ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03524677Updated Jan 25, 2019

Mutation of K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53 in Pancreatic Cancer: Role of Liquid Biopsy in Preoperative Diagnosis

An observational study in Pancreatic Cancer, sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza. Status unknown at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-25.

Sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pancreatic cancers represent a challenge for the multidisciplinal team. A patient-tailored treatment plan requires an accurate preoperative staging. Currently more than 40% of patient taken to the OR are actually unresectable and another 40% will shortly recur with dismal prognosis.

Among patients that meet upfront surgery some would have benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and vice versa. Accuracy of preoperative staging is of primary importance in treatment decisional making. Due to its location, invasive preoperative diagnostic tests on pancreatic cancer are expensive and risky. Liquid biopsy provides a non-invasive signature of the tumor. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinic-pathological features and likely on its progression. This study would be the first -in our knowledge- analyzing the relationship of a pattern of 4 major genes involved in pancreatic cancer progression on liquid biopsy and the time to recurrence and T-stage, with particular attention to vascular invasion. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation, an optimal treatment plan and improves patient's outcomes.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the 4th cancer-related cause of death in Western countries and it is expected to become the 2nd leading cause of death by 2030 [1]. Approximately 80% of patients are unresectable at diagnosis [2] including a 41.4% of patients found unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy/tomy [3]. Moreover up to 38% of eventually resected patients will need a vascular resection in order to achieve a radical pancreatectomy [4], just over half of which because of a histological invasion [2]. Last but not least, successfully resected patients will recur within 12 months in more than 40% of cases with dismal prognosis [5]. Those early recurrent patients will show local spread or metastatic disease within 12 months with a post-recurrence survival and overall survival more than halved compared to patients recurring beyond one year from resection [5]. Laparotomy may be therefore useless in such patients. In this setting neoadjuvant treatment plays a key-role. It has the potential advantages to deliver systemic therapy to all patients with an increased efficacy of radio- and chemotherapies distributed in a virgin field, identify patients with aggressive tumor biology that could recur shortly after surgery and thus would not benefit form an operation. Moreover neoadjuvant therapy could downstage the tumor avoiding major vessels resections, decrease positive margins resections and decrease post-operative pancreatic fistulas [6]. Unfortunately imaging is no longer reliable in predicting resectability after neoadjuvant treatment [7]. The total mean direct cost of a patient with a resectable disease is $134,700, while for metastatic or unresectable patients this cost is $49,000-65,300 [8]. A properly staged patient provides a better resource allocation.

Liquid biopsy provides an non-invasive signature of the tumor, it is based circulating genetic material coming from cellular turnover and thus especially from the tumor [9]. Analyzing mutations on cell-free nucleic acids gives translational information on tumor biology and therefore on its clinico-pathological features and likely on its progression. Pancreatic cancer progression has long been studied. What is clear is that activating K-RAS mutations are an early event in most lesions, followed by inactivating mutations in CDKN2A, TP53 and SMAD4 [10]. Those 4 mountain genes are predictive of progression pattern in an autoptic study: patients with 2 or less genes mutations were more likely to develop oligometastatic failure and to harbor earlier disease stage at diagnosis compared to those with 3 or more mutated genes [11]. K-RAS mutations have been associated to a worse overall survival in particular when found in peripheral blood by liquid biopsy [12]. CDKN2A mutations have been associated to lymphatic invasion and widespread metastatic recurrence [13]. TP53 mutations have been associated to poor differentiation and locoregional recurrence [13]. Finally SMAD4 mutations have been associated to portal vein invasion, perineural invasion and lymph vessel invasion [14]. Besides evidences on those mountain genes there is a growing body of evidence of several stage and prognosis predictors: MET protein over expression significantly correlated with increased TNM stage and worsened survival [15]; EDIL3 expression was significantly up-regulated in PDAC in both cell lines and clinical specimens and correlated with patients' TNM stage, T classification and overall survival times [16]; BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation predict significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival [17]; High RAB27A expression was significantly associated with vascular invasion and tumor stage [18].

Those data have been validated on samples of the tumor and thus usually on specimens since only 53,3% of ultrasound guided biopsies provides enough material for histopathology and/or immunohistochemistry [19]. Recent evidences show that pancreatic cancer is one of the 4 cancers, along with colorectal, gastroesophageal and breast cancer, in which detectable ctDNA levels are present either in localized either in metastatic stages [20]. As seen in previous studies, the concordance between plasma and primary tumor mutations is as high as 100% in pancreatic cancer [9, 21].

The study of those mutations on liquid biopsy would provide non-invasive informations on preoperative staging and pattern progression and therefore a more accurate therapeutic planning.

AIM OF THE PROJECT This study is a pilot study. Genomic data will be described along with the clinical features of the disease for each patient.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship of mutations of the main genes responsible for pancreatic cancer progression (K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53) along with others related to stage and prognosis (MET, BRCA1/BRCA2, EDIL3 and RAB27A) detected on peripheral blood and time to progression and vascular invasion in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Other outcomes of interest will be clinicopathological and operative features such as operative time, type of vascular resection, clinical stage, pathological T-, N- and M-stage, margin status and overall-survival.

MATERIALS AND METHOD Patients with non-metastatic PaC undergoing pancreatic resection will be enrolled from surgery departments of a multi center international web. Blood samples in EDTA will be centrifugated at 2300 rpm for 10min twice. Liquid biopsies will be preoperatively collected and stored at -80°. An protected anonymous multi parametric database will be filled with all relevant patient's and disease's informations (sex, birth date, comorbidities, BMI, lab tests, imaging clinical stage, operation time, operation type, ICU stay, Dindo-Clavien post-operative morbidity, pathological stage, TNM, Grading, ajcc 8th stage, perineural, vascular and lymphatic invasion, resection margins, disease free survival, overall survival) and K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4, TP53, MET, BRCA1/BRCA2, RAB27A and EDIL3 somatic genetic mutations on liquid biopsy with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).

Recruitment will be multicentric: AOU sant'andrea di Roma, Policlinico Universitario Gemelli di Roma, St Vincent University Hospital Dublino, Policlinico Universitario di Modena.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Assessment of relationship among gene mutations and vascular invasion will be performed by means of logistic regression models. An overall score will be prepared based on rounding of estimated log-odds ratios and its performance evaluated by means of ROC curves and C-statistic.

An evaluation of the conditional association will also be performed by means of multivariable logistic regression models, which will be selected by minimizing the Akaike Information Criterion.

To assess secondary outcomes we will also use Cox regression models in a similar fashion.

To the best of our knowledge, there is information in the literature regarding the frequency of vascular invasion in pancreatectomies with vascular resection (56.7%), and about mutations of the genes of interest in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (the lowest mutated allele frequency being 30% for CDKN2A). Since there is no previous hypothesis on the relationship among genes and vascular invasion, and since this study simply involves the analysis of a small amount of blood posing no additional risk for the patient, we decided to perform a pilot study based on 50 patients. A fully planned and adequately powered study will be then conducted on the basis of the results of this pilot study. The sample size of 50 is deemed small enough (considering, as stated, the no additional risk and no use of invasive techniques) but large enough to guarantee that the final contingency table is not sparse. All analyses will be conducted with the R software.

CONCLUSIONS Non-metastatic PaC represent a challenge in staging and prognosis definition. A patient tailored treatment requires an accurate preoperative staging. Up to now more than 40% of patients thought to be resectable exit the operating room unresected and another 40% of resected patients recur within one year. Among patients who are offered a surgery, some would benefit of a neoadjuvant treatment and some others of palliative treatments. This is why a reliable preoperative staging is essential in therapeutic decisional making. Invasive diagnostic tests of the pancreas are expensive and risky due to its central retroperitoneal location. Liquid biopsy offers a non invasive tumor characterization. This study will be the first analyzing the relationship of the four major genes, along with 5 other prognostic genes, involved in pancreatic cancer genesis and progression and T stage with special attention to early recurrence and vascular invasion, by liquid biopsy. This will result in a better resource allocation, treatment planning and patients outcomes.

REFERENCES

  1. Cancer Res. 2014; 74: 2913-2921
  2. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):2028-37
  3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 6;7:CD009323
  4. J Gastrointest Surg 2004 Dec;8(8):935-49
  5. Ann Surg 2018 Mar 23 Epub ahead of print.
  6. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Aug;6(4):418-29.
  7. Ann Surg. 2017 Dec 7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600. [Epub ahead of print]
  8. Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5132-9
  9. Science 2018 Feb 23:359(6378):926-930.
  10. Oncogene. 2013 Nov 7;32(45):5253-60.
  11. Clin Cancer Res 2012 Nov 15;18(22):6229-47.
  12. Cancer 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2271-80.
  13. Ann Surg 2013 Aug;258(2):336-46.
  14. Pancreas 2015 May;44(4):660-4.
  15. World J Gastroenterol 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8458-70.
  16. Oncotarget 2016 Jan 26;7(4):4226-40.
  17. J Am Coll Surg 2018 Apr;226(4):630-637.
  18. Med Oncol (2015) 32:372.
  19. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Oct;84(4):670-8.
  20. Sci Transl Med 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24.
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10202-10207.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

  • pancreatic cancer
  • liquid biopsy
  • vascular invasion
  • early recurrence
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,310 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 910 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 200 across 636 observational studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Roma La Sapienza is the lead sponsor of 397 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients affected by non metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18y
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Non metastatic pancreatic cancer

    patients with biopsy or fnac proven ductal adenocarcinoma without any systemic metastatic spread at preoperative imaging

    Diagnostic Test: Liquid Biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLiquid Biopsy

    K-RAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and TP53 mutation on circulating cfDNA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vascular Invasion

    Presence of venous and/or arterial invasion

    Time frame: within one month from recruiting

  2. Early recurrence

    local or systemic recurrence after resection

    Time frame: within 12 months from resection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Time to death

    Time frame: 3 years follow up

  2. Disease free survival

    Time to relapse

    Time frame: 3 years follow up

  3. N stage

    Presence of locoregional nodes' metastasis

    Time frame: within one month from recruiting

07

Study locations

2 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2019, 10 months after the start.

Of 276 non-industry observational studies under Pancreatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 86 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 41 and three quarters within 206. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 305 studies reached it within 83 months; a quarter within 40 and three quarters within 206.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 2, 2018
First posted
May 15, 2018
StartActual
Jan 23, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2019
CompletionEst.
Jan 2020
Last update
Jan 25, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03524677
Collaborators
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
Responsible party
Laura Antolino (PhD, University of Roma La Sapienza) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2018
Start date
Jan 23, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 25, 2019

Study contacts

Laura Antolino, MD, PhD stud
Contact
laura.antolino@uniroma1.it
+393470409876
Francesco D'Angelo, MD, PhD
Contact
francesco.dangelo@uniroma1.it
+390633775632
Giovanni Ramacciato, MD, FACS
study chair · Sapieza University of Rome (IT)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion