CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03626272Updated Aug 13, 2018

Effects of the in Situ Simulation to Competencies in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Nursing Team.

An interventional study of educational intervention in Learning Disorders, sponsored by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-13.

Sponsored by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Introduction: In situ simulation is a methodology that meets the concept of permanent education, since it allows learning from the context of practice and in the work environment itself.

Objective: to compare the development of skills (knowledge and skills) for CPR between groups submitted to different in situ simulation periodicities, and to identify the level of confidence to participate in a CPR.

Method: A randomized controlled, non-blind study comparing 3 periodicities of educational intervention performed by in situ simulation. This study will include nursing professionals from the nephrology department of a university hospital. The sample will be composed of 24 randomized participants in the groups, using opaque envelopes for each periodicity of training and professional category, being subdivided into 3 groups of periodicities with intervals of 2, 4 and 8 months. The instruments will evaluate the knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the perception of preparation for performing the maneuvers.

Read the detailed description

The objective is to compare the development of skills (knowledge and skills) for CPR between groups submitted to different in situ simulation periodicities, and to identify the level of confidence to attend a CPR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Learning Disorders

Browse trials for

03

In context

Learning Disabilities

138 studies on the registry are indexed under Learning Disabilities; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 60 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Learning Disabilities.

Browse Learning Disabilities studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • They must be nurses and nursing technicians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not complete the evaluations
  • be under 18 years old
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    8-month intervals

    Participants will be submitted to the educational intervention with in situ simulation every 8 months.

    Other: educational intervention

  • Active comparator
    4-month intervals

    Participants will be submitted to the educational intervention with in situ simulation every 4 months.

    Other: educational intervention

  • Active comparator
    2-month intervals

    Participants will be submitted to the educational intervention with in situ simulation every 2 months.

    Other: educational intervention

Interventions

  • Othereducational intervention

    The simulation scenarios were constructed using the service environment, with real equipment and materials and a low fidelity mannequin. The interventions were not filmed, and the clinical cases elaborated were fictitious, with clear objectives and developed according to the context of the unit. The simulations took place during the working hours of the participants, with the expected duration of the 10 minutes (average) for the scenario, and the average duration of the debriefing was 10 minutes, which took place immediately after the simulation and in the same location of the scenario.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average number of hits in the test of knowledge on cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    Measurement of the average/median/standard deviation of hits in the questions of the knowledge test, in each group (A, B, C,). This measurement was performed in two moments: * Pre and post initial intervention: measure performed to evaluate the impact of the initial intervention on the participants' knowledge about the issue. * After simulation intervention: measurement performed to evaluate the impact of the simulation intervention on the maintenance of knowledge, according to the periodicity group of intervention where the participant was allocated. The measurement was applied to all groups at the same moments. The following tests were used to make comparisons among groups: Wilcoxon Test; Estimate of the size of the Cohen's d effect (paired data); Kruskal-Wallis Test - Dunn's Post Hoc; Cohen's d: Effect size measures by the " Cohen's d" method complemented by the Confidence Interval 95%.

    Time frame: up to eight months

  2. Average number of hits in the accomplishment of a set of skills.

    To compare, among groups exposed to the periodicity of different interventions, the average/median/standard deviation of hits in the accomplishment of a set of skills that matches the CPR procedures. Group A was evaluated when receiving the intervention every eight months, group B every four months, and group C every two months. The Kruskal-Wallis Test was applied to compare the significance of the average outcomes among groups.

    Time frame: Group A was evaluated when receiving the intervention every eight months, group B every four months, and group C every two months.

  3. Average agreement in the preparation for CPR

    To Measure the average/median/standard deviation, referring to the agreement level of preparation for the accomplishment of CPR, in order to check the impact of the intervention performed according to the periodicity of application. The following tests were used to make comparisons among groups: Wilcoxon Test; Estimate of the size of the Cohen's d effect (paired data); Kruskal-Wallis Test - Dunn's Post Hoc; Cohen's d: Effect size measures by the "Cohen's d" method complemented by the Confidence Interval 95%.

    Time frame: up to eight months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cleidilene Ramos Magalhaes
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03626272
Lead sponsor
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Responsible party
Cleidilene Ramos Magalhães (Principal Investigator, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion