CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03532334Updated Jul 24, 2018

Comparison of 133Xe Scintigraphy With 19F MRI

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Perfluorinated Gas/Oxygen Mixture in Lung Diseases, sponsored by Hal C Charles. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-24.

Sponsored by Hal C Charles · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was withdrawn
unable to accrue in subjects in a timely fashion
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The central hypothesis and current observation is that PFx gases used as contrast agents readily provide functional images of the lung airways including important regional ventilation information such as ventilation defect severity and gas trapping. This is a pilot proof of concept study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of 19F MRI gas Ventilation imaging compared to 133Xe ventilation Scintigraphy in subjects with lung disease. The secondary goal of the study is to develop sufficient information to adequately power a pivotal trial of 19F MRI gas Ventilation imaging compared to 133Xe Ventilation Scintigraphy

Read the detailed description

Aim 1: Compare measures of lung ventilation performance obtained using 133Xe Scintigraphy with performance using 19F Perfluorinated gas MRI using two independent readers.

133Xe Scintigraphy will be scored using the methods described in the statistics section and 19F images will be scored using the methods described in the statistics section. Scores for each subject will be earluated for consistency between readers and modalities. 60% concordance will be considered equivalent.

The outcomes of the work proposed is expected to show the non-inferiority of 19F Perfluorinated gas MRI to 133Xenon Scintigraphy

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • 19F MRI gas Ventilation
  • 133 XE ventilation Scintigraphy
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Hal C Charles is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into the trial

  1. Outpatients of either gender, age > 18.
  2. Willing and able to give informed consent and adhere to visit/protocol schedules. (Consent must be given before any study procedures are performed.)
  3. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test. This will be confirmed before participation in this investigational protocol.
  4. Completion of 133Xe ventilation scintigraphy after referral for ventilation imaging for any reason in Pro00081987 A Comparison of Technegas® and Xenon 133 Planar Lung Imaging in Subjects Referred for Ventilation Scintigraphy. The MRI will be accomplished in a timely fashion after the Scintigraphy study based on scheduling availability in the Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (CAMRD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects presenting with any of the following will not be included in the trial:

  1. Conditions that will prohibit MRI scanning (metal in eye, claustrophobia, inability to lie supine)
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPerfluorinated Gas/Oxygen Mixture

    19-Fluorine (19F) MRI of the lungs with 21%/79% Oxygen/Perfluorinated Gas, ≤ 25 liters, gas, single visit, \< 1 hour

    Also known as: Perfluorinated Propane Imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of 19F MRI compared to 133 Xenon Scintigraphy

    To evaluate the non-inferiority of 19F Perfluorinated gas MRI compared to 133 Xenon Scintigraphy ventilation imaging studies two readers will be selected as having experience reading Xe-133 ventilation scans. Readers will also receive training on interpretation of 19F ventilation images We note that the nature of the images both nuclear medicine and 19F MRI preclude blinding of the readers to the image modality. Images from each modality will be assessed independently and the images will be coded so that readers will not know which image set is from each subject.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03532334
Lead sponsor
Hal C Charles
Responsible party
Hal C Charles (Assistant Professor of Radiology, Duke University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 22, 2018
Start date
Apr 4, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2018

Study contacts

Cecil Charles, PhD
principal investigator · Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion