ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03626753Updated Aug 15, 2018

Comparison of Two Routes of Administration of a Multimodal Analgesic Protocol in Postoperative Cesarean Section

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Nefopam 20 MG/ML and "Nefopam (Acupan)" 20 MG/ML Injectable Solution in Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Infection (Following Delivery), Postoperative Pain and Spinal Anaesthesia During the Puerperium, sponsored by Centre de Maternité de Monastir. Completed at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-15.

Sponsored by Centre de Maternité de Monastir · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2015, registered Jul 2018).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Many drugs with various mechanisms of action are used for postcaesarean pain relief. Although the response to pain relief is sometimes believed to be individual, it is very important to establish the most effective with the least adverse effects type of oral analgesia for women after caesarean section. Optimal pain control post-caesarean section will benefit not only the mother and her baby, but also a healthcare system. Optimal pain control may shorten the time spent in hospital after caesarean section and, therefore, reduce healthcare costs.

Read the detailed description

Pain after cesarean section (CS), usually described as strong, is an obstacle to good mother-child interaction and post-operative rehabilitation. Its management is important for a quick recovery and allow the mother to take care and link with her newborn. Currently, intrathecal opioids are the most commonly used technique and provide the foundation for post-cesarean analgesia. This technique combined with multimodal analgesia reduces the doses of morphine consumed, including these side effects. Spinal anesthesia is the standard anesthetic technique for caesarean section; it offers several advantages including the possibility of prescribing oral analgesics. An ideal analgesic protocol is one that is simple to implement, cost-effective, and has minimal impact on the work staff. It would have a good safety profile, a low incidence of side effects and complications, and respond to wide inter-patient variability. It relieves the mother of high quality pain while having minimal interference with her, newborn care and anesthesia while allowing safe breastfeeding.

The aim of this work is to compare the quality of an multimodal oral analgesia with intravenous analgesia and to demonstrate non-inferiority of the oral route pain relieve in postoperative caesarean section period. The secondary objectives was to evaluate the maternal tolerance of the drugs (piroxicam, nefopam, paracetamol) used postoperatively of a caesarean section.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Infection (Following Delivery)
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Spinal Anaesthesia During the Puerperium

Keywords

  • Pain
  • multimodal
  • analgesia
  • postoperative
  • cesarean section
  • obstetric
  • Agents
  • Physiological effects of drugs
  • opioid
  • Paracetamol
  • NSAIDs
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

2,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 441 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 70 across 1,424 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre de Maternité de Monastir is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant in singleton pregnancy with gestational age > 34 weeks
  • (ASA) physical status I-II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of gastrointestinal disorders predisposing to bleeding disorders such as ulcerative colitis,
  • Crohn's disease,
  • gastrointestinal cancers or diverticulitis,
  • an active peptic ulcer,
  • an inflammatory gastrointestinal disorder or a gastrointestinal haemorrhage,
  • parturients who present preeclampsia,
  • premature delivery (\<32 weeks),
  • constitutional or acquired coagulopathy,
  • An antecedent of hemorrhage of the delivery,
  • a hemorrhagic complication postoperatively,
  • Anemia ( less than 8g / 100ml),
  • conversion of spinal anesthesia into general anesthesia,
  • women with severe medical conditions: renal failure (preoperative \<30ml / min), heart or liver failure.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Oral Group

    received in post operative period oral analgesia ( "nefopam (Acupan)" 20mg/6h, "piroxicam (piroxan)" 40mg/24h," Acetaminophen (paracetamol)" 1g/6h)

    Drug: Nefopam 20 MG/ML · Drug: "Acetaminophen, (paracetamol)" 500Mg Tab · Drug: (Piroxicam "piroxan") 20 MG Oral Tablet

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous group

    received in post operative period intravenous analgesia ( "nefopam (Acupan)" 20mg/6h, "piroxicam (piroxan)" 40mg/24h," Acetaminophen (paracetamol)" 1g/6h)

    Drug: "Nefopam (Acupan)" 20 MG/ML Injectable Solution · Drug: (Acetaminophen "paracetamol") IV Soln 10 MG/ML · Drug: (Piroxicam "piroxan") 20Mg/1mL Injection

Interventions

  • DrugNefopam 20 MG/ML

    Drug page: Nefopam

    given by Oral route the dose of 20mg every 6 hours.

    Also known as: 2 ampoule

  • Drug"Nefopam (Acupan)" 20 MG/ML Injectable Solution

    Drug page: Nefopam

    given by intravenous route at the dose of 20mg every 6 hours.

    Also known as: 2 ampoule

  • 2 tablets of "Acetaminophen (paracetamol)" 500Mg Tab administrated orally every 6 hours.

    Also known as: 2 tablets

  • Drug(Acetaminophen "paracetamol") IV Soln 10 MG/ML

    Acetaminophen IV Soln 10 MG/ML, 1g paracetamol administrated intravenously every 6 hours.

    Also known as: 1 ampoule: 1g

  • Drug(Piroxicam "piroxan") 20 MG Oral Tablet

    2 tablets of "piroxicam (piroxan)" administrated orally once per 24 hours.

    Also known as: 2 tablets

  • Drug(Piroxicam "piroxan") 20Mg/1mL Injection

    2 ampoules of (piroxicam "piroxan") administrated intravenously once per 24 hours.

    Also known as: 2 ampoules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain

    from 0 - 10 (with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain imaginable) at rest and coughing or mobilization

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. morphine consumption

    morphine consumption

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative

  2. sides effects

    the occurrence of any undesirable effects related to the administration of any of the 3 drugs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, hypotension, sweating, convulsion, dryness of the mouth, tachycardia, palpitations, vertigo, allergic reactions)

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative

  3. postoperative complications

    The occurrence of a postoperative complication (postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, etc).

    Time frame: 24 hours post operative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre de Maternité de Monastir
    Monastir, 5000, Tunisia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mahajan L, Mittal V, Gupta R, Chhabra H, Vidhan J, Kaur A. Study to Compare the Effect of Oral, Rectal, and Intravenous Infusion of Paracetamol for Postoperative Analgesia in Women Undergoing Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):594-598. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.206872. PubMed 28928554 ↗
  • Mkontwana N, Novikova N. Oral analgesia for relieving post-caesarean pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 29;2015(3):CD010450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010450.pub2. PubMed 25821010 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2015 to primary completion in Jun 2015, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2018
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
StartActual
Jan 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2015
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2015
Last update
Aug 15, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03626753
Lead sponsor
Centre de Maternité de Monastir
Responsible party
Fethi Jebali (Medical doctor, clinical professor of Anesthesiology and intensive care medecine, Centre de Maternité de Monastir) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2015
Completion
Jun 30, 2015
Last update
Aug 15, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Nefopam · Acetaminophen

Start the discussion