CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03535714Updated Mar 5, 2021

Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adolescents and Young Adults (MANTR-a)

An interventional study of MANTR-a treatment in Anorexia Nervosa and Anorexia, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Status unknown at 1 site in Austria. Open to female participants aged 14 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-05.

Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2021), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
14 Years to 21 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to test effectiveness of a new treatment program for adolescents and young adults within the age of 14-21 suffering from AN (MANTR-a) compared to treatment as usual (TAU).

Read the detailed description

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious mental illness which leads untreated to aggravation of symptomatology and chronification. Among all mental illnesses, AN has the highest mortality rate, which is about 5.1 per 1000 people per year. High drop-out rates (up to 40%) or small treatment motivation constrains treatment success. Since the onset of AN is mainly in adolescence, it is important to start with therapy as early as possible and establish an effective single-setting treatment program for this age group to prevent chronification.

MANTR-a (Maudsley model of anorexia nervosa treatment for adolescents) is an innovative, theory-based, tailored treatment program which combines a cognitive behavioural approach with motivational interviewing. The main focus of the treatment program is the transformation maintaining factors of AN, like personality aspects, pro-anorexic beliefs, emotion regulation strategies, thinking styles and obstructive behaviour from caregivers.

The aim of this study is the examination ot the effectiveness of the MANTR-a treatment program for adolescents and young adults. Therefore we compare MANTR-a (intervention group) with treatment as usual (control group). Assessments will be conducted before treatment (T0, baseline), after six months (T1), after 12 months (T2) and after 18 months (T3, follow-up) via questionnaires, interviews and neuropsychological measurements. Process evaluation takes place after every session. Each group consists of female adolescents and young adults within the age of 14-21 suffering from AN (ICD-10: F50.0, F50.1), resulting in an overall sample size of 100.

The long-term goal of the study is to provide an evidence-based outpatient treatment for children and adolescents with AN in order to prevent a chronic course of the disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Anorexia

Keywords

  • Treatment
  • Psychotherapy
  • Young Adult
  • Adolescence
03

In context

Anorexia

411 studies on the registry are indexed under Anorexia; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 41 across 287 interventional studies indexed under Anorexia.

Browse Anorexia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,076 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ICD-10 diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (F50.0) or atypical anorexia nervosa (F50.1).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • life-threatening AN requiring immediate inpatient treatment as defined by NICE (2017)
  • insufficient cognitive ability
  • insufficient knowledge of German language to understand the treatment
  • severe mental or physical illness that needs treatment on its own (e.g. psychosis)
  • substance abuse
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    MANTR-a group

    Patients who are in the MANTR-a group attend the MANTR-a treatment program, which consists of 20 once-weekly therapy sessions. Caregivers can be invited to 2 sessions. After 20 weeks, therapy continues with four monthly booster-sessions. In sum, each patient (whose bodyweight is above the 3rd BMI percentile) can attend 24 therapy sessions. In patients whose bodyweight is below the 3rd BMI percentile treatment will be extended to 30 once-weekly and 4 monthly booster sessions. Besides therapy the patients are in nutritional consultation by a dietician and under regular medical care to monitor the physical health and weight gain. Patients who who have already an existing psychotherapy are attached to the control group.

    Behavioral: MANTR-a treatment

  • No intervention
    control group

    Patients of the control group receive treatment as usual (TAU). It consists of medical care and monitoring, psychotherapy in a single or family setting, parents counselling and dietetics.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMANTR-a treatment

    MANTR-a treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Increase of BMI

    Weight and height will be assessed and combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Improvement of eating disorder symptomatology based on professional's rating

    Professionals use a structured clinical interview ("Eating Disorder Examination - EDE") to rate severity of eating disorder symptomatology

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Improvement of eating disorder symptomatology based on patient's self-rating

    "Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2)" is used to assess eating disorder symptomatology from a patients's view

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Increase of BMI

    Weight and height will be assessed and combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: 6 months, 18 months

  2. Improvement of eating disorder symptomatology based on professional's rating

    Professionals use a structured clinical interview ("Eating Disorder Examination - EDE") to rate severity of eating disorder symptomatology

    Time frame: 6 months, 18 months

  3. Improvement of eating disorder symptomatology based on patient's self-rating

    "Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2)" is used to assess eating disorder symptomatology from a patients's view

    Time frame: 6 months, 18 months

  4. Group differences: increase of BMI

    Group differences are calculated based on BMI (weight and height will be assessed and combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2)

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  5. Group differences: improvement of eating disorder symptomatology based on professional's rating

    Group differences are calculated based on professional's rating in a structured clinical interview ("Eating Disorder Examination - EDE)"

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  6. Group differences: improvement of eating disorder symptomatology based on patient's self-rating

    Group differences are calculated based on a patient's self-rating questionnaire ("Eating Disorder Inventory-2")

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  7. Improvement of comorbid symptomatology based on professional's rating

    Professionals use a structured clinical interview ("Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter") to rate severity of comorbid symptomatology

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  8. Reduction of anxiety

    "State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI X1, STAI X2)" is used to assess severity of anxiety from a patients's view

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  9. Reduction of depression

    "Beck Depressionsinventar (BDI-II)" is used to assess severity of depression from a patients's view

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  10. Reduction of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology

    "Zwangsinventar (OCI-R)" is used to assess severity of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology from a patients's view

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  11. Increase of cognitive flexibility

    Cognitive flexibility is measured with "Computergestütztes Kartensortierverfahren (CKV)"

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Increase of central coherence

    Central coherence is measured with "Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)"

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Increase of emotion recognition

    Emotion recognition is measured with "Frankfurter Program to test and to teach the recognition of facial affect (FEFA-2)"

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Influence of motivation of change

    Motivation of change is measured with "Anorexia nervosa Stages of Change Questionnaire (ANSOCQ)"

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Quality of life (group differences, improvement over time)

    Quality of Life is measured with "Lebensqualität von Kindern und Jugendlichen (ILK)"

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  16. Influence of therapeutic relationship

    Therapeutic relationship is measured with "Fragebogen zur therapeutischen Beziehung für Kinder und Jugendliche (FTB-KJ)"

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

  17. Influence of treatment contentment

    Treatment contentment is measured with "Fragebogen zur Beurteilung der Behandlung (FBB)"

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

  18. Changes in personality

    Changes in personality are measured with "Junior Temperament und Charakter Inventar (JTCI 12-18R)"

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna, Dep. of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    Vienna, 1090, Austria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arcelus J, Mitchell AJ, Wales J, Nielsen S. Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;68(7):724-31. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74. PubMed 21727255 ↗
  • Dejong H, Broadbent H, Schmidt U. A systematic review of dropout from treatment in outpatients with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Jul;45(5):635-47. doi: 10.1002/eat.20956. Epub 2011 Aug 30. PubMed 22684990 ↗
  • Schmidt U, Treasure J. Anorexia nervosa: valued and visible. A cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. Br J Clin Psychol. 2006 Sep;45(Pt 3):343-66. doi: 10.1348/014466505x53902. PubMed 17147101 ↗
  • Treasure J, Schmidt U. The cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model of anorexia nervosa revisited: a summary of the evidence for cognitive, socio-emotional and interpersonal predisposing and perpetuating factors. J Eat Disord. 2013 Apr 15;1:13. doi: 10.1186/2050-2974-1-13. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24999394 ↗
  • Wittek T, Truttmann S, Zeiler M, Philipp J, Auer-Welsbach E, Koubek D, Ohmann S, Werneck-Rohrer S, Sackl-Pammer P, Schofbeck G, Mairhofer D, Kahlenberg L, Schmidt U, Karwautz AFK, Wagner G. The Maudsley model of anorexia nervosa treatment for adolescents and young adults (MANTRa): a study protocol for a multi-center cohort study. J Eat Disord. 2021 Mar 8;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00387-8. PubMed 33685522 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03535714
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Collaborators
Pharmig - Gesundheitsziele aus dem Rahmen-Pharmavertrag
Responsible party
Dr. Andreas Karwautz (Univ. Prof. Dr., Medical University of Vienna) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 24, 2018
Start date
Apr 25, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2021

Study contacts

Andreas Karwautz, Univ.-Prof.
study director · Medical University of Vienna
Gudrun Wagner, Ass.-Prof.
study director · Medical University of Vienna

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion