ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03525522Updated May 15, 2018

Nd:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser Treatment for Lichen Sclerosus

An interventional study of Nd:YAG Laser and Topical corticosteroid Diprosone in Lichen Sclerosus and Lichen Sclerosus Et Atrophicus, sponsored by Dr Adolf Lukanovič. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-15.

Sponsored by Dr Adolf Lukanovič · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Apr 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of Nd:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser (Nd:YAG) Treatment of Lichen sclerosus in comparison with topical corticosteroid treatment. Half of participants will receive laser treatment and the other half corticosteroid treatment and the results will be followed for 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic skin disease of unknown cause and very unpleasant symptoms which significantly influences the quality of life of the affected patients. Large majority of LS lesions is located in anogenital region where initial white flat papules usually develop into large, white patches of thin, itchy skin causing fusion of labia minora, narrowing of the introitus and burying of the clitoris. Most common symptoms are itching, pain, soreness, burning, dyspareunia and dysuria all strongly interfering with sexual function and patient's self image. Existing treatment options with systemic and topical medications (oral retinoids, topical steroids) have some drawbacks and recently the use of laser was proposed for treatment of LS. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Nd:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser (Nd:YAG) Treatment of Lichen sclerosus in comparison with topical corticosteroid treatment. Half of participants will receive laser treatment and the other half corticosteroid treatment and the results will be followed for 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lichen Sclerosus
  • Lichen Sclerosus Et Atrophicus

Keywords

  • Lichen sclerosus
  • laser
  • Nd:YAG
  • randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 45 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus.

Browse Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus studies →

Lead sponsor

Dr Adolf Lukanovič is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed Lichen sclerosus
  • voluntary signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • use of photosensitizing medication
  • pathology other than Lichen
  • damage of tissues in the treatment area
  • other inflammation
  • refusal to sign
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nd:YAG Laser

    Three sessions of Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) treatment with Dynamis (Fotona, Slovenia)

    Device: Nd:YAG Laser

  • Active comparator
    Topical Corticosteroid Diprosone

    Topical corticosteroid betamethasone (Diprosone, Merck Sharp \& Dohme, d.o.o.) for 3 months.

    Drug: Topical corticosteroid Diprosone

Interventions

  • DeviceNd:YAG Laser

    Three sessions of Nd:YAG treatment every two weeks.

    Also known as: Nd:YAG, neodymium, Dynamis

  • DrugTopical corticosteroid Diprosone

    3 months of topical corticosteroids Diprosone

    Also known as: topical corticosteroids betamethasone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Visual analog scale (VAS) score symptom evaluation from baseline to 3 months

    Patients will evaluate symptoms on a 0-10 VAS scale

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Visual analog scale (VAS) score symptom evaluation from baseline to 1 month

    Patients will evaluate symptoms on a 0-10 VAS scale

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 month

  2. Change in Visual analog scale (VAS) score symptom evaluation from baseline to 6 months

    Patients will evaluate symptoms on a 0-10 VAS scale

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

  3. Comparative histological evaluation

    biopsies taken at baseline and after treatment

    Time frame: baseline and 3 months

  4. patient satisfaction

    Patients will indicate their satisfaction with the outcome of treatment on a 0-3 scale.

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. patient satisfaction

    Patients will indicate their satisfaction with the outcome of treatment on a 0-3 scale.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. patient satisfaction

    Patients will indicate their satisfaction with the outcome of treatment on a 0-3 scale.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. evaluation of improvement from clinical photographs

    by blinded evaluators on a 1-4 scale

    Time frame: 3 months

Other outcomes

  1. tolerability of first laser treatment (pain and discomfort) on a 1-10 VAS scale

    rated by patients in the laser group on a 1-10 VAS scale

    Time frame: day 0 (first laser treatment)

  2. tolerability of second laser treatment (pain and discomfort) on a 1-10 VAS scale

    rated by patients in the laser group on a 1-10 VAS scale

    Time frame: day 14 (second laser treatment)

  3. tolerability of third laser treatment (pain and discomfort) on a 1-10 VAS scale

    rated by patients in the laser group on a 1-10 VAS scale

    Time frame: 1 month (third laser treatment)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2016 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2018, 28 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 5, 2018
First posted
May 15, 2018
StartActual
Jan 28, 2016
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2018
CompletionEst.
May 30, 2018
Last update
May 15, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03525522
Lead sponsor
Dr Adolf Lukanovič
Collaborators
Juna d.o.o.
Responsible party
Dr Adolf Lukanovič (Medical Director of the Division of Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 15, 2018
Start date
Jan 28, 2016
Primary completion
May 30, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
May 15, 2018

Study contacts

Adolf Lukanović, PhD
principal investigator · UKC Ljubljana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion