CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03704064Updated Nov 2, 2022Results posted

Behavioral Weight Loss and Stigma Reduction

An interventional study of Stigma-Reduction Intervention and Behavioral Weight Loss (BWL) in Obesity, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-02.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled trial to test the effects on long-term weight loss of a novel stigma-reduction intervention combined with standard BWL treatment, as compared to BWL alone. Participants will be a total of 104 men and women seeking weight loss, ages 18 years and older, with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or above (or 27 kg/m2 or above with an obesity-related comorbidity), a history of experiencing weight bias, and elevated levels of WBI. Participants will attend a screening visit in which they will complete a behavioral evaluation with a psychologist and a medical history that will be reviewed by a nurse practitioner or physician. Questionnaires assessing experiences and internalization of weight bias, with confirmation by interviewer assessment during the behavioral evaluation, will be used to determine whether participants meet criteria for having high levels of WBI. Eligible consenting participants will be randomly assigned to the standard BWL intervention (n = 52) or the stigma + BWL intervention (n = 52). All participants will attend weekly, 90-minute group meetings for 20 weeks (20 visits). In the stigma + BWL treatment group, 60 minutes will be devoted to BWL and 30 minutes to weight stigma. In the standard BWL treatment group, the additional 30 minutes will be devoted to sharing recipes and food preparation tips. Following 20 weeks of weight loss treatment, participants will attend group meetings focused on weight loss maintenance, monthly from weeks 21-46 (6 visits), and every-other-month from weeks 47-72 (3 visits). Maintenance sessions in the stigma + BWL group will continue to incorporate discussion of WBI and stigma-related barriers to physical activity. Assessments - which include questionnaires, blood draws, and measurements of body weight and physical activity - will occur at baseline and weeks 20, 46 (no blood draw this week), and 72. Weight will be measured at every group meeting for clinical purposes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Weight Loss
  • Weight Stigma
  • Physical Activity
  • Cardiovascular Risk Factor
03

In context

Weight Loss

1,766 studies on the registry are indexed under Weight Loss; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 73 across 1,496 interventional studies indexed under Weight Loss.

Browse Weight Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible participants will be men and women ages 18 years and older.
  • Participants must have obesity, defined as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or ≥ 27 kg/m2 with an obesity-related comorbidity.

    o Obesity-related comorbidities (which confer added CVD risk) will include:

  • coronary heart disease;
  • other atherosclerotic disease;
  • sleep apnea;
  • hypercholesteremia (i.e., high cholesterol, as diagnosed by doctor and/or if taking medication to lower cholesterol);
  • and components of the metabolic syndrome, including hypertension (SBP ≥130, DBP ≥80 mm Hg, diagnosed by doctor and/or if taking anti-hypertensive medication); fasting blood glucose of 100-125 mg/dL (or prediabetes, diagnosed by doctor),; low HDL cholesterol (\<40 mg/dL in men, \<50 mg/dL in women), elevated triglycerides (>150 mg/dL, i.e., dyslipidemia diagnosed by doctor or taking medication to treat dyslipidemia), or elevated waist circumference (≥40 in for men, ≥35 in for women),.
  • Eligible participants must also report a history of experiencing weight bias as assessed by self-report questionnaire and in-person interview, and have elevated levels of WBI as indicated by an average score of 4 (midpoint) or above on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS) and by in-person interview.
  • Participants must be seeking weight loss.
  • If currently taking medications, dosages must be stable for at least 3 months.
  • Participants will be eligible to participate if they exhibit mild to moderate severity of depression, anxiety, or binge eating disorder, as determined by the behavioral evaluation and the screening measures (Beck Depression Inventory-II and Questionnaire for Eating and Weight Patterns; see below for details). Elevated WBIS scores are often associated with these variables.
  • Participants taking anti-depressant medication will be eligible if their dose has been stable for a minimum of 3 months.

Eligible female patients will be:

  • non-pregnant and non-lactating
  • surgically sterile or postmenopausal, or they will agree to continue to use a method of birth control during the study

Participants must:

  • have a PCP who is responsible for providing routine care
  • have reliable telephone service and/or email access with which to be in contact with the study team
  • understand and be willing to comply with all study-related procedures and agree to participate in the study by giving written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Applicants will be excluded if they have:

  • a diagnosis of type I or II diabetes (for type II diabetes, blood glucose ≥126 mg/dL or A1C ≥6.5);
  • uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 160/100 mm Hg);
  • experienced a cardiovascular event (e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction) in the last 12 months;
  • lost and maintained ≥ 5% of their initial weight in the last 3 months or ≥ 10% in the past 2 years;
  • or have participated in individual or group psychotherapy related to weight in the last 3 months (due to the potentially confounding effects of receiving a simultaneous cognitive-behavioral intervention).

    o Participants who have recently received or are currently receiving therapy for a pre-existing mental health issue unrelated to weight (e.g., psychotherapy for depression or anxiety, or marriage, grief, or career counseling) may be eligible if the therapy is deemed by the Principal Investigator to be unlikely to affect weight, eating habits, or physical activity.

  • Applicants with severe symptoms of mood (BDI-II score ≥ 29), anxiety, or binge eating disorder, and any severity of thought or substance use disorders will not be accepted into the study, as these symptoms may interfere with individuals' ability to adhere to a weight loss program.

    o Clinician judgment will be used to determine severity of mood disorder symptoms independent from obesity-related concerns and complications (e.g., fatigue), and decisions about applicants' eligibility based on psychiatric symptoms will fall within the Principal Investigator's discretion.

  • Individuals with bulimia nervosa will not be eligible to participate, because weight loss may be contraindicated.
  • Applicants with current, active suicidal ideation, and/or a suicide attempt within the past year will be excluded from the study and referred to psychiatric treatment facilities in the greater Philadelphia area.
  • Applicants will not be eligible if they have a history of bariatric surgery.
  • Women who are nursing, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant in the next 16 months are not eligible to participate.
  • Applicants who report obtaining 150 minutes or more of structured physical activity per week (e.g., 30 minutes 5 days per week) will not be eligible, as they will already be obtaining the recommended amount of physical activity and may not be able to further increase their activity as part of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stigma + BWL Intervention

    Participants in this group will receive the standard behavioral weight loss (BWL) program, which will be combined with a stigma-reduction intervention (more details provided in the Intervention section). All group meetings will be 90 minutes. Beginning at week 5, the 60-minute BWL sessions will be followed by 30 minutes devoted to stigma-related content. In the monthly and every-other-month weight loss maintenance sessions from weeks 21-72, strategies for coping with weight stigma and challenging internalized beliefs will be reviewed, and participants will be encouraged to use these strategies specifically with physical activity.

    Behavioral: Stigma-Reduction Intervention · Behavioral: Behavioral Weight Loss (BWL)

  • Active comparator
    Standard BWL Intervention

    Participants in this group will be provided with 20 weekly behavioral weight loss (BWL) session (described in more detail in the Intervention section), followed by 6 monthly weight loss maintenance sessions and 3 every-other-month sessions (for a total of 29 visits over 72 weeks). All group meetings will be 90 minutes. Beginning at week 5, BWL content in these sessions will last 60 minutes, with an additional 30 minutes devoted to discussing recipes and food preparation.

    Behavioral: Behavioral Weight Loss (BWL)

Interventions

  • BehavioralStigma-Reduction Intervention

    Session topics will be based on those tested in a previous pilot study, including: psychoeducation about weight and weight stigma; challenging myths and cognitive distortions related to weight; strategies for coping with instances of stigma; and increasing empowerment and body esteem. The effects of weight stigma on health behaviors will be discussed, and sessions will focus specifically on helping participants overcome stigma-related barriers to physical activity. For example, they will be given strategies to cope with anticipated stigma while exercising in public spaces (e.g., while walking), as well as to challenge self-critical beliefs (e.g., that they are lazy) which may otherwise lead them to avoid exercising. These concrete strategies, along with reducing WBI and improving self-confidence, are intended to increase participants' self-efficacy for and engagement in physical activity.

  • BehavioralBehavioral Weight Loss (BWL)

    This intervention will be based on the Diabetes Prevention Program. A diet of 1200-1499 calories per day will be prescribed for participants \< 250 lb, and 1500-1800 for those ≥ 250 lb. Participants will be instructed to eat a balanced deficit diet. Session topics during the first 20 weeks will include self-monitoring, stimulus control, social support, portion sizes, and goal-setting. Those during weeks 21-72 will focus on skills required for weight loss maintenance and relapse prevention. Physical activity will be begin with a prescription of 60 min/wk, and will gradually progress by 10 minutes over 2-4 week intervals until achieving 150 min/wk by week 20, 200 min/wk by week 46, and 250 min/wk by week 72. Participants will be instructed to spread the activity equally across at least 5 days in bouts that are \>10 minutes in duration. Moderate intensity will be prescribed with an emphasis on walking; the vast majority of our research participants self-select this form of activity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Weight Change at Week 72

    Estimated mean percent change in weight from baseline to week 72

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

Secondary outcomes

  1. Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72

    The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 72

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  2. Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72

    The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 72

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  3. Percent Weight Change at Week 46

    Estimated mean percent weight change

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  4. Percent Weight Change at Week 20

    Estimated mean percent weight change

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  5. Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46

    The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 46

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  6. Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46

    The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 46

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  7. Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20

    The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 20

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  8. Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20

    The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 20

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  9. Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 72

    Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  10. Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 46

    Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  11. Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 20

    Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  12. Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 72

    Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  13. Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 46

    Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  14. Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 20

    Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  15. Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 72

    Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  16. Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 46

    Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  17. Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 20

    Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  18. Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 72

    Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  19. Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 46

    Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  20. Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 20

    Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  21. Change in Triglycerides at Week 72

    Estimated mean change in triglyceride concentration in blood

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  22. Change in Triglycerides at Week 20

    Estimated mean change in triglyceride concentration in blood

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  23. Change in Blood Pressure at Week 72

    Estimated mean change in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure; mmHg)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  24. Change in Blood Pressure Week 20

    Estimated mean change in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure; mmHg)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  25. Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 72

    Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization).

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  26. Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 46

    Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  27. Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 20

    Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  28. "Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 72

    Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  29. "Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 46

    Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  30. "Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 20

    Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  31. Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 72

    Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  32. Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 46

    Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  33. Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 20

    Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  34. Treatment Acceptability at Week 20

    To assess treatment acceptability, participants in both groups rated (1-7) how acceptable and helpful the program was, how much they liked the program, and how satisfied they were; scores for these 4 items were averaged. Participants also rated (1-7) the BWL treatment, as well as the stigma intervention (i.e., BIAS component) or recipe exchange, on how helpful they found each component of the program, how much they liked the components, and how much they learned. Scores for these three items were averaged (1-7) separately for the BWL treatment, BIAS component, and recipe exchange. Participants rated how much they learned BWL scores, and how much they learned and used skills related to stigma (all averaged 1-7). Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.

    Time frame: Week 20

  35. Treatment Acceptability at Week 72

    To assess treatment acceptability, participants in both groups rated (1-7) how acceptable and helpful the program was, how much they liked the program, and how satisfied they were; scores for these 4 items were averaged. Participants also rated (1-7) the BWL treatment, as well as the stigma intervention (i.e., BIAS component) or recipe exchange, on how helpful they found each component of the program, how much they liked the components, and how much they learned. Scores for these three items were averaged (1-7) separately for the BWL treatment, BIAS component, and recipe exchange. Participants rated how much they learned BWL scores, and how much they learned and used skills related to stigma (all averaged 1-7). Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.

    Time frame: Week 72

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Minutes of Sedentary Time at Week 72

    Single item from Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  2. Change in Minutes of Sedentary Time at Week 46

    Single item from Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  3. Change in Minutes of Sedentary Time at Week 20

    Single item from Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  4. Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 72

    Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  5. Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 20

    Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  6. Change in Waist Circumference at Week 72

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  7. Change in Waist Circumference at Week 20

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  8. Change in Blood Glucose at Week 72

    Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  9. Change in Blood Glucose at Week 20

    Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  10. Change in C-reactive Protein at Week 72

    Concentration in blood

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  11. Change in C-reactive Protein at Week 20

    Concentration in blood

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  12. Change in Stereotype Endorsement Scores at Week 72

    Fat Phobia Scale (scores averaged 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  13. Change in Stereotype Endorsement Scores at Week 46

    Fat Phobia Scale (scores averaged 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  14. Change in Stereotype Endorsement Scores at Week 20

    Fat Phobia Scale (scores averaged 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  15. Change in Weight-related Quality of Life at Week 72

    Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lite (total score and 5 subscales; t-scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  16. Change in Weight-related Quality of Life at Week 46

    Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lite (total score and 5 subscales; t-scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  17. Change in Weight-related Quality of Life at Week 20

    Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lite (total score and 5 subscales; t-scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  18. Change in Perceived Stress at Week 72

    Perceived Stress Scale (total score 0-40; higher scores = greater perceived stress)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  19. Change in Perceived Stress at Week 46

    Perceived Stress Scale (total score 0-40; higher scores = greater perceived stress)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  20. Change in Perceived Stress at Week 20

    Perceived Stress Scale (total score 0-40; higher scores = greater perceived stress)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  21. Change in Depression Symptoms at Week 72

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (scores summed 0-27; higher scores = more symptoms of depression)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  22. Change in Depression Symptoms at Week 46

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (scores summed 0-27; higher scores = more symptoms of depression)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  23. Change in Depression Symptoms at Week 20

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (scores summed 0-27; higher scores = more symptoms of depression)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  24. Change in Body Image Scores at Week 72

    Body Appreciation Scale (scores averaged 1-5; higher scores = greater body appreciation)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  25. Change in Body Image Scores at Week 46

    Body Appreciation Scale (scores averaged 1-5; higher scores = greater body appreciation)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  26. Change in Body Image Scores at Week 20

    Body Appreciation Scale (scores averaged 1-5; higher scores = greater body appreciation)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  27. Change in Presence and Frequency of Binge Eating at Week 72

    Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (yes/no and episodes per week)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  28. Change in Presence and Frequency of Binge Eating at Week 46

    Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (yes/no and episodes per week)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  29. Change in Presence and Frequency of Binge Eating at Week 20

    Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (yes/no and episodes per week)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

  30. Change in Self-monitoring Behaviors at Week 72

    Food records and self-report recording of food intake and physical activity

    Time frame: Baseline to week 72

  31. Change in Self-monitoring Behaviors at Week 46

    Food records and self-report recording of food intake and physical activity

    Time frame: Baseline to week 46

  32. Change in Self-monitoring Behaviors at Week 20

    Food records and self-report recording of food intake and physical activity

    Time frame: Baseline to week 20

07

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Started5253
Week 204446
Week 464446
Week 724247
Completed4247
Not completed106
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up84
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: No longer available for study visits01
Withdrew: Censoring event10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Weight Change at Week 72

Estimated mean percent change in weight from baseline to week 72

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · percent weight change
Percent Weight Change at Week 72
percent weight changeStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Percent Weight Change at Week 72-7.16 ± 0.95-5.19 ± 0.92
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.14 · Mean difference (net): -1.97
SecondaryLoss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72

The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 72

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 722021
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.89 · Odds ratio (or): 1.1 · 95% CI 0.4 to 3.4
SecondaryLoss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72

The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 72

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72147
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.06 · Odds ratio (or): 3.7 · 95% CI 1.0 to 14.7
SecondaryPercent Weight Change at Week 46

Estimated mean percent weight change

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · percent weight change
Percent Weight Change at Week 46
percent weight changeStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Percent Weight Change at Week 46-8.2 ± 0.9-5.9 ± 0.9
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.07 · Mean difference (net): -2.4
SecondaryPercent Weight Change at Week 20

Estimated mean percent weight change

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · percent weight change
Percent Weight Change at Week 20
percent weight changeStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Percent Weight Change at Week 20-6.7 ± 0.9-5.7 ± 0.9
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.42 · Mean difference (net): -1.1
SecondaryLoss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46

The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 46

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 462822
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.24 · Odds ratio (or): 2.0 · 95% CI 0.6 to 6.3
SecondaryLoss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46

The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 46

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46159
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.24 · Odds ratio (or): 2.2 · 95% CI 0.6 to 8.1
SecondaryLoss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20

The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 20

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 203122
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.07 · Odds ratio (or): 3.0 · 95% CI 0.9 to 9.6
SecondaryLoss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20

The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 20

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20115
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.21 · Odds ratio (or): 2.6 · 95% CI 0.6 to 11.4
SecondaryChange in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 72

Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes per day
Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 72
Minutes per dayStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
MVPA per day with 10 minute bouts9.6 ± 4.17.2 ± 4.1
MVPA per day with 20 minute bouts9.4 ± 3.28.4 ± 3.1
Moderate activity per day3.2 ± 6.8-10.2 ± 6.7
Light activity per day-35.6 ± 15.1-51.5 ± 14.3
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.62 · Mean difference (net): 2.4
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.92 · Mean difference (net): 1.0
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.16 · Mean difference (net): 13.4
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.41 · Mean difference (net): 15.9
SecondaryChange in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 46

Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes per day
Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 46
Minutes per dayStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
MVPA per day with 10 minute bouts9.5 ± 4.35.4 ± 4.4
MVPA per day with 20 minute bouts9.9 ± 3.410.5 ± 3.2
Moderate activity per day0.6 ± 7.2-17.9 ± 7.2
Light activity per day-37.1 ± 15.9-67.0 ± 16.0
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.46 · Mean difference (net): 4.1
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.87 · Mean difference (net): -0.5
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.07 · Mean difference (net): 18.5
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.17 · Mean difference (net): 30.0
SecondaryChange in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 20

Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes per day
Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 20
Minutes per dayStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
MVPA per day with 10 minute bouts11.4 ± 4.08.8 ± 4.1
MVPA per day with 20 minute bouts10.5 ± 2.69.9 ± 2.7
Moderate activity per day10.6 ± 6.74.7 ± 6.7
Light activity per day-19.0 ± 14.23.8 ± 13.2
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.63 · Mean difference (net): 2.2
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.72 · Mean difference (net): 0.6
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.52 · Mean difference (net): 6.0
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.27 · Mean difference (net): -21.8
SecondaryChange in Energy Expenditure at Week 72

Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · Kcal
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 72
KcalStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 72314.8 ± 105.9307.5 ± 108.0
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.84 · Mean difference (net): 7.3
SecondaryChange in Energy Expenditure at Week 46

Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · Kcal
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 46
KcalStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 46148.7 ± 90.1260.4 ± 103.5
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.53 · Mean difference (net): -111.7
SecondaryChange in Energy Expenditure at Week 20

Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · Kcal
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 20
KcalStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 20452.5 ± 111.9289.3 ± 105.6
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.27 · Mean difference (net): 163.2
SecondaryChange in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 72

Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 72
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 72-9.4 ± 3.3-15.0 ± 3.2
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.22 · Mean difference (net): 5.7
SecondaryChange in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 46

Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 46
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 46-10.6 ± 3.2-15.9 ± 3.2
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.24 · Mean difference (net): 5.3
SecondaryChange in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 20

Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 20
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 201.1 ± 3.2-2.0 ± 3.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.48 · Mean difference (net): 3.2
SecondaryChange in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 72

Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 72
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 726.5 ± 2.51.7 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.16 · Mean difference (net): 4.9
SecondaryChange in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 46

Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 46
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 465.8 ± 2.4-1.0 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.045 · Mean difference (net): 6.8
SecondaryChange in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 20

Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 20
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 2012.3 ± 2.48.6 ± 2.3
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.27 · Mean difference (net): 3.7
SecondaryChange in Triglycerides at Week 72

Estimated mean change in triglyceride concentration in blood

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in Triglycerides at Week 72
mg/dLStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Triglycerides at Week 72-9.9 ± 6.4-13.7 ± 6.8
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.72 · Mean difference (net): 3.9
SecondaryChange in Triglycerides at Week 20

Estimated mean change in triglyceride concentration in blood

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in Triglycerides at Week 20
mg/dLStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Triglycerides at Week 20-10.9 ± 6.3-7.7 ± 6.5
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.67 · Mean difference (net): -3.3
SecondaryChange in Blood Pressure at Week 72

Estimated mean change in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure; mmHg)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Blood Pressure at Week 72
mmHgStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Systolic Blood Pressure-5.0 ± 1.7-5.6 ± 1.8
Diastolic Blood Pressure-1.9 ± 1.1-2.0 ± 1.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.80 · Mean difference (net): 0.6
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.94 · Mean difference (net): 0.1
SecondaryChange in Blood Pressure Week 20

Estimated mean change in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure; mmHg)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · mmHG
Change in Blood Pressure Week 20
mmHGStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Systolic Blood Pressure-9.7 ± 1.7-5.4 ± 1.6
Diastolic Blood Pressure-3.5 ± 1.1-3.6 ± 1.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.07 · Mean difference (net): -4.3
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.96 · Mean difference (net): 0.1
SecondaryChange in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 72

Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization).

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 72
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 72-1.7 ± 0.2-1.5 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.30 · Mean difference (net): -0.2
SecondaryChange in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 46

Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 46
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 46-1.5 ± 0.1-1.4 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.67 · Mean difference (net): -0.1
SecondaryChange in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 20

Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 20
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 20-1.4 ± 0.1-1.2 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.45 · Mean difference (net): -0.2
Secondary"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 72

Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 72
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 722826
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.38 · Odds ratio (or): 1.7 · 95% CI 0.5 to 5.9
Secondary"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 46

Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 46
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 462425
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.95 · Odds ratio (or): 1.0 · 95% CI 0.3 to 3.3
Secondary"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 20

Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 20
ParticipantsStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 202526
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.99 · Odds ratio (or): 1.0 · 95% CI 0.3 to 3.1
SecondaryChange in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 72

Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 72
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
WSSQ-Total-9.7 ± 1.1-6.7 ± 1.1
WSSQ-SD-5.0 ± 0.7-3.8 ± 0.6
WSSQ-FE-4.7 ± 0.7-2.9 ± 0.7
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.06 · Mean difference (net): -3.0
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.06 · Mean difference (net): -1.8
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.19 · Mean difference (net): -1.2
SecondaryChange in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 46

Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 46
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
WSSQ-Total-8.5 ± 1.1-5.5 ± 1.1
WSSQ-SD-4.0 ± 0.7-2.8 ± 0.6
WSSQ-FE-4.5 ± 0.6-2.7 ± 0.6
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): -3.0
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.18 · Mean difference (net): -1.2
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.046 · Mean difference (net): -1.8
SecondaryChange in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 20

Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 20
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
WSSQ-Total-8.2 ± 1.1-5.5 ± 1.1
WSSQ-SD-4.6 ± 0.7-3.2 ± 0.6
WSSQ-FE-3.6 ± 0.6-2.3 ± 0.6
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.07 · Mean difference (net): -2.7
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.11 · Mean difference (net): -1.5
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.15 · Mean difference (net): -1.3
SecondaryTreatment Acceptability at Week 20

To assess treatment acceptability, participants in both groups rated (1-7) how acceptable and helpful the program was, how much they liked the program, and how satisfied they were; scores for these 4 items were averaged. Participants also rated (1-7) the BWL treatment, as well as the stigma intervention (i.e., BIAS component) or recipe exchange, on how helpful they found each component of the program, how much they liked the components, and how much they learned. Scores for these three items were averaged (1-7) separately for the BWL treatment, BIAS component, and recipe exchange. Participants rated how much they learned BWL scores, and how much they learned and used skills related to stigma (all averaged 1-7). Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Treatment Acceptability at Week 20
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Overall treatment acceptability6.4 ± 0.25.8 ± 0.2
BWL component acceptability6.1 ± 0.25.9 ± 0.2
BIAS vs recipe component acceptability6.1 ± 0.24.6 ± 0.2
BWL skill acquisition6.2 ± 0.25.6 ± 0.2
Stigma-related skill acquisition5.8 ± 0.24.9 ± 0.2
Stigma-related skill use4.1 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.04 · Mean difference (net): 0.6
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.35 · Mean difference (net): 0.3
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 1.5
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.01 · Mean difference (net): 0.6
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 1.0
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 0.7
SecondaryTreatment Acceptability at Week 72

To assess treatment acceptability, participants in both groups rated (1-7) how acceptable and helpful the program was, how much they liked the program, and how satisfied they were; scores for these 4 items were averaged. Participants also rated (1-7) the BWL treatment, as well as the stigma intervention (i.e., BIAS component) or recipe exchange, on how helpful they found each component of the program, how much they liked the components, and how much they learned. Scores for these three items were averaged (1-7) separately for the BWL treatment, BIAS component, and recipe exchange. Participants rated how much they learned BWL scores, and how much they learned and used skills related to stigma (all averaged 1-7). Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.

Time frame:
Week 72
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Treatment Acceptability at Week 72
score on a scaleStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Overall treatment acceptability6.1 ± 0.25.8 ± 0.2
BWL component acceptability6.0 ± 0.25.7 ± 0.2
BIAS vs recipe component acceptability5.9 ± 0.34.1 ± 0.3
BWL skill acquisition5.9 ± 0.25.6 ± 0.2
Stigma-related skill acquisition5.8 ± 0.25.0 ± 0.2
Stigma-related skill use3.8 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.24 · Mean difference (net): 0.3
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.28 · Mean difference (net): 0.3
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 1.8
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.34 · Mean difference (net): 0.3
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.008 · Mean difference (net): 0.8
  • Stigma + BWL Intervention vs Standard BWL Intervention · ANOVA · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (net): 0.6
Other pre-specifiedChange in Minutes of Sedentary Time at Week 72

Single item from Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Minutes of Sedentary Time at Week 46

Single item from Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Minutes of Sedentary Time at Week 20

Single item from Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (minutes)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 72

Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 20

Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Waist Circumference at Week 72
Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Waist Circumference at Week 20
Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Blood Glucose at Week 72

Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Blood Glucose at Week 20

Concentration in blood, controlling for medication use

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in C-reactive Protein at Week 72

Concentration in blood

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in C-reactive Protein at Week 20

Concentration in blood

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Stereotype Endorsement Scores at Week 72

Fat Phobia Scale (scores averaged 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Stereotype Endorsement Scores at Week 46

Fat Phobia Scale (scores averaged 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Stereotype Endorsement Scores at Week 20

Fat Phobia Scale (scores averaged 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Weight-related Quality of Life at Week 72

Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lite (total score and 5 subscales; t-scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Weight-related Quality of Life at Week 46

Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lite (total score and 5 subscales; t-scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Weight-related Quality of Life at Week 20

Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lite (total score and 5 subscales; t-scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Perceived Stress at Week 72

Perceived Stress Scale (total score 0-40; higher scores = greater perceived stress)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Perceived Stress at Week 46

Perceived Stress Scale (total score 0-40; higher scores = greater perceived stress)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Perceived Stress at Week 20

Perceived Stress Scale (total score 0-40; higher scores = greater perceived stress)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Depression Symptoms at Week 72

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (scores summed 0-27; higher scores = more symptoms of depression)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Depression Symptoms at Week 46

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (scores summed 0-27; higher scores = more symptoms of depression)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Depression Symptoms at Week 20

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (scores summed 0-27; higher scores = more symptoms of depression)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Body Image Scores at Week 72

Body Appreciation Scale (scores averaged 1-5; higher scores = greater body appreciation)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Body Image Scores at Week 46

Body Appreciation Scale (scores averaged 1-5; higher scores = greater body appreciation)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Body Image Scores at Week 20

Body Appreciation Scale (scores averaged 1-5; higher scores = greater body appreciation)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Presence and Frequency of Binge Eating at Week 72

Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (yes/no and episodes per week)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Presence and Frequency of Binge Eating at Week 46

Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (yes/no and episodes per week)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Presence and Frequency of Binge Eating at Week 20

Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (yes/no and episodes per week)

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Self-monitoring Behaviors at Week 72

Food records and self-report recording of food intake and physical activity

Time frame:
Baseline to week 72

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Self-monitoring Behaviors at Week 46

Food records and self-report recording of food intake and physical activity

Time frame:
Baseline to week 46

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedChange in Self-monitoring Behaviors at Week 20

Food records and self-report recording of food intake and physical activity

Time frame:
Baseline to week 20

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through week 72. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stigma + BWL Intervention0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)14/52 (26.9%)
Standard BWL Intervention0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)17/53 (32.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL Intervention
Viral gastroenteritisInfections and infestations3/527/53
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/525/53
Contact dermatitisProduct Issues4/522/53
MigraineNervous system disorders4/521/53
Knee painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/524/53
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/523/53

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
Mean48.96 ± 12.8649.15 ± 12.0549.06 ± 12.40
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
Female494695
Male3710
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
Hispanic or Latino033
Not Hispanic or Latino5250102
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American121426
White373774
More than one race303
Unknown or Not Reported000
Weight
Weight(kg)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
Mean104.39 ± 18.21104.48 ± 21.04104.44 ± 19.59
Height
Height(cm)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
Mean165.04 ± 7.13166.35 ± 7.87165.70 ± 7.51
Body mass index (BMI)
Body mass index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Stigma + BWL InterventionStandard BWL InterventionTotal
Mean38.23 ± 5.5937.48 ± 5.1637.85 ± 5.36
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Pennsylvania Center for Weight and Eating Disorders
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 10, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Aug 7, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03704064
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Rebecca L. Pearl, Ph.D. (Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 12, 2018
Start date
Oct 16, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 26, 2021
Completion
Aug 2, 2021
Results posted
Oct 31, 2022
Last update
Nov 2, 2022

Study contacts

Rebecca L Pearl, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion