ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03554278Updated Feb 5, 2025

Alteration of Stool Microbiota in Preterm Infants With Anemia

An observational study in Anemia, Neonatal, Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Dysbiosis, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Days to 30 Days, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-05.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
57
Ages
7 Days to 30 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the relationship between anemia and stool microbiota in premature infants. It also evaluates the relationship between blood transfusion and stool microbiota.

Read the detailed description

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a leading cause of death in preterm infants, yet the disease mechanism is not well understood. Among the factors that have been studied are the change in stool microbiota (dysbiosis), severe anemia, and transfusion. Studies suggest that dysbiosis occurs in neonates with NEC. Large studies and meta-analyses have shown a predominance of Gammaproteobacteria, a decrease in Firmicutes, and decreased bacterial diversity in stool from infants with NEC. Studies do not support a relationship between transfusions and NEC since there are conflicting findings on this topic. There is a suggestion, however, that severe anemia may be associated with NEC though this requires further study.

No studies have been done evaluating the relationship between anemia and change in stool microbiota, or blood transfusion and change in stool microbiota. This study aims to primarily evaluate the relationship between anemia and stool microbiota, and secondarily evaluate the relationship between transfusion and stool microbiota.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anemia, Neonatal
  • Necrotizing Enterocolitis
  • Dysbiosis

Keywords

  • NEC
  • transfusion
  • microbiome
  • premature
03

In context

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

228 studies on the registry are indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is below the median of 144 across 95 observational studies indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing.

Browse Enterocolitis, Necrotizing studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Days to 30 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will enroll preterm infants that are less than 32 weeks gestational age at birth. At time of enrollment, these infants must be between 7 days of age up to (and including) 30 days of age. They must also be on enteral feeds of at least 100mL/kg/day. The investigators will exclude infants who have developed NEC prior to enrollment, who have had surgery prior to enrollment, who have major congenital anomalies, or who are requiring FiO2 >50% at time of enrollment.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants less than 32 weeks gestation at birth
  • Age at enrollment between 7 days and less than/equal to 30 days
  • Minimum 100 mL/kg/day enteral feeds

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) prior to enrollment
  • Prior surgery
  • Major congenital anomalies
  • Oxygen requirement with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) >50% (at time of enrollment)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Anemia

    Stool samples from infants with anemia. Severe anemia defined as hematocrit less than 25%. Anemia defined as hematocrit greater than or equal to 25% and less than 30%.

  • No Anemia

    Stool samples from infants without anemia. No anemia defined as hematocrit equal to or greater than 30%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. qRT-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) quantitative stool analysis

    Quantify major bacterial groups, including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroides in stool samples

    Time frame: qRT-PCR will be analyzed for infant stool samples from enrollment until infants are 38 weeks corrected, or until they are discharged from the hospital. This time frame will be an average of 10 weeks per infant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Alpha diversity

    Use next generation sequencing to assess changes in alpha diversity of bacteria between non-anemic and anemic stool samples

    Time frame: Infant stool samples will be analyzed from enrollment until infants are 38 weeks corrected, or until they are discharged from the hospital. This time frame will be an average of 10 weeks per infant.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Parkland Health & Hospital System
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gritz EC, Bhandari V. The human neonatal gut microbiome: a brief review. Front Pediatr. 2015 Mar 5;3:17. doi: 10.3389/fped.2015.00017. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25798435 ↗
  • Patel RM, Denning PW. Intestinal microbiota and its relationship with necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res. 2015 Sep;78(3):232-8. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.97. Epub 2015 May 20. PubMed 25992911 ↗
  • Warner BB, Tarr PI. Necrotizing enterocolitis and preterm infant gut bacteria. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Dec;21(6):394-399. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PubMed 27343151 ↗
  • Warner BB, Deych E, Zhou Y, Hall-Moore C, Weinstock GM, Sodergren E, Shaikh N, Hoffmann JA, Linneman LA, Hamvas A, Khanna G, Rouggly-Nickless LC, Ndao IM, Shands BA, Escobedo M, Sullivan JE, Radmacher PG, Shannon WD, Tarr PI. Gut bacteria dysbiosis and necrotising enterocolitis in very low birthweight infants: a prospective case-control study. Lancet. 2016 May 7;387(10031):1928-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00081-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9. PubMed 26969089 ↗
  • Zhou Y, Shan G, Sodergren E, Weinstock G, Walker WA, Gregory KE. Longitudinal analysis of the premature infant intestinal microbiome prior to necrotizing enterocolitis: a case-control study. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 5;10(3):e0118632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118632. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25741698 ↗
  • Pammi M, Cope J, Tarr PI, Warner BB, Morrow AL, Mai V, Gregory KE, Kroll JS, McMurtry V, Ferris MJ, Engstrand L, Lilja HE, Hollister EB, Versalovic J, Neu J. Intestinal dysbiosis in preterm infants preceding necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiome. 2017 Mar 9;5(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0248-8. PubMed 28274256 ↗
  • Patel RM, Knezevic A, Shenvi N, Hinkes M, Keene S, Roback JD, Easley KA, Josephson CD. Association of Red Blood Cell Transfusion, Anemia, and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants. JAMA. 2016 Mar 1;315(9):889-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1204. PubMed 26934258 ↗
  • Hay S, Zupancic JA, Flannery DD, Kirpalani H, Dukhovny D. Should we believe in transfusion-associated enterocolitis? Applying a GRADE to the literature. Semin Perinatol. 2017 Feb;41(1):80-91. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.021. Epub 2016 Nov 17. PubMed 27866662 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 60 months.

Of 39 observational studies under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 115. This study's 60 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 3, 2018
First posted
Jun 13, 2018
StartActual
Oct 9, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Oct 30, 2023
Last update
Feb 5, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03554278
Responsible party
Julie Mirpuri Hathiramani (Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 13, 2018
Start date
Oct 9, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2023
Completion
Oct 30, 2023
Last update
Feb 5, 2025

Study contacts

Julie Mirpuri Hathiramani, MD
principal investigator · UT Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion