CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03636958Updated Jun 27, 2022

Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel in Combination in Glioma-refractory Epilepsy

An interventional study of Perampanel and conventional antiepileptic treatment in Refractory Epilepsy, sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Withdrawn at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-27.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
concomitant decision of the sponsor and the PI, lack of patients
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gliomas are primitive brain tumors frequently associated with epilepsy. In a significant number of these patients epilepsy is resistant to antiepileptic drugs. There are currently no recommendations for the management of these drug-resistant epilepsies associated with glioma. In addition, few studies have addressed the subject and no treatment appears to be superior to others in the literature for this indication. In addition, many antiepileptic drugs pose problems of tolerance or interaction with chemotherapy in these patients.

Fundamental studies on glioma-associated epilepsies have shown that there is a major dysregulation of glutamatergic systems involved in epileptogenesis and tumor growth. Targeting this glutamatergic system seems particularly interesting from a physiopathological point of view. Perampanel is a recent antiepileptic treatment with a novel mode of action targeting AMPA glutamate receptors. It has been shown to be effective in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. He has demonstrated his tolerance in these patients. He has obtained a marketing authorization and is therefore used in routine epileptology without serious problems of tolerance being reported. It is neither an inducer nor an enzyme inhibitor, avoiding the problems of interaction with chemotherapy and is used in a daily dose facilitating compliance.

Therefore, there may be specific antiepileptic efficacy of perampanel in patients with glioma. Nevertheless, the only current data is limited to a retrospective study of 12 patients.

The objective of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with glioma with drug-resistant epilepsy.

a prospective randomized study with two parallel arms: antiepileptic combination therapy with perampanel and antiepileptic combination therapy without perampanel (free choice of the practitioner). The main criterion of judgment will be the decrease of the monthly frequency of crisis. Secondary endpoints will assess tolerance, efficacy on responder rate (at least 50% decrease in seizure frequency), seizure severity (secondary generalization, loss of consciousness), and quality. patients' lives (quality of life questionnaires, side effects and anxiety / depression). The duration of participation per patient will be 23 weeks (6 weeks of baseline, 5 weeks of titration and 12 weeks of maintenance). The recruitment period will be 3 years. Investigators plan to recruit 120 patients.

In the context of no recommendation in the management of these patients, superior efficacy of perampanel compared with other antiepileptic drugs is expected. This would allow targeted treatment in this population and confirm the tolerance of this treatment in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Background: Gliomas are primitive brain tumors frequently associated with epilepsy. In a significant number of these patients epilepsy is resistant to antiepileptic drugs. There are currently no recommendations for the management of these drug-resistant epilepsies associated with glioma. In addition, few studies have addressed the subject and no treatment appears to be superior to others in the literature for this indication. In addition, many antiepileptic drugs pose problems of tolerance or interaction with chemotherapy in these patients.

Rational: Fundamental studies on glioma-associated epilepsies have shown that there is a major dysregulation of glutamatergic systems involved in epileptogenesis (= perpetuation of epileptic seizures) and tumor growth (Huberfeld and Vecht, 2016). Targeting this glutamatergic system seems particularly interesting from a physiopathological point of view. Perampanel is a recent antiepileptic treatment with a novel mode of action targeting AMPA glutamate receptors. It has been shown to be effective in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. He has demonstrated his tolerance in these patients. He has obtained a marketing authorization and is therefore used in routine epileptology without serious problems of tolerance being reported. It is neither an inducer nor an enzyme inhibitor, avoiding the problems of interaction with chemotherapy and is used in a daily dose facilitating compliance.

Therefore, there may be specific antiepileptic efficacy of perampanel in patients with glioma. Nevertheless, the only current data is limited to a retrospective study of 12 patients.

The objective of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with glioma with drug-resistant epilepsy.

The investigators want to perform a prospective randomized study with two parallel arms: antiepileptic combination therapy with perampanel and antiepileptic combination therapy without perampanel (free choice of the practitioner). The main criterion of judgment will be the decrease of the monthly frequency of crisis. Secondary endpoints will assess tolerance, efficacy on responder rate (at least 50% decrease in seizure frequency), seizure severity (secondary generalization, loss of consciousness), and quality. patients' lives (quality of life questionnaires, side effects and anxiety / depression). The duration of participation per patient will be 23 weeks (6 weeks of baseline, 5 weeks of titration and 12 weeks of maintenance). The recruitment period will be 3 years. The investigators plan to recruit 120 patients.

Expected benefits: In the context of no recommendation in the management of these patients, the investigators hope to demonstrate superior efficacy of perampanel compared with other antiepileptic drugs. This would allow targeted treatment in this population and confirm the tolerance of this treatment in these patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractory Epilepsy
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,805 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 417 are open to participants now.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient, male or female, over 18 years old

  • Glioma confirmed by histology
  • Not in progression (clinico-radiological criterion RANO, (Wen et al., 2014), see appendix 1)

    • No clinical worsening (excluding epileptic seizures)
    • No increase greater than 25% in contrast enhancement after gadolinium injection
    • No increase in the T2 / FLAIR hyper signal
    • Absence of new lesion
  • Diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy according to international epilepsy definitions (Fisher 2014 and Kwan 2010, see Appendices 2 and 3)

    o Repeated epileptic seizures despite testing of two effective dose antiepileptic drugs tried at least 3 months

  • With at least 2 attacks per month (to ensure visibility on the duration of the study of the antiepileptic effect, see below)
  • Patient with epileptic seizures not limited to only subjective signs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Minor
  • Impossibility of signing consent
  • No affiliation to a social security scheme (beneficiary or beneficiary)
  • Person in emergency,
  • Person of legal age subject to a legal protection measure (major under guardianship, guardianship or court order), or unable to express his or her consent
  • Patient with at least 2 generalized tonic-clonic seizures per month.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    control group

    they will receive conventional antiepileptic treatment (antiepileptic combination therapy) without perampanel

    Drug: conventional antiepileptic treatment

  • Experimental
    experimental group

    they will receive conventional antiepileptic treatment (antiepileptic combination therapy) with perampanel

    Drug: Perampanel · Drug: conventional antiepileptic treatment

Interventions

  • DrugPerampanel

    Perampanel is an antiepileptic with a novel mechanism of action as it targets post-synaptic AMPA receptors. It has been shown to be effective as adjunctive therapy (dual therapy) for partial / focal epilepsy seizures and generalized in patients over 12 years of age.

  • Drugconventional antiepileptic treatment

    choice of the molecule is left to the discretion of the clinician excluding the following benzodiazepines: clobazam, clonazepam, diazepam. Antiepileptic drugs allowed are therefore: lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lacosamide, sodium valproate, carbamazepine, oxcarbabazepine, slicarbazepine, pregabalin, gabapentin, topiramate, phenytoin, phenobarbital, zonisamide, vigabatrin.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numbers of crisis at baseline

    The monthly frequency of crisis

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Numbers of crisis under treatment

    The monthly frequency of crisis during treatment period

    Time frame: 5 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille
    Marseille, Paca 13354, France
  • Department of Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, Hôpital La Timone, APHM
    Marseille, 13385, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03636958
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 17, 2018
Start date
Feb 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2022

Study contacts

EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE
study director · APHM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion