CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03549988Updated May 1, 2026

Pro-active Fecal Calprotectin Monitoring PROMOTE-UC

An observational study in Ulcerative Colitis, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
726
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis:

Pro-active home fecal calprotectin testing in patients with Ulcerative Colitis will allow early detection and treatment of inflammation to prevent symptomatic flares. This will result in less steroid use, fewer hospitalizations and a reduced risk of surgery, as well as improved quality of life and adherence to medication.

Read the detailed description

Previous studies have shown that fecal calprotectin (FC) may be useful to predict relapse of inflammatory bowel disease and response to treatment. Current methods for measurement of FC require bringing stool samples to the laboratory or physician's office. The test is either not readily available or is expensive for patients. Some patients also find it inconvenient to collect, transport and travel to return the sample.

A prior study in our institution showed that only 77% of patients returned samples for processing. Therefore, a home-based kit may offer greater uptake by patients as samples do not need to be returned to a lab or physician's office. Regular monitoring of patients at home may allow the detection and prediction of flares before the appearance of symptoms. With earlier treatment, the risk of complications may be minimized and the quality of life for people living with this disease may be improved.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ulcerative Colitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Fecal calprotectin
03

In context

Colitis, Ulcerative

1,492 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative; 399 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 726 is above the median of 157 across 395 observational studies indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative.

Browse Colitis, Ulcerative studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Study population will consist of 756 patients with Ulcerative colitis in symptomatic remission. Through the Canadian Intestinal Research Consortium (CIRC), we intent to involve a minimum of 12 sites across Canada, Europe and Australia.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients age 19 years or older with Ulcerative Colitis
  • Symptomatic remission defined as a modified Partial Mayo score ≤ 2 with a rectal bleeding score = 0
  • Able to use IBDocTM test kit which requires a smart phone with a camera and internet access to download the CalApp® which interprets the measurement
  • Able to give informed consent to the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients experiencing a symptomatic flare
  • Patients currently receiving therapy as part of a clinical trial
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
726 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control

    The group will receive current standard of care as the usual practice of the attending physician. Basic research data will be collected and participants in this group will be asked to complete the on-line questionnaires (SIBDQ and EQ-5D 5L) on the baseline visit and month 6, 12 and month 18. When endoscopy is performed biopsies should be taken and the endoscopic and histologic assessment will be recorded. If a fecal calprotectin is measured, every effort should be made to use the IBDoc with the result being sent to the central primary investigator via the IBDoc Web Portal. However, should a different fecal calprotectin measure be used, this will be recorded as part of the study documentation and will be included in the study data.

  • Intervention: FC measurements with IBDoc

    Fecal Calprotectin (FC) measurements with IBDocTM home kits will be performed by participants in the intervention group every 2 months until final visit. Basic research data will be collected and participants in this group will be asked to complete the on-line questionnaires (SIBDQ and EQ-5D 5L) on baseline visit and month 6, 12 and month 18.

    Other: Fecal Calprotectin (FC) measurements with IBDocTM

Interventions

  • OtherFecal Calprotectin (FC) measurements with IBDocTM

    Each IBDocTM kit measure one fecal calprotectin value. The IBDoc® is an in-vitro diagnostic immunoassay analyzed by a downloadable smartphone application (CalApp®). A patient is able to process their stool at home using a test cassette. The IBDocTM test results are displayed in a light signal system as three titre categories; normal \<100 µg/g (green), 100-300 µg/g (yellow), \>300 µg/g (high). Patients' results will be sent directly to the central research coordinator through the IBDoc® Web Portal. If the FC is \>250 µg/g a second FC will be performed within 2 weeks. If this result is \<250 µg/g patients will continue to monitor their FC every 2 months. If the second result is \>250 µg/g, the attending physician will review the patient either by telephone or in the office within 7 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The time to a symptomatic flare, defined as an increase in modified partial Mayo score > 2 points from baseline or a rectal bleeding score > 1

    All patients in both control and intervention group will be contacted every 6 months until end of study. Partial Mayo and rectal bleeding score will be obtained and if there is an increase in partial Mayo score \> 2 points from baseline or a rectal bleeding score \> 1, this is considered as flare. Endoscopy will be performed wherever possible.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospitalization, surgery, steroid or biologic use

    All patients in both control and intervention group will be asked every 6 months whether they were hospitalized, had undergone surgery, had used steroid (oral or rectal) or any biologics.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Proportion of subjects who underwent an escalation of therapy

    Choice of therapy for all patients should be according to the standard of care and by the judgement of the attending physician.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Quality of life measured by SIBDQ questionnaire

    Quality of life is measured by Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SIBDQ) questionnaire. Both control and intervention group will be asked to complete these questionnaires on-line during baseline, month 6, 12 and month 18. The SIBDQ provide a measure of subjective health status or quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It consists of four domains, bowel symptoms, emotional health, systemic systems and social function. The total score ranges from 10 (worst health) to 70 (best health).

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Quality of life measured by EQ-5D 5L questionnaire

    Quality of life is measured by EQ-5D 5L health questionnaire. Both control and intervention group will be asked to complete these questionnaires on-line during baseline, month 6, 12 and month 18. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status. It comprises of 5 dimensions like mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state. This decision results in a 1-digit number expressing the level selected for that dimension. The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Number of physician visits

    Participants will be asked the number of physician visits during the course of the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Time lost from work or school

    Participants will be asked about time lost from work or school because of ulcerative colitis symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Correlation of fecal calprotectin with endoscopic activity

    Endoscopic disease activity is measured by Mayo score. The Mayo Endoscopic Score is classified into the following four categories: 0, normal mucosa or inactive disease; 1, mild disease with erythema, decreased vascular patterns and mild friability; 2, moderate disease with marked erythema, absence of vascular patterns, friability and erosions; 3, severe disease with spontaneous bleeding and ulceration.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Correlation of fecal calprotectin with histologic disease activity

    A histologic scoring index is a system used to assess the patient's disease severity using tissue sample. In this study, the Robarts Histology Index (RHI) is used. The RHI can be calculated as 1 x chronic inflammatory infiltrate (4 levels) plus 2 x lamina propria neutrophils (4 levels) plus 3 x neutrophils in epithelium (4 levels) plus 5 x erosion or ulceration (4 levels after combining Geboes 5:1 and 5:2). Score takes into consideration histologic variables like crypt abscesses, presence of granulation tissue or aggregates of inflammatory elements in the superficial part of the mucosa, indicative of erosions or ulcers, neutrophils in the lamina propria.

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Successful use of IBDoc

    Successful use of IBDoc home test kits will be measured by the completed test reported in the IBDoc portal.

    Time frame: 2 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pacific Gastroenterology Associates
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2K5, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Svenson LW, MacKenzie A, Koehoorn M, Jackson M, Fedorak R, Israel D, Blanchard JF. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul;101(7):1559-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00603.x. PubMed 16863561 ↗
  • Rocchi A, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, Feagan B, Panaccione R, Glasgow KW, Fernandes A, Ghosh S. Inflammatory bowel disease: a Canadian burden of illness review. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov;26(11):811-7. doi: 10.1155/2012/984575. PubMed 23166905 ↗
  • Roseth AG, Aadland E, Jahnsen J, Raknerud N. Assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis by faecal calprotectin, a novel granulocyte marker protein. Digestion. 1997;58(2):176-80. doi: 10.1159/000201441. PubMed 9144308 ↗
  • Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ceccarelli L, Bellini M, Romano MR, Sterpi C, Ricchiuti A, Marchi S, Bottai M. Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn's disease. Gut. 2005 Mar;54(3):364-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.043406. PubMed 15710984 ↗
  • Kopylov U, Rosenfeld G, Bressler B, Seidman E. Clinical utility of fecal biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014 Apr;20(4):742-56. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000442681.85545.31. PubMed 24562174 ↗
  • Zhulina Y, Cao Y, Amcoff K, Carlson M, Tysk C, Halfvarson J. The prognostic significance of faecal calprotectin in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;44(5):495-504. doi: 10.1111/apt.13731. Epub 2016 Jul 12. PubMed 27402063 ↗
  • Rosenfeld G, Greenup AJ, Round A, Takach O, Halparin L, Saadeddin A, Ho JK, Lee T, Enns R, Bressler B. FOCUS: Future of fecal calprotectin utility study in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 28;22(36):8211-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8211. PubMed 27688663 ↗
  • Trindade AJ, Ehrlich A, Kornbluth A, Ullman TA. Are your patients taking their medicine? Validation of a new adherence scale in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and comparison with physician perception of adherence. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011 Feb;17(2):599-604. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21310. PubMed 20848512 ↗
  • Jowett SL, Seal CJ, Barton JR, Welfare MR. The short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire is reliable and responsive to clinically important change in ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;96(10):2921-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04682.x. PubMed 11693327 ↗
  • Agborsangaya CB, Lahtinen M, Cooke T, Johnson JA. Comparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 16;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-74. PubMed 24885017 ↗
  • Mosli MH, Feagan BG, Zou G, Sandborn WJ, D'Haens G, Khanna R, Shackelton LM, Walker CW, Nelson S, Vandervoort MK, Frisbie V, Samaan MA, Jairath V, Driman DK, Geboes K, Valasek MA, Pai RK, Lauwers GY, Riddell R, Stitt LW, Levesque BG. Development and validation of a histological index for UC. Gut. 2017 Jan;66(1):50-58. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310393. Epub 2015 Oct 16. PubMed 26475633 ↗
  • Bressler B, Marshall JK, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, Jones J, Leontiadis GI, Panaccione R, Steinhart AH, Tse F, Feagan B; Toronto Ulcerative Colitis Consensus Group. Clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of nonhospitalized ulcerative colitis: the Toronto consensus. Gastroenterology. 2015 May;148(5):1035-1058.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 4. PubMed 25747596 ↗
  • Heida A, Knol M, Kobold AM, Bootsman J, Dijkstra G, van Rheenen PF. Agreement Between Home-Based Measurement of Stool Calprotectin and ELISA Results for Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;15(11):1742-1749.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 10. PubMed 28606846 ↗
  • Bello C, Roseth A, Guardiola J, Reenaers C, Ruiz-Cerulla A, Van Kemseke C, Arajol C, Reinhard C, Seidel L, Louis E. Usability of a home-based test for the measurement of fecal calprotectin in asymptomatic IBD patients. Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Sep;49(9):991-996. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 19. PubMed 28587751 ↗
  • Feagan BG, Macdonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD000543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000543.pub3. PubMed 23076889 ↗
  • Rosenfeld G, Narula N, Leung Y, Afif W, Williams AJ, Huang V, Singh H, McCurdy JD, Jairath V, Lam M, Loomes DE, Zezos P, Stewart M, Ma C, Ropeleski M, Ancheta-Schmit M, Tavakoli P, Bone JN, Lewis JD, Colombel JF, Bressler B. Proactive Fecal Calprotectin Home Monitoring in Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a Prospective Randomized Control Trial. Gastroenterology. 2026 Jun 23:S0016-5085(26)06980-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2026.06.006. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42336164 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03549988
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Greg Rosenfeld (Clinical Assistant Professor, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2018
Start date
Dec 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

Gregory Rosenfeld, MD
principal investigator · University of British Columbia, Depart. of Medicine, Div. of Gastroenterology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion