An interventional study of PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish and SDF solution in Root Caries, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-05.
Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 4-monthly application of 10% povidone iodine solution followed by 5% sodium fluoride varnish with those of annual application of 38% silver diammine fluoride solution on the prevention of new dental root caries in elders. A secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of the two interventions mentioned above on arresting (halting the progression) active root surface caries in the elders, thus avoiding the need for placing dental restorations.
This proposed study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial with 24-month follow-up. A total of 353 elders aged 60 years or above living in residential homes or attending long-term care facilities in different districts in Hong Kong were recruited. Baseline clinical examination will be conducted by two calibrated examiners in the homes using an intra-oral LED light, dental mirrors and probes. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups:
The study population of this proposed clinical trial is adults aged 60 years and above living in residential care homes or attending long-term care facilities in Hong Kong. Totally, 10 residential care homes or long-term care institutions served by NGO dental outreach teams in various districts with different background were selected by the PI in consultation with the NGOs. All elders living in the selected residential homes were invited to attend a free dental examination. Elders fulfilling the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study and informed written consent will be obtained before commencement of the study. Dental treatments other than the study interventions were provided by dentists from the NGOs which serve the residential homes.
Totally, 353 elder adults enrolled in the trial. The baseline examination was carried out in the residential home by two calibrated examiners, and so will be as follow-up examinations after 12 and 24 months. A portable dental chair, an intra-oral LED light, disposable dental mirrors and CPI probes were used in the examination.
For each tooth that was not indicated for extraction, status of its crown and its root were assessed and recorded separately. Caries diagnosis was based on visual and tactile inspection. No radiograph was taken. Plaque and food debris that obscures visual inspection of the tooth surfaces were removed. Four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth were examined and the status were recorded using the following codes which basically follow the criteria recommended by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) Coordinating Committee (2009).
The oral hygiene status of the subject was assessed and recorded by using the Visible Plaque Index (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975). The presence or absence of visible plaque were recorded on four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth.
The gingival status of the subject was assessed and recorded using the Gingival Bleeding Index (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975). The presence or absence of bleeding within 10 seconds after running a probe across the gingival margin was recorded on four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth.
Other information that was recorded included whether the subject normally wears a removable partial denture or not, and the subject's general health status and medications that affect the saliva flow rate.
The same calibrated two examiners were blinded by the assignment of the participants. A random sample of 10% of the subjects were re-examined during each examination to monitor intra-examiner reproducibility.
At the examinations, the subjects were asked to report on their oral hygiene practices, use of fluoridated toothpaste and other topical fluoride agents, and use of dental services during the study period.
Oral health education talk and instructions on how to keep good oral hygiene were provided at baseline and every year to all the elders in the selected residential homes. Standard fluoride toothpastes with 1000-1500 ppm fluoride were provided free to all the elders in the selected residential homes over the 24-month study period.
After the baseline examination, subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria of the study were stratified into two groups according to the number of natural teeth with exposed root surfaces in their mouth, those with 12 or fewer teeth and those with 13 or more teeth. The subjects were assigned to one of the two study groups by a research assistant using a block randomization method with a block size of 6. The stratified randomization procedure will help to ensure that the numbers of teeth involved in the two study groups are balanced. The interventions for the two study groups were provided by other dentists and are described below:
Group 1 - plaque on the root surfaces of all teeth in the subject's mouth was removed and a 38% SDF solution (Saforide, Toyo Chemical, Japan ) was applied onto the root surfaces using a microbrush/applicator. This will be repeated every year.
Group 2 - plaque on the root surfaces of all teeth in the subject's mouth was removed and a 10% povidone iodine solution (Betadine, Mundipharma, Switzerland) was applied, then followed by application of a 5% sodium fluoride varnish (Duraflor, Medicom, Canada) using a microbrush/applicator. This will be repeated every 4 months.
39 studies on the registry are indexed under Root Caries; 14 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 353 is above the median of 62 across 35 interventional studies indexed under Root Caries.
Browse Root Caries studies →The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.
Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
4-monthly application of 10% povidone-iodine solution and 5% sodium fluoride varnish
Device: PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish
Annual application of 38% SDF solution
Device: SDF solution
4-monthly application of 10% povidone-iodine solution and 5% sodium fluoride varnish
Annual application of 38% SDF solution
new root caries found in clinical examination
development of new carious lesion on exposed tooth root as assessed in clinical examination where there is a soft decayed root surface on gentle probing with a blunt probe
Time frame: 24 months
arrested root caries found in clinical examination
in the follow-up clinical examination, there is arrest of active caries lesions that were present at baseline and found to be a hard root surface upon gentle probing with a blunt probe
Time frame: 24 months
Plan to share: No
Started Aug 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2020, 29 months after the start.
Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Root Caries, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 29 months is close to that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.