ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03614806TCvsPETCO2Updated Jun 29, 2020

Comparison of Transcutaneous Vs End-tidal CO2 Pressure Measurements in Hyperventilation Syndrome Diagnosis

An interventional study of Simultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements in Hyperventilation Syndrome, Hypocapnia and Alkalosis, Respiratory, sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-29.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hyper Ventilation Syndrome is a frequent disease affecting adults whose diagnosis is often belated or even unrecognized due to the lack of "gold standard" criteria. Its diagnosis currently relies on the Nijmegen score associated with a PetCO2 assesment using a hyperventilation provocation test. Correlation between Nijmegen Questionnaire scores and PetCO2 appears highly variable. PtcCO2 monitoring is a noninvasive alternative method providing a continuous estimation of arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2) which could represent an advantageous alternative to PetCO2 measurements. Several reports have demonstrated that PtcCO2 monitoring reflects more faithfully PaCO2 than PetCO2, no study have evaluated its value in this indication.

The primary aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic value of PtcPCO2 monitoring with PetCO2, the method currently used.

Included patient will be invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire and an ambient air gas measurement will be performed. PtcCO2 (mmHg) will be simultaneously measured during hyperventilation test. Nijmegen score signs reproduced by the test will be analysed. HVS diagnosis will be assessed by usual criteria (PetCO2 \<30 mmHg at the end of hyperventilation test or under the PetCO2 value at rest, Nijmegen score> 23).

PtcCO2 data will be blinded interpreted later. We will compare if PetCO2 and PtcCO2 leads to the same diagnosis or not.

Read the detailed description

Primary Goal:

Show that the use of either of the two pCO2 measurements leads to the same diagnostic conclusion in HVS diagnosis with a likelihood greater than 80 %.

Secondary Outcome Measures :

Evaluate the correlation between PtcCO2 and PtcCO2 measurements Evaluate tolerance to the hyperventilation test

Inclusion Criteria :

  1. The patient must have reached the age of the civil majority (≥ 18 yo)
  2. All patients refered to the Physiology department of Rouen University Hospital, France, for an hyperventilation test
  3. The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance program
  4. The patient must have given his / her free and informed consent and signed the consent

Exclusion Criteria :

  1. Sepsis
  2. Hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 50mmHg)
  3. Patient treated by long-term oxygen therapy
  4. Subjects under judicial protection, or adults under any kind of guardianship or under judicial control
  5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  6. Electrolytic unbalance
  7. Hyperthyroidism
  8. Neurological disease
  9. Probability of drug-induced hyperventilation (progestagens , aspirin, beta agonists)
02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperventilation Syndrome
  • Hypocapnia
  • Alkalosis, Respiratory
  • Hyperventilation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperventilation

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperventilation; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 40 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Hyperventilation.

Browse Hyperventilation studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen is the lead sponsor of 418 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patient must have reached the age of the civil majority (≥ 18 yo)
  2. All patients refered to the Physiology department of Rouen University Hospital, France, for an hyperventilation test
  3. The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance program
  4. The patient must have given his / her free and and signed the consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Sepsis
  2. Hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 50mmHg)
  3. Patient treated by long-term oxygen therapy
  4. Subjects under judicial protection, or adults under any kind of guardianship or under judicial control
  5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  6. Electrolytic unbalance
  7. Hyperthyroidism
  8. Neurological disease
  9. Probability of drug-induced hyperventilation (progestagens , aspirin, beta agonists)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients tested for hyperventilation

    Simultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements. Eligible patients will be first invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire. Then, in an hyperventilation test, transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Pressure will be recorded simultaneously with the standard End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Pressure measurement.

    Diagnostic Test: Simultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSimultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements

    Included patients will be invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire. During the hyperventilation test, PtcCO2 (mmHg) will be recorded simultaneously with the standard End-tidal Cpartial pressure CO2 measurement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Trans-cutaneous Carbon Dioxide pressure

    Trans-cutaneous Carbon Dioxide pressure measurements diagnostic of hyperventilation syndrome will be evaluated by comparing it with that of standard

    Time frame: during hyperventilation test

  2. End-tidal Carbon Dioxide partial pressure

    End-tidal Carbon Dioxide partial pressure measurement. Consistency of the diagnostic conclusions reached by either test will be analyzed.

    Time frame: during hyperventilation test

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Physiology department of Rouen University Hospital,
    Rouen, 76000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2018, 1 month.

Of 16 interventional studies with no phase under Hyperventilation, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 37. This study's 1 month is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2017
First posted
Aug 3, 2018
StartActual
Dec 21, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 15, 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 15, 2018
Last update
Jun 29, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03614806
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2018
Start date
Dec 21, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2018
Completion
Feb 15, 2018
Last update
Jun 29, 2020

Study contacts

ARTAUD-MACARI Elise, MD
principal investigator · Rouen University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion