ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03656744Updated Aug 25, 2026Results posted

A Study of HTD1801 in Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

A Phase 2 interventional study of HTD1801 and Placebo in Fatty Liver, Nonalcoholic, NAFLD and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, sponsored by HighTide Therapeutics (Hong Kong) Limited. Completed at 17 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by HighTide Therapeutics (Hong Kong) Limited · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study comparing multiple doses of HTD1801 to placebo.

Read the detailed description

This 18-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, proof of concept (POC), dose-ranging study compared multiple doses of HTD1801 to placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. Since accumulation of hepatic fat is considered the "first hit" in the pathogenesis of NASH (Adams and Angulo 2006), change in liver fat content (LFC) by magnetic resonance imaging estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) is an appropriate primary endpoint and is consistent with that used in other recent Phase 2 POC studies in NASH (Harrison et al., 2018, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals 2018).

The Harrison et al., 2018, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals 2018 study showed clinically meaningful absolute and relative reductions in LFC assessed by MRI-PDFF over 12-week treatment periods thus, it was considered that an 18 week HTD1801 treatment period would therefore be adequate to assess the study's primary endpoint and to maximize collection of exposure and safety related data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fatty Liver, Nonalcoholic
  • NAFLD
  • Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
  • Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
  • Digestive System Diseases
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
03

In context

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

1,617 studies on the registry are indexed under Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; 324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 101 is above the median of 60 across 1,176 interventional studies indexed under Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Browse Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

HighTide Therapeutics (Hong Kong) Limited is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of NASH as assessed by MRI
  • Clinically documented diagnosis of T2DM
  • (BMI) >25 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Liver disease unrelated to NASH
  • Poorly controlled T2DM or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence
  • Inability to undergo MRI for any reason
  • History of significant cardiovascular disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    500mg HTD1801, bid

    Drug: HTD1801

  • Experimental
    1000mg HTD1801, bid

    Drug: HTD1801

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo, bid

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • HTD1801 tablets, 250mg

  • DrugPlacebo

    tablets manufactured to mimic HTD1801 tablets

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    The primary endpoint was the absolute change in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Fasting Glucose

    Change in fasting glucose from Baseline to Week 18 .

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

  2. Changes in Hemoglobin A1c

    Changes in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  3. Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 30% Relative Reduction in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Proportion of subjects who achieved ≥ 30% relative reduction in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  4. Relative Change in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Relative change in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  5. Number of Subjects Who Normalized LFC to <5% as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Number of subjects who normalized liver fat content (LFC) to \<5% as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

  6. Number of Subjects Who Achieved ≥5% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Number of subjects who achieved ≥5% absolute reduction in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

  7. Change in HOMA-IR

    Change in homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) from Baseline to Week 18. The higher the HOMA-IR score, the more insulin resistant a person is. Values of \<1 are considered optimal while values \>2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  8. Change in LDL-c

    Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline visit through study week 18

  9. Change in Serum Triglycerides

    Change in serum triglycerides from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  10. Change in HDL-c

    Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  11. Change in AST

    Absolute change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  12. Change in ALT

    Absolute change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  13. Proportion of Subjects With Elevated ALT at Baseline Who Normalized ALT at Week 18

    Proportion of subjects with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at Baseline who normalized ALT at Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  14. Change in Pro-Peptide of Type III Collagen (Pro-C3)

    Change in Pro-C3 from Baseline to Week 18 for subjects with elevated Pro-C3 at Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  15. Change in ELF Score

    Change in the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. The ELF score is calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers, including TIMP-1, PIIINP, and HA. The ELF score has been reported to show good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease, with higher ELF scores associated with higher fibrosis stages. The ELF score is hence used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \< 9.8 : Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \< 11.3 : Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \> = 11.3 : High risk of progression.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  16. Change in TIMP-1

    Change in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  17. Change in PIIINP

    Change in N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (PIIINP) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  18. Change in HA

    Change in hyaluronic acid (HA) from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  19. Change in Total Bile Acids

    Changes in total bile acids from Baseline to Week 18.

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  20. Change in FGF19

    Change in fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) from Baseline to Week 18

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

  21. Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Events From Baseline Through Week 18

    AEs were mapped to MedDRA version 20.1 preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC). If the subject experienced multiple events that mapped to a single preferred term, the greatest severity grade according to CTCAE Version 4.0, and strongest investigator assessment of relation to study medication was assigned to the preferred term. If an event had a missing severity or relationship, it was classified as having the highest severity and/or strongest relationship to study medication. The occurrence of TEAEs was summarized by treatment group by SOC, PT, and severity. Separate summaries of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs related to study drug, severe or life threatening TEAEs, and TEAEs leading to the discontinuation of study treatment were generated. Additionally, the occurrence of liver-specific AEs was summarized by treatment group. All reported adverse events were listed for individual subjects showing verbatim term, PT and SOC.

    Time frame: Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent form through the date of the last visit for a specific subject, that is, approximately 24 weeks in total for a completed subject.

07

Results

Posted Dec 29, 2021
Limitations and caveats
The study was conducted exclusively in the United States and data may not be applicable to other populations. The study enrolled subjects with presumed NASH and diabetes. Further studies to determine the effect of HTD1801 in non-diabetics may be needed. Future studies will focus on patients with biopsy confirmed NASH and use liver histology (i.e., liver biopsies) as a histological endpoint.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Started343433
Completed292732
Not completed571
Withdrew: Adverse event141
Withdrew: Protocol violation100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up220
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject010
Withdrew: Randomized in error. did not start investigational product. considered an et.100

Outcome measures

PrimaryAbsolute Change in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF

The primary endpoint was the absolute change in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study Week 18
Reported as:
Mean · Change in percentage of liver fat
Absolute Change in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF
Change in percentage of liver fat500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Absolute Change in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF-2.918 ± 4.0204-4.829 ± 4.3516-1.962 ± 4.8844
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.199
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.011
SecondaryChange in Fasting Glucose

Change in fasting glucose from Baseline to Week 18 .

Time frame:
Baseline through study Week 18
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in Fasting Glucose
mg/dL500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in Fasting Glucose120 ± 28.6129 ± 42.5131 ± 40.9
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.152
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.109
SecondaryChanges in Hemoglobin A1c

Changes in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
Changes in Hemoglobin A1c
Percentage500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Changes in Hemoglobin A1c-0.3 ± 0.68-0.6 ± 0.960.1 ± 0.82
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.034
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.004
SecondaryProportion of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 30% Relative Reduction in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF

Proportion of subjects who achieved ≥ 30% relative reduction in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 30% Relative Reduction in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF
Participants500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 30% Relative Reduction in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF6107
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.884
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.236
SecondaryRelative Change in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF

Relative change in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage change
Relative Change in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF
Percentage change500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Relative Change in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF-15.097 ± 22.7749-24.140 ± 21.7020-8.322 ± 24.4804
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.196
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.016
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Normalized LFC to <5% as Measured by MRI-PDFF

Number of subjects who normalized liver fat content (LFC) to \<5% as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study Week 18
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects Who Normalized LFC to <5% as Measured by MRI-PDFF
Participants500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Number of Subjects Who Normalized LFC to <5% as Measured by MRI-PDFF100
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.294
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Achieved ≥5% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF

Number of subjects who achieved ≥5% absolute reduction in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study Week 18
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects Who Achieved ≥5% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF
Participants500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Number of Subjects Who Achieved ≥5% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF10128
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.287
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.090
SecondaryChange in HOMA-IR

Change in homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) from Baseline to Week 18. The higher the HOMA-IR score, the more insulin resistant a person is. Values of \<1 are considered optimal while values \>2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in HOMA-IR
score on a scale500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in HOMA-IR-3.38 ± 6.779-4.21 ± 7.074-6.66 ± 17.752
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.201
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.534
SecondaryChange in LDL-c

Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline visit through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in LDL-c
mg/dL500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in LDL-c5 ± 34.1-16 ± 26.50 ± 20.5
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.955
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.072
SecondaryChange in Serum Triglycerides

Change in serum triglycerides from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in Serum Triglycerides
mg/dL500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in Serum Triglycerides-41 ± 136.3-24 ± 70.418 ± 142.9
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.041
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.120
SecondaryChange in HDL-c

Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in HDL-c
mg/dL500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in HDL-c1 ± 5.70 ± 8.20 ± 7.5
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.955
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.072
SecondaryChange in AST

Absolute change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Change in AST
U/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in AST0 ± 13.2-13 ± 26.3-3 ± 11.6
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.488
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.022
SecondaryChange in ALT

Absolute change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Change in ALT
U/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in ALT-4 ± 17.9-19 ± 27.2-3 ± 19.2
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.674
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.030
SecondaryProportion of Subjects With Elevated ALT at Baseline Who Normalized ALT at Week 18

Proportion of subjects with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at Baseline who normalized ALT at Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Subjects With Elevated ALT at Baseline Who Normalized ALT at Week 18
Participants500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Proportion of Subjects With Elevated ALT at Baseline Who Normalized ALT at Week 18395
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.588
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.103
SecondaryChange in Pro-Peptide of Type III Collagen (Pro-C3)

Change in Pro-C3 from Baseline to Week 18 for subjects with elevated Pro-C3 at Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Change in Pro-Peptide of Type III Collagen (Pro-C3)
ng/mL500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in Pro-Peptide of Type III Collagen (Pro-C3)0.5 ± 5.17-2.3 ± 7.09-0.8 ± 2.94
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.236
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.944
SecondaryChange in ELF Score

Change in the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. The ELF score is calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers, including TIMP-1, PIIINP, and HA. The ELF score has been reported to show good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease, with higher ELF scores associated with higher fibrosis stages. The ELF score is hence used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \< 9.8 : Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \< 11.3 : Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \> = 11.3 : High risk of progression.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in ELF Score
score on a scale500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in ELF Score0.05 ± 0.723-0.10 ± 0.592-0.05 ± 0.461
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.267
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.911
SecondaryChange in TIMP-1

Change in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · µg/L
Change in TIMP-1
µg/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in TIMP-11.8 ± 53.26-8.9 ± 57.32-6.0 ± 31.55
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.387
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.855
SecondaryChange in PIIINP

Change in N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (PIIINP) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · µg/L
Change in PIIINP
µg/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in PIIINP0.68 ± 2.9050.03 ± 3.360-0.31 ± 2.016
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.107
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.489
SecondaryChange in HA

Change in hyaluronic acid (HA) from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · µg/L
Change in HA
µg/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in HA-0.64 ± 35.398-5.25 ± 34.046-3.83 ± 49.844
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.515
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.887
SecondaryChange in Total Bile Acids

Changes in total bile acids from Baseline to Week 18.

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · μmol/L
Change in Total Bile Acids
μmol/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in Total Bile Acids1307 ± 1432.61625 ± 2332.2-581 ± 1487.4
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.003
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.016
SecondaryChange in FGF19

Change in fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) from Baseline to Week 18

Time frame:
Baseline through study week 18
Reported as:
Mean · μmol/L
Change in FGF19
μmol/L500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Change in FGF19-11 ± 111.8-9 ± 71.1-40 ± 84.8
Statistical analysis
  • 500mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.124
  • 1000mg HTD1801, Bid vs Placebo, Bid · ANCOVA · p = 0.171
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting an Adverse Events From Baseline Through Week 18

AEs were mapped to MedDRA version 20.1 preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC). If the subject experienced multiple events that mapped to a single preferred term, the greatest severity grade according to CTCAE Version 4.0, and strongest investigator assessment of relation to study medication was assigned to the preferred term. If an event had a missing severity or relationship, it was classified as having the highest severity and/or strongest relationship to study medication. The occurrence of TEAEs was summarized by treatment group by SOC, PT, and severity. Separate summaries of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs related to study drug, severe or life threatening TEAEs, and TEAEs leading to the discontinuation of study treatment were generated. Additionally, the occurrence of liver-specific AEs was summarized by treatment group. All reported adverse events were listed for individual subjects showing verbatim term, PT and SOC.

Time frame:
Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent form through the date of the last visit for a specific subject, that is, approximately 24 weeks in total for a completed subject.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Events From Baseline Through Week 18
Participants500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Events From Baseline Through Week 18212620

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent form through the date of the last visit for a specific subject, that is, approximately 24 weeks for a completed subject.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
500mg HTD1801, Bid0/33 (0%)1/33 (3%)21/33 (63.6%)
1000mg HTD1801, Bid0/34 (0%)1/34 (2.9%)26/34 (76.5%)
Placebo, Bid0/33 (0%)1/33 (3%)20/33 (60.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/331/340/33
Bladder transitional cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/330/341/33
Decreased oxygen saturationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/331/340/33
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, Bid
Gastrointestinal DisordersGastrointestinal disorders14/3319/3410/33
Infections and InfestationsInfections and infestations4/335/3411/33
Nervous system disordersNervous system disorders3/335/343/33
Respiratory disordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/331/343/33
General DisordersGeneral disorders2/333/340/33
Metabolic disordersMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/332/342/33
InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/330/342/33
Skin disordersSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/332/341/33
Endocrine DisordersEndocrine disorders0/332/340/33

Baseline characteristics

One-hundred one subjects were randomized into the study, however, subject did not receive investigational study drug and was not included in the efficacy or safety analyses data sets.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, BidTotal
Mean58 ± 10.253 ± 12.258 ± 10.756 ± 11.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, BidTotal
Female26242272
Male7101128
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, BidTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian1102
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American3205
White29313191
More than one race0022
Unknown or Not Reported0000
All Randomized Subjects
All Randomized Subjects(Participants)500mg HTD1801, Bid1000mg HTD1801, BidPlacebo, BidTotal
Disposition333433100
Eligible Subjects32333398
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • Institute for Liver Health
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Institute for Liver Health
    Tucson, Arizona 85711, United States
  • Adobe Clinical Research
    Tucson, Arizona 85712, United States
  • National Research Institute
    Panorama City, California 91402, United States
  • Excel Medical Clinical Trials
    Boca Raton, Florida 33434, United States
  • Florida Research Institute
    Lakewood Rch, Florida 34211, United States
  • Compass Research
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Kansas City Research Institute
    Kansas City, Missouri 64131, United States
  • Cumberland Research Associates
    Fayetteville, North Carolina 28304, United States
  • Gastro One
    Germantown, Tennessee 38138, United States
  • Digestive Health Research
    Hermitage, Tennessee 37076, United States
  • Pinnacle Clinical Research
    Austin, Texas 78746, United States
  • Doctors Hospital at Renaissance
    Edinburg, Texas 78539, United States
  • Pinnacle Clinical Research
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants
    Southlake, Texas 76092, United States
  • Harborview Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • University of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Harrison SA, Gunn N, Neff GW, Kohli A, Liu L, Flyer A, Goldkind L, Di Bisceglie AM. A phase 2, proof of concept, randomised controlled trial of berberine ursodeoxycholate in patients with presumed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 17;12(1):5503. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25701-5. PubMed 34535644 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03656744
Lead sponsor
HighTide Therapeutics (Hong Kong) Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2018
Start date
Nov 26, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2020
Completion
Mar 9, 2020
Results posted
Dec 29, 2021
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Adrian Di Bisceglie, MD,FACP,FAASLD
study director · HighTide Therapeutics USA, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Berberine ursodeoxycholate

Start the discussion