CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03587142BESSTUpdated Jun 15, 2023Results posted

Buspirone for Early Satiety and Symptoms of Gastroparesis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Buspirone and Placebo in Gastroparesis, sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-15.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates whether the study medication, buspirone, an antianxiety drug, improves the symptoms of gastroparesis in patients with gastroparesis symptoms and at least moderately severe symptoms of fullness and/or inability to eat a full meal. Half the patients will receive buspirone and half the patients will receive a placebo.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel treatment groups phase 2 trial to determine the effect of buspirone, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) 1a receptor agonist, on early satiety and postprandial fullness in participants with symptoms of gastroparesis and with at least moderately severe symptoms of early satiety and/or postprandial fullness. After enrollment, participants aged 18-75 years will be treated with buspirone (10 mg three times per day) or a matching placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week post-treatment washout period. The primary outcome for the study is 4-week change (week 4 minus baseline) in the 4-item postprandial fullness/early satiety subscore (higher scores indicate worse symptoms) from the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). We hypothesize that buspirone treatment will improve symptoms of postprandial fullness/early satiety compared to treatment with placebo, as indicated by a lower (smaller, more negative) 4-week change in the postprandial fullness/early satiety subscore in the buspirone arm compared to the placebo arm; change for a participant will be calculated as subscore at 4-weeks minus subscore at baseline.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • gastroparesis
  • early satiety
  • stomach
  • buspirone
  • 5-HT 1a receptor agonist
03

In context

Gastroparesis

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroparesis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is above the median of 44 across 201 interventional studies indexed under Gastroparesis.

Browse Gastroparesis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 85 years of age at initial screening interview
  • Symptoms compatible with gastroparesis or other functional gastric disorder for at least 3 months (does not have to be contiguous) prior to initial screening interview
  • Diagnosis of either diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis
  • Delayed or normal gastric emptying retention on screening 4-hour Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy test
  • Symptoms of gastroparesis measured by the 9-item PAGI-SYM Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) total score > 2.0 at enrollment
  • Symptomatic with postprandial fullness/early satiety severity at enrollment using the PAGI-SYM GCSI post-prandial fullness/early satiety subscore ≥ 3
  • Upper endoscopy or upper GI series without ulcers or mass lesions in the 2 years prior to enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Post-surgical gastroparesis, including prior pyloromyotomy, pyloric resection, vagotomy, bariatric surgery or post-Nissen fundoplication
  • Another active disorder which could explain symptoms in the opinion of the investigator
  • Concurrent use of opiate narcotic analgesics more than 3 days per week
  • Significant hepatic injury as defined by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation of greater than twice the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) or a Child-Pugh score of 10 or greater
  • Significant renal impairment as defined by serum creatinine > 3.0
  • Uncontrolled diabetes defined as HbA1c (%) of 10% or more within 60 days of enrollment
  • Allergy to buspirone
  • Concurrent or prior use (within 30 days) of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors
  • Concurrent or prior use (within 30 days) of benzodiazepines
  • Concurrent or prior use (within 30 days) of buspirone, warfarin, haloperidol, and drugs to treat seizures (e.g., phenytoin and carbamazepine)
  • Women breast feeding or known to be pregnant
  • Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would impede compliance or hinder completion of the study
  • Failure to give informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Buspirone

    Buspirone HCl 10 mg capsule orally three times daily, 30 minutes before each meal, for 4-weeks

    Drug: Buspirone

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo capsule orally three times daily, 30 minutes before each meal, for 4-weeks; manufactured to look identical to buspirone capsule

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBuspirone

    Buspirone tablet

    Also known as: Buspar, buspirone hydrochloride (HCl), Buspar Dividose, Vanspar

  • DrugPlacebo

    "Sugar" pill manufactured to mimic buspirone 10 mg tablet

    Also known as: Placebo (for buspirone)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 4-Week Change in the Postprandial Fullness and Early Satiety Symptoms Severity

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported early satiety/postprandial fullness subscore (ES/PPF), which is computed as the average of 4 scores for 4-items on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey: stomach fullness, inability to finish a normal-sized meal, feeling excessively full after meals, and loss of appetite. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. 4-Week Change in Stomach Fullness Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of stomach fullness severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptoms Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  2. 4-Week Change in Excessive Fullness Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of feeling excessively full after meals severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  3. 4-Week Change in Inability to Finish a Normal-sized Meal Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of inability to finish a normal-sized meal severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  4. 4-Week Change in Loss of Appetite Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of loss of appetite severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  5. 4-Week Change in Total Overall GCSI Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) total score, which is computed as the average of the 3 subscores on the GCSI survey: 3-item early satiety/postprandial fullness subscore, the nausea/vomiting subscore (average of 3-items: nausea, retching, vomiting), and bloating subscore (average of 2-items: bloating, stomach visibly larger). Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the total score ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the total score at 4-weeks minus the baseline total score. A negative change indicates improved symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  6. 4-Week Change in Nausea, Vomiting and Retching Symptoms Severity

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported nausea/vomiting subscore, which is computed as the average of 3 scores for 3-items on the Gastrointestinal Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey: nausea, retching, vomiting. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. Negative change indicates improvement in symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  7. 4-Week Change in Nausea Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of nausea severity item from the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  8. 4-Week Change in Vomiting Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of vomiting severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates improvement in vomiting severity.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  9. 4-Week Change in Bloating and Stomach Distention Symptoms Severity

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported bloating subscore, which is computed as the average of 2 scores for 2-items on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey: bloating, stomach visibly larger. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. A negative value for change indicates improvement in symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  10. 4-Week Change in Bloating Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of bloating severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  11. 4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain and Discomfort Symptoms Severity

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported upper abdominal pain subscore, which is computed as the average of 2 scores for 2-items on the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) survey: upper abdominal pain, upper abdominal discomfort. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  12. 4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Severity

    The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of upper abdominal pain severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  13. 4-Week Change in Gastroesophageal (GERD) Symptoms Severity

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported GERD subscore, which is computed as the average of 7 scores for 7-items on the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) survey: heartburn during the day, heartburn when lying down, feeling of discomfort inside chest during the day, feeling of discomfort inside chest during sleep, regurgitation or reflux during the day, regurgitation when lying down, bitter, acid or sour taste in mouth. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  14. 4-Week Change in Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) Global Score

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported GSRS total score which is computed as the mean of the 15 item scores on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) survey. Each item is scored from 1 (no discomfort) to 7 (very severe discomfort) of the symptom in the past week. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  15. 4-Week Change in Participant's Rating of Symptom Relief

    The outcome is assessed using the participant-rated Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale (CPGAS) score which is scored from -3 (very considerably worse) to 3 (completely better) in the past week compared to the way the participant usually feels. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates patient feeling better.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  16. 4-Week Change in Severity of Somatic Symptoms

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire 15 Somatic Symptom Severity Scale (PHQ-15) total somatization score (ranges from 0 -30, with 30 being most bothered by symptoms in prior 4-weeks), calculated as the sum of 15-items, each scored from 0 (not bothered at all) to 2 (bothered a lot) by somatic symptoms in the prior 4-weeks. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates being less bothered by the symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  17. 4-Week Change in Depression

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression subscore, calculated as the sum of 7 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. A negative change indicates reduced depression.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  18. 4-Week Change in Anxiety

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscore, calculated as the sum of 7-items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. A negative change indicates reduced anxiety at 4-weeks.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  19. 4-Week Change Overall Quality of Health Due to Gastroparesis Issues

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) total score which comprises 30 items scored from 0 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time) the participant's QOL has been affected by their gastrointestinal issues in the prior two weeks. The total score is the mean of the 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0 (lowest QOL) to 5 (highest QOL) in past 2-weeks. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates improved QOL.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  20. 4-Week Change in Overall Mental Quality of Life (QOL)

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) mental health QOL component score. The score ranges from 0 (poorest) to 100 (highest) QOL. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates improved mental QOL.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  21. 4-Week Change in Overall Physical Quality of Life (QOL)

    The outcome is assessed using the self-reported 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical health QOL component score. The score ranges from 0 (poorest) to 100 (highest) QOL. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates improved Physical QOL.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  22. 4-Week Change in Gastric Retention

    The outcome is assessed using the percent of gastric retention at 4-hours from the Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy (GES) test. The change is computed as the percent retention at 4-weeks minus the baseline percent retention. % retention is the amount of food remaining in the stomach at 4-hours of the GES test and ranges from 0% (no food) to 100% (all of the food).

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  23. Change at 4-weeks in the Intragastric Meal Distribution (IMD)

    The Intragastric meal distribution (IMD) is assessed at baseline and 4-weeks during the Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy Test. The ratio of gastric counts of the meal in the proximal stomach to the distal stomach is used to compute the Intragastric meal distribution (IMD) which can be used as an indirect measure of Fundic Accommodation.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  24. Change From Baseline at 4-weeks in the Water Load Satiety Test (WLST)

    The Water Load Satiety Test (WLST) is the amount of water a patient can consume until full in 5 minutes. The volume of water is recorded. The change is computed as the volume of water ingested at baseline subtracted from the amount of water ingested at 4-weeks. A positive change indicates that the patient can ingest more water at 4-weeks than at baseline.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

Other outcomes

  1. 4-Week Change in Weight

    This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the weight (kg) at baseline from the weight (kg) at 4-weeks

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  2. 4-Week Cardiac Rhythm

    This safety outcome is computed from the results of an electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc interval at 4-weeks measured in milliseconds (msec).

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  3. 4-Week Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (ALT)

    This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the baseline level of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) from the 4-week level.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  4. 4-Week Change in Creatinine

    This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the baseline level of creatinine (mg/dL) from the 4-week level.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  5. 4-Week Change in Fasting Glucose

    This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the baseline level of glucose (mg/dL) from the 4-week level.

    Time frame: baseline and 4-weeks

  6. Assessment of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks

    This safety outcome is the frequency over the 4-weeks of the study of all reported adverse events using the v5.0 CTCAE classification system.

    Time frame: over 4-weeks

  7. Assessment of the Severity of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks

    This safety outcome is the frequency over the 4-weeks of the study of all reported adverse events' severity grade as classified by the NCI's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). For the patient with 2 AE's, the AE with the maximum severity is reported.

    Time frame: over 4-weeks

  8. Serious Adverse Events

    Serious Adverse Event (SAE) defined by the FDA as an event meeting one or more of the following criteria; inpatient hospitalization or prolonged existing hospitalization; persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of ability to conduct normal life functions; jeopardized patient and required medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious event; or congenital anomaly or birth defect.

    Time frame: over 4 weeks of treatment

  9. Total Number of Hospitalizations Over 4-weeks of Treatment

    Hospitalization events by treatment arm were reported on the Adverse Event Case-Report form at each visit and also at time of occurrence and tabulated at end of treatment visit for comparison between placebo and buspirone arms.

    Time frame: over the 4-weeks of the trial

  10. Adverse Events by Body Classification System by Treatment Group During the Trial

    Adverse events were reported on the Adverse Event Report form by the principal investigator at each clinic site using the CTCAE v5 classification system.

    Time frame: over 4-weeks of treatment

07

Results

Posted Jun 15, 2023

Participant flow

131 adult participants with gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like 28, symptoms with at least moderately severe symptoms of early satiety and post-prandial fullness and a normal endoscopy were recruited at 6 tertiary clinic sites located in the U.S. between August 2019 and February 2022. The first participant was enrolled August 27, 2019 and the last participant was enrolled February 28, 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBuspironePlacebo
Started4749
Completed3939
Not completed810
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up53
Withdrew: Did not complete the f4 visit37

Outcome measures

Primary4-Week Change in the Postprandial Fullness and Early Satiety Symptoms Severity

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported early satiety/postprandial fullness subscore (ES/PPF), which is computed as the average of 4 scores for 4-items on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey: stomach fullness, inability to finish a normal-sized meal, feeling excessively full after meals, and loss of appetite. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in the Postprandial Fullness and Early Satiety Symptoms Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in the Postprandial Fullness and Early Satiety Symptoms Severity-1.16 ± 1.25-1.03 ± 1.19
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.69 (Nominal P value. Power was determined at a level of P=0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -0.11 · 95% CI -0.68 to 0.45Multiple imputation using regression and 50 datasets to estimate the outcome for the 18/96 (19%) randomized patients without the f4 visit data.
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.62 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made from multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value for the 10 sensitivity outcomes is \<0.005.) · Mean difference (net): -0.13 · 95% CI -0.65 to 0.39
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.62 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value for the 10 sensitivity outcomes is \<0.005) · Mean difference (net): -0.25 · 95% CI -0.89 to 0.38
Secondary4-Week Change in Stomach Fullness Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of stomach fullness severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptoms Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Stomach Fullness Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Stomach Fullness Symptom Severity-1.16 ± 1.55-1.07 ± 1.34
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.76 (Nominal P value reported. Bonferroni p-value for the 10 sensitivity outcomes is \<0.005) · Mean difference (net): -0.09 · 95% CI -0.69 to 0.50
Secondary4-Week Change in Excessive Fullness Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of feeling excessively full after meals severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Excessive Fullness Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Excessive Fullness Symptom Severity-1.14 ± 1.56-0.99 ± 1.30
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.64 (Nominal P values; Bonferroni p value for the 10 sensitivity outcomes is \<0.005) · Mean difference (net): -0.15 · 95% CI -0.76 to 0.47
Secondary4-Week Change in Inability to Finish a Normal-sized Meal Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of inability to finish a normal-sized meal severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Inability to Finish a Normal-sized Meal Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Inability to Finish a Normal-sized Meal Symptom Severity-1.27 ± 1.55-1.12 ± 1.63
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.66 (P values are nominal; Bonferroni p-value for the 10 sensitivity outcomes is \<0.005) · Mean difference (net): -0.14 · 95% CI -0.79 to 0.50
Secondary4-Week Change in Loss of Appetite Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of loss of appetite severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Loss of Appetite Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Loss of Appetite Symptom Severity-1.09 ± 1.64-0.96 ± 1.62
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.70 (Nominal P values; Bonferroni p-value for the 10 sensitivity outcomes is \<0.005) · Mean difference (net): -0.12 · 95% CI -0.75 to 0.50
Secondary4-Week Change in Total Overall GCSI Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) total score, which is computed as the average of the 3 subscores on the GCSI survey: 3-item early satiety/postprandial fullness subscore, the nausea/vomiting subscore (average of 3-items: nausea, retching, vomiting), and bloating subscore (average of 2-items: bloating, stomach visibly larger). Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the total score ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the total score at 4-weeks minus the baseline total score. A negative change indicates improved symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Total Overall GCSI Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Total Overall GCSI Symptom Severity-1.06 ± 1.16-0.86 ± 1.00
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.40 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferrini p-value is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.20 · 95% CI -0.66 to 0.27
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.56 (Nominal P value without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni threshold for level of significance is \<0.002.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 0.53 to 3.21Odds ratio, 95% C.I. and P (two-sided) from a logistic regression of the binary outcome on treatment group for symptomatic improvement in GCSI.
Secondary4-Week Change in Nausea, Vomiting and Retching Symptoms Severity

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported nausea/vomiting subscore, which is computed as the average of 3 scores for 3-items on the Gastrointestinal Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey: nausea, retching, vomiting. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. Negative change indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Nausea, Vomiting and Retching Symptoms Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Nausea, Vomiting and Retching Symptoms Severity-0.65 ± 1.40-0.60 ± 1.26
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.86 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.05 · 95% CI -0.58 to 0.48
Secondary4-Week Change in Nausea Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of nausea severity item from the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Nausea Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Nausea Symptom Severity-0.75 ± 1.40-0.70 ± 1.51
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.85 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.06 · 95% CI -0.64 to 0.53
Secondary4-Week Change in Vomiting Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of vomiting severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates improvement in vomiting severity.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Vomiting Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Vomiting Symptom Severity-0.71 ± 1.81-0.57 ± 1.47
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.65 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.14 · 95% CI -0.76 to 0.47
Secondary4-Week Change in Bloating and Stomach Distention Symptoms Severity

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported bloating subscore, which is computed as the average of 2 scores for 2-items on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey: bloating, stomach visibly larger. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. A negative value for change indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Bloating and Stomach Distention Symptoms Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Bloating and Stomach Distention Symptoms Severity-1.36 ± 1.42-0.95 ± 1.27
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.16 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.41 · 95% CI -0.99 to 0.16
Secondary4-Week Change in Bloating Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of bloating severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Bloating Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Bloating Symptom Severity-1.34 ± 1.46-0.69 ± 1.18
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.03 (P values are nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -0.65 · 95% CI -1.23 to -0.08
Secondary4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain and Discomfort Symptoms Severity

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported upper abdominal pain subscore, which is computed as the average of 2 scores for 2-items on the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) survey: upper abdominal pain, upper abdominal discomfort. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain and Discomfort Symptoms Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain and Discomfort Symptoms Severity-0.78 ± 1.55-0.95 ± 1.63
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.59 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): 0.17 · 95% CI -0.44 to 0.77
Secondary4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Severity

The outcome is assessed using self-reported assessment of upper abdominal pain severity in the prior 2-weeks using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) survey. The item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms; the change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Upper Abdominal Pain Symptom Severity-0.69 ± 1.73-0.93 ± 1.63
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.46 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): 0.24 · 95% CI -0.39 to 0.88
Secondary4-Week Change in Gastroesophageal (GERD) Symptoms Severity

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported GERD subscore, which is computed as the average of 7 scores for 7-items on the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) survey: heartburn during the day, heartburn when lying down, feeling of discomfort inside chest during the day, feeling of discomfort inside chest during sleep, regurgitation or reflux during the day, regurgitation when lying down, bitter, acid or sour taste in mouth. Each item is scored from 0 (no) to 5 (very severe) symptoms in the past 2-weeks; the subscore ranges from 0 to 5. The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change in Gastroesophageal (GERD) Symptoms Severity
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Gastroesophageal (GERD) Symptoms Severity-0.36 ± 1.44-0.45 ± 1.01
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.73 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): 0.09 · 95% CI -0.42 to 0.59
Secondary4-Week Change in Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) Global Score

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported GSRS total score which is computed as the mean of the 15 item scores on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) survey. Each item is scored from 1 (no discomfort) to 7 (very severe discomfort) of the symptom in the past week. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) Global Score
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) Global Score-0.63 ± 1.09-0.49 ± 0.90
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.50 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.14 · 95% CI -0.55 to 0.27
Secondary4-Week Change in Participant's Rating of Symptom Relief

The outcome is assessed using the participant-rated Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale (CPGAS) score which is scored from -3 (very considerably worse) to 3 (completely better) in the past week compared to the way the participant usually feels. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates patient feeling better.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Participant's Rating of Symptom Relief
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Participant's Rating of Symptom Relief0.69 ± 1.030.37 ± 1.10
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.18 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): 0.32 · 95% CI -0.15 to 0.79
Secondary4-Week Change in Severity of Somatic Symptoms

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire 15 Somatic Symptom Severity Scale (PHQ-15) total somatization score (ranges from 0 -30, with 30 being most bothered by symptoms in prior 4-weeks), calculated as the sum of 15-items, each scored from 0 (not bothered at all) to 2 (bothered a lot) by somatic symptoms in the prior 4-weeks. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates being less bothered by the symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Severity of Somatic Symptoms
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Severity of Somatic Symptoms-0.99 ± 3.88-2.00 ± 3.93
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.19 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made from multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002.) · Mean difference (net): 1.01 · 95% CI -0.49 to 2.51
Secondary4-Week Change in Depression

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression subscore, calculated as the sum of 7 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. A negative change indicates reduced depression.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Depression
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Depression0.42 ± 4.06-1.43 ± 3.91
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.02 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni P-value threshold for the level of significance is \<=0.002) · Mean difference (net): 1.86 · 95% CI 0.33 to 3.38
Secondary4-Week Change in Anxiety

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscore, calculated as the sum of 7-items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). The change is computed as the subscore at 4-weeks minus the baseline subscore. A negative change indicates reduced anxiety at 4-weeks.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Anxiety
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Anxiety-1.27 ± 4.82-2.03 ± 3.94
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.40 (P values are nominal; no adjustments for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (net): 0.76 · 95% CI -1.02 to 2.54
Secondary4-Week Change Overall Quality of Health Due to Gastroparesis Issues

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) total score which comprises 30 items scored from 0 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time) the participant's QOL has been affected by their gastrointestinal issues in the prior two weeks. The total score is the mean of the 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0 (lowest QOL) to 5 (highest QOL) in past 2-weeks. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates improved QOL.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
4-Week Change Overall Quality of Health Due to Gastroparesis Issues
score on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change Overall Quality of Health Due to Gastroparesis Issues0.43 ± 0.810.64 ± 0.95
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.25 (P value is nominal with no adjustment for multiple comparisons. The Bonferroni level of significance threshold is \<=0.002.) · Mean difference (net): -0.21 · 95% CI -0.57 to 0.15
Secondary4-Week Change in Overall Mental Quality of Life (QOL)

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) mental health QOL component score. The score ranges from 0 (poorest) to 100 (highest) QOL. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates improved mental QOL.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Overall Mental Quality of Life (QOL)
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Overall Mental Quality of Life (QOL)1.19 ± 10.543.17 ± 11.83
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.36 · Mean difference (net): -1.98 · 95% CI -6.20 to 2.24
Secondary4-Week Change in Overall Physical Quality of Life (QOL)

The outcome is assessed using the self-reported 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical health QOL component score. The score ranges from 0 (poorest) to 100 (highest) QOL. The change is computed as the score at 4-weeks minus the baseline score. A positive change indicates improved Physical QOL.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
4-Week Change in Overall Physical Quality of Life (QOL)
units on a scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Overall Physical Quality of Life (QOL)1.10 ± 7.183.17 ± 5.95
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.15 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons Bonferroni p-value is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -2.07 · 95% CI -4.91 to 0.76
Secondary4-Week Change in Gastric Retention

The outcome is assessed using the percent of gastric retention at 4-hours from the Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy (GES) test. The change is computed as the percent retention at 4-weeks minus the baseline percent retention. % retention is the amount of food remaining in the stomach at 4-hours of the GES test and ranges from 0% (no food) to 100% (all of the food).

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a percentage scale
4-Week Change in Gastric Retention
units on a percentage scaleBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Gastric Retention4.24 ± 21.192.87 ± 21.8
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.76 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferrini p-value is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): 1.37 · 95% CI -7.51 to 10.25
SecondaryChange at 4-weeks in the Intragastric Meal Distribution (IMD)

The Intragastric meal distribution (IMD) is assessed at baseline and 4-weeks during the Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy Test. The ratio of gastric counts of the meal in the proximal stomach to the distal stomach is used to compute the Intragastric meal distribution (IMD) which can be used as an indirect measure of Fundic Accommodation.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ratio
Change at 4-weeks in the Intragastric Meal Distribution (IMD)
ratioBuspironePlacebo
Change at 4-weeks in the Intragastric Meal Distribution (IMD)-0.04 ± 0.130.02 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.10 (Nominal P values; no adjustment for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -0.05 · 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01
SecondaryChange From Baseline at 4-weeks in the Water Load Satiety Test (WLST)

The Water Load Satiety Test (WLST) is the amount of water a patient can consume until full in 5 minutes. The volume of water is recorded. The change is computed as the volume of water ingested at baseline subtracted from the amount of water ingested at 4-weeks. A positive change indicates that the patient can ingest more water at 4-weeks than at baseline.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ml
Change From Baseline at 4-weeks in the Water Load Satiety Test (WLST)
mlBuspironePlacebo
Change From Baseline at 4-weeks in the Water Load Satiety Test (WLST)-43.3 ± 219.1-21.8 ± 145.6
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.29 (Nominal P values; no adjustments for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -21.51 · 95% CI -99.4 to 56.4
Other pre-specified4-Week Change in Weight

This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the weight (kg) at baseline from the weight (kg) at 4-weeks

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kilogram
4-Week Change in Weight
kilogramBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Weight-0.34 ± 1.36-0.43 ± 1.99
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.84 (P value is nominal; no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): 0.09 · 95% CI -0.78 to 0.95
Other pre-specified4-Week Cardiac Rhythm

This safety outcome is computed from the results of an electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc interval at 4-weeks measured in milliseconds (msec).

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milliseconds (msec)
4-Week Cardiac Rhythm
milliseconds (msec)BuspironePlacebo
4-Week Cardiac Rhythm-2.80 ± 19.183.63 ± 23.42
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.27 (P value is nominal) · Mean difference (net): -6.43 · 95% CI -17.90 to 5.03
Other pre-specified4-Week Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (ALT)

This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the baseline level of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) from the 4-week level.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · U/L
4-Week Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (ALT)
U/LBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (ALT)0.32 ± 15.931.34 ± 9.57
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.74 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold for the level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -1.02 · 95% CI -6.93 to 4.89
Other pre-specified4-Week Change in Creatinine

This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the baseline level of creatinine (mg/dL) from the 4-week level.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
4-Week Change in Creatinine
mg/dLBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Creatinine0.02 ± 0.07-0.01 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.18 · Mean difference (net): 0.03 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.08P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold level of significance \<0.002
Other pre-specified4-Week Change in Fasting Glucose

This safety outcome is computed by subtracting the baseline level of glucose (mg/dL) from the 4-week level.

Time frame:
baseline and 4-weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
4-Week Change in Fasting Glucose
mg/dLBuspironePlacebo
4-Week Change in Fasting Glucose10.30 ± 38.1010.69 ± 42.21
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.97 (P value is nominal: no adjustments made for multiple comparisons. Bonferroni p-value threshold level of significance is \<0.002) · Mean difference (net): -0.39 · 95% CI -20.42 to 19.64
Other pre-specifiedAssessment of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks

This safety outcome is the frequency over the 4-weeks of the study of all reported adverse events using the v5.0 CTCAE classification system.

Time frame:
over 4-weeks
Reported as:
Number · events
Assessment of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks
eventsBuspironePlacebo
Assessment of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks128
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · Exact poisson regression · p = 0.64 (P values are nominal and not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Incident rate ratio: 1.27 · 95% CI 0.57 to 2.82
Other pre-specifiedAssessment of the Severity of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks

This safety outcome is the frequency over the 4-weeks of the study of all reported adverse events' severity grade as classified by the NCI's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). For the patient with 2 AE's, the AE with the maximum severity is reported.

Time frame:
over 4-weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Assessment of the Severity of Adverse Events Over 4-Weeks
ParticipantsBuspironePlacebo
No Adverse events3541
1-mild severity52
2-moderate severity66
3-severe10
4-life threatening00
5-death00
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.54 (P values are nominal.) · Incident rate ratio: 0.95 · 95% CI 0.35 to 2.62
Other pre-specifiedSerious Adverse Events

Serious Adverse Event (SAE) defined by the FDA as an event meeting one or more of the following criteria; inpatient hospitalization or prolonged existing hospitalization; persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of ability to conduct normal life functions; jeopardized patient and required medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious event; or congenital anomaly or birth defect.

Time frame:
over 4 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Number · Serious adverse events
Serious Adverse Events
Serious adverse eventsBuspironePlacebo
Serious Adverse Events11
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00 (P value is nominal.)
Other pre-specifiedTotal Number of Hospitalizations Over 4-weeks of Treatment

Hospitalization events by treatment arm were reported on the Adverse Event Case-Report form at each visit and also at time of occurrence and tabulated at end of treatment visit for comparison between placebo and buspirone arms.

Time frame:
over the 4-weeks of the trial
Reported as:
Number · hospitalizations
Total Number of Hospitalizations Over 4-weeks of Treatment
hospitalizationsBuspironePlacebo
Total Number of Hospitalizations Over 4-weeks of Treatment10
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · Exact poisson regression · p = 1.00 (P-values are nominal.) · Incident rate ratio: 1.03 · 95% CI 0 to 40.36
Other pre-specifiedAdverse Events by Body Classification System by Treatment Group During the Trial

Adverse events were reported on the Adverse Event Report form by the principal investigator at each clinic site using the CTCAE v5 classification system.

Time frame:
over 4-weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Number · events by body classification
Adverse Events by Body Classification System by Treatment Group During the Trial
events by body classificationBuspironePlacebo
Gastrointestinal33
Immune system10
Infections & infestations31
Investigations02
Metabolic & nutrition10
Nervous system30
Renal & urinary11
Surgical & medical01
Musculoskeletal & connective tissue disorders01
Total129
Statistical analysis
  • Buspirone vs Placebo · Binomial probability test · p = 0.52 (Nominal P value.)2-sided test with probability of success=0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were counted after randomization through end of treatment at 4-weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Buspirone0/47 (0%)1/47 (2.1%)11/47 (23.4%)
Placebo0/49 (0%)1/49 (2%)7/49 (14.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBuspironePlacebo
severe allergic reactionImmune system disorders1/470/49
neurostimulator implantationSurgical and medical procedures0/471/49
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBuspironePlacebo
Nausea, vomiting, retchingGastrointestinal disorders3/472/49
upper respiratory & sinus infectionInfections and infestations3/471/49
Episodes of dizziness and somnolenceNervous system disorders3/470/49
QTC interval was highInvestigations0/472/49
Worsening of a comorbid illnessMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/470/49
urinary tract infection & renal calculiRenal and urinary disorders1/471/49
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/471/49

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Mean43.0 ± 15.844.2 ± 15.043.6 ± 15.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Female434588
Male448
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino131730
Not Hispanic or Latino343266
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American257
White434184
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported011
Married
Married(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Count of participants162137
Diabetes Type 1
Diabetes Type 1(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Count of participants369
Diabetes Type 2
Diabetes Type 2(Participants)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Count of participants131528
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)BuspironePlaceboTotal
Mean29.5 ± 7.529.8 ± 7.329.7 ± 7.4

35 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

6 sites
  • University of Louisville
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Temple University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • Texas Tech University Health Science Center
    El Paso, Texas 79905, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 13, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Sep 15, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study will comply with the NIH Data Sharing Policy. The data will be first de-identified so that no individual participant identifiers will be included in the dataset (no names, addresses, dates, comments, etc). If a characteristic is an extreme value for this population, then those values will be categorized into one frequency group. If a CSR has multiple versions, then all data will be recoded into the format of the most current form version. A random unique identification number will be substituted for the unique BESST identification number. If a clinical item was obtained from surveys with restrictions due to licensing, then that data will be excluded. The data will be shared in 2 stages: the first will be the analytic datasets to produce the primary outcome paper. For this dataset, the documentation will include analytic code. The full dataset by CSR will be provided in the second stage.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03587142
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Johns Hopkins University, Temple University, University of Louisville, Wake Forest University, Massachusetts General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 16, 2018
Start date
Aug 27, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2022
Completion
Apr 30, 2022
Results posted
Jun 15, 2023
Last update
Jun 15, 2023

Study contacts

Henry P Parkman, MD
principal investigator · Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
Pankaj J Pasricha, MD
study chair · Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion