ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03545386Updated Aug 12, 2026

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Pouchitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fecal microbiota transplantation and Placebos in Pouchitis, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial involving a single centre (McMaster University) recruiting patients from Hamilton, ON and the surrounding regions, to evaluate whether fecal microbiota transplantation once weekly for six weeks increases the remission rate compared to placebo in patients with active pouchitis.

Read the detailed description

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may undergo colectomy due to a variety of reasons, including medically refractory disease or dysplastic changes of the colon. Ileal-pouch anal anastomosis is often offered to these patients. Unfortunately the pouch commonly develops inflammation, known as pouchitis, which is the most common complication of this procedure and occurs in approximately 50% of patients, with the majority of these patients having multiple episodes.

Although the exact cause of pouchitis is not clear, it is felt that fecal bacteria may be implicated in the cause. Studies have demonstrated changes in the fecal contents of patients with pelvic pouches compared to those with end ileostomies, with higher concentrations of Bacteroides and stool anaerobes identified in those patients with pelvic pouches. Antibiotics are a mainstay of treatment for pouchitis, with randomized controlled trials demonstrating response rates of 70-85% to metronidazole or ciprofloxacin for treatment of acute pouchitis. Unfortunately, recurrent use of systemic antibiotics is associated with adverse events and development of antibiotic resistance.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is the administration of the supernatant component of stool and water mixture from a healthy screened donor. The donors are screened for numerous infections and pathogens prior to being accepted as donors. FMT has been advocated for some colonic disorders; however it is primarily used in recurrent/refractory Clostridium difficile infections (CDI). A case series from McMaster of over 100 patients and have shown that approximately 90% of patients with recurrent CDI have been cured with FMT. The rationale is that the aberrant colonic microbiome can be replaced with a normal healthy microbiome from a donor. A similar rationale has been applied to ulcerative colitis, and a recent systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the investigators demonstrated FMT is associated with improved clinical remission and endoscopic healing compared to placebo. It seems possible that changing the intestinal flora in patients with pouchitis could also return the mucosa to a healthy state.

The investigators have conducted the world's first randomized trial of fecal transplant therapy to determine its efficacy and safety in patients with active UC. The investigators found that fecal transplants given once per week for 6 weeks resolved the inflammation in 24% of patients with active UC compared to 5% with placebo. There has been no randomized control trial evaluating the efficacy of FMT for treatment of pouchitis. An initial case series of 8 patients did not find treatment with one administration of FMT via nasogastric administration to be associated with any improvement in clinical response. However a subsequent case series found improvement in 4 out of 5 patients with chronic pouchitis who had multiple FMT treatments over 3-4 weeks. The investigators will conduct a randomized trial at a single centre (McMaster University) comparing fecal transplant therapy (from a healthy donor) versus placebo for six weeks for induction of remission in patients with active pouchitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pouchitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pouchitis

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Pouchitis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is above the median of 20 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Pouchitis.

Browse Pouchitis studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged 18 or over
  2. Active pouchitis defined as PDAI of 7-18 points
  3. Females of child bearing potential must be willing and able to use acceptable as per Appendix III. II. b. Toxicity section of the Health Canada Guidance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participating in another clinical trial
  2. Unable to give
  3. Severe comorbid medical illness
  4. Concomitant Clostridium difficile infection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FMT

    Other: Fecal microbiota transplantation

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Other: Placebos

Interventions

  • OtherFecal microbiota transplantation

    Stool from healthy donor administered via enema

  • OtherPlacebos

    Saline with food coloring administered via enema

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission of pouchitis, defined as a pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) score of <7, with a decreased from baseline PDAI score of 3 points

    Comparison between FMT and placebo arms in remission rates

    Time frame: 7 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. compliance of patients who receive FMT

    Measurement of retention rate of patients who receive FMT

    Time frame: 7 weeks

  2. compare the fecal microbiome in pouchitis patients in remission versus still active at the end of the trial.

    Analysis of changes using 16S rRNA to look at changes in the bacterial profiles of patients who respond to FMT compared to those who do not

    Time frame: 7 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario L8S4K1, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 83 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 10, 2018
First posted
Jun 4, 2018
StartActual
Apr 17, 2019
Primary completionActual
Mar 31, 2026
CompletionActual
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03545386
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2018
Start date
Apr 17, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026
Completion
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion