ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03531372Updated May 26, 2021

Mipolixin® Compared to Poliprotect® in Moderate Functional Dyspepsia and Heartburn.

An interventional study of Mipolixin® and Poliprotect® in Dyspepsia and Heartburn, sponsored by Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola. Completed at 11 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-26.

Sponsored by Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
158
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of two medical devices, Mipolixin® and Poliprotect®, in improving the overall symptom severity of functional dyspesia and/or heartburn

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyspepsia
  • Heartburn
03

In context

Dyspepsia

372 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspepsia; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 158 is above the median of 89 across 302 interventional studies indexed under Dyspepsia.

Browse Dyspepsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to provide , preferably in writing or, failing that, orally in front of a witness, before any study procedure is performed.
  • Male and female patients aged 18 to 75 years old (inclusive).
  • Patients with symptoms of functional dyspepsia (according to the Rome IV criteria) of moderate severity (VAS score between 30 mm and 70 mm) and/or bothersome heartburn within 2 and 14 days prior to the screening/baseline visit.

    o According to the current Rome IV diagnostic criteria, functional dyspepsia is defined as one or more of the following symptoms: postprandial fullness (classified as postprandial distress syndrome), early satiation (inability to finish a normal sized meal, also classified as postprandial distress syndrome), and epigastric pain or burning (classified as epigastric pain syndrome).

  • Ability of the patients (according to the investigator's opinion) to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study including possible risks and side effects.
  • Patients who agree not to alter their diet in any way for the duration of the trial and to maintain it at steady state.
  • Patients who agree not to make any major lifestyle changes during the trial.
  • Willingness to comply with all the study procedures and schedule.
  • Chronic therapies (if not related to the gastroenterological pathologies object of the study, according to the opinion of the investigator) are allowed, if the regimen is maintained stable during the whole study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declines or unable to provide .

    • Disease or health condition
  • Patient presenting at least one of the following symptoms or conditions at screening: anemia, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, progressive unintentional weight loss, epigastric mass, anorexia, persistent or recurrent vomiting, dysphagia or odynophagia, porphyria, hypophosphatemia, and/or cachexia.
  • Patients presenting with at least of the following gastrointestinal conditions at screening: erosive GERD, Barrett's oesophagus or oesophageal stricture, active or healing gastroduodenal ulcer (except scars), history of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery, symptomatic gallstone, and/or other gastrointestinal disease such as gastroenteritis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease and/or colorectal cancer.
  • Patients with known disease, infectious disease or severe heart or pulmonary disease.
  • Patients with known severe liver or kidney disease (/SGOT, ALT/SGPT >2 , serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl).
  • Patients with mental or metabolic disorders and any other disease that according to the physician can compromise the patient´s safety and/or patient´s study compliance.

    • Treatments
  • Patients receiving any treatment (pharmacological or medical device) for heartburn or dyspeptic symptoms within the last 14 days prior to randomization.
  • Patients receiving any drugs that could affect symptoms or study evaluation such antacids, PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, and/or gastric mucosal protectants at baseline and/or taken within the last 14 days prior to randomization.
  • Patients receiving any drugs that could affect symptoms or the study as antibiotics, NSAIDs, anticholinergics and/or cholinergic agents.

Note: Patients will be asked to avoid any drugs of the above mentioned since the beginning of the study (baseline visit) until the end of the study.

  • Patients under triple therapy or eradication therapy against Helicobacter pylori.
  • Patients planned for long-term new therapies with anti-anxiety agents, glucocorticosteroids and anti-inflammatory agents during study period.
  • Known hypersensitive or intolerance to any components of the study medical devices.
  • Previous intake of any of the study medical devices.

    • Other general conditions
  • Patients who are unable to understand or are unwilling to sign an informed consent form.
  • Unable or unwilling to complete all required screening and/or follow-up assessments.
  • Unable to understand and complete self-administered scales/questionnaires planned to be used in the study.
  • Participation in interventional research studies of medicinal or device products (ongoing or terminated less than 30 days before screening)
  • Patients with active alcohol or drug addiction or any other condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with their ability to comply with the study requirements.
  • Patients with any concurrent condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would jeopardize the safety of the patient or compliance with the protocol.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women;
  • Women of and sexually active: they must be willing to use at least one acceptable effective measure (- progestogen-only oral hormonal contraception, where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action , - male or female condom with or without spermicide, - cap, diaphragm or sponge with spermicide). Pregnancy test will be performed at screening and at the final/premature withdrawal visit. The use of contraception in male patients is not required.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
158 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mipolixin®

    Mipolixin® (Advanced Natural Antacid - AdNA)

    Device: Mipolixin®

  • Active comparator
    Poliprotect®

    Poliprotect® (Neobianacid)

    Device: Poliprotect®

Interventions

  • DeviceMipolixin®

    1.55g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks

    Also known as: Advanced Natural Antacid

  • DevicePoliprotect®

    1.55 g chewable tablet 5 times a day for 2 weeks

    Also known as: Neobianacid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in overall symptom severity from baseline (day 0) to day 14 between the two study arms

    The primary endpoint is the change in the score of a visual analog scale (VAS) (from "no symptoms" to "overwhelming symptoms") used for evaluating overall symptom severity from baseline (day 0) to day 14 after treatment initiation, between the two study arms. A decrease in VAS score of at least 30% is considered as a clinically meaningful improvement, and therefore subjects achieving a decrease ≥30% in this scale will be considered as responders. The non-inferiority is considered demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the percentage of responders between both study arms lies within the non-inferior margin value defined of 20%.

    Time frame: Day 0 and Day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Responders from baseline to day 3 and day 7

    Percentage of responder patients (VAS score decrease of at least 30%) on the basis of the mean change in the overall symptom severity assessed by the VAS score from baseline to day 3 and day 7 in both study arms

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7

  2. Self-assessment severity of individual specific symtoms

    Comparison between Mipolixin® and Poliprotect® in the mean change of the score of the self-assessed severity of individual specific symtoms (bothersome postprandial fullness, bothersome early satiation, bothersome epigastric pain, bothersome epigastric burning, and bothersome heartburn) rated on a 100 mm VAS (from "no symptoms" to "overwhelming symptoms") from baseline to 1 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment initiation.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14

  3. Change in the score of GOS scale from baseline to day 1

    Change in the score of GOS ( Global Overall Symptom) scale from baseline to day 14 in both study arms. A decrease in GOS score ≥2 is considered as a clinically meaningful improvement, and therefore subjects achieving a decrease in overall severity score ≥2 from baseline in this scale will be considered as responders.

    Time frame: Day 0 and Day 14

  4. Incidence of AEs during study treatment

    Incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during study treatment.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14

  5. Incidence of AEs and clinical findings during study period

    Safety will be assessed on the basis of all AEs experienced during study treatment and all observed and volunteered AEs and abnormal findings on physical examination, including vital signs throughout the study.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28

  6. Patient satisfaction (treatment administration)

    Patient level of satisfaction in terms of treatment administration/posology will be assessed by means of specific questions about patient level of satisfaction after the 2-week treatment period. The response will be scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, as follows: 1 = "very satisfied", 2 = "quite satisfied", 3 = "somewhat satisfied", 4 = "not satisfied".

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14

  7. Patient satisfaction (taste)

    Patient level of satisfaction in terms of chewable tablets taste will be assessed by means of specific questions about patient level of satisfaction after the 2-week treatment period. The response will be scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, as follows: 1 = "very satisfied", 2 = "quite satisfied", 3 = "somewhat satisfied", 4 = "not satisfied".

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14

  8. Treatment compliance

    Treatment compliance will be evaluated by performing the IP accountability. This data will be corroborated with the information recorded in the patient diary concerning the daily administered and missed doses.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • CS Albuñol
    Albuñol, 18700, Spain
  • CS Disset de Setembre
    El Prat De Llobregat, 08820, Spain
  • CS Montesa
    Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • CS Goya
    Madrid, 28009, Spain
  • Primary Care Centre Eloy Gonzalo
    Madrid, 28010, Spain
  • CS Comillas
    Madrid, 28019, Spain
  • CS Baviera
    Madrid, 28028, Spain
  • CS Las Americas
    Parla, 28981, Spain
  • CS San Blas
    Parla, 28981, Spain
  • CS Isabel II
    Parla, 28982, Spain
  • Consultorio Local Perales de Tajuña
    Perales de Tajuña, 28540, Spain
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 36 months.

Of 79 interventional studies with no phase under Dyspepsia, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28. This study's 36 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 9, 2018
First posted
May 21, 2018
StartActual
Apr 24, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
May 26, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03531372
Lead sponsor
Aboca Spa Societa' Agricola
Collaborators
La Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria, Dynamic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2018
Start date
Apr 24, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2021
Completion
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
May 26, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion