CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03701269Updated Oct 10, 2018

Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Nonunion

An observational study in Orthopedic, sponsored by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-10.

Sponsored by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The treatment for scaphoid proximal pole nonunion remains challenging due to the poor vascularity in the proximal pole fragment, associated SL injury and the technique of fixation. Vascularized bone grafts and non-vascularized iliac bone graft have been used in patients with scaphoid proximal pole nonunion, but the indication has not been well clarified. Alternatively, we have been treating such patients with vascularized bone graft , or non-vascularized bone graft with screw or k-wire fixation with considerable success. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze retrospectively the surgical efficacy of our procedure.

Read the detailed description

Scaphoid nonunion are common and operative treatment with bone graft was reported to have good result. However, the treatment for proximal pole nonunion remains controversial. There are some patterns of pathoanatomy combined with scaphoid fracture, like SL ligament tears, which could not be easily identified or treated initially. The proximal pole nonunion was near SL joint. Therefore, proximal pole nonunion may result in DISI instability. Furthermore, proximal pole nonunion was identified as a poor prognostic factor in scaphoid nonunion.

In the past 10 years, we have some different technique, like VBG, arthroscopic bone graft to achieve good results. Some studies revealed that significantly better SL stability was achieved with ARASL. We also used ARASL with BG to improve proximal pole union. However, it is not clear which method would be appropriate for proximal pole nonunion. We retrospectively investigated the functional outcome and radiological results after at least 2-year follow-up to clarify the surgical efficacy of these procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Orthopedic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fracture
03

In context

Fractures, Ununited

54 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Ununited; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 100 across 19 observational studies indexed under Fractures, Ununited.

Browse Fractures, Ununited studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 325 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Using arthroscopic or open fixation combined with bone graft surgery for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) chronic nonunion (wrist pain for more than 3 months after injury) as defined by preoperative radiographs; and (2) combined positive SL instability measured by intraoperative arthroscopy exam test; (3) Grade I SNAC.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) skeletally immature patients; (2) previous wrist trauma or surgery.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score

    30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100

    Time frame: averaged 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiographic examination

    The union was defined as trabecular bridging across the fracture site

    Time frame: averaged 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei, 112, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03701269
Lead sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2018
Start date
Aug 14, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 13, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 13, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 10, 2018

Study contacts

Jung-Pan Wang, M.D.,ph.D
Contact
jpwang801@gmail.com
02-28757557 ext. 1125
Jung-Pan Wang, M.D.,ph.D
principal investigator · Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion