ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03718052CHIRURGENDOUpdated May 25, 2025

Early Valve Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Infective Endocarditis Patients With High Risk of Embolism

An interventional study of Early valve surgery (EVS) and Conventional Care in Endocarditis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-25.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
73
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 15-25% and a high incidence of embolic events (20-50%). Leading causes of mortality are heart failure (HF) resulting from valve dysfunction, and stroke caused by vegetation embolization. The rate of symptomatic embolic events occurring after antibiotic initiation is around 15%. Valve surgery benefit has been clearly demonstrated in patients with periannular complications and moderate to severe HF resulting from acute valve regurgitation. The timing of surgery to prevent embolism is critical since the risk of new embolic event is highest during the first weeks of antibiotic treatment.

The primary objective is to compare clinical outcomes of Early Valve Surgery (as soon as possible within 72 hours of randomization) with those of a conventional management based on current guidelines in patients with native left-sided IE and high risk of embolism.

208 patients (104 patients per arm) will be included in a national multicenter (21 centers) prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) sequential superiority trial.

Read the detailed description

Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 15-25% and a high incidence of embolic events (20-50%). Leading causes of mortality are heart failure (HF) resulting from valve dysfunction, and stroke caused by vegetation embolization. The rate of symptomatic embolic events occurring after antibiotic initiation is around 15%. Valve surgery benefit has been clearly demonstrated in patients with periannular complications and moderate to severe HF resulting from acute valve regurgitation. Indications of valve surgery for prevention of embolic complications are less clearly defined. Potential complications of valve surgery and of implanted permanent prosthetic valve are to be balanced against their potential benefits in terms of prevented embolism and improved survival. The timing of surgery to prevent embolism is critical since the risk of new embolic event is highest during the first weeks of antibiotic treatment. The points in favor of early valve surgery (EVS) in patients with high embolic risk include the following 1) patients with high risk of embolism are identified by transesophageal echocardiography (TOE); 2) advances in surgical management of IE dramatically lowered postoperative mortality; 3) 2015 European ESC IE guidelines state that valve surgery should be performed in IE with vegetation above 10 mm AND an embolic event occurring while patients are receiving antibiotic (grade I/B) and should be considered in IE with vegetation above 30 mm (Grade IIaB ) and may be above 10 mm and severe valve regurgitation.

The primary objective is to compare clinical outcomes of EVS (as soon as possible within 72 hours of randomization) with those of a conventional management based on current 2015 European ESC guidelines in patients with native left-sided IE and high risk of embolism.

The primary assessment criterion is a composite of all-cause death and clinically symptomatic embolic events within 6 weeks from randomization in all included patient.

208 patients (104 patients per arm) will be included in a national multicenter (21 centers) prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) sequential superiority trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endocarditis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Endocarditis

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Endocarditis; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 73 is below the median of 92 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Endocarditis.

Browse Endocarditis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Definite or possible IE based on the modified Duke criteria (ESC 2015)
  3. Length of vegetation on native aortic and/or mitral valve, as assessed by TOE * :

    • between 10 and 15 mm AND (severe regurgitation OR previous symptomatic or asymptomatic embolic events)
    • OR above or equal to 15 mm
  4. Initiation of specific IE active antibiotic less than 5 days (≤120 hours) before inclusion
  5. For non-menopause women: negative blood or urinary β-HCG test. *If the patient has several vegetations, only one vegetation with these criterions, is enough to included patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with "emergent" indication of surgery based on 2015 European Guidelines
  2. Prosthetic valve endocarditis
  3. Patient who is not candidate for surgery due to high risk post-surgery mortality including for example coexisting major embolic stroke with a high risk of hemorrhagic transformation, symptomatic hemorrhagic stroke; poor medical status, such as coexisting ...
  4. No written from the patient or a legal representative if appropriate
  5. Patient with no national health or universal plan affiliation coverage
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Patient under guardianship or curatorship
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
73 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early valve surgery (EVS)

    Cardiac surgery as soon as possible within 72 hours of randomization

    Procedure: Early valve surgery (EVS)

  • Active comparator
    Conventional care

    Conventional care according to the 2015 European guidelines.

    Procedure: Conventional Care

Interventions

  • ProcedureEarly valve surgery (EVS)

    Early valve surgery (EVS) within 72 hours of randomization

  • ProcedureConventional Care

    Conventional care according to the 2015 European guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complications and deaths in all included patient

    A composite of all-cause death and clinically symptomatic embolic events within 6 weeks from randomization in all included patient.

    Time frame: Week 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complications and deaths in patient with definite IE

    All-cause death and clinically symptomatic embolic events from randomization in patient with definite IE

    Time frame: Week 6

  2. Complications and deaths

    Combination of all-cause death and clinically symptomatic embolic events documented by imaging studies up to 6 months and one-year after randomization.

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  3. Deaths

    All-cause death up to 6 months and one-year (post study analysis) after randomization

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  4. Symptomatic embolic events

    All clinically symptomatic embolic events documented by imaging studies up to 6 months and one-year after randomization

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  5. Intensive care scale

    Glasgow outcome scale and Rankin scale at week 6, month 3, 6 and one-year visits.

    Time frame: Week 6 , Months 3, 6 and 12

  6. Infective EI relapse

    Relapse of infective IE up to 6 months and one-year after randomization.

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  7. Infective EI recurrences

    Recurrences of infective IE up to 6 months and one-year after randomization.

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  8. Rehospitalization

    Readmission due to development of congestive heart failure up to 6 weeks, 6 months and one-year after randomization

    Time frame: Week 6, Months 6 and 12

  9. Rehospitalization for valve surgery

    Readmission for valve surgery (between hospital discharge and 6 months and one-year after enrolment) in patients operated on during the acute phase of IE

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  10. Thrombosis and ischemia

    Six month and one-year prosthesis thrombosis, severe adverse events due to anticoagulation, ischemic stroke due to documented suboptimal anticoagulation

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  11. Quality of life scale 1

    WhoQol scale up to 6 months and one-year after randomization.

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  12. Quality of life scale 2

    SF36 up to 6 months and one-year after randomization.

    Time frame: Months 6 and 12

  13. Delay between randomization and surgery

    Time interval between randomization and date of cardiac surgery in patients operated-on during the acute phase of the IE.

    Time frame: Months 12

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2025, 73 months after the start.

Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Endocarditis, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 73 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2018
First posted
Oct 24, 2018
StartActual
Apr 11, 2019
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2026
Last update
May 25, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03718052
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2018
Start date
Apr 11, 2019
Primary completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 25, 2025

Study contacts

Xavier Duval
principal investigator · Bichat Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion