CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03674203Updated Jan 28, 2019

Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma in Treatment of Melasma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Melasma, sponsored by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-28.

Sponsored by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2017, registered Sep 2018).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The application of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) on three occasions with an interval of 15 days between each one, is related to a decrease in the intensity of the spots and improvement in the quality of the skin of patients with melasma.

Read the detailed description

832/5000 Objective: To evaluate the effect of PRP for Melasma treatment. Material and methods: Prospective cohort with therapeutic intervention. Patients, female, with melasma were included. Changes in the melanin concentration of the face (MASI), degree of satisfaction (MELASQOL) and histological changes were clinically evaluated.

The Sp-MELASQOL questionnaire, Fitzpatrick and MASI scales were applied, and photographs were taken with ambient light and with Wood's light with the Janus-II General Model. The patients were evaluated and classified, before and after the treatment by means of dermatoscopy, which was performed using a dermatoscope with polarized light (DermLite DL3N®), which allows an increase from 6 to 400X.

The dermatoscopy reported the findings of: Quantity, Density and Depth of melasma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Melasma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Platelet-rich plasma
03

In context

Melanosis

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanosis; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 139 interventional studies indexed under Melanosis.

Browse Melanosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social is the lead sponsor of 124 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Previous diagnosis of melasma
  • History of pregnancy with a time greater than 6 months
  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In lactation period
  • History of skin cancer
  • History of liver, thyroid diseases
  • With active acne lesions and traumatic lesions on the face
  • PRP pre-treatmentPre-treatment for melasma with less than 6 months
  • Hb values \<10 g / dL or platelet count \<105x109 / L
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Application of platelet-rich plasma

    The patients received three sessions of PRP application, at intervals of 15 days between each of them. It was applied by means of a 32G needle to introduce the PRP by means of superficial micro-injections via the mesotherapy technique (approximately 1.5-2.0 mm deep) and it was deposited in the papillary dermis of the rosotro.

    Biological: Platelet-Rich Plasma

Interventions

  • BiologicalPlatelet-Rich Plasma

    1 ml of PRP was distributed in the papillary dermis of the face, repeating the dose at 15 and 30 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the severity of melasma.

    First divide the face into four regions: front (F), right malar (MR), left malar (ML), and chin (CH), which corresponds to 30%, 30%, 30% and 10% , respectively, of the total area(A) of the face. Subsequently, the area involved in each region is evaluated, assigning values from 1 to 6, depending on whether it affects: less than 10%; 10 to 29%; 30 to 49%; 50 to 69%; 70 to 89%; or 90 to 100%. A score is also assigned according to the darkening of the pigmentation (D): absent (0); mild (1); moderate (2); marked (3) or maximum (4). Finally, following this same scale, a value is assigned according to the homogeneity of the pigmentation (H). The following equation is used to calculate this index: The Melasma Area and Severity Index= 0.3 (DF + HF) AF+ 0.3 (DMR + HMR) AMR + 0.3 (DML + HML) AML + 0.1 (DCH + HCH) ACH The range is 0-48, although it is strictly an aesthetic problem, the higher the score, the greater the affectation. This scale was applied before and after the treatment.

    Time frame: one year

  2. Comparison of histological analysis

    For this analysis, the obtained samples were fixed by 10% formalin and cuts of 6 μm were made. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was used for the visualization of melanophages in the dermis, cutaneous atrophy, solar elastosis and inflammatory infiltrate. Fontana-Masson stain to evaluate the pigmentation, focality of the pigmentation, distribution and absence of pigment in the papillary dermis. Biopsy was taken at the beginning of the study and at the end.

    Time frame: one year

  3. Type of melasma by dermatoscopy

    It was performed using a dermatoscope (DermLite DL3N brand) with polarized light. Pictures were taken, (with Canon Powershot G12 camera) of the most characteristic part of the lesion, either in front, cheekbones or jaw. The photograph was taken before and after starting the treatment of the same anatomical site on both occasions. The melasma was classified according to the depth in: epidermal (regular and brown pigment is appreciated), dermal (regularity is lost and a color between blue and gray is seen) and mixed (combinations of these two). Two researchers were in charge of performing the dermatoscopy and the qualitative measurement of it.

    Time frame: one year

  4. Amount of melasma by dermatoscopy

    Photographs were compared by dermatoscopy of the most characteristic part of the lesion before and after treatment. Categorizing these photographs in: 0 (without appreciable lesions), 1 (discolorations and slight presence of pigment), 2 (scattered pigment points) and 3 (pigment points together).

    Time frame: one year

  5. Density of melasma by dermatoscopy

    Photographs were compared by dermatoscopy of the most characteristic part of the lesion before and after treatment. Categorizing these photographs in: 1 (brown pigment), 2 (gray-blue) or 3 (dark brown / black).

    Time frame: one year

  6. Presence or not of telangiectasias.

    Photographs were compared by dermatoscopy of the most characteristic part of the lesion before and after treatment. In search of telangiectasias. Two researchers were in charge of performing the dermatoscopy and the qualitative measurement of it.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in the quality of life: Sp-MELASQOL

    Melasma Quality of Life scale (MELASQOL) is a useful and objective tool to assess the quality of life of patients. In this protocol, the Sp-MELASQOL will be used, since it is the version in Spanish validated by Domínguez and cols, for the Latin American population. Which consists of 10 questions, with a score for each question from 1 to 7 points, where 1 = never and 7 = always. The results range from 7-70 points, the higher the score indicated, the lower the quality of life presented by the patients. We compare the results obtained before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Western Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44340, Mexico
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03674203
Lead sponsor
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Responsible party
CLOTILDE FUENTES OROZCO (PhD, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 17, 2018
Start date
May 1, 2017
Primary completion
May 31, 2018
Completion
Jul 31, 2018
Last update
Jan 28, 2019

Study contacts

Clotilde Fuentes, pHD
principal investigator · Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion