ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03498898Updated Aug 16, 2018

The Effect of Ongoing Beta-blockers Administration on Analgesic Requirements in the Immediate Perioperative Period.

An interventional study of Chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blocker in Nociceptive Pain, sponsored by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-16.

Sponsored by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to discover if chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers affects pain sensation during and after an elective procedure of hip or knee replacement. The study's population will be divided to four groups: Group A- chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers undergoing total hip replacement, Group B- no use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers undergoing total hip replacement, Group C- chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers undergoing total knee replacement and Group D- no use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers undergoing total knee replacement. Each patient will be anesthetized using the same anesthesia protocol with pain assessment done by the ANI device intra operatively and by NRS score postoperatively.

Read the detailed description

The effect of ongoing Beta adrenergic receptor blockers administration on perioperative and post-operative pain.

Beta adrenergic receptor blockers are in common use for treatment of a variety of illnesses. Mostly ones that are connected to the cardiovascular system (such as congestive heart failure, angina pectoris and dysrhythmias) but also for treatment of some neurological disorders and more.

Esmolol and Labetalol are frequently utilized during the perioperative period because of their beneficial effects in treating the acute hemodynamic response to surgical stress. However, clinical studies have confirmed that these adjuvant drugs can reduce postoperative opioid consumption and facilitate earlier extubation. In multiple studies, Esmolol was found effective reducing postoperative pain and the need for narcotic analgesics following surgery. A Meta-analysis published in 2015 in the Journal of Anesthesiology found that Esmolol caused a 32-50% reduction in the need for rescue analgesics and that propranolol decreased the need for rescue analgesics by 72%.

The "Analgesia Nociception Index" (ANI; MetroDoloris Medical Systems, Lille, France), derived from an electrocardiogram (ECG) trace, has been proposed as a noninvasive guide to analgesia. The ANI monitor calculates heart rate variation with respiration, a response mediated primarily by changes in the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) stimulation to the sinoatrial node of the heart . A painful stimulus will cause a relative decrease in parasympathetic tone and therefore result in a decrease in ANI scores. A score of 100 indicates maximum parasympathetic tone and low nociceptive levels, while a score of zero indicates minimum parasympathetic tone and high nociceptive levels. ANI has been validated in a few studies. In a recently published clinical trial comparing ANI to other predictive modalities and to traditional clinical signs (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) ANI was found to have the highest sensitivity and specificity (P k -0.98) for detecting painful stimulations.

The NRS for pain is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults. The most commonly used is the 11-item NRS which is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0 -10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain where 0 is described as no pain and 10 is described as the worst pain imaginable. The NRS-11 is perhaps the most commonly used pain intensity rating tool with a highly correlated validity to the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition High test-retest reliability has been observed in both literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis (r 0.96 and 0.95, respectively).

02

Conditions studied

  • Nociceptive Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Beta adrenergic receptor blockers
  • Analgesia nociceptive index
  • Total hip replacement
  • Total knee replacement
03

In context

Nociceptive Pain

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Nociceptive Pain; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 61 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Nociceptive Pain.

Browse Nociceptive Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 554 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Candidates for an elective hip replacement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with no sinus rhythm.
  • Patients with an internal cardiac device / cardiac pacemaker.
  • The use of Anti muscarinic, alpha adrenergic receptor blockers or anti arhythmic medications.
  • Chronic use of Opioids (defined as 20 mg or more of Oxycodone per day for a period of 6 weeks or more).
  • > 40.
  • Sensitivity to one of the following drugs: Propofol, Fentanyl, Rocuronium, Isoflurane, Morphine, Acetaminophen, Ondansetron.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score 2-3 with chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers planned to undergo total hip replacement

    Other: Chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blocker

  • No intervention
    Group B

    American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score 2-3 with no chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers planned to undergo total hip replacement

  • Active comparator
    Group C

    American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score 2-3 with chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers planned to undergo total knee replacement.

    Other: Chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blocker

  • No intervention
    Group D

    American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score 2-3 with no chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers planned to undergo total knee replacement

Interventions

  • OtherChronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blocker

    Chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blocker

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fentanyl consumption during surgery.

    Measuring the effect of chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers on the amount of analgesia (Fentanyl).

    Time frame: Intra operative (anaesthesia start until anaesthesia end).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post operative Morphine consumption.

    Measuring the effect of chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers on the amount of analgesia (Morphine).

    Time frame: Immediate post operative time (from admission to release from PACU).

  2. Post operative non opioid analgesia consumption.

    Measuring the effect of chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers on the amount of non opioid analgesia.

    Time frame: Immediate post operative time (from admission to release from PACU).

  3. Post operative pain (NRS score).

    Measuring the effect of chronic use of Beta adrenergic receptor blockers on NRS pain score.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after admission to PACU.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel-Aviv, 64239, Israel
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • White PF. What are the advantages of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of acute and chronic pain? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;18(4):329-333. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1289176. Epub 2017 Feb 20. No abstract available. PubMed 28132576 ↗
  • Chia YY, Chan MH, Ko NH, Liu K. Role of beta-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Dec;93(6):799-805. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh268. Epub 2004 Sep 17. PubMed 15377583 ↗
  • Collard V, Mistraletti G, Taqi A, Asenjo JF, Feldman LS, Fried GM, Carli F. Intraoperative esmolol infusion in the absence of opioids spares postoperative fentanyl in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1255-62, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000282822.07437.02. PubMed 17959952 ↗
  • Lopez-Alvarez S, Mayo-Moldes M, Zaballos M, Iglesias BG, Blanco-Davila R. Esmolol versus ketamine-remifentanil combination for early postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):442-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9684-x. Epub 2012 Mar 2. PubMed 22383085 ↗
  • Harkanen L, Halonen J, Selander T, Kokki H. Beta-adrenergic antagonists during general anesthesia reduced postoperative pain: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):934-43. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2041-9. Epub 2015 Jul 10. PubMed 26160590 ↗
  • Funcke S, Sauerlaender S, Pinnschmidt HO, Saugel B, Bremer K, Reuter DA, Nitzschke R. Validation of Innovative Techniques for Monitoring Nociception during General Anesthesia: A Clinical Study Using Tetanic and Intracutaneous Electrical Stimulation. Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):272-283. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001670. PubMed 28489614 ↗
  • De Jonckheere J, Logier R, Jounwaz R, Vidal R, Jeanne M. From pain to stress evaluation using heart rate variability analysis: development of an evaluation platform. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:3852-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627661. PubMed 21097068 ↗
  • Logier R, Jeanne M, De Jonckheere J, Dassonneville A, Delecroix M, Tavernier B. PhysioDoloris: a monitoring device for analgesia / nociception balance evaluation using heart rate variability analysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:1194-7. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5625971. PubMed 21095676 ↗
  • Upton HD, Ludbrook GL, Wing A, Sleigh JW. Intraoperative "Analgesia Nociception Index"-Guided Fentanyl Administration During Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Lumbar Discectomy and Laminectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):81-90. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001984. PubMed 28598927 ↗
  • Dundar N, Kus A, Gurkan Y, Toker K, Solak M. Analgesia nociception index (ani) monitoring in patients with thoracic paravertebral block: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Jun;32(3):481-486. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0036-9. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PubMed 28631050 ↗
  • Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993 Nov;55(2):195-203. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-I. PubMed 8309709 ↗
  • Andersson V, Bergman S, Henoch I, Ene KW, Otterstrom-Rydberg E, Simonsson H, Ahlberg K. Pain and pain management in hospitalized patients before and after an intervention. Scand J Pain. 2017 Apr;15:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 9. PubMed 28850341 ↗
  • Gruenewald M, Ilies C, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Fudickar A, Hocker J, Bein B. Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet019. Epub 2013 Mar 6. PubMed 23471754 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2019, 16 months after the start.

Of 37 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Nociceptive Pain, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 16 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 42 studies reached it within 8 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 8, 2018
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
StartActual
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2019
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2019
Last update
Aug 16, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03498898
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Start date
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 16, 2018

Study contacts

Idit Matot, MD, PhD
Contact
iditm@tlvmc.gov.il
97236974758
Miri Davidovich
Contact
mirid@tlvmc.gov.il
97236974758
Idit Matot, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion