ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03623880Updated Mar 30, 2023

Enhancing Behavioral Treatment for Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders

An interventional study of Unified Protocol and Supportive Therapy in Pelvic Floor Disorders, Anxiety and Urinary Urgency, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-30.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this proposal is to test a novel behavioral treatment - Unified Protocol Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (UP-CBT)1 - to enhance quality of life in women with pelvic floor disorders. Emotional distress is treatable using behavioral procedures, and effective treatment would increase women's emotional health and help to reduce urinary symptoms (e.g., incontinence, frequent urination). Women with pelvic floor disorders are often seen in the urogynecology clinic, which makes this setting ideal for offering additional interventions that may improve their quality of life. Unfortunately, many women with pelvic floor disorders may not receive effective behavioral treatment, such as cognitive behavior therapy, because urogynecologists and other medical professionals may not be aware of providers in their community who offer this treatment. The investigators will enhance treatment options by 1) providing evidence for an all-purpose cognitive-behavioral intervention (i.e., UP-CBT), 2) offering treatment in the urogynecology clinic, maximizing convenience, and 3) improving clinical outcomes for these patients.

Specific Aims:

  1. To demonstrate that UP-CBT is an effective form of therapy for women with lower urinary tract symptoms.
  2. To use baseline characteristics in moderation analyses to determine which women will be most likely to have a good response to therapy.
  3. To use mediation analyses to test a possible causal chain of events - Does treatment lead to lower anxiety, which in turn leads to fewer urinary symptoms?
02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Anxiety
  • Urinary Urgency
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Nocturia
  • Urinary Frequency/Urgency
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
  • Urinary Hesitancy
  • Urinary Straining
03

In context

Pelvic Floor Disorders

212 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Floor Disorders; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 63 across 148 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Floor Disorders.

Browse Pelvic Floor Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,423 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 105 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 78 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Presence of one or more of the following urinary symptoms in past 12 months and currently seeking treatment: frequency, nocturia, urgency, leakage, hesitancy, straining, or dribbling
  • Willing and able to provide
  • Anxious presentation and/or history of anxiety
  • English speaking
  • Willing to defer usual treatment for urinary problems

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Blood in the urine, positive urine culture, signs of infection
  • Pregnant, or 6 months or less postpartum
  • Psychosis, dementia, or other cognitive impairment that would preclude participation
  • Recent (within 6 months) pelvic or endoscopic surgery, urethral stricture, pelvic , current chemotherapy or other cancer therapy, pelvic device or implant complication
  • Recent (within 12 months) Botox injection to the bladder or pelvic structures
  • Currently in psychotherapy
  • Current alcohol or substance use disorder
  • Difficulty communicating in English
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Unified Protocol

    This is a type of CBT for emotional distress.

    Behavioral: Unified Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Supportive Therapy

    This is a commonly-used form of all-purpose psychotherapy, often used as a comparator in CBT clinical trials.

    Behavioral: Supportive Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralUnified Protocol

    The unified protocol is a form of cognitive behavior therapy focused on helping the person reduce emotional distress through cognitive changes and behavioral skills. Exercises included confronting emotional-driven behaviors and mindfulness activities.

  • BehavioralSupportive Therapy

    Supportive therapy seeks to improve self-esteem, aid the patient with problem solving, and provide structured support using empathetic listening.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Anxiety 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of anxiety symptoms. Min T Score = 40.3; Max T Score = 81.6. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Higher T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., greater number of anxiety symptoms).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  2. Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6)

    Self-report measure of urinary symptoms and bother. Scores are scale scores: mean value of items answered multiplied by 25; min scale score = 0; max scale score = 100. This scale score can be combined with the scale scores of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6) and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRAD-8) to form the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) summary score: add three scale scores together (range 0 to 300). Higher score indicates worse outcome (i.e., greater urinary symptoms and bother).

    Time frame: 3 months; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 (POPDI-6)

    Self-report measure of pelvic symptoms and bother. Sores are scale scores: mean value of items answered multiplied by 25; min scale score = 0; max scale score = 100. This scale score can be combined with the scale scores of the UDI-6 and CRAD-8 to form the PFDI-20 summary score: add three scale scores together (range 0 to 300). Higher score indicates worse outcome (i.e., greater pelvic symptoms and bother).

    Time frame: 3 months; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  2. Colorectal-Anal distress Inventory 8 (CRAD-8)

    Self-report measure of colorectal-anal symptoms and bother. Sores are scale scores: mean value of items answered multiplied by 25; min scale score = 0; max scale score = 100. This scale score can be combined with the scale scores of the POPDI-6 and UDI-6 to form the PFDI-20 summary score: add three scale scores together (range 0 to 300). Higher score indicates worse outcome (i.e., greater colorectal-anal symptoms and bother).

    Time frame: 3 months; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Depression 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of depression symptoms. Min T Score = 41.0; Max T Score = 79.4. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Higher T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., greater number of depressive symptoms).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  4. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Physical Function 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of physical function. Min T Score = 22.9; Max T Score = 56.9. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Lower T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., worse physical functioning).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  5. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Fatigue 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of fatigue. Min T Score = 33.7; Max T Score = 75.8. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Higher T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., greater fatigue).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  6. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of sleep quality and disturbance. Min T Score = 32.0; Max T Score = 73.3. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Higher T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., greater sleep disturbance).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of social role function. Min T Score = 27.5; Max T Score = 64.2. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Lower T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., greater difficulty participating in social roles/activities).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  8. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - Profile V2.0: Adult v1.0 - Pain Interference 4a T Score

    Self-report measure of pain interference with daily activities. Min T Score = 41.6; Max T Score = 75.6. Raw scores are summed, then converted to T Scores from a lookup table. Higher T scores represent a worse outcome (i.e., greater pain interference).

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  9. PROMIS Pain Intensity

    Self-report measure of average pain intensity. One item 0-10 numeric rating scale. Min score = 0, Max score = 10. Higher score represents worse outcome (i.e., greater pain intensity)

    Time frame: 1 week; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

  10. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    Single item self-report measure of patient perception of improvement in their urinary symptoms compared to before treatment. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Lower score represents better outcome (i.e., more improvement).

    Time frame: This item assess how the patient is "right now" compared to beginning treatment; Administered at baseline, mid-treatment (6 weeks), post-treatment (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Taple BJ, Griffith JW, Weaver C, Kenton KS. Enhancing behavioral treatment for women with pelvic floor disorders: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 3;17:100514. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100514. eCollection 2020 Mar. PubMed 31956723 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2020, 27 months.

Of 101 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pelvic Floor Disorders, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 31. This study's 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 107 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2018
First posted
Aug 9, 2018
StartActual
Sep 3, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 10, 2020
CompletionActual
Dec 10, 2020
Last update
Mar 30, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03623880
Responsible party
James W Griffith (Associate Professor, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2018
Start date
Sep 3, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2020
Completion
Dec 10, 2020
Last update
Mar 30, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion