CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06783504PENFSUpdated Oct 1, 2026

Effect Of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation on Symptom Control/Nervous System Activity in Patients w/Diabetes Types 1/2

An interventional study of PERCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL FIELD NERVE STIMULATION and Sham percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation in Diabetes and Gastroparesis, sponsored by Indiana University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 1, 2026Study completion movedEligibility revised+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether stimulation of the vagus nerve can improve nausea and vomiting in diabetic gastroparetic patients.

Read the detailed description

The vagus nerve is one of the main determinants of gastrointestinal motility and gastric emptying. It has been speculated that neuropathy of the vagus nerve is the cause of the delay in gastric emptying in gastroparesis, the symptoms of which include nausea, vomiting, weight loss, early satiety, abdominal pain and bloating.

Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) has been approved by the FDA to treat adolescents with functional abdominal pain associated with irritable bowel syndrome. In this study, the impact of PENFS on gastroparesis symptoms will be evaluated.

After informed consent is obtained, participant eligibility will be assessed at a Screening Visit. A Hemoglobin A1C level (HgbA1c) will be drawn for this purpose. Eligible participants will then return for 5 Study Visits at which, they will:

  • Complete will complete 4 questionnaires
  • Lie in a supine position and have ECG electrodes applied to the chest and/or arms, palmar skin electrodes placed on the fingers of the non-dominant hand to measure galvanic skin response (GSR) and sympathetic nerve activity, and a chest strap to record respiratory activity. Once the equipment is placed, electrocardiogram (ECG) and GSR will be recorded for 20 minutes in the supine position. After the 20 minutes, participants will be asked to sit while ECG and GSR are recorded for 2 additional minutes. Participants will then stand for an additional 2 minutes of ECG and GSR recordings.
  • Have a PENFS device applied to the left ear (the device will be applied at the first four study visits, and not at the fifth). The device will remain in place for 5 days after each visit.

Each participant will have a PENFS device applied at the study visits, however, participants are randomized to whether they will receive active stimulation during the study. The device will remain in place for 5 days after each visit. On the morning of Day 6 after each study visit, the participants will remove the PENFS device and return it at the next study visit.

Participants will also complete a daily diary to document symptoms over the previous 24 hours. Prior to each study visit, participants will be asked to refrain from caffeine on the day of the visit and to refrain from nicotine use for 24 hours prior to the visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes
  • Gastroparesis
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 200 are open to participants now.

Of its 142 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 112 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Wiling to have one teaspoon (5 ml) of blood drawn.
  • Willing to have electrodes placed in the external ear.
  • Diagnosed with gastroparesis for twelve months or longer
  • Diagnosed with diabetes either Type 1 or Type 2
  • Documented delayed gastric emptying (>10% retention of the test meal at four hours) on a standardized scrambled-egg scintigraphy gastric emptying test performed in the last two years.
  • Upper GI endoscopy indicating no mechanical obstruction performed in the last five years.
  • Symptoms of nausea and vomiting consistent with clinical diagnosis of gastroparesis (as opposed to other causes of nausea and vomiting such as mechanical obstruction, acute viral illness, chemotherapy, psychogenic vomiting.
  • Documented Hb A1c within three months of screening or at the time of screening (\<=8.0)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide consent
  • Pregnant females
  • Medical records indicate intestinal pseudo-obstruction
  • Diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmia
  • History of prior gastric surgery
  • History of vagotomy
  • History of organ transplantation
  • History of seizures
  • Diagnosed with primary swallowing disorders
  • Subjects who are dependent on drugs like Marinol for their condition
  • Those diagnosed with psychogenic vomiting and not related to gastroparesis
  • Medically unstable subjects
  • Those at high surgical risk
  • Subjects taking narcotic analgesics daily.
  • Those with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (Hgb A1c>8) within three months of screening or at the time of screening.
  • Subjects diagnosed with hemophilia, psoriasis vulgaris are excluded
  • Those having a cardiac pacemaker will be excluded from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ACTIVE (electrical charge)

    The PENFS device is placed behind the patient's left ear and connected to stimulation needles on the auricle. The appliance transmits low-frequency electrical impulses throughout the auricle.

    Device: PERCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL FIELD NERVE STIMULATION

  • Sham comparator
    Sham percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (no electrical charge)

    The PENFS device is placed behind the patient's left ear and connected to stimulation needles on the auricle. The appliance will not transmit any electrical impulses.

    Device: Sham percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation

Interventions

  • DevicePERCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL FIELD NERVE STIMULATION

    The IB-Stim is a percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulator (PENFS) system intended to be used in patients 11-18 years of age with functional abdominal pain associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The IB-Stim is intended to be used for 120 hours per week up to 3 consecutive weeks, through application to branches of Cranial Nerves V, VII, IX and X, and the occipital nerves identified by transillumination, as an aid in the reduction of pain when combined with other therapies for IBS.

    Also known as: IB-STIM

  • DeviceSham percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation

    SHAM (no electrical charge)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Dairy

    A modified version of the GASTROPARESIS CARDINAL SYMPTOM INDEX - DAILY DIARY (GCSI-DD) will be used. The questionnaire evaluates 4 gastroparesis symptoms (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain) and asks participants to rate the severity of symptoms over the past 24 hours on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Additionally, vomiting episodes are reported (0 for none, 1 for one episode, 2 for two episodes, 3 for three episodes, or 4 for four or more episodes). Lower total scores indicate fewer or less severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  2. Change in Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorder Symptoms

    Scores are calculated by averaging the scores for each item in the subscale, with scores ranging from 0 (none or absent) to 5 (very severe). Optimal outcome would be a score of zero, no episodes/symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Heart Rate Variability

    Heart Rate Variability is reported on a 0-100 scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  2. Change in Anxiety

    The General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 scale is from 0-21, where 0= no anxiety and 21=severe anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  3. Change in the measure of depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 is a questionnaire that measures self-reported depressive systems. PHQ-8 uses a range from 0-24, where 0=no depressive symptoms and 24=severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  4. Change in Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorder Symptoms by Diabetes Type

    Scores are calculated by averaging the scores for each item in the subscale, with scores ranging from 0 (none or absent) to 5 (very severe). Optimal outcome would be a score of zero, no episodes/symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  5. Change in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary by Diabetes Type

    A modified version of the GASTROPARESIS CARDINAL SYMPTOM INDEX - DAILY DIARY (GCSI-DD) will be used. The questionnaire evaluates 4 gastroparesis symptoms (nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal pain) and asks participants to rate the severity of symptoms over the past 24 hours on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Additionally, vomiting episodes are reported (0 for none, 1 for one episode, 2 for two episodes, 3 for three episodes, or 4 for four or more episodes). Lower total scores indicate fewer or less severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Indiana University Hospital
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
    • Maureen Schilling, BS · Contact · maschi@iu.edu · 3172782064
    • Thomas V Nowak, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Revicki DA, Speck RM, Lavoie S, Puelles J, Kuo B, Camilleri M, Almansa C, Parkman HP. The American neurogastroenterology and motility society gastroparesis cardinal symptom index-daily diary (ANMS GCSI-DD): Psychometric evaluation in patients with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Apr;31(4):e13553. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13553. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PubMed 30734412 ↗
  • Kovacic K, Kolacz J, Lewis GF, Porges SW. Impaired Vagal Efficiency Predicts Auricular Neurostimulation Response in Adolescent Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;115(9):1534-1538. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000753. PubMed 32732620 ↗
  • Berntson GG, Bigger JT Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, Malik M, Nagaraja HN, Porges SW, Saul JP, Stone PH, van der Molen MW. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997 Nov;34(6):623-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x. PubMed 9401419 ↗
  • Lewis GF, Furman SA, McCool MF, Porges SW. Statistical strategies to quantify respiratory sinus arrhythmia: are commonly used metrics equivalent? Biol Psychol. 2012 Feb;89(2):349-64. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.11.009. Epub 2011 Dec 3. PubMed 22138367 ↗
  • Porges SW. Method and apparatus for evaluating rhythmic oscillations in aperiodic physiological response systems. US4510944A, 1985 cited 2020 Aug 4.
  • Asahina M, Poudel A, Hirano S. Sweating on the palm and sole: physiological and clinical relevance. Clin Auton Res. 2015 Jun;25(3):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s10286-015-0282-1. Epub 2015 Apr 17. PubMed 25894655 ↗
  • 11. Dawson ME, Schell AM, Filion DL. The electrodermal system. In: Handbook of Physiology. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 159-81.
  • Woodbury A, Krishnamurthy V, Gebre M, Napadow V, Bicknese C, Liu M, Lukemire J, Kalangara J, Cui X, Guo Y, Sniecinski R, Crosson B. Feasibility of Auricular Field Stimulation in Fibromyalgia: Evaluation by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Randomized Trial. Pain Med. 2021 Mar 18;22(3):715-726. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa317. PubMed 33164085 ↗
  • Krasaelap A, Sood MR, Li BUK, Unteutsch R, Yan K, Nugent M, Simpson P, Kovacic K. Efficacy of Auricular Neurostimulation in Adolescents With Irritable Bowel Syndrome in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;18(9):1987-1994.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 14. PubMed 31622740 ↗
  • Santucci NR, King C, El-Chammas KI, Wongteerasut A, Damrongmanee A, Graham K, Fei L, Sahay R, Jones C, Cunningham NR, Coghill RC. Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation on mechanosensitivity, sleep, and psychological comorbidities in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Aug;34(8):e14358. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14358. Epub 2022 Mar 16. PubMed 35293081 ↗
  • Kovacic K, Hainsworth K, Sood M, Chelimsky G, Unteutsch R, Nugent M, Simpson P, Miranda A. Neurostimulation for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):727-737. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30253-4. Epub 2017 Aug 18. PubMed 28826627 ↗
  • Ward MP, Gupta A, Wo JM, Rajwa B, Furness JB, Powley TL, Nowak TV. An emerging method to noninvasively measure and identify vagal response markers to enable bioelectronic control of gastroparesis symptoms with gastric electrical stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Apr 15;336:108631. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108631. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PubMed 32087238 ↗
  • Frangos E, Ellrich J, Komisaruk BR. Non-invasive Access to the Vagus Nerve Central Projections via Electrical Stimulation of the External Ear: fMRI Evidence in Humans. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):624-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Dec 6. PubMed 25573069 ↗
  • Garcia RG, Lin RL, Lee J, Kim J, Barbieri R, Sclocco R, Wasan AD, Edwards RR, Rosen BR, Hadjikhani N, Napadow V. Modulation of brainstem activity and connectivity by respiratory-gated auricular vagal afferent nerve stimulation in migraine patients. Pain. 2017 Aug;158(8):1461-1472. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000930. PubMed 28541256 ↗
  • Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W. Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2003 Aug;125(2):421-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00878-3. PubMed 12891544 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All data and devices will be stored containing only the study subject number and dates of device usage. Sharing this data will not involve any IPD.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Study completion
Aug 2029→Feb 2029
Oct 1, 2026
Also revised
eligibility and primary outcomes
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Study completion Aug 2029→Feb 2029
    Eligibility Criteria revised
    Primary outcomes Revised (3 changes)
    + 6 other changes: verification date, description, design details, arm descriptions, secondary outcomes and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06783504
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Responsible party
Thomas V. Nowak (Professor of Clinical Medicine, Indiana University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 20, 2025
Start date
Feb 10, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Maureen Schilling, BS
Contact
maschi@iu.edu
317-278-2064
Thomas V Nowak, MD
principal investigator · IU School of Medicine/IU Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion