CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03578978PISALONSUpdated Jul 17, 2020

A Panel of Biomarkers in Diagnosing Late-onset Neonatal Sepsis and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Sibu Hospital

An observational study in Neonatal SEPSIS and Necrotizing Enterocolitis, sponsored by Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia. Status unknown at 2 sites in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 72 Hours to 30 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-17.

Sponsored by Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
72 Hours to 30 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a cross-sectional study to evaluate the utilities of a panel of biomarkers (Procalcitonin, Interleukin-6, Serum Amyloid A and Apolipoprotein C2) versus the gold standard blood culture result diagnosing late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) and/or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Neonates who meet the initial screening criteria for suspected LONS or NEC will be recruited into the study. A group of 50 neonates who are clinically well, admitted to the nursery or general ward for reasons other than neonatal sepsis or NEC will also be recruited into the study.

Read the detailed description

The diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is challenging especially the very low birth weight infants as the signs and symptoms of sepsis are nonspecific and can be attributed to non-infected aetiologies including exacerbation of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, apnoea of prematurity and gastroesophageal reflux. Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing septicaemia (either bacteremia or fungemia). However, its effectiveness in the population of preterm infants is compromised.Given the dire consequences of not treating the sepsis early, clinicians tend to have a low threshold for treatment. This leads to overuse of antimicrobials, promotion of antimicrobial resistance, exposure of infants to avoidable side effects from the antimicrobial treatment, prolonged hospitalisation and increased healthcare costs. Hence, there is a need for a clearly defined algorithm for diagnosing LONS and NEC. This study aims to examine the diagnostic utilities of a panel of sepsis biomarkers and explore if they can be incorporated into a diagnostic algorithm which hopefully, can be translated into clinical practice in the future.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 160 across 931 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
72 Hours to 30 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Neonates suspected of LONS and/or NEC admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Special Care Nursery (SCN) or Paediatric Medical 27 (PM27) wards in Sibu Hospital, Malaysia during the period of 1 July 2018 and 31 May 2020 will be screened for their eligibility. Apart from that, neonates admitted to Sibu Hospital for reasons other than neonatal sepsis or NEC will also be recruited into the study during the period of 1 June 2018 and 31 May 2020.

Eligibility criteria

Neonates with suspected LONS/NEC

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with signs and symptoms suggestive of sepsis and/or NEC and requiring full sepsis screening and start of intravenous antibiotic(s), or a change of antibiotics (if already on)
  • Infants with postnatal age greater than 72 hours and less than 28 days of life, of all gestation
  • Parents of potential neonates who are willing to give written informed consent

Healthy subjects

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically well infants admitted to Sibu Hospital for reasons other than neonatal sepsis or NEC
  • Infants with postnatal age greater than 72 hours and less than 28 days of life, of all gestation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants who have lethal or life-threatening congenital abnormalities
  • Infants who have chromosomal abnormalities
  • Infants who have hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
  • Infants who are on steroid treatment
  • Infants who received blood transfusions
  • Post-operative infants
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Neonates with suspected LONS and/or NEC

    A group of 150 neonates with suspected LONS and/or NEC will be recruited. No intervention will be given to the subjects. Blood sampling will be obtained from subjects at 4 time points (Hour 0, 24, 48 and 72) for analysis of the sepsis biomarkers of interest.

    Other: No intervention

  • Healthy neonates

    A group of 50 neonates who are clinically well, admitted to the NICU for reasons other than neonatal sepsis or NEC will be recruited into the study to explore the kinetics and concentrations of the panel of biomarkers in healthy subjects comparing to subjects with suspected LONS/NEC. No intervention will be given to the subjects. Blood sampling will be obtained from subjects at 4 time points (Hour 0, 24, 48 and 72) for analysis of the sepsis biomarkers of interest.

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    No intervention will be given to study subjects. Only blood will be obtained from study subjects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic utilities of biomarkers of interest in diagnosing LONS

    Diagnostic utilities of each individual biomarker (procalcitonin, interleukin-6, serum amyloid A and apolipoprotein C2) or in combination in diagnosing LONS

    Time frame: Hour 0 to 72

  2. Diagnostic utilities of biomarkers of interest in diagnosing NEC

    Diagnostic utilities of each individual biomarker (procalcitonin, interleukin-6, serum amyloid A and apolipoprotein C2) or in combination in diagnosing LONS

    Time frame: Hour 0 to 72

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Sarawak General Hospital
    Kuching, Sarawak 93586, Malaysia
    • Shirin H Tan · Contact · shirin_hui88@yahoo.com · 6082276820
    • Ann Cheng Wong · Sub investigator
    • Lee Gaik Chan · Sub investigator
    • Janet Lin Yee Hii · Sub investigator
    • Debbie Diewo · Sub investigator
    • Kim Lai Ng · Sub investigator
    • Janet Huey Jing Liew · Sub investigator
    • Hui Ling Sim · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • Sibu Hospital
    Sibu, Sarawak 96000, Malaysia
    • Shirin Hui Tan · Contact
    • See Chang Wong · Principal investigator
    • Teck Hock Toh · Sub investigator
    • Chae Hee Chieng · Sub investigator
    • Phaik Ngan Lee · Sub investigator
    • Yi-Pinn Tai · Sub investigator
    • Wei Nin Kong · Sub investigator
    • Justina Sie Wei Lau · Sub investigator
    • Hanizah Amran · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03578978
Lead sponsor
Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 6, 2018
Start date
Jul 1, 2018
Primary completion
May 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2020

Study contacts

Shirin Hui Tan
Contact
shirin_hui88@yahoo.com
+6082-276820
Shirin Hui Tan
principal investigator · Clinical Research Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion