An interventional study of Presence of bile duct stones and Non-presence of bile duct stones in Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct, sponsored by Hvidovre University Hospital. Withdrawn at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-28.
Sponsored by Hvidovre University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Background. X-ray cholangiography has a high sensitivity and specificity of detecting bile duct stones and is the gold standard. There are no studies describing the sensitivity and specificity of IFC for bile duct stone detection.
Research question. What is the sensitivity of IFC to visualize bile duct stones? Method. Prospective study with 40 patients undergoing planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy with preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) (gold standard) and intraoperative IFC, X-ray cholangiography and choledochuscopy in that order.
Primary outcome. Sensitivity of visualization of bile duct stone by fluorescent cholangiography and secondary outcome is visualization of anatomy.
346 studies on the registry are indexed under Gallstones; 46 are open to participants now.
Browse Gallstones studies →Hvidovre University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion criteria
Diagnostic Test: Presence of bile duct stones
Diagnostic Test: Non-presence of bile duct stones
MRCP verified gall stones in the bile ducts
MRCP without bile duct stones
Sensitivity and specificity
Sensitivity and specificity of visualization of bile duct stones by intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography
Time frame: 120mins
Visualization
Visualization of the extrahepatic bile ducts
Time frame: 120mins
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hvidovre University Hospital