 and 60 mm Hg and a pH between 7.20 and 7.45. PO2 and PCO2 levels were monitored using arterial blood gas analysis and/or transcutaneous monitoring.

    Device: CMV

Interventions

  • DeviceHFOV

    HFOV + volume guarantee (VG) as the intervention group HFOV was provided only with piston or membrane oscillators capable of delivering true oscillatory pressure with an active expiratory phase (i.e., Acutronic FABIAN-III, SLE 5000, Löwenstein Med LEONI+, or Sensormedics 3100A). Other machines offering high frequency ventilation were excluded. The lung recruitment maneuver was performed as previously described, and lung volume was assessed by chest radiography or lung ultrasound, targeting the right diaphragm at the level of 8th-9th rib (or 7th-8th rib in case of air leak). Crossover between HFOV and CMV This study allowed infants who failed to respond to their assigned ventilation mode to receive a trial of the alternate mode. Crossover criteria for HFOV-assigned neonates included failure for 3 hours to maintain SpO2 ≥ 50% despite FiO2 of 1.0, PaCO2 \> 60 mmHg for 3 hours, or signs of ventilator-induced cardiac output reduction. Non-responders to HFOV were switched to CMV.

  • DeviceCMV

    CMV as the standard group CMV was delivered by time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilators. Only pressure regulated volume control (PRVC) will be provided by any type of neonatal ventilator. Crossover criteria for CMV-assigned neonates included failure for 3 hours to maintain SpO2 ≥ 50% despite FiO2 of 1.0, PaCO2 \> 60 mmHg for 3 hours, or requiring \> 30 cm H2O PIP to sustain ventilation. Non-responders to CMV were switched to HFOV. Ventilator settings were adjusted at the discretion of the attending clinician to maintain a SpO2 between 90%-94%, a PaO2 between 50 and 80 mm Hg and a PaCO2 between 35 and 60 mm Hg and a pH between 7.20 and 7.45. PO2 and PCO2 levels were monitored using arterial blood gas analysis and/or transcutaneous monitoring in both groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD)

    BPD is defined according to the 2019 diagnostic criteria. For infants discharged before 36 weeks' GA, BPD severity was assessed based on respiratory support at the time of discharge. Infants receiving no supplemental respiratory support were divided into no BPD, those treated with nasal cannula (≤ 2 L/min) as grade 1 BPD, those treated with nasal cannula (\> 2 L/min) or noninvasive positive airway pressure as grade 2 BPD and those treated with invasive mechanical ventilation as grade 3 BPD.

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age

Secondary outcomes

  1. duration of invasive ventilation

    duration of invasive ventilation for HFOV or CMV

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age

  2. mortality

    the included neonates were diagnosed with death

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age or before discharge

  3. air leak (pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum) occurred

    the included neonates were diagnosed with air leak

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age or before discharge

  4. the incidence of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA)

    the included neonates were diagnosed with hsPDA.

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age or before discharge

  5. the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)> 2nd grades

    ROP was categorized according to the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, revised in 2005

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age or before discharge

  6. the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)≥2nd stages

    the development of NEC, specifically focusing on cases classified as Bell's stage ≥2, according to the modified Bell's staging criteria for NEC.

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age or before discharge

  7. intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH)>2nd grade

    IVH with grades 1-4 were defined by Papile et al

    Time frame: 36 weeks' gestational age or before discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality 400042, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03736707
Lead sponsor
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
Collaborators
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Jiulongpo No.1 People's Hospital, Chongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Children's Hospital of The Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Women and Children's Hospital, Branch of Chongqing Sanxia Central Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Quanzhou Children's Hospital, Xiamen Maternity & Child Care Hospital, Zhujiang Hospital, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science and General Hospital, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Women and Children's Health Hospital of Yulin, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, The First People's Hospital of Zunyi, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, LanZhou University, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, China, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province, Bethune International Peace Hospital, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Maternal and Children's Healthcare Hospital of Taian, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Shanxi Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital Of Southwest Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Medical College of Jinan University, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Kunming Children's Hospital, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Women and Children's Health Hospital of Qujing, The People's Hospital of Dehong Autonomous Prefecture, The First People's Hospital of Yinchuan, The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University, Beijing 302 Hospital, Hunan Children's Hospital, Women and Children Hospital of Qinghai Province, Jiangxi Province Children's Hospital, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Mianyang Central Hospital, People's Liberation Army No.202 Hospital, Ningbo Women & Children's Hospital, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Xianyang Children's Hospital, Qinhuangdao Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou Children Hospital
Responsible party
Chen Long,MD (Principal Investigator, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion