CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03584516Updated Oct 20, 2025Results posted

GRAVITAS-309: Itacitinib and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Itacitinib and Placebo in Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease, sponsored by Incyte Corporation. Terminated at 133 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-20.

Sponsored by Incyte Corporation · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated due to insufficient efficacy to support moving into Part 2 of the study; there were no safety concerns that contributed to this decision.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
155
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of itacitinib in combination with corticosteroids as first-line treatment for moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease

Keywords

  • Graft-versus-host-disease
  • itacitinib
  • Janus kinase inhibitor
  • corticosteroids
03

In context

Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

376 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 155 is above the median of 35 across 296 interventional studies indexed under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome.

Browse Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Incyte Corporation is the lead sponsor of 286 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Of its 144 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 93 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Active, clinically diagnosed, moderate or severe cGVHD per NIH Consensus Criteria
  • Underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT)
  • Karnofsky Performance Status score ≥ 60%.
  • Evidence of myeloid and platelet engraftment.
  • Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children based on protocol-defined criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has received more than 3 days/72 hours of systemic corticosteroid treatment for cGVHD.
  • Has received any other systemic treatment for cGVHD, including extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP).
  • Prior treatment with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for acute GVHD, unless the participant achieved complete or partial response and has been off JAK inhibitor treatment for at least 8 weeks before randomization.
  • cGVHD occurring after a nonscheduled donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) administered for pre-emptive treatment of malignancy recurrence.
  • Evidence of relapsed primary malignancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
155 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1 : Dose determination of itacitinib

    itacitinib administered in combination with corticosteroids.

    Drug: Itacitinib · Drug: Methylprednisolone · Drug: Prednisone

  • Experimental
    Part 1 : Dose expansion of itacitinib

    itacitinib administered in combination with corticosteroids or corticosteroids alone.

    Drug: Itacitinib · Drug: Placebo · Drug: Methylprednisolone · Drug: Prednisone

  • Placebo comparator
    Part 2 : itacitinib recommended dose from part 1

    itacitinib or placebo administered in combination with corticosteroids

    Drug: Itacitinib · Drug: Methylprednisolone · Drug: Prednisone

Interventions

  • DrugItacitinib

    In Part 1dose determination participants will receive itacitinib administered orally once daily at the protocol-defined dose according to cohort enrollment. In Part 1 expansion, participants will receive either itacitinib administered orally either once daily or twice a day or corticosteroid alone based on the assigned treatment regimen according to cohort enrollment. In Part 2, participants will receive the recommended dose from Part 1 expansion.

    Also known as: INCB039110

  • DrugPlacebo

    In Part 2, participants will receive matching placebo.

  • DrugMethylprednisolone

    Administered in Parts 1 and 2 as background reference therapy at a dose level that is commensurate with institutional guidelines based on organ involvement and severity of disease.

    Also known as: Medrol, Medrol Dosepak, Solu-Medrol

  • DrugPrednisone

    Administered in Parts 1 and 2 as background reference therapy at a dose level that is commensurate with institutional guidelines based on organ involvement and severity of disease.

    Also known as: Deltasone, Prednicot, predniSONE Intensol, Rayos, Sterapred, Sterapred DS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    A DLT was defined as the occurrence of any protocol-defined toxicity with onset up to and including Day 28, except those with a clear alternative explanation. Participants who received at least 21 of 28 doses of study drug at the level assigned or had a DLT were considered evaluable for determining tolerability of the dose. Participants who did not achieve this duration of exposure and did not have a DLT were to be replaced for purposes of toxicity identification.

    Time frame: up to Day 28

  2. Part 1 Expansion: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: until at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 1103 days)

  3. Part 2: Response Rate at Month 6

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), per National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

    Time frame: Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Months 3 and 6

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

    Time frame: Months 3 and 6

  2. Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Cmax of Itacitinib

    Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of itacitinib.

    Time frame: Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

  3. Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Ctau of Itacitinib

    Ctau was defined as the trough concentration of itacitinib over the dose interval. For pharmacokinetic steady state Day 7 and Day 28, for the calculation of NCA exposure estimates (as more than 3 PK data points are necessary for the estimation beyond Cmax) it was assumed, that PK concentration returns to the predose value (at 12 hours post-dose for BID dosing; at 24 hours post-dose for QD dosing). Predose PK samples were transposed to 24 hours post-dose for QD administration and to 12 hours post-dose for BID administration to allow the steady-state NCA PK estimates on Day 7 and Day 28.

    Time frame: Day 1: predose, and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose. Days 7 and 28: predose, and 1, 2, 5, 12 (for BID dosing), and 24 hours post-dose (for QD dosing)

  4. Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Tmax of Itacitinib

    tmax was defined as the time to the maximum concentration of itacitinib. For pharmacokinetic steady state Day 7 and Day 28, for the calculation of NCA exposure estimates (as more than 3 PK data points are necessary for the estimation beyond Cmax) it was assumed, that PK concentration returns to the predose value (at 12 hours post-dose for BID dosing; at 24 hours post-dose for QD dosing). Predose PK samples were transposed to 24 hours post-dose for QD administration and to 12 hours post-dose for BID administration to allow the steady-state NCA PK estimates on Day 7 and Day 28.

    Time frame: Day 1: predose, and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose. Days 7 and 28: predose, and 1, 2, 5, 12 (for BID dosing), and 24 hours post-dose (for QD dosing)

  5. Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Cl/F of Itacitinib

    Cl/F was defined as the apparent oral dose clearance of itacitinib. For pharmacokinetic steady state Day 7 and Day 28, for the calculation of NCA exposure estimates (as more than 3 PK data points are necessary for the estimation beyond Cmax) it was assumed, that PK concentration returns to the predose value (at 12 hours post-dose for BID dosing; at 24 hours post-dose for QD dosing). Predose PK samples were transposed to 24 hours post-dose for QD administration and to 12 hours post-dose for BID administration to allow the steady-state NCA PK estimates on Day 7 and Day 28.

    Time frame: Day 1: predose, and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose. Days 7 and 28: predose, and 1, 2, 5, 12 (for BID dosing), and 24 hours post-dose (for QD dosing)

  6. Part 2: Cmax of Itacitinib

    Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of itacitinib.

    Time frame: Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

  7. Part 2: Cmin of Itacitinib

    Cmin was defined as the minimum observed plasma or serum concentration of itacitinib over the dose interval.

    Time frame: Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

  8. Part 2: Tmax of Itacitinib

    tmax was defined as the time to the maximum concentration of itacitinib.

    Time frame: Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

  9. Part 2: AUC0-t of Itacitinib

    AUC0-t was defined as the area under the plasma or serum concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration at time = t.

    Time frame: Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

  10. Part 2: Cl/F of Itacitinib

    Cl/F was defined as the apparent oral dose clearance of itacitinib.

    Time frame: Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

  11. Part 1: Response Rate at Months 3, 6, and 12

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

    Time frame: Months 3, 6, and 12

  12. Part 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Month 12

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

    Time frame: Month 12

  13. Part 1 Expansion: Time to Response

    Time to response was defined as the interval between randomization and the first response (CR or PR) before initiation of new therapy. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

    Time frame: up to Month 12

  14. Part 1 Expansion: Duration of Response

    Duration to response was defined as the interval between the first response and cGVHD progression, death, or the initiation of a new systemic cGVHD therapy.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  15. Part 1 Expansion: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: up to 36 months

  16. Part 1 Expansion: Nonrelapse Mortality (NRM) Rate

    NRM was defined as the percentage of participants who died due to causes other than a relapse of their primary hematologic disease.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  17. Part 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Day 180 From the Corticosteroid Dose on Day 1

    The corticosteroid dose at Day 180 was compared to the corticosteroid dose on Day 1 to assess reduction.

    Time frame: Day 1; Day 180

  18. Part 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off All Corticosteroids at Day 180

    The percentage of participants who were not taking any corticosteroids at Day 180 was assessed.

    Time frame: Day 180

  19. Part 1 Expansion: Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Diseases

    The relapse rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose underlying disease relapsed at any time during the course of the study.

    Time frame: up to 1073 days

  20. Part 1 Expansion: Time to Primary Hematologic Disease Relapse

    Time to primary hematologic disease relapse was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of relapse.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  21. Part 2: Change From Baseline in Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale (LLS) Scores

    The LSS consists of 30 items in 7 subscales (skin, eye, mouth, lung, nutrition, energy, and psychological). It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

    Time frame: Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

  22. Part 2: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life-Short Form-36 Version 2 (QOL-SF-36 v2) Scores

    The QOL-SF-36 v2 is 36-item scale that captures changes in health status during the course of treatment. The SF-36 assesses 8 health concepts related to limitations in physical activities, social activities, bodily pain, general mental and physical health, and vitality. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

    Time frame: Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

  23. Part 2: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-3L Scores

    The EQ-5D-3L is a descriptive classification consisting of 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

    Time frame: Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

  24. Part 2: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Responses

    The PGIC is 1 question that captures the overall change in symptoms over the course of treatment. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

    Time frame: Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

  25. Part 2: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Responses

    The PGIS is 1 question that captures the overall change in the severity of symptoms over the previous week. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

    Time frame: Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

  26. Part 2: Response Rate at Months 3 and 12

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

    Time frame: Months 3 and 12

  27. Part 2: Duration of Response

    Duration to response was defined as the interval between the first response and cGVHD progression, death, or the initiation of a new systemic cGVHD therapy.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  28. Part 2: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: up to 36 months

  29. Part 2: NRM Rate

    NRM was defined as the percentage of participants who died due to causes other than a relapse of their primary hematologic disease.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  30. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Day 180 From the Corticosteroid Dose on Day 1

    The corticosteroid dose at Day 180 was compared to the corticosteroid dose on Day 1 to assess reduction.

    Time frame: Day 1; Day 180

  31. Part 2: Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off All Corticosteroids at Day 180

    The percentage of participants who were not taking any corticosteroids at Day 180 was assessed.

    Time frame: Day 180

  32. Part 2: Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Diseases

    The relapse rate was defined as the defined as the percentage of participants whose underlying disease relapsed at any time during the course of the study.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  33. Part 2: Time to Primary Hematologic Disease Relapse

    Time to primary hematologic disease relapse was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of relapse.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  34. Part 2: Number of Participants With Any TEAE

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: up to 30 days after the last dose in Phase 2

07

Results

Posted Jan 27, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Based on preliminary data, Part 2 did not enroll participants. All participants in Part 1 Expansion who were on treatment with either itacitinib 300 or 400 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) and who were tolerating and continuing to receive benefit from itacitinib had the option to continue itacitinib treatment in the INCB 39110-801 (NCT04640025) roll-over study.

Participant flow

Part 1
Participant flow — Part 1
MilestonePart 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Started11100000
Completed650000
Not completed550000
Withdrew: Death230000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject200000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100000
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor020000
Part 1 Expansion
Participant flow — Part 1 Expansion
MilestonePart 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Started0035392936
Completed003211
Not completed0032372835
Withdrew: Death009845
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up000100
Withdrew: Physician decision004323
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor0017202023
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject002423
Withdrew: Discontinued treatment and terminated cs tapering000100
Withdrew: Disease progression; cgvhd flare000001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPart 1: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

A DLT was defined as the occurrence of any protocol-defined toxicity with onset up to and including Day 28, except those with a clear alternative explanation. Participants who received at least 21 of 28 doses of study drug at the level assigned or had a DLT were considered evaluable for determining tolerability of the dose. Participants who did not achieve this duration of exposure and did not have a DLT were to be replaced for purposes of toxicity identification.

Time frame:
up to Day 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
ParticipantsPart 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CS
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)01
PrimaryPart 1 Expansion: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
until at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 1103 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part 1 Expansion: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
ParticipantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)34382832
PrimaryPart 2: Response Rate at Month 6

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), per National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

Time frame:
Month 6

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Months 3 and 6

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

Time frame:
Months 3 and 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Months 3 and 6
percentage of participantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Month 360.0 (42.1 to 76.1)69.2 (52.4 to 83.0)58.6 (38.9 to 76.5)50.0 (32.9 to 67.1)
Month 642.9 (26.3 to 60.6)53.8 (37.2 to 69.9)34.5 (17.9 to 54.3)36.1 (20.8 to 53.8)
SecondaryParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Cmax of Itacitinib

Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of itacitinib.

Time frame:
Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanomoles per Liter (nmol/L)
Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Cmax of Itacitinib
nanomoles per Liter (nmol/L)Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: 100 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 100 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CS
Day 1201 ± NA655 ± 82.91050 ± 87.3951 ± 68.0—769 ± 118736 ± 79.1
Day 7191 ± NA1070 ± 88.91580 ± 1251190 ± 103—1520 ± 73.01110 ± 66.2
Day 28486 ± 1401460 ± 67.31290 ± 2481350 ± 72.21350 ± 29.42040 ± 62.61580 ± 51.4
SecondaryParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Ctau of Itacitinib

Ctau was defined as the trough concentration of itacitinib over the dose interval. For pharmacokinetic steady state Day 7 and Day 28, for the calculation of NCA exposure estimates (as more than 3 PK data points are necessary for the estimation beyond Cmax) it was assumed, that PK concentration returns to the predose value (at 12 hours post-dose for BID dosing; at 24 hours post-dose for QD dosing). Predose PK samples were transposed to 24 hours post-dose for QD administration and to 12 hours post-dose for BID administration to allow the steady-state NCA PK estimates on Day 7 and Day 28.

Time frame:
Day 1: predose, and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose. Days 7 and 28: predose, and 1, 2, 5, 12 (for BID dosing), and 24 hours post-dose (for QD dosing)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nmol/L
Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Ctau of Itacitinib
nmol/LParts 1 and 1 Expansion: 100 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 100 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CS
Day 1NA ± NANA ± NA0.153 ± NA135 ± 197—7.54 ± NANA ± NA
Day 70.298 ± NA53.6 ± 21852.2 ± 42533.5 ± 118—483 ± 175127 ± 177
Day 2810.4 ± 444068.0 ± 31442.2 ± 18229.7 ± 152392 ± 85.6460 ± 123195 ± 116
SecondaryParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Tmax of Itacitinib

tmax was defined as the time to the maximum concentration of itacitinib. For pharmacokinetic steady state Day 7 and Day 28, for the calculation of NCA exposure estimates (as more than 3 PK data points are necessary for the estimation beyond Cmax) it was assumed, that PK concentration returns to the predose value (at 12 hours post-dose for BID dosing; at 24 hours post-dose for QD dosing). Predose PK samples were transposed to 24 hours post-dose for QD administration and to 12 hours post-dose for BID administration to allow the steady-state NCA PK estimates on Day 7 and Day 28.

Time frame:
Day 1: predose, and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose. Days 7 and 28: predose, and 1, 2, 5, 12 (for BID dosing), and 24 hours post-dose (for QD dosing)
Reported as:
Median · hours
Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Tmax of Itacitinib
hoursParts 1 and 1 Expansion: 100 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 100 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CS
Day 11.0 (1.0 to 1.0)2.1 (0.9 to 4.8)2.1 (0.8 to 5.0)2.0 (0.0 to 5.0)—2.0 (1.0 to 5.0)2.4 (1.0 to 5.0)
Day 71.0 (1.0 to 1.0)2.1 (0.0 to 5.0)2.0 (1.0 to 13.4)2.0 (1.0 to 5.2)—1.9 (0.0 to 10.7)2.0 (0.9 to 5.0)
Day 284.0 (1.0 to 4.8)3.1 (0.8 to 12.0)2.0 (0.0 to 16.9)2.1 (0.9 to 5.0)2.0 (2.0 to 2.2)2.3 (2.0 to 5.6)2.0 (1.0 to 5.0)
SecondaryParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Cl/F of Itacitinib

Cl/F was defined as the apparent oral dose clearance of itacitinib. For pharmacokinetic steady state Day 7 and Day 28, for the calculation of NCA exposure estimates (as more than 3 PK data points are necessary for the estimation beyond Cmax) it was assumed, that PK concentration returns to the predose value (at 12 hours post-dose for BID dosing; at 24 hours post-dose for QD dosing). Predose PK samples were transposed to 24 hours post-dose for QD administration and to 12 hours post-dose for BID administration to allow the steady-state NCA PK estimates on Day 7 and Day 28.

Time frame:
Day 1: predose, and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose. Days 7 and 28: predose, and 1, 2, 5, 12 (for BID dosing), and 24 hours post-dose (for QD dosing)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Liters per hour
Parts 1 and 1 Expansion: Cl/F of Itacitinib
Liters per hourParts 1 and 1 Expansion: 100 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSParts 1 and 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 100 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 200 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CS
Day 1NA ± NANA ± NA258 ± NA41.2 ± 130—640 ± NANA ± NA
Day 7224 ± NA43.0 ± 10548.9 ± 15985.9 ± 90.7—31.8 ± 82.994.4 ± 61.3
Day 2847.7 ± 21130.0 ± 96.954.8 ± 18981.0 ± 65.120.2 ± 54.226.9 ± 75.567.5 ± 62.1
SecondaryPart 2: Cmax of Itacitinib

Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of itacitinib.

Time frame:
Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Cmin of Itacitinib

Cmin was defined as the minimum observed plasma or serum concentration of itacitinib over the dose interval.

Time frame:
Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Tmax of Itacitinib

tmax was defined as the time to the maximum concentration of itacitinib.

Time frame:
Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: AUC0-t of Itacitinib

AUC0-t was defined as the area under the plasma or serum concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration at time = t.

Time frame:
Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Cl/F of Itacitinib

Cl/F was defined as the apparent oral dose clearance of itacitinib.

Time frame:
Days 1, 7, and 28: predose and 1, 2, and 5 hours post-dose

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 1: Response Rate at Months 3, 6, and 12

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

Time frame:
Months 3, 6, and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Response Rate at Months 3, 6, and 12
percentage of participantsPart 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CS
Month 363.6 (30.8 to 89.1)50.0 (18.7 to 81.3)
Month 636.4 (10.9 to 69.2)50.0 (18.7 to 81.3)
Month 1218.2 (2.3 to 51.8)20.0 (2.5 to 55.6)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Month 12

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Month 12
percentage of participantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Response Rate at Month 1222.9 (10.4 to 40.1)41.0 (25.6 to 57.9)24.1 (10.3 to 43.5)19.4 (8.2 to 36.0)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the interval between randomization and the first response (CR or PR) before initiation of new therapy. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

Time frame:
up to Month 12
Reported as:
Median · days
Part 1 Expansion: Time to Response
daysPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Time to Response16.0 (12 to 120)16.0 (12 to 86)16.0 (13 to 145)16.0 (13 to 88)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Duration of Response

Duration to response was defined as the interval between the first response and cGVHD progression, death, or the initiation of a new systemic cGVHD therapy.

Time frame:
up to 24 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Part 1 Expansion: Duration of Response
daysPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Duration of Response581.0 (147.0 to 807.0)NA (306.0 to NA)512.0 (161.0 to NA)197.0 (103.0 to NA)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
up to 36 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Part 1 Expansion: Overall Survival
daysPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Overall SurvivalNA (694.0 to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Nonrelapse Mortality (NRM) Rate

NRM was defined as the percentage of participants who died due to causes other than a relapse of their primary hematologic disease.

Time frame:
up to 24 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1 Expansion: Nonrelapse Mortality (NRM) Rate
percentage of participantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Nonrelapse Mortality (NRM) Rate25.7 (12.5 to 43.3)15.4 (6.2 to 32.0)10.3 (2.3 to 28.2)11.1 (3.2 to 26.7)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Day 180 From the Corticosteroid Dose on Day 1

The corticosteroid dose at Day 180 was compared to the corticosteroid dose on Day 1 to assess reduction.

Time frame:
Day 1; Day 180
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Day 180 From the Corticosteroid Dose on Day 1
percentage of participantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Day 180 From the Corticosteroid Dose on Day 190.5100.0100.0100.0
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off All Corticosteroids at Day 180

The percentage of participants who were not taking any corticosteroids at Day 180 was assessed.

Time frame:
Day 180
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off All Corticosteroids at Day 180
percentage of participantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off All Corticosteroids at Day 18052.466.747.144.4
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Diseases

The relapse rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose underlying disease relapsed at any time during the course of the study.

Time frame:
up to 1073 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1 Expansion: Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Diseases
percentage of participantsPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Diseases5.7 (0.7 to 19.2)7.7 (1.6 to 20.9)13.8 (3.9 to 31.7)2.8 (0.1 to 14.5)
SecondaryPart 1 Expansion: Time to Primary Hematologic Disease Relapse

Time to primary hematologic disease relapse was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of relapse.

Time frame:
up to 24 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Part 1 Expansion: Time to Primary Hematologic Disease Relapse
daysPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Part 1 Expansion: Time to Primary Hematologic Disease RelapseNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale (LLS) Scores

The LSS consists of 30 items in 7 subscales (skin, eye, mouth, lung, nutrition, energy, and psychological). It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

Time frame:
Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life-Short Form-36 Version 2 (QOL-SF-36 v2) Scores

The QOL-SF-36 v2 is 36-item scale that captures changes in health status during the course of treatment. The SF-36 assesses 8 health concepts related to limitations in physical activities, social activities, bodily pain, general mental and physical health, and vitality. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

Time frame:
Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-3L Scores

The EQ-5D-3L is a descriptive classification consisting of 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

Time frame:
Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Responses

The PGIC is 1 question that captures the overall change in symptoms over the course of treatment. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

Time frame:
Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Responses

The PGIS is 1 question that captures the overall change in the severity of symptoms over the previous week. It was to be used to assess patient-reported changes in health status, symptoms, and well being.

Time frame:
Baseline; End of Treatment in Phase 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Response Rate at Months 3 and 12

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants that had CR or PR, per NIH Consensus Criteria, as determined by the investigator, within 14 days of the post-Baseline visit date until new anti-GVHD therapy or overall response-progression or relapse/progression of underlying disease. CR was defined as the complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGvHD in all evaluable organs. PR was defined as an improvement in at least one organ without progression in other organs.

Time frame:
Months 3 and 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Duration of Response

Duration to response was defined as the interval between the first response and cGVHD progression, death, or the initiation of a new systemic cGVHD therapy.

Time frame:
up to 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
up to 36 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: NRM Rate

NRM was defined as the percentage of participants who died due to causes other than a relapse of their primary hematologic disease.

Time frame:
up to 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Day 180 From the Corticosteroid Dose on Day 1

The corticosteroid dose at Day 180 was compared to the corticosteroid dose on Day 1 to assess reduction.

Time frame:
Day 1; Day 180

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off All Corticosteroids at Day 180

The percentage of participants who were not taking any corticosteroids at Day 180 was assessed.

Time frame:
Day 180

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Diseases

The relapse rate was defined as the defined as the percentage of participants whose underlying disease relapsed at any time during the course of the study.

Time frame:
up to 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Time to Primary Hematologic Disease Relapse

Time to primary hematologic disease relapse was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of relapse.

Time frame:
up to 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPart 2: Number of Participants With Any TEAE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
up to 30 days after the last dose in Phase 2

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over until at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 1103 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CS2/11 (18.2%)6/11 (54.5%)11/11 (100%)
Part 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CS3/10 (30%)5/10 (50%)10/10 (100%)
Part 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CS9/35 (25.7%)18/35 (51.4%)33/35 (94.3%)
Part 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CS8/39 (20.5%)22/39 (56.4%)37/39 (94.9%)
Part 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CS4/29 (13.8%)12/29 (41.4%)27/29 (93.1%)
Part 1 Expansion: Total21/103 (20.4%)52/103 (50.5%)97/103 (94.2%)
Part 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy5/36 (13.9%)9/36 (25%)31/36 (86.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 107
Most frequent serious events
EventPart 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: TotalPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/111/102/355/392/299/1030/36
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/110/100/354/390/294/1031/36
Anal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/111/100/350/390/290/1030/36
AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/111/100/350/390/290/1030/36
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosisInfections and infestations0/111/102/350/390/292/1030/36
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/111/101/350/390/291/1030/36
Hepatic fibrosisHepatobiliary disorders0/111/101/350/390/291/1030/36
Liver injuryHepatobiliary disorders0/111/101/350/390/291/1030/36
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/111/100/350/390/290/1030/36
OedemaGeneral disorders0/111/101/350/390/291/1030/36
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 161
Most frequent other events
EventPart 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: TotalPart 1 Expansion: CS Monotherapy
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations5/113/106/357/399/2922/1032/36
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/112/1014/359/3910/2933/1031/36
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/114/106/354/396/2916/1035/36
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/114/105/354/390/299/1031/36
FatigueGeneral disorders4/112/106/357/394/2917/1035/36
HypertensionVascular disorders2/112/106/357/399/2922/1037/36
Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/113/103/352/390/295/1030/36
Blood cholesterol increasedInvestigations3/112/103/354/394/2911/1031/36
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations3/112/103/354/393/2910/1031/36
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/111/105/352/391/298/1035/36

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Part 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS MonotherapyTotal
Mean57.2 ± 7.0758.4 ± 15.0853.6 ± 14.0152.6 ± 13.7952.6 ± 12.8655.7 ± 13.3254.2 ± 13.23
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Part 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS MonotherapyTotal
Female331716141972
Male871823151788
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Part 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS MonotherapyTotal
White/Caucasian11831362734147
Black/African-American0120003
Asian0113218
Captured as "Other" in Database0010012
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Part 1: Itacitinib 200 mg QD + CSPart 1: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 400 mg QD + CSPart 1 Expansion: Itacitinib 300 mg BID + CSPart 1 Expansion: CS MonotherapyTotal
Hispanic or Latino42681526
Not Hispanic or Latino6825261929113
Not Reported10224211
Unknown0021104
Captured as "Other" in Database0002406
08

Study locations

133 sites
  • University of Arizona Cancer Center - Out Pt.
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences - Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • City of Hope National Medical Center
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • University of California San Diego Medical Center, Moores Cancer Center
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Miami, Florida 33136-1002, United States
  • Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Augusta University - Medical College of Georgia
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Illinois Cancer Specialists
    Chicago, Illinois 60714, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153-3328, United States
  • Advocate Lutheran General Hospital - Oncology Specislists Sc
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60028, United States
  • Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5201, United States
  • University of Kansas Hospital Authority
    Westwood, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Tulane University
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112-2618, United States
  • University of Maryland - Greenebaum Cancer Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111-1552, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Spectrum Health
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Saint Louis University Cancer Center
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601-8550, United States
  • University of Rochester, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center
    Rochester, New York 14642-0001, United States
  • Stony Brook University Medical Center
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Oncology Hematology Care, Inc
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45236, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106-1716, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Jefferson University Hospitals
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Western Pennsylvania Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232-1309, United States
  • Avera Cancer Institute
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57105-2108, United States
  • Tri Star Bone Marrow Transplant
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • St David'S South Austin Medical Center
    Austin, Texas 78704, United States
  • Texas Oncology - Medical City Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Texas Oncology - Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Ordensklinikum Linz Gmbh Elisabethinen
    Linz, 04020, Austria
  • Zna Stuivenberg
    Antwerp, 02060, Belgium
  • Institut Jules Bordet
    Brussels, 01000, Belgium
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen (Uza)
    Edegem, 02650, Belgium
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
    Ghent, 09000, Belgium
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuis Leuven - Gasthuisberg
    Leuven, 03000, Belgium
  • CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE LI�GE - SART TILMAN
    Liège, 04000, Belgium
  • AZ DELTA
    Roeselare, 08800, Belgium
  • University of Alberta
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P4, Canada
  • University Health Network
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Hospital Maisonneuve Rosemont
    Montreal, Quebec H1T 2M4, Canada
  • Saskatchewan Cancer
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 4H4, Canada
  • The Finsen Centre National Hospital
    Copenhagen, 02100, Denmark
  • Turku University Hospital
    Turku, 20521, Finland
  • Chu Amiens Picardie - Hopital Sud
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Centre Hospitalier D'Angers
    Angers, 49000, France
  • Chu de Grenoble - Hopital Albert Michallon
    Grenoble, 38700, France
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes
    Marseille, 13273, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (Chu de Nantes) - Hotel-Dieu
    Nantes, 44000, France
  • Chu de Nice - Hospital L Archet
    Nice, 06800, France
  • Chu de Rennes - Hospital Pontchaillou
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • Centre Henri Becquerel
    Rouen, 76038, France
  • Chru Hopitaux de Tours Hospital Bretonneau
    Tours, 37000, France
  • Hopitaux de Brabois
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
  • Charite Berlin
    Berlin, 12200, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Bonn Aoer
    Bonn, 00011, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Koln
    Cologne, 50937, Germany
  • University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus Technical University Dresden
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen - Medizinische Klinik 5
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Essen
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • UNIVERSIT�TSKLINIKUM HALLE (SAALE)
    Halle, D06120, Germany
  • University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf Centre of Oncology
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Jena
    Jena, 07740, Germany
  • Selbststandige Abteilung Fur Hamatologie Und Internistische Onkologie
    Leipzig, 00341, Germany
  • Universitatsmedizin Der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz Iii
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • University Hospital Mannheim
    Mannheim, 68167, Germany
  • Iii Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik Klinikum Rechts Der Isar Technische Universitat Munchen
    Munich, 81675, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Munster
    Münster, 48149, Germany
  • Universitaetsmedizin Rostock
    Rostock, 18057, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum in Tubingen
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • University Hospital of West Attica - Attikon
    Chaïdári, 124 62, Greece
  • General Hospital of Thessaloniki G. Papanikolaou
    Thessaloniki, 57010, Greece
  • Rambam Medical Center
    Haifa, 3109601, Israel
  • Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center Ein Karem Hadassah
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital
    Petach Tiqwa, 49100, Israel
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • CLINICA DI EMATOLOGIA, UNIVERSIT� POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE
    Ancona, 60126, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni Xxiii
    Bergamo, 24127, Italy
  • L AZIENDA OSPEDALIERO-UNIVERSITARIA DI BOLOGNA POLICLINICO S. ORSOLA � MALPIGHI
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia
    Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • Azienda Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
    Catania, 95123, Italy
  • Fondazione Irccs Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore
    Milan, 20122, Italy
  • Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura A Carattere Scientifico (Irccs) Ospedale San Raffaele
    Milan, 20132, Italy
  • A.O.U. Di Modena - Policlinico
    Modena, 41124, Italy
  • A.O.U. Federico Ii
    Naples, 80131, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti "Villa Sofia - Cervello"
    Palermo, 90100, Italy
  • Comitato Di Bioetica Della Fondazione Irccs Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Ospedali Riuniti
    Reggio Calabria, 89133, Italy
  • Universita Degli Studi Di Roma La Sapienza - Umberto I Policlinico Di Roma - Centro Di Ematologia
    Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Universita Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore
    Roma, 00168, Italy
  • Irrcs Instituto Clinico Humanitas
    Rozzano, 20089, Italy

Showing the first 100 of 133 sites across 16 countries.

09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 30, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 3, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03584516
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2018
Start date
Jan 17, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 3, 2023
Completion
Nov 3, 2023
Results posted
Jan 27, 2025
Last update
Oct 20, 2025

Study contacts

Rodica Morariu-Zamfir, MD
study director · Incyte Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion