CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03670212NSSUpdated Sep 13, 2018

Investigation of Nicotine Seeking Behavior in Current Smokers

A Phase 1 interventional study of Yohimbine Hydrochloride and Hydrocortisone in Cigarette Smoking, sponsored by Wayne State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-13.

Sponsored by Wayne State University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Oct 2016, 10 years ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 2 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Sep 2018).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, 21 non-treatment-seeking cigarette smokers were recruited to investigate the effects of acute stress on brain function and nicotine seeking/self-administration behavior.

Read the detailed description

Non-treatment-seeking cigarette smoking individuals were recruited from the Detroit, MI area. Individuals were screened for cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric contraindications. 21 healthy smokers completed two oral pre-treatment experimental sessions (on separate non-consecutive days) in randomized order under double-blind conditions: placebo (lactose) and stress (54mg yohimbine and 10mg hydrocortisone). Yohimbine + hydrocortisone elicit a neurochemical and physiological response that mimics a 'natural' stressor. Placebo and stress sessions were identical and started at 11am. Upon arrival, subject sobriety was confirmed with expired breath alcohol measurement (\<.02%). At 11:30am, each subject smoked 6 cigarette puffs (preferred brand; provided by study) over 5 minutes to control for recent nicotine exposure. Throughout each experimental session, subjects periodically completed self-reported measures of cigarette craving, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, affect, and anxiety, and vital signs were measured. Subjects self-administered (swallowed) oral doses of yohimbine (or placebo) at 11:45am and hydrocortisone (or placebo) at 12:15pm. At 1pm, subjects completed a 60-min neuroimaging scan which included: 1) T1-weighted structural scan, 2) proton functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) acquisition from the left prefrontal cortex during a letter 2-back working memory paradigm, and 3) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisition during an N-back paradigm yoked with cigarette cues. At 2:30pm, subjects completed an 11-trial choice progressive ratio task in which they could earn cigarette puffs (preferred brand; provided by study) or money. At 3pm, subjects self-administered earned cigarette puffs (video monitored). Subjects remained on site until 4pm discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cigarette Smoking

Keywords

  • cigarette smoking
  • acute stress
  • executive function
  • craving
  • nicotine seeking
  • relapse
  • excitatory neural activity
  • glutamate
  • negative affect
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wayne State University is the lead sponsor of 226 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (24%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    1. Aged between 21-35 years old, 2) current smokers (expired breath carbon monoxide > 4ppm, self-reported 10+ cigarettes/day, Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence score > 3, 3) normal seated and resting vital signs (systolic blood pressure 80-160mmHg, diastolic blood pressure 50-90mmHg, and heart rate 50-90 bpm), and 4) normal or corrected-normal vision.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Abnormal electrocardiogram (reviewed by licensed cardiologist), 2) magnetic resonance imaging contraindications (e.g. metal implants), 3) medical/neurological contraindications (e.g., diabetes or head trauma), 4) pregnancy (urine test; females only), 5) positive urine test result for opioids, cocaine metabolites, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, or amphetamines, 6) psychiatric contraindications (subject met criteria for current Axis 1 disorder [other than nicotine dependence] as indicated by computerized MINI-6 screen), and 7) self-reported marijuana and/or alcohol use on 15+ days in the past month.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The placebo compound, Lactose Monohydrate Powder, was encapsulated in generic opaque capsules identical to the capsules used in the acute stress session. During the placebo session, two capsules were self-administered (swallowed) by each subject. At 11:45am, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 54mg of lactose. At 12:15pm, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 10mg of lactose.

    Drug: Lactose Monohydrate Powder

  • Experimental
    Acute Stress

    During the acute stress experimental session, subjects self-administered two generic opaque capsules. At 11:45am, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 54mg of Yohimbine Hydrochloride powder. At 12:15pm, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 10mg of Hydrocortisone.

    Drug: Yohimbine Hydrochloride · Drug: Hydrocortisone

Interventions

  • DrugYohimbine Hydrochloride

    54mg of yohimbine powder was encapsulated in a generic opaque capsule and swallowed with water.

    Also known as: YOH

  • DrugHydrocortisone

    10mg hydrocortisone was encapsulated in a generic opaque capsule and swallowed with water.

    Also known as: HYD

  • DrugLactose Monohydrate Powder

    Lactose powder was encapsulated in generic opaque capsules identical to those used during the acute stress session. Lactose doses weighed the same as the acute stress session doses (54mg and 10mg, respectively).

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cigarette puff vs. money choice task

    Participants could earn (via computer mouse 'clicks') money or cigarette puffs (preferred brand; provided by the study) across 11 independent choice trials. At the start of each trial, subjects selected either money or cigarette puffs on a computer screen. After each selection, subjects could earn one unit of that selection by satisfying the computer 'mouse' click requirement. The click requirement increased with each successive unit earned separately for cigarette puffs and money following a progressive ratio schedule (5, 12, 33, 100, 180, 340, 540, 835, 1220, 1660, and 2275 'mouse' clicks; identical schedule for both options and experimental sessions). Units were $0.25 money and 1 cigarette puff. Earned cigarette puffs were smoked at the end of the task and earned money was applied to the subject's study payment. The task was completed between 2:30pm and 3pm for each session.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Letter 2-back task

    Participants completed 5 blocks of a letter 2-back working memory task during proton functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy data acquisition from the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The 2-back task consisted of a neurochemistry normalization period (passive viewing of a 3Hz flashing checkerboard; 208s) and alternating periods of passive visual fixation (centered fixation cross; 32s) and letter 2-back (64s; 4s instructions \['2-back'\], 20 letters \[3s/letter; 500ms on screen; 2500ms blank screen\], 6 target letters). Changes in neurochemistry as quantified using LCModel were the primary outcome variable. 2-back response accuracy (% correct) and response latency (ms) were secondary outcomes.

    Time frame: 12 minutes

  2. Cigarette-cued letter N-back task

    Participants completed a neutral image vs. cigarette smoking-related image cued letter N-back task during functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition. The task consisted of pseudo-randomly ordered blocks of 0-, 1-, and 2-back with either cigarette cues or matched neutral images behind each letter. Two 32s blocks of each task permutation were collected separated by 16s of blank screen (to minimize carry-over effects). Patterns of brain activation throughout the task was the primary outcome measure while N-back response accuracy (% correct) and response latency (ms) were secondary outcomes.

    Time frame: 15 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale

    Well-validated self-report measure of nicotine withdrawal symptoms was measured (MNWS; Hughes and Hatsukami, 1986). Subjects were asked to rate 15 adjectives describing common nicotine withdrawal symptoms on a 5-point Likert scale reflecting symptom severity during the past 10 minutes from 0='not present' to 4='severe'. Mean scores were calculated across items with higher values (maximum=4) reflecting greater withdrawal symptom severity and lower scores (minimum=0) reflecting less severe withdrawal symptoms.

    Time frame: 1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session

  2. Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges

    Well-validated self-report measure of subjective cigarette craving was measured (QSU; Cox et al., 2001). The self-report measure consists of 10-items with first-person statements describing one's desire to smoke a cigarette. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale: 1='strongly disagree' to 7='strongly agree'. Two sub-scales were considered separately; appetitive vs. relief-motivated craving. Sub-scales were quantified as a sum of items: higher scores reflected greater cigarette craving (both sub-scale scores range=5-35).

    Time frame: 1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session

  3. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

    Well-validated self-report measure of state anxiety symptoms was measured (STAI; Spielberger, 1985). Subjects were asked to rate 20 first-person statements describing one's anxiety at this moment from 1='not at all' to 4='very much so'. State anxiety was quantified as a sum across items with higher scores reflecting more anxiety (range=20-80).

    Time frame: 1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session

  4. Positive-Negative Affect Scale

    Well-validated measure of self-reported positive and negative affect was measured (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988). Subjects were asked to rate 20 adjectives on a 5-point Likert scale from 1='not at all or very slightly' to 5='extremely'. Two sub-scales were analyzed separately: positive vs. negative affect. Mean scores for each sub-scale were calculated and ranged from 1 to 5 with higher scores reflecting more positive or more negative affect.

    Time frame: 1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session

  5. Blood pressure

    Seated and resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP; mmHg) was measured.

    Time frame: 1 minute; collected six times throughout each experimental session

  6. Heart Rate

    Seated and resting heart rate (HR; bpm) was measured.

    Time frame: 1 minute; collected six times throughout each experimental session

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wayne State University
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cox LS, Tiffany ST, Christen AG. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Feb;3(1):7-16. doi: 10.1080/14622200020032051. PubMed 11260806 ↗
  • Spielberger CD. Assessment of state and trait anxiety: Conceptual and methodological issues. Southern Psychologist 2(4): 6-16, 1985.
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. PubMed 3397865 ↗
  • Hughes JR, Hatsukami D. Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;43(3):289-94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800030107013. PubMed 3954551 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03670212
Lead sponsor
Wayne State University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Eric Andrew Woodcock (Doctoral Candidate, Wayne State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2018
Start date
Jan 7, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2016
Completion
Oct 4, 2016
Last update
Sep 13, 2018

Study contacts

Eric A Woodcock, PhD
principal investigator · Wayne State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion