ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03499522He-PainSitUpdated Apr 17, 2018

Pain in Patients With Congenital Coagulopathies

An observational study in Hemophilia Arthropathy, sponsored by Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia. Status unknown. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-17.

Sponsored by Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Introduction. The development of joint hemorrhages in patients with congenital coagulopathies favor the development of an intra-articular, degenerative and progressive lesion (hemophilic arthropathy). Pain is one of the main clinical manifestations of hemophilic arthropathy and is related to the development of disability and a worse quality of life.

Objective. Observe the characteristics of pain, coping models and the perception of quality of life in patients with congenital coagulopathies.

Study design. Observational, cross-sectional and multi-center study. Method. 80 patients with congenital coagulopathies (hemophilia A and B, and von Willebrand's disease), of legal age, will be included in the study. Patients will be recruited in six centers, from different regions of Spain. The study variables and measurement instruments used will be: pain perception (numerical pain scale, Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Scale); perception of quality of life (Short Form -36 questionnaires); anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire); coping strategies (Coping Strategy Questionnaire); and disease perception (Illness behaviour questionnaire and Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire). A descriptive statistical analysis of the dependent and independent variables will be carried out. In the same way, the correlations between the variables and the characteristics of the subjects will be analyzed according to age, the type of coagulopathy and the degree of sequelae.

Expected results. Observe the characteristics of pain, its coping models and its implication in the quality of life in patients with congenital coagulopathies, and evaluate the independent variables related to the perception of pain.

Read the detailed description

Objectives:

Main objective: to observe the characteristics of pain, its coping models and its implication in the quality of life in patients with congenital coagulopathies. Secondary objectives: to evaluate the degree of kinesiofobia and catastrophism in patients with congenital coagulopathies; analyze the perception of quality of life, of disease and of anxiety in patients with hemophilia and von Willebrand's disease of age; and to identify the ingestion and administration of analgesic drugs in patients with hemophilia or von Willebrand's disease for the control of pain.

Design of the investigation Describe the type of study, methodology, research variables Cross-sectional and multicentric observational study, carried out in patients with congenital coagulopathies, with the aim of knowing the characteristics of pain, its coping strategies and its implications for quality of life.

Collection of information Instruments and data collection process

  • Numerical scale of pain. The patient assigns pain a numerical value between 0 and 10. With this scale pain is considered a simple one-dimensional concept and is measured only according to its intensity. The scale is discrete, not continuous.
  • Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). Health questionnaire that measures the quality of life related to health. Generic instrument consisting of 36 questions, covering 8 dimensions (physical functioning, physical role, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health of the patient).
  • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Generic instrument that assesses the current level of anxiety and the predisposition of the person to respond to stress. It consists of two sections that let you know how you feel at a certain time and how you feel in general. The score for each scale can range from 0-30, indicating higher scores, higher levels of anxiety.
  • Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia (TSK-11SV). Through this scale the fear of movement of the patients included in the study will be evaluated. This self-report measure contains 17 items on fear of movement and recurrence of a new lesion. Four of the items have a negative wording and carry an inverse notation. The scores of the different items evaluated are added to give a total score, where the highest values reflect a greater fear of injury or relapse of the same.
  • Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). Self-administered scale of 13 items used to assess the 3-dimensional pain-mapping construct: rumination, magnification and hopelessness. Low scores indicate a low catastrophization, and high values, high catastrophization.
  • Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Questionnaire composed of 42 items grouped in 7 scales of 6 items each. Each item is scored according to a scale of 7 points: deviation of attention, reinterpretation of pain sensations, ignorance of pain sensations, self-assertive coping, prayer and hope, catastrophism and increased level of activity.

Subjects of the study Number and characteristics of the sample. The inclusion criteria to participate in the present study are patients: with a medical diagnosis of congenital coagulopathies (hemophilia A and B, or von Willebrand's disease); adults; in a prophylactic or on demand regimen with FVIII / FIX concentrates; and that they have signed the informed consent document. On the other hand, those patients with: neurological or cognitive alterations that impede the comprehension of the questionnaires will be excluded from the study; inability to walk autonomously or with an orthosis; and without access to digital media to complement the measuring instruments.

It is expected to recruit a total of 80 patients for inclusion in the study. The sample size is justified with respect to the prevalence of patients with hemophilia (2039 patients with hemophilia A and B in Spain). Based on the established selection criteria (n = 678, according to the census of the Spanish Federation of Hemophilia) the sample size at the national level would be 151, with a level of confidence or 95% confidence and an expected proportion of dropouts from the fifteen%. Thus, for the 6 regions of Spain where the study will be developed, a sample of 80 patients is established for the established study period (April to December 2018).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia Arthropathy

Keywords

  • Hemophilic arthropathy
  • Pain
  • Functional Disease Present
  • Quality of life
  • Anxiety
  • Stress
  • Coping strategies
03

In context

Pain

10,060 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,651 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 100 across 1,253 observational studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with hemophilia attending in six hemophilia Associations into Spanish Federation of Hemophilia (Fedhemo).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with medical diagnosis of congenital coagulopathies: hemophilia A, hemophilia B, or von Willebrand's disease
  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Patients in a prophylactic or on demand regimen with FVIII / FIX concentrates
  • Patients that have accepted the document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological or cognitive disorders that prevent the comprehension of the questionnaires
  • Patients without capacity to walk autonomously or with orthosis
  • Patients without access to digital media to complement the measuring instruments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Observational group

    80 patients with congenital coagulopathies (hemophilia A and B, and von Willebrand's disease), of legal age, will be included in the study. Patients will be recruited in six centers, from different regions of Spain. The inclusion criteria to participate in the present study are patients: with a medical diagnosis of congenital coagulopathies (hemophilia A and B, or von Willebrand's disease); adults; in a prophylactic or on demand regimen with FVIII / FIX concentrates; and that they have signed the informed consent document. On the other hand, those patients with: neurological or cognitive alterations that impede the comprehension of the questionnaires will be excluded from the study; inability to walk autonomously or with an orthosis; and without access to digital media to complement the measuring instruments.

    Other: Observational group

Interventions

  • OtherObservational group

    The dependent variables (pain, quality of life, anxiety and coping strategies) and the outcome measures used to measure these variables will be: * Numerical scale of pain * Short Form 36 Health Survey \[SF-36\]. * State-Trait Anxiety Inventory \[STAI\]. * Tampa Scale of Kinesiophofia \[TSK-11SV\]. * Pain catastrophizing scale \[PCS\]. * Coping Strategies Questionnaire \[CSQ\].

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perception of joint pain

    Measurement with numerical scale of pain. The patient must assign pain to a numerical value between two extreme points (0 to 10). Although the subject is asked to use numerical values to indicate the level of pain, the use of keywords, as well as previous instructions, are necessary if the investigators expect the patient to conceptualize their pain in numerical terms. The scale is discrete, not continuous, but to perform statistical analyzes, equal intervals can be assumed between categories.

    Time frame: Screening visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perception of pain coping strategies

    Measurement with Coping Strategies Questionnaire \[CSQ\]. Questionnaire composed of 42 items grouped in 7 scales of 6 items each, plus 2 items referring to the control exercised over pain and the ability to reduce it. Each item is scored according to a scale of 7 points (0 = never, 3 = sometimes, 6 = always). The scales included in this measuring instrument are: deviation of attention, reinterpretation of pain sensations, ignoring pain sensations, self-assertive coping, prayer and hope, catastrophism and increased level of activity.

    Time frame: Screening visit

  2. Perception of quality of life

    Measurement with Short Form 36 Health Survey \[SF-36\]. This health questionnaire is one of the most widely used, validated and translated instruments in the field of measuring the quality of life related to health. The SF-36 health questionnaire is a generic instrument consisting of 36 questions, which provides a profile of the health status and is applicable to both patients and the healthy population. The questionnaire covers 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role, corporal pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health of the patient.

    Time frame: Screening visit

  3. Perception of anxiety

    Measurement with State-Trait Anxiety Inventory \[STAI\]. This generic measurement instrument evaluates the current level of anxiety and the predisposition of the person to respond to stress. The STAI scale consists of two sections: the A-state scale contains 20 elements with which the patient can express how they feel at a given time and in the A-trait sscala, which also includes 20 elements, the subject can indicate how they feel. feel in general. The score for each scale can range from 0-30, indicating higher scores, higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Screening visit

  4. kinesiophobia

    Measurement with Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia \[TSK-11SV\]. Through this scale the fear of movement of the patients included in the study will be evaluated. This self-report measure contains 17 items on fear of movement and recurrence of a new lesion. Four of the items have a negative wording and carry an inverse notation. The scores of the different items evaluated are added to give a total score, where the highest values reflect a greater fear of injury or relapse of the same.

    Time frame: Screening visit

  5. Perception of pain catastrophizing

    Measurement with Pain catastrophizing scale \[PCS\]. This self-administered scale of 13 items is one of the most used to assess the construct catrastofización before pain. It includes 3 dimensions: rumination, magnification and despair. The theoretical range of the instrument is between 13 and 62, indicating low scores a low catastrophization, and high values, high catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Screening visit

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2018; primary completion for Dec 2018, 7 months later.

Of 504 non-industry observational studies under Pain, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 519 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2018
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
StartEst.
May 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2018
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2019
Last update
Apr 17, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03499522
Lead sponsor
Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia
Responsible party
Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD (Principal Investigator, Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Start date
May 1, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2018

Study contacts

Rubén Cuesta Barriuso, PhD
Contact
ruben.cuestab@gmail.com
607547274
Rubén Cuesta Barriuso
principal investigator · Royal Victoria Eugenia Foundation

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion