CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03601832Updated Dec 7, 2022

Non-invasive Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

An interventional study of 4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation in Ventricular Tachycardia, sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava. Completed at 3 sites in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-07.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Phase I/II study of 4-D Navigated Non-invasive radiosurgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia (NIRA-VT).

Read the detailed description

The goal of this project dealing with 4D-navigated substrate ablation is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of elimination of the scar-related monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or tachycardias by stereotactic radiosurgical ablation that is completely non-invasive. The arrhythmic substrate is defined as the scar after myocardial infarction (MI) described by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and specified by PET-CT or MRI. All sustained monomorphic VT induced by programmed ventricular stimulation via implanted ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) will be analyzed using body surface ECG mapping. The target volume for stereotactic radiosurgical ablation (single dose of 25 Gy) will be based on accordance between a post-infarction scar (PET-CT or MRI imaging) and arrhythmic substrate (body surface ECG mapping).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

  • scar-related
  • ventricular tachycardia
  • substrate ablation
  • stereotactic radiosurgery
  • functional radiosurgery
  • 4D navigation
03

In context

Tachycardia

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 64 across 379 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia.

Browse Tachycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ostrava is the lead sponsor of 146 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • history of sustained monomorphic VT or termination of monomorphic VT by ICD (appropriate therapy) during previous 6 months prior to enrollment
  • implantation ICD
  • inducibility at least one of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia by ICD during EP study with programmed ventricular stimulation
  • history of myocardial infarction (MI)
  • left ventricular scar and decreased systolic function of the left ventricle (ejection fraction of left ventricle less than 40%) based on transthoracic ultrasound
  • stable chronic heart failure (NYHA II-III)
  • older than 18 years
  • signed an IRB approved written informed consent document.
  • failed at least one invasive catheter ablation procedure or have a contraindication to a catheter ablation procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute myocardial infarction
  • chronic heart failure NYHA IV
  • channelopathy
  • reversible cause of VT (e.g. ionic dysbalance, intoxications)
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • history of chest radiotherapy
  • arrhythmic substrate larger than 100 ccm
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation

    The patients enroled to this arm of the study will undergo 4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation.

    Procedure: 4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation

Interventions

  • Procedure4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation

    4-D Navigated Non-invasive radiosurgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia/tachycardias after myocardial infarction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of death

    Composite of death occurring at any time after treatment or arrhythmic storm (three or more documented episodes of VT within 24 hours) or appropriate ICD therapy (both shock and pacing) after a 90-day treatment period. 90-day treatment period was imposed to exclude nonfatal outcomes that might occur during acute radiation reaction. Moreover, functional radiosurgery has 90% success rate after 3 months.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Acute radiation-induced events

    Acute radiation-induced events (within 3 months after treatment) according to CTCAE 4.0. Major concern will be on radiation myocarditis, pericarditis and pneumonitis/fibrosis. Needs of antiemetic drugs will be recorded.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Late radiation-induced effects

    Late radiation-induced effects (after 3 months after treatment) according to CTCAE 4.0. Major concern will be on radiation myocarditis, pericarditis and pneumonitis/fibrosis. Needs of antiemetic drugs will be recorded.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to death at any time

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Time to arrhythmic storm

    Time to arrhythmic storm (three or more documented episodes of VT within 24 hours) at any time and after 90-day treatment period.

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Time to appropriate ICD shock

    Time to appropriate ICD shock at any time and after 90-day treatment period.

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Time to appropriate antitachycardial pacing by ICD

    Time to appropriate antitachycardial pacing by ICD at any time and after 90-day treatment period.

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Hospitalization due to VT

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. Hospitalization due to chronic heart failure

    Time frame: 18 months

  7. Quality of life measured with EQ-5D questionnaire

    Quality of life measurement using a standardised tool named EQ-5D. EQ-5D is a standardised instrument in the form of a questionnaire developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The EQ-5D instrument consists of a descriptive system and the EuroQol-visual analogue scales (EQ VAS). The quality of life is measured in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The higher the score achieved, the higher the quality of life of the patient.

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Hospital Nový Jičín, Nuclear Medicine - PET/CT
    Nový Jičín, Moravian-Silesian Region 741 01, Czechia
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region 708 52, Czechia
  • Hospital Podlesí
    Třinec, Moravian-Silesian Region 739 61, Czechia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, Schron EB, Kuck KH, Zipes DP, Greene HL, Boczor S, Domanski M, Follmann D, Gent M, Roberts RS. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2071-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476. PubMed 11102258 ↗
  • Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19. PubMed 11907286 ↗
  • Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, Reddy RK, Marchlinski FE, Yee R, Guarnieri T, Talajic M, Wilber DJ, Fishbein DP, Packer DL, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071098. PubMed 18768944 ↗
  • Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, Thibault B, Rivard L, Gula L, Leong-Sit P, Essebag V, Nery PB, Tung SK, Raymond JM, Sterns LD, Veenhuyzen GD, Healey JS, Redfearn D, Roux JF, Tang AS. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5. PubMed 27149033 ↗
  • Mallidi J, Nadkarni GN, Berger RD, Calkins H, Nazarian S. Meta-analysis of catheter ablation as an adjunct to medical therapy for treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Apr;8(4):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.015. Epub 2010 Dec 13. PubMed 21147263 ↗
  • Tung R, Michowitz Y, Yu R, Mathuria N, Vaseghi M, Buch E, Bradfield J, Fujimura O, Gima J, Discepolo W, Mandapati R, Shivkumar K. Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia: an institutional experience of safety and efficacy. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Apr;10(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.12.013. Epub 2012 Dec 11. PubMed 23246598 ↗
  • Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Burkhardt DJ, Bai R, Mohanty P, Carbucicchio C, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Mohanty S, Pump A, Hongo R, Beheiry S, Pelargonio G, Santarelli P, Zucchetti M, Horton R, Sanchez JE, Elayi CS, Lakkireddy D, Tondo C, Natale A. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 10;60(2):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.044. PubMed 22766340 ↗
  • Jais P, Maury P, Khairy P, Sacher F, Nault I, Komatsu Y, Hocini M, Forclaz A, Jadidi AS, Weerasooryia R, Shah A, Derval N, Cochet H, Knecht S, Miyazaki S, Linton N, Rivard L, Wright M, Wilton SB, Scherr D, Pascale P, Roten L, Pederson M, Bordachar P, Laurent F, Kim SJ, Ritter P, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2012 May 8;125(18):2184-96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043216. Epub 2012 Apr 4. PubMed 22492578 ↗
  • Tzou WS, Frankel DS, Hegeman T, Supple GE, Garcia FC, Santangeli P, Katz DF, Sauer WH, Marchlinski FE. Core isolation of critical arrhythmia elements for treatment of multiple scar-based ventricular tachycardias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;8(2):353-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002310. Epub 2015 Feb 13. PubMed 25681389 ↗
  • Chang SD, Main W, Martin DP, Gibbs IC, Heilbrun MP. An analysis of the accuracy of the CyberKnife: a robotic frameless stereotactic radiosurgical system. Neurosurgery. 2003 Jan;52(1):140-6; discussion 146-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200301000-00018. PubMed 12493111 ↗
  • Fariselli L, Marras C, De Santis M, Marchetti M, Milanesi I, Broggi G. CyberKnife radiosurgery as a first treatment for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2 Suppl):A96-101. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000341714.55023.8F. PubMed 19165081 ↗
  • Regis J, Tuleasca C, Resseguier N, Carron R, Donnet A, Gaudart J, Levivier M. Long-term safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a 497-patient historical cohort study. J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):1079-87. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142144. Epub 2015 Sep 4. PubMed 26339857 ↗
  • Gianni C, Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Di Biase L, Al-Ahmad A, Natale A, David Burkhardt J. Alternative Approaches for Ablation of Resistant Ventricular Tachycardia. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017 Mar;9(1):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Dec 24. PubMed 28167089 ↗
  • Cuculich PS, Schill MR, Kashani R, Mutic S, Lang A, Cooper D, Faddis M, Gleva M, Noheria A, Smith TW, Hallahan D, Rudy Y, Robinson CG. Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2325-2336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613773. PubMed 29236642 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03601832
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Ostrava
Collaborators
University of Ostrava, Hospital Podlesi, Hospital Nový Jičín
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 26, 2018
Start date
Aug 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019
Completion
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
Dec 7, 2022

Study contacts

Jakub Cvek, Ing.,MD,Ph.D.
principal investigator · University Hospital Ostrava

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion