CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03524781Updated Aug 4, 2020

Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a National Population-based Cohort

An observational study in Gastroesophageal Reflux, sponsored by University of Southern Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-04.

Sponsored by University of Southern Denmark · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36,292
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the treatment of newly diagnosed gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a Danish national cohort, comparing medical and surgical treatment.

Read the detailed description

Aim: To compare rate of surgery with medical treatment in patients with newly diagnosed gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a nationwide population based cohort over 15 years.

Background: Between 1990 and 1997, frequency of anti-reflux surgery in USA rose from 4,4 per 100.000 inhabitants to 12 per 100.000 inhabitants. In the same period a trans-abdominal laparoscopic approach increased to 64% of cases and mortality as well as morbidity decreased. The operation rate peaked around 2000 with an increase of 260% to approximately 16.7 operations per 100.000 inhabitants. Complications fell to its lowest point around 2000 as well.

Hereafter, the frequency of anti-reflux surgery dropped by 40% between 2000 and 2006. Complications in the form of morbidity and mortality rates steadily rose again, but the patients having performed surgery were now older and have longer hospital stays and more comorbidity. A slight rise in frequency of anti-reflux surgery to 6,1 per 100.000 inhabitants was registered in 2010 and at this time length of stay, morbidity and mortality rates have decreased, probably illustrating an increased experience. Interesting to note is, that in the American data, use of laparoscopic approach does tend to plateau at 70-80%.

It is unknown whether anti-reflux surgery in Denmark has followed the same trend. There are important differences in the setup of surgical service that may affect the results, as open anti-reflux surgery never gained much popularity in Denmark. Also, significantly fewer centers offer the procedure. In a study of re-operative anti-reflux surgery based on data from 1997-2005, a primary anti-reflux surgery rate of 5.2 per 100.000 inhabitants was reported. However, we do not know how this rate has developed or was preceded.

Hypothesis: From 2000-2015 there has been an increase in diagnosis of GERD and in the use of anti-secretory drugs, but a decrease in the utilization of anti-reflux surgery.

Methods and materials: Patient selection will be done through the Danish National Patient Registers. Included will be the period 2000-2015 for a total of 15 years of follow-up.

All adult Danish patients diagnosed with GERD and GERD-related diagnosis will be identified (ICD-10 DK21.0-21.9B \& DK20.9B) using The National Patient Registry.To validate GERD-diagnosis, upper endoscopy must have been performed no more than three months before time of diagnosis.

Patients with GERD-diagnosis within previous four years or with concomitant diagnosis requiring independent anti-secretory treatment will be excluded (DK25.0-9, DK26.0-9, DK27.0-9, DK22.7 \& DE16.4B). Patients diagnosed with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract (DC15-26) will also be excluded.

Using the Danish National Prescription Register, use of H2-antagonists (A02BA), proton pump inhibitors (A02BC), prostaglandins A02BB and bismuth, alginate and sucralfate (A02BX) will be identified in daily doses within two years of GERD-diagnosis. Anti-reflux surgery within the same period will be identified from The National Patient Registry using the procedure codes (NOMESCO: KJBC00, KJBC01, KJBC02, KJBW96, KJBW97).

From The National Patient Registry, age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index will be retrieved. Mortality during follow-up will be retrieved from The Civil Registration System.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

  • Anti-reflux surgery
  • Proton-pump inhibitors
  • Upper endoscopy
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36,292 is above the median of 180 across 298 observational studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patient selection will be done through the Danish National Patient Register. Included will be the period 2000-2015 for a total of 15 years of follow-up.

All adult Danish patients diagnosed with GERD and GERD-related diagnosis will be identified (ICD-10 DK21.0-21.9B \& DK20.9B). Patients with GERD-diagnosis within previous two years or with concomitant diagnosis requiring independent anti-secretory treatment will be excluded (DK25.0-9, DK26.0-9, DK27.0-9, DK22.7 \& DE16.4B). To validate GERD-diagnosis, upper endoscopy must have been performed no more than three months before time of diagnosis.

Inclusion criteria

  • Danish adult patient with GERD-diagnosis verified by upper endoscopy 1997-2014

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any diagnosis of cancer in the gastrointestinal tract during follow-up
  • Patients with GERD-diagnosis within previous four years or with concomitant diagnosis requiring independent anti-secretory treatment will be excluded (DK25.0-9, DK26.0-9, DK27.0-9, DK22.7 \& DE16.4B).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36,292 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment of GERD

    Medical treatment, surgical treatment or no treatment

    Time frame: 2 years after diagnosis

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Surgery, Kolding Hospital
    Kolding, Denmark
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 2, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual patient data are by Danish law no allowed to be shared without specific authorization prior to study initiation.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03524781
Lead sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
Collaborators
Kolding Sygehus, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network
Responsible party
Jonas Sanberg Jensen (MD, PhD Student, University of Southern Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2018
Start date
May 2, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2019
Completion
Aug 1, 2020
Last update
Aug 4, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion