CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03617562SCRUpdated Jul 30, 2026

Superior Capsular Reconstruction vs. Partial Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

An interventional study of Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Partial Repair in Rotator Cuff Tear, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Recruiting at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2018; still recruiting 8 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Little evidence exists to guide treatment in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MRCTS). Arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair (PRCR) has the longest record of use. The new technique of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has more recently been described. Despite high enthusiasm for this technique, its effectiveness, cost and safety profile have not been established.

The long-term goal of this study is to perform a multicenter randomized control trial to evaluate the effectiveness of SCR compared to PRCR in patients with MRCTS. The current study is a pilot required to support the development of an expanded formal clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

The current study seeks to improve the management of patients suffering from massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Despite several available surgical options, no level 1 evidence or randomized clinical trials have been performed in this patient population to date. Arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair (PRCR) is arguably the gold-standard surgical option with the longest record of use. The new technique of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has also emerged with early biomechanical and case series showing promising results. SCR has quickly made its way into clinical practice in North America. Despite this, the effectiveness, cost, and safety profile has not been established for this procedure. As such, patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears are in need of high level evidence to support surgical decision making, particular with regards to the proliferation of SCR surgery.

This pilot study is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial comparing superior capsular reconstruction using dermal allograft with arthroscopic partial repair in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. In this study, "double-blind" includes study patients and outcome assessors. Randomization will occur intra-operatively once a tear is determined to be irreparable.

This trial will be conducted at 7 sites and involve 7 surgeons. Surgeons must meet eligibility requirements to participate (shoulder or sports fellowship-trained, minimum of 3 SCR procedures, and 25 arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures in the past year). A member of the local research team will pre-screen consults of eligible patients. Full eligibility will be determined during the primary appointment with an orthopaedic surgeon. Baseline data will be recorded following informed consent. Postoperative outcomes will be measured during regularly scheduled clinic visits (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1-year and 2-year post-surgery).

Prior to surgery, patients will have informed consent for both procedures, with randomization to be performed intraoperatively. Based on initial arthroscopic assessment of the shoulder, patients that have a confirmed irreparable tear will be randomized into one of two groups: arthroscopic partial repair or superior capsular reconstruction. Surgical techniques will be standardized. Allocation will be concealed using a centralized 24-hour computerized randomization system that will allow Internet-based allocation. A random number generator will be used to create a 1:1 allocation scheme for randomization of the patient into one of the two treatment groups. The post-operative therapy regimen will be the same for each group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tear

Keywords

  • Massive Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Shoulder Injuries
03

In context

Rotator Cuff Injuries

734 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 60 across 538 interventional studies indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries.

Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 566 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic shoulder pain and/ or weakness (regardless of baseline range of motion/ psuedoparalysis)
  • Massive rotator cuff tear, identified by MRI as being greater than 4 cm in greatest diameter, and involvement of the entire supraspinatus and infraspinatus.
  • Failure of at least a 3 month trial of non-surgical treatment including physiotherapy and activity modifications
  • Irreparable tear determined intra-operatively using standard arthroscopic techniques
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of subscapularis muscle insertion, or irreparable subscapularis tear
  • Advanced rotator cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada Grade 3+) or glenohumeral osteoarthritis (Samilson-Prieto grade 2+)
  • Acute tears (within 6 months)
  • Neurologic injury causing paralysis of affected shoulder / arm
  • Any previous surgery to the affected shoulder
  • Limited life expectancy due to significant medical co-morbidity or medical contraindication to surgery (ASA Grade IV or higher)
  • Anticipated problems with ability to maintain follow-up in the judgement of the investigators (ie. patients with no fixed address, etc.)
  • Are there any non-orthopedic comorbidities that put the patient at significant risk?
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Superior Capsular Reconstruction

    Patients will be treated with the new technique of superior capsular reconstruction with dermal allograft.

    Procedure: Superior Capsular Reconstruction

  • Active comparator
    Partial Repair

    Patients will have a partial repair with residual defect as an established standard procedure.

    Procedure: Partial Repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureSuperior Capsular Reconstruction

    Residual rotator cuff defect is reconstructed with a dermal allograft secured to the glenoid and humeral head.

  • ProcedurePartial Repair

    Rotator cuff is repaired with residual defect remaining.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES)

    Functional Outcome Score Sub scales: Pain (10 cm VAS); function/disability (10 items, each rated on 4-point Likert scale for level of difficulty) Score range: Pain subscale 0-50 ASES points; function/disability subscale 0-50 ASES points. Total score 0-100 ASES points (0 = worse pain and functional loss/disability)

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rate

    Incidence of minor and major complications related to each procedure.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  2. Recruitment rate

    Assessment of number of eligible patients identified and number enrolled and randomized.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  3. Constant-Murley Score

    Functional outcome score Sub scales: Pain item (4 Likert levels), Activities of Daily Living (Likert scales), Mobility (2 points for every 30 degrees of elevation), Strength (1 point per 0.5 kg) Score Range: pain (0-15 points), activities of daily living (0-20 points), strength (0-25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (0-40 points). Total score: 0-100. The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  4. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index

    Functional outcome score Consists of 21 visual analog scale (VAS) items organised in 5 subscales: physical symptoms, sports/recreation, work, lifestyle, and emotions. Each item in WORC has a possible score from 0-100 (100mm VAS). Scores can be computed for individual subscales and summated for a total score, which can range from 0-2100, with a higher score representing lower quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  5. Pain: Numeric Rating Scale

    Scale range: 0 to 10 (whole number integers). Higher scores represent more pain.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  6. Range of Motion

    Measured by handheld goniometer

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  7. EQ-5D

    Health Related Quality of Life The EQ-5D questionnaire is made up for two components; health state description and evaluation. In description part, health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Rated level can be coded as a number 1, 2, or 3, which indicates having no problems for 1, having some problems for 2, and having extreme problems for 3. Visual analogue scale: 20 cm vertical scale with end points of 0 and 100. 0 corresponds to " the worst health you can imagine", and 100 corresponds to "the best health you can imagine".

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  8. Xray: Acromio-Humeral Interval

    Measured distance from inferior acromion to superior humeral head at the closest distance. Distance in millimetres.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  9. Xray: Degenerative Change

    Measured by Samilson-Prieto Grade: Mild Arthritis (Grade 1): inferior humeral and/or glenoid exostosis \< 3mm in height Moderate Arthritis (Grade 2): inferior humeral and/or glenoid exostosis measuring 3mm to 7mm slight gleno-humeral irregularity Severe Arthritis (Grade 3): inferior humeral and/or glenoid exostosis measuring \> 7mm gleno-humeral joint narrowing and sclerosis

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  10. MRI - graft healing

    Assess graft integrity: Healed or Torn

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  11. MRI - tear size

    Assess size of recurrent tear (in maximum anterior to posterior and medial to lateral dimensions). Measured in cm.

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

  12. MRI - fatty degeneration

    Measured by Goutallier classification of each rotator cuff muscle: grade 0: normal muscle grade 1: some fatty streaks grade 2: less than 50% fatty muscle atrophy grade 3: 50% fatty muscle atrophy grade 4: greater than 50% fatty muscle atrophy

    Time frame: 1 year post operative

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03617562
Lead sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Collaborators
Women's College Hospital, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, The Ottawa Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2018
Start date
Jul 18, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Patrick Henry, MD, FRCSC
Contact
patrick.henry@sunnybrook.ca
416-967-8701
Ryan A Paul, MD, FRCSC
Contact
rpaul2011@gmail.com
7808609272
Patrick Henry, MD, FRCSC
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion