ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03665909Updated Oct 5, 2023

A Proactive Health Monitoring Intervention for Dementia Caregivers

An interventional study of Remote activity monitoring system in Dementia and Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-05.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2014, registered Sep 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
179
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this 5-year demonstration project is to build on the work of The Lutheran Home Association (TLHA) and conduct an embedded experimental mixed methods evaluation to determine the efficacy of the eNeighbor technology in improving outcomes among persons with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (ADRD) living in the community and their family caregivers. The Specific Aims are as follows: 1) To compare 100 ADRD caregivers randomly assigned to an attention control with 100 ADRD caregivers who utilize eNeighbor over an 18-month period to determine if the use of the remote sensor technology results in a) significant (p \< .05) increases in caregiver self-efficacy and sense of competence, b) significant decreases in caregiver distress (subjective stress, depressive symptoms), c) significant delays of or reductions in negative health transitions (falls, wandering events) and service utilization (residential care placement, hospitalizations) for persons with ADRD; and d) greater cost-effectiveness; 2) To determine through "embedded" qualitative data collection components how eNeighbor is successfully utilized and why this health monitoring technology benefits persons with ADRD and their family caregivers; and 3) To engage stakeholders on a quarterly basis throughout this 5-year demonstration project in order to enhance the utility and stakeholder-relevance of health monitoring technology for families who care for persons with ADRD. The investigators anticipate that the successful completion of the project aims will position the eNeighbor as an innovative, stakeholder-centric service that offers robust support for family caregivers of persons with ADRD in the community.

Read the detailed description

In collaboration with a 15-member Community Advisory Board that includes community care providers, healthcare organizations, and ADRD caregivers themselves, the proposed 5-year project will build on the current efforts of The Lutheran Home Association (TLHA) to evaluate eNeighbor remote monitoring technology for persons with ADRD living in the community and their family caregivers. The Specific Aims are as follows:

  1. To determine the efficacy of remote sensor technology over an 18-month period for 100 persons with ADRD and their caregivers randomly assigned to an eNeighbor treatment condition when compared to 100 usual care controls. The investigators hypothesize:

    Hx. 1) Significant (p \< .05) improvements in caregiver self-efficacy and sense of competence in managing a relative's ADRD; Hx. 2) Significant reductions in caregiver distress (e.g., subjective stress, or feelings of emotional fatigue and role entrapment; depressive symptoms); Hx. 3) Significant delay of or reductions in health transitions (falls, wandering) and service utilization (hospitalizations, nursing home admission) for persons with ADRD; and Hx. 4) Greater cost-effectiveness associated with a person with ADRD's health service use.

  2. To "embed" evaluation components: a) during the randomized controlled evaluation through the administration of open-ended survey items to all ADRD caregivers in the eNeighbor treatment condition every 6 months to examine the utility of the remote health monitoring technology; and b) at the conclusion of the 18-month evaluation by purposively sampling 15 ADRD caregivers who reported positive acceptance on the embedded qualitative and quantitative 6-, 12-, and 18-month system reviews and 15 ADRD caregivers who reported low acceptance on the embedded qualitative and quantitative 6-, 12-, and 18-month system reviews to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interviews will help the research team determine why the health monitoring intervention was or was not efficacious; and
  3. To engage stakeholders on a quarterly basis throughout the 5-year project with the goal of enhancing the utility (via community-based participatory approaches) and stakeholder-relevance of eNeighbor implementation and evaluation for family caregivers of persons with ADRD.
02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia
  • Alzheimer Disease
03

In context

Dementia

2,230 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 549 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 179 is above the median of 83 across 1,669 interventional studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,210 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 133 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The person with ADRD must be English speaking;
  • The person with ADRD must have a physician diagnosis of ADRD (Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body disease, fronto-temporal dementia, or stroke/vascular dementia; mild cognitive impairment only)
  • The person with ADRD must not be currently receiving care or case management services;
  • The person with ADRD must be 55 years of age and over;
  • The caregiver of persons with ADRD must be English speaking;
  • The caregiver of persons with ADRD must be 21 years of age and over;
  • The caregiver of persons with ADRD must self-identify as someone who provides help to the person with ADRD because of their cognitive impairments;
  • The caregiver of persons with ADRD must self-identify as the person most responsible for providing hands-on care to the person with ADRD;
  • The caregiver of persons with ADRD must plan to remain in the area for at least 18 months in order to reduce possible loss to follow-up; and
  • The caregiver of persons with ADRD must indicate a willingness to use eNeighbor.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION

● Those who do not meet the above inclusion criteria.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
179 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Remote activity monitoring

    Receive the remote activity monitoring system (i.e., "eNeighbor;" see intervention description) over an 18-month period.

    Other: Remote activity monitoring system

  • No intervention
    Control

    Control participants do not receive the remote activity monitoring intervention.

Interventions

  • OtherRemote activity monitoring system

    The home-based sensor technology of eNeighbor relies on multiple, non-invasive and safe remote monitors (up to 6 sensors) that can alert family caregivers and/or health professionals to potentially negative situations that lead to adverse outcomes (e.g., wandering, falls, incomplete activity of daily living tasks). The technology platform of eNeighbor relies on wireless infrastructure that allows for remote monitoring via alerts that are communicated to the family caregiver's or nurse care manager's personal computers or handheld devices. The Alerts that are generated from the sensors detected abnormal motion or activity are sent to the family caregiver as well as a nurse care manager that monitors the real-time information generated by the eNeighbor sensors.

    Also known as: eNeighbor

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nursing home utilization at 18 months for the person with ADRD

    Caregiver report of nursing home use at 18 months.

    Time frame: 18-months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceptions of change in caregiver self-efficacy

    An 8-item survey measure of caregiver self-efficacy. Item responses range from 1 "very unconfident" to 5 "very confident." Scores are summed and can range from a score of 1 (low self-efficacy) to 40 (high self-efficacy).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  2. Perceptions of change in caregiver competence

    The 7-item Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ), which assesses individuals' sense of capability in providing assistance to a relative with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias via survey report. Item responses range from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Item responses are summed, with a total score range of 5 to 35.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  3. Perceptions of change in caregiver burden

    The 22-item Zarit Burden Interview self-report survey measure. Item responses range from 0 "never" to 4 "nearly always." Scores are summed and can range from a score of 0 (no burden) to 88 (high burden).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  4. Perceptions of change in caregiver role captivity

    The 4-item role captivity measure assesses the involuntary aspects of the caregiving role. Item responses range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much." The total role captivity score is the sum of item responses with a range of 4 (no role captivity) to 16 (high role captivity).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  5. Change in caregiver role overload

    The 3-item role overload survey measure ascertains caregivers' feelings of emotional and physical fatigue. Item responses range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much." The total role overload score is the sum iof item responses with a range of 4 (no role overload) to 16 (high role overload).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  6. Change in frequency/perceptions caregiver depressive symptom severity

    The 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) survey measure is used to assess caregivers' depressive symptoms. Item responses range from 1 = "Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day)" to 5 = "Most of the time (5-7 days)." The total CES-D score is summed, with a range of 20 (little to no depressive symptoms) to 100 (frequent depressive symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  7. Perceived acceptability/utility of remote activity monitoring at 6-, 12-, and 18-months

    The Remote Activity Monitoring Review Checklist is administered to caregiving participants in the treatment condition at the 6-month, 12-month and 18-month follow-up survey intervals. The checklist consists of 21 self-report survey Likert scale items. Item responses range from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The total checklist score is averaged, with a score of 1 = the remote activity monitoring system was not well-received/accepted to 5 = the remote activity monitoring system was very well received/accepted.

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitchell LL, Peterson CM, Rud SR, Jutkowitz E, Sarkinen A, Trost S, Porta CM, Finlay JM, Gaugler JE. "It's Like a Cyber-Security Blanket": The Utility of Remote Activity Monitoring in Family Dementia Care. J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):86-98. doi: 10.1177/0733464818760238. Epub 2018 Mar 4. PubMed 29504488 ↗
  • Zmora R, Mitchell LL, Bustamante G, Finlay J, Nkimbeng M, Gaugler JE. Dementia Caregivers' Experiences and Reactions to Remote Activity Monitoring System Alerts. J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):13-20. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20201208-03. PubMed 33377980 ↗
  • Gaugler JE, Zmora R, Mitchell LL, Finlay JM, Peterson CM, McCarron H, Jutkowitz E. Six-Month Effectiveness of Remote Activity Monitoring for Persons Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: An Experimental Mixed Methods Study. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):78-89. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny078. PubMed 29982413 ↗
  • Gaugler JE, Zmora R, Mitchell LL, Finlay J, Rosebush CE, Nkimbeng M, Baker ZG, Albers EA, Peterson CM. Remote activity monitoring for family caregivers of persons living with dementia: a mixed methods, randomized controlled evaluation. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02634-8. PubMed 34922475 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 20, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2014 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 71 months.

Of 835 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dementia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43. This study's 71 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 875 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2018
First posted
Sep 11, 2018
StartActual
Apr 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
Mar 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Apr 8, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03665909
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2014
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2020
Completion
Apr 8, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion