An interventional study of Mipolixin® and Poliprotect® in Dyspepsia and Heartburn, sponsored by Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola. Completed at 11 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-26.
Sponsored by Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of two medical devices, Mipolixin® and Poliprotect®, in improving the overall symptom severity of functional dyspesia and/or heartburn
372 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspepsia; 67 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 158 is above the median of 89 across 302 interventional studies indexed under Dyspepsia.
Browse Dyspepsia studies →Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patients with symptoms of functional dyspepsia (according to the Rome IV criteria) of moderate severity (VAS score between 30 mm and 70 mm) and/or bothersome heartburn within 2 and 14 days prior to the screening/baseline visit.
o According to the current Rome IV diagnostic criteria, functional dyspepsia is defined as one or more of the following symptoms: postprandial fullness (classified as postprandial distress syndrome), early satiation (inability to finish a normal sized meal, also classified as postprandial distress syndrome), and epigastric pain or burning (classified as epigastric pain syndrome).
Exclusion Criteria:
Declines or unable to provide .
Patients with mental or metabolic disorders and any other disease that according to the physician can compromise the patient´s safety and/or patient´s study compliance.
Note: Patients will be asked to avoid any drugs of the above mentioned since the beginning of the study (baseline visit) until the end of the study.
Previous intake of any of the study medical devices.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Mipolixin® (Advanced Natural Antacid - AdNA)
Device: Mipolixin®
Poliprotect® (Neobianacid)
Device: Poliprotect®
1.55g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks
Also known as: Advanced Natural Antacid
1.55 g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks
Also known as: Neobianacid
Change in overall symptom severity from baseline (day 0) to day 14 between the two study arms
The primary endpoint is the change in the score of a visual analog scale (VAS) (from "no symptoms" to "overwhelming symptoms") used for evaluating overall symptom severity from baseline (day 0) to day 14 after treatment initiation, between the two study arms. A decrease in VAS score of at least 30% is considered as a clinically meaningful improvement, and therefore subjects achieving a decrease ≥30% in this scale will be considered as responders. The non-inferiority is considered demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the percentage of responders between both study arms lies within the non-inferior margin value defined of 20%.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 14
Responders from baseline to day 3 and day 7
Percentage of responder patients (VAS score decrease of at least 30%) on the basis of the mean change in the overall symptom severity assessed by the VAS score from baseline to day 3 and day 7 in both study arms
Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7
Self-assessment severity of individual specific symtoms
Comparison between Mipolixin® and Poliprotect® in the mean change of the score of the self-assessed severity of individual specific symtoms (bothersome postprandial fullness, bothersome early satiation, bothersome epigastric pain, bothersome epigastric burning, and bothersome heartburn) rated on a 100 mm VAS (from "no symptoms" to "overwhelming symptoms") from baseline to 1 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment initiation.
Time frame: Day 0, Day 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14
Change in the score of GOS scale from baseline to day 1
Change in the score of GOS ( Global Overall Symptom) scale from baseline to day 14 in both study arms. A decrease in GOS score ≥2 is considered as a clinically meaningful improvement, and therefore subjects achieving a decrease in overall severity score ≥2 from baseline in this scale will be considered as responders.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 14
Incidence of AEs during study treatment
Incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during study treatment.
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14
Incidence of AEs and clinical findings during study period
Safety will be assessed on the basis of all AEs experienced during study treatment and all observed and volunteered AEs and abnormal findings on physical examination, including vital signs throughout the study.
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28
Patient satisfaction (treatment administration)
Patient level of satisfaction in terms of treatment administration/posology will be assessed by means of specific questions about patient level of satisfaction after the 2-week treatment period. The response will be scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, as follows: 1 = "very satisfied", 2 = "quite satisfied", 3 = "somewhat satisfied", 4 = "not satisfied".
Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14
Patient satisfaction (taste)
Patient level of satisfaction in terms of chewable tablets taste will be assessed by means of specific questions about patient level of satisfaction after the 2-week treatment period. The response will be scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, as follows: 1 = "very satisfied", 2 = "quite satisfied", 3 = "somewhat satisfied", 4 = "not satisfied".
Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14
Treatment compliance
Treatment compliance will be evaluated by performing the IP accountability. This data will be corroborated with the information recorded in the patient diary concerning the daily administered and missed doses.
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14
Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 36 months.
Of 79 interventional studies with no phase under Dyspepsia, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28. This study's 36 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola