CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03656679Updated May 3, 2021

Paravertebral Versus Pectoralis Block for Post Mastectomy Pain

An interventional study of Pectoralis Blockade (PECs) and Paravertebral Blockade in Pain, Postoperative, Post-Mastectomy Chronic Pain Syndrome and Opioid Use, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-03.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
insufficient participant population per COVID-19
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Post-mastectomy pain affects more than half of patients undergoing the procedure and can last for years. It has been well established that development of chronic pain is related to experienced pain in the perioperative period. This study therefore aims to assess if both acute and chronic post-operative mastectomy pain can be better managed by a novel regional anesthesia nerve block known as the pectoralis block (PECs). The PECs block is easier for patients to position for placement, has less risk of harm to nearby structures, and less risk for systemic uptake of local anesthetic in comparison to the paravertebral block. The PECs block has a strong safety profile. Standard of care at University of Wisconsin (UW) hospital is to utilize regional anesthesia for post op pain management. While PVB is performed on a regular basis at UW per surgeon request, Surgeon can request for PECS block in patients where a PVB was contraindicated (ie. coagulation issues). PECS is in fact the standard of care at other hospitals. This study will assess outcomes in the post anesthetic care unit (PACU), post-operative day 1, 7 and 30.

Read the detailed description

Post-mastectomy pain occurs in up to 55% of patients and can last for months. The development of chronic pain is related to experienced perioperative pain. The development of chronic pain is related to experienced perioperative pain. There is great potential to enhance the quality of life for breast surgery patients if the hospital can improve our perioperative pain prevention techniques. New to the spectrum of multimodal analgesia is the pectoralis block (PECs), which provides anesthesia to the anterior and anterior lateral chest wall as well to the axilla. This study is about aims to compare the pectoralis block to paravertebral block with benefits of ease placement, less risk for harm to nearby structures including pneumothorax, spinal cord trauma, sympathetic block and hypotension.

Literature reveals that the pectoralis block has provided improved pain scores as well as decreases post-operative nausea and vomiting, longer block duration, and subsequent pain relief in patient. Despite these promising preliminary studies, there remains a paucity on the effectiveness of the PECs Block, particularly regarding long term outcomes for patients.

Furthermore, there is no literature to date which has evaluated the best regional anesthetic technique for patients who receive breast tissue expanders, which can cause a significant amount of muscle pain and spasm due to the intended muscle disruption during surgical placement. The primary outcomes of this study is to compare total opioid consumption during the post-surgical period limited to 24 hrs beginning at PACU admission between patients who receive bilateral pectoralis plane versus bilateral paravertebral blocks and subsequently undergo bilateral mastectomy with tissue expanders.

The secondary outcomes includes post-operative pain scores on PACU arrival and discharge, post-operative days (POD) 1, 7, and 30, presence/absence of axillary pain, muscle relaxant consumption, presence of severity of muscle spasm, total antiemetic consumption 24-hrs beginning at PACU admission, presence of chronic opioid use (Defined as consumption at 30 days), time to perform block, and PACU duration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Post-Mastectomy Chronic Pain Syndrome
  • Opioid Use
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,161 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 151 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 114 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • The clinical decision has been made that the patient will have a bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander placement
  • The participant is ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years
  • Weight ≥ 60 kg and ≤ 90 kg
  • The participant's primary anesthesia care team has planned for general anesthesia
  • The participant agrees to receive a regional block
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1-3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or >80 years of age
  • \< 60 kg or > 90 kg
  • Non-English speaking
  • Known or believed to be pregnant
  • Participant is a prisoner
  • Participant has impaired decision-making capacity per discretion of the Investigator
  • Standard contraindications to regional blocks (coagulopathy including abnormal INR after discontinuation of warfarin, baseline INR (international normalized ratio) >1.5, platelets \<100,000, elevated PTT (prothrombin time), failure to discontinue anticoagulant medication, or infection at site)
  • Significant renal, cardiac or hepatic disease per discretion of the investigator
  • A clinical decision made that indicates need for a partial or complete axillary node dissection
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4-5
  • Known hypersensitivity and/or allergies to local anesthetics
  • Chronic Opioid Use (daily or almost daily use of opioids for > 3 months)
  • Participant refusal
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pectoralis Blockade(PECs)

    Participants undergo pectoralis nerve block (PEC II) will received anesthesia between the pectoralis major and minor in the chest while lying flat.

    Procedure: Pectoralis Blockade (PECs)

  • Active comparator
    Paravertebral Blockade (PVB)

    Participants undergoing paravertebral nerve block (PVB) consisting of receiving anesthesia in the back while sitting upright.

    Procedure: Paravertebral Blockade

Interventions

  • ProcedurePectoralis Blockade (PECs)

    Ten milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine with 2.5 mcg/ml epinephrine will be deposited between the pectoralis major and minor (PECs I) and 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 2.5mcg/ml epinephrine deposited between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscle.

  • ProcedureParavertebral Blockade

    10cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 2.5 mcg/ml epinephrine will be deposited at two levels (T3 and T5) per side while in the sitting position.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Opioid Consumption

    Primary outcome will be total opioid consumption in 24 hours for Paravertebral Nerve Block vs. Pectoralis Nerve Block.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. time to perform the block

    To compare the following perioperative variables (pre/intraoperative): time to perform the block.

    Time frame: 4 hours

  2. Pain score

    To compare the following perioperative variables: pain score at time of PACU, POD 1, 7 and 30

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Location of most severe pain

    To compare the following perioperative variables location of most severe pain at PACU, POD 1, 7 and 30

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Presence or absence of axillary pain

    To compare the following perioperative variables: presence or absence of axillary pain at PACU, POD 1, 7 and 30

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Presence and severity of muscle spasm

    To compare the following perioperative variables : presence and severity of muscle spasm at PACU, POD 1, 7 and 30

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Total muscle relaxant consumption

    To compare the following perioperative variables: total muscle relaxant consumption at PACU, POD 1, 7 and 30

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Total antiemetic consumption

    To compare the following perioperative variables: total antiemetic consumption at PACU and POD 1

    Time frame: 48 hours

  8. Time in PACU and hospital duration

    To compare the following perioperative variables : time in PACU and hospital duration

    Time frame: 48 hours

  9. Opioid consumption at POD 7 and 30

    To compare the following perioperative variables : Opioid consumption at POD 7 and 30

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03656679
Lead sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2018
Start date
Oct 18, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2020
Completion
Feb 28, 2020
Last update
May 3, 2021

Study contacts

Elizabeth Wilson, MD
principal investigator · Anesthesiology Department, University of Wisonsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, United States,53792.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion