ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03493672Updated Nov 18, 2020

Counting Steps! Integration of Objectively Assessed Physical Activity and Fitness With Smartphones in Clinical Oncology Practice.

An observational study in Neoplasms, sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-18.

Sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
135
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale:

Optimal selection of patients with cancer eligible for a clinical trial, is of utmost importance, but can be very difficult. Patients must be sufficiently fit and have a reasonable life expectancy, to be eligible for participation in clinical trials. In current clinical practice, the ECOG/WHO performance status, is used to select patients for clinical trials, and it has proven to be an independent predictor of survival in patients with cancer. This score is based on a subjective assessment of the treating physician, which can, together with the strong motivation of some patients to participate, lead to overestimation of a patient's actual physical condition and may thereby contribute to early trial discontinuation. Participation of these patients may not only harm them, but will also hamper trial conduct and outcomes.

Both, physical activity and fitness are positively associated with survival in patients with cancer. This gives rise to the investigators hypothesis that objective measurements can be of added value in the selection process. Additionally, preliminary results in 50 patients with cancer that participated in part 1 of the "Counting Steps!" project revealed that the smartphone can produce valid and reliable assessments of physical activity and fitness, and the user friendliness was rated "good" by patients.

The investigators hypothesize that measurements of physical activity and fitness with smartphones will provide more objective and accurate information about the actual physical condition of a patient with cancer.

With a better prediction of trial feasibility (without early trial discontinuation) and overall survival in patients participating in phase I-II clinical trials, the selection of eligible trial participants could be improved. In this way, it is possible to more adequately identify patients who are most likely to successfully participate in a clinical trial and thereby have the highest chance to benefit from trial participation. Successful trial participation will provide optimal palliative care to patients and improve their quality of life. In addition, it may prohibit participation of patients who are currently incorrectly included in clinical trials and suffer from toxic therapies without having a chance to benefit from treatment. A better selection of patients will be beneficial for the trial outcomes and subsequently for the development of new anticancer drugs or treatment regimens.

Objective:

The investigators aim to:

  1. Identify whether objective smartphone measurements of physical activity and fitness is predictive for trial feasibility (without early trial discontinuation) in patients with cancer participating in phase I-II clinical trials.
  2. Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the use of the smartphone's objective assessments of physical activity and fitness in clinical practice.

Study design: Observational study

Study population:

  • 135 patients with hematologic or solid cancer referred to the VU medical center for participation in phase I-II clinical trials.

Intervention:

In this observational study, patients will not receive an additional intervention.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Prior to the start of medical treatment, physicians will rate the performance status, and participants will wear a smartphone for one week to measure the daily number of steps, to complete the 6 minute walk test using the smartphone application, and to fill out the 5-item physical function subscale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These assessments will be repeated after 4 and 8 weeks.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

No extra visits to the hospital will be necessary. Participation in this study will not cause any additional risks or expected benefits for participants. It will only deliver knowledge, which may be used in the future to better select patients eligible for participation in phase I-II clinical trials or even for regular treatment. Participation in the study will only cost time for patients. The patients will be asked to wear a smartphone for a week, have to perform a six-minute walk test (6MWT) once in this week and have to complete a questionnaire about their own physical function once. Subsequently, patients will repeat those measurements 4 and 8 weeks after inclusion in the phase I-II clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Phase I clinical trial
  • Phase II clinical trial
  • Early trial discontinuation
  • Objective smartphone measurements
  • Physical activity
  • Physical fitness
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 135 is below the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc is the lead sponsor of 305 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients with advanced cancer referred to the outpatient department of Medical Oncology and Hematology of the VU medical center, for treatment in a phase I/II clinical trial

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of advanced cancer, referred for treatment in phase I/II clinical trial
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already started treatment in phase I/II clinical trial
  • Inability to understand the Dutch language
  • Cognitive disorders or severe emotional instability
  • Reasons why mobilizing is impossible, like fracture, paraplegia etc.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
135 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testObjective measurement of physical activity and fitness

    Physical activity and fitness will be assessed objectively with a smartphone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Early trial discontinuation

    Early trial discontinuation is defined as discontinuation of trial in the first two months after inclusion, dichotomized into yes or no

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Overall survival is defined as the time between start of trial participation and death of any cause and will be tracked via the registration of the original clinical trial

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Progression free survival

    Progression free survival is defined as the time between trial participation and the clinically or radiologically confirmation of progressive disease (established via RECIST-criteria) as defined by the original clinical trial and will be tracked via the registration of the original clinical trial

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VU Medical Center
    Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2020, 27 months.

Of 1,098 non-industry observational studies under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 61 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 227. This study's 27 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,246 studies reached it within 58 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 210.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2018
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
StartActual
Oct 18, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2020
Last update
Nov 18, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03493672
Responsible party
Laurien Maria Buffart (MD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Oct 18, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2020
Completion
Feb 1, 2020
Last update
Nov 18, 2020

Study contacts

Henk MW Verheul, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion