CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03549104CBTUpdated Jun 6, 2024Results posted

A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Intervention to Reduce Fear of Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes

An interventional study of Fear Reduction Intervention and Attention Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-06.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

All persons with type 1 diabetes are at risk for developing hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). This is a life-threatening condition that leads to profound fear of hypoglycemia and reduced quality of life. Fear of hypoglycemia results in glucose fluctuations (from high to low glucose levels). Young adults are particularly at risk because they report high levels of fear of hypoglycemia and poor glucose control. Currently, no diabetes self-management programs specifically address how to cope with fear of hypoglycemia. The investigators propose to pilot test a fear reduction intervention (Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation [FREE]) and its effects on fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes self-management, glucose control, and glucose variability.

Read the detailed description

In persons with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), hypoglycemia is the major limiting factor in achieving optimal blood glycemic control. All persons with T1DM are at risk for hypoglycemia (blood glucose level \< 70 mg/dl), which is life-threatening and accompanied by serious physical and psychological symptoms, resulting in a profound fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) and reduced quality of life. Young adults with T1DM are at greater risk for FOH and have worse glycemic control and self-management behavior than other age groups with T1DM. The investigator's preliminary research identified that 77% of young adults with T1DM reported FOH, and FOH resulted in increased glycemic variability. Glycemic variability (GV) is the minute-to-minute fluctuation in blood glucose that can be missed if looking only at A1C, a longer-term measure. Increased GV is dangerous because it is associated with cardiovascular events and diabetes complications. A major gap exists in how to manage FOH as a component of diabetes self-management. The Investigators specifically aim to: (1) determine the feasibility and acceptability of a fear reduction program in young adults with T1DM, who experience FOH; and (2) determine the impact of an 8-week cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based intervention on the outcomes: FOH, self-management behavior, glycemic control, and GV. To achieve these aims, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial in 50 young adults aged 18 to 35 years with T1DM. At completion, FOH will be measured and glycemic patterns will be analyzed to determine differences between the FREE and control groups. Findings from this proposed pilot study will serve as the foundation for a larger clinical trial to reduce FOH and improve self-management, glycemic control, and GV. This program of research promises to reduce the development of diabetes complications and improve quality of life for young adults with T1DM.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • fear of hypoglycemia
  • glycemic control
  • glycemic variability
  • self-management behavior
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is above the median of 40 across 2,649 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 515 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of T1DM ≥ 1 year, receive medical care from an endocrinologist, use insulin pump therapy or multiple daily injection (MDI), have fear of hypoglycemia (screening questionnaire), and attended a basic diabetes educational program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant or breastfeeding, have received therapy specifically for fear of hypoglycemia, have a co-existing chronic illness

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)

    The FREE intervention group will participate in eight weekly individual one-hour sessions using CBT and exposure treatment for specific fears.

    Behavioral: Fear Reduction Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Attention Control

    The attention control group will participate in eight weekly individual one-hour Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) sessions.

    Behavioral: Attention Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralFear Reduction Intervention

    FREE

  • BehavioralAttention Control

    DSMES

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fear of Hypoglycemia

    Change in Worry Subscale score. Fear of hypoglycemia is measured with the Worry Subscale of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II (HFS-II) which is an 18-item, 5-point Likert-style scale with a possible score range from 0-72. A higher score indicates greater fear of hypoglycemia.

    Time frame: Assessing change between two time points: from baseline to week 8 of intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Glycemic Control

    Change in HemoglobinA1c (A1C)

    Time frame: Assessing change between two time points: from baseline to week 8 of intervention.

  2. Glycemic Variability

    Change in glucose variability (continuous glucose monitor-derived, glucose (mg/dl) standard deviation. Higher numbers indicate worse glycemic variability.

    Time frame: Assessing change between two time points: from baseline to week 8 of intervention

07

Results

Posted May 20, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention Control
Started2525
Completed1921
Not completed64
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject52
Withdrew: Covid shelter in place12

Outcome measures

PrimaryFear of Hypoglycemia

Change in Worry Subscale score. Fear of hypoglycemia is measured with the Worry Subscale of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II (HFS-II) which is an 18-item, 5-point Likert-style scale with a possible score range from 0-72. A higher score indicates greater fear of hypoglycemia.

Time frame:
Assessing change between two time points: from baseline to week 8 of intervention.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fear of Hypoglycemia
units on a scaleFear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention Control
Week 054.3 ± 2.458.7 ± 2.3
Week 835.29 ± 1.749.0 ± 2.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE) vs Attention Control ·
SecondaryGlycemic Control

Change in HemoglobinA1c (A1C)

Time frame:
Assessing change between two time points: from baseline to week 8 of intervention.
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of HbA1C
Glycemic Control
percentage of HbA1CFear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention Control
Week 07.25 ± 0.297.07 ± 0.19
Week 86.68 ± .266.69 ± .20
Statistical analysis
  • Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE) vs Attention Control ·
SecondaryGlycemic Variability

Change in glucose variability (continuous glucose monitor-derived, glucose (mg/dl) standard deviation. Higher numbers indicate worse glycemic variability.

Time frame:
Assessing change between two time points: from baseline to week 8 of intervention
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Glycemic Variability
mg/dLFear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention Control
Week 057.8 ± 3.5456.2 ± 2.7
Week 854.9 ± 3.455.5 ± 3.8
Statistical analysis
  • Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE) vs Attention Control ·

Adverse events

Collected over 13 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Attention Control0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years252550
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
Mean26.1 ± 5.526.1 ± 4.826.1 ± 5.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
Female151530
Male101020
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino3710
Not Hispanic or Latino221840
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American246
White211839
More than one race123
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
United States252550
Fear of hypoglycemia
Fear of hypoglycemia(units on a scale)Fear Reduction Efficacy Evaluation (FREE)Attention ControlTotal
Mean36.3 ± 11.840.7 ± 11.438.6 ± 11.7
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Martyn-Nemeth P, Duffecy J, Quinn L, Park C, Mihailescu D, Penckofer S. A cognitive behavioral therapy intervention to reduce fear of hypoglycemia in young adults with type 1 diabetes (FREE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3876-4. PubMed 31888691 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 12, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03549104
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
Loyola University Chicago, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Pamela Martyn-Nemeth (Assistant Professor Biobehavioral Nursing Science College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 7, 2018
Start date
Jan 14, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Results posted
May 20, 2022
Last update
Jun 6, 2024

Study contacts

Pamela Martyn-Nemeth, PhD
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion