An observational study in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-06.
Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Observational
The hypotheses are: 1) the intestinal stem cell marker, DCLK1, which is increased in both the epithelium and stroma in colon cancer is also increased in BE (Barrett's esophagus) with HGD (high grade dysplasia) and in EAC (esophageal adenocarcinoma), 2) this expression correlates with disease progression towards EAC and 3) eradication of cells expressing stem cell markers occurs after therapy of EMR (endoscopic mucosal resection) or RFA (radiofrequency ablation) to eradicate BE with HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma and esophagectomy for EAC. We will test our hypotheses with the following aims: 1) To characterize the cell specific expression patterns of intestinal stem cell biomarkers in BE patients and correlate them with serum expression and disease progression, 2) To examine prospectively the effects of EMR, RFA or esophagectomy on the expression of stem cell biomarkers and the progression to EAC.
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a metaplasia of normal squamous epithelium. BE can progressively develop more abnormal features like low-grade intraepithelial dysplasia (LGID), high-grade intraepithelial dysplasia (HGID) before ultimately developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with a low 5-year survival rate of 20 % or less. Recent evidence for the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has advanced our understanding of cancer and has opened doors to new therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment. The fundamental goals of this project are to determine the effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on eradication of putative intestinal stem cell markers that are overexpressed in BE with HGID and EAC. A better understanding of the cellular mechanisms that regulate the progression from normal squamous mucosa to EAC has enormous implications in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. The presence of a CSC in esophageal cancer has been reported in both dysplastic BE/ EAC as well as in mouse models of the disease. The central hypotheses of the current proposal are: elimination of cells expressing stem cell markers occurs after ablative therapies (EMR/RFA) to eradicate BE with HGID/ EAC, and monitoring of stem cell marker expression during follow-up will correlate with disease recurrence or appropriate clinical response. Recently, we have reported that DCLK1, although minimally expressed in normal distal esophageal squamous mucosa, is markedly expressed in BE epithelium and EAC. We will test our central hypotheses with the following specific aims: 1. To prospectively characterize the cell specific expression patterns of putative intestinal stem cell biomarkers in BE patients and correlate them with serum/plasma protein expression and disease progression, 2. to examine prospectively the effects of EMR/RFA on the expression of putative stem cell biomarkers and correlate them with serum/plasma protein expression and disease progression and/or recurrence, and 3. to examine prospectively the effects on EMR/ RFA on esophageal-related quality of life and dysphagia during the endoscopic intervention period as well as following completion. The studies proposed have the potential to offer new insights for both the early diagnosis and monitoring of therapeutic response of future therapies for EAC. Moreover, these studies may identify novel biomarkers that can aid in the confirmation of HGID and potentially predict disease onset, progression and/or recurrence. Finally, these studies have the potential to provide preliminary data that will serve as the rationale for large scale multicenter trials to compare the effectiveness of EMR and RFA in BE with respect to clinical outcome, molecular features and effect on putative tumor stem cells. The recent identification of DCLK1 as a marker that distinguishes between normal and tumor stem cells in a rodent model of intestinal tumorigenesis lends support for our rationale for examining DCLK1 as a potential mediator of the neoplastic response in BE.
2,004 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma; 375 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 153 across 332 observational studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma.
Browse Adenocarcinoma studies →University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.
Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients presenting for upper endoscopy to evaluate symptoms or risk factors such as GERD, dyspepsia, or dysphagia with a finding of BE or EAC; treatment with EMR or RFA for BE with HGD, focal intramucosal adenocarcinoma or esophagectomy for EAC.
Exclusion Criteria:
Effects of EMR and RFA on the expression of putative stem cell biomarkers and correlate them with serum/plasma protein expression and disease progression and/or recurrence (Barrett's esophagus/ esophageal adenocarcinoma)
Other: EMR and RFA effect on stem cell marker expression in BE/EAC
Observation of EMR and RFA on the expression of putative stem cell biomarkers and correlate them with serum/plasma protein expression and disease progression and/or recurrence (Barrett's esophagus/ esophageal adenocarcinoma)
cell-specific expression patterns of putative intestinal stem cell biomarkers in BE patients; correlation of markers with serum/plasma protein expression and disease progression.
Exploratory; analysis of expression of various markers for Barrett's esophagus and esophogeal adenocarcinoma
Time frame: 2 yrs
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Oklahoma