ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03492788optCRTUpdated May 1, 2019

Optimizing CRT With ECGI

An interventional study of ECGI-optimized VV-offset and Zero VV-offset in Heart Failure, Systolic and Left Bundle-Branch Block, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-01.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study lost access to ECGI
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

CRT is delivered from two electrodes on opposite sides of the heart [right (RV) and left ventricle (LV)] delivering stimulation for more efficient heart beats. There is flexibility in the sequence and temporal staggering of the stimulation from these two electrodes with a different optimum for different patients. However, standard techniques to figure out the optimal stimulation strategy like standard 12-lead surface electrical recording (ECG) or routine ultrasound have failed. The investigators have developed ECG imaging (ECGI) with 250 electrode surface recording combined with CT scan to reconstruct high resolution 4-dimensional panoramic electrical maps of the heart. The study seeks to enroll 56 patients undergoing CRT in a clinical trail to evaluate short and long term impact of using ECGI for optimal programming of CRT.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction is a major global health problem. Every year, over 200,000 patients with HF and electrical abnormalities receive device implants for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). However, one-third of these patients receiving CRT fail to clinically improve, a large population with refractory HF symptoms, high mortality, and tremendous healthcare costs. The overall objective of the study is to improve the clinical response to CRT by physiological optimization of CRT programming with individualized ventriculo-ventricular (VV) offset, guided by novel 4-dimensional panoramic electroanatomical heart mapping using Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI). ECGI is a high-resolution, non-invasive, validated technique using 250 recording electrodes combined with heart-torso anatomy from chest CT.

Specific Aims:

  1. Assess the acute impact of ECGI-guided CRT optimization on hemodynamic heart function.
  2. Determine the impact of ECGI-guided CRT optimization on reverse heart remodeling at 6 months.

Methods:

The study will enroll 56 adult patients undergoing CRT for standard clinical indications.

  1. Compare the impact of ECGI-guided CRT optimization vs. standard-of-care (zero VV offset) on acute hemodynamic function i.e. left ventricular stroke volume on Doppler echocardiography.
  2. Randomize patients to (a) ECGI-guided CRT optimization or (b) standard-of-care (zero VV offset). Patients will be crossed-over at 6 months and serve as their own controls. The primary outcome will be the difference in heart remodeling, i.e. % reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline, between the two groups after 6 months. Reduction in LVESV is a validated physiological marker of CRT response that strongly predicts lower mortality and HF events. The secondary outcomes will include quality-of-life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), functional performance (6-minute hall walk distance) and a prognostic biomarker (serum N-terminal proBNP).

The results of this important study will provide key mechanistic insights on the salutary effects of CRT on reverse heart remodeling and enhance the understanding of failure in CRT response. Physiologically tailored CRT therapy would improve individual patient health by reducing CRT non-responders, and decrease the economic burden of refractory HF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure, Systolic
  • Left Bundle-Branch Block

Keywords

  • cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • electrocardiographic imaging
03

In context

Heart Failure, Systolic

230 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure, Systolic; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 60 across 165 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure, Systolic.

Browse Heart Failure, Systolic studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥18 years of age who are able to give consent, having systolic heart failure despite treatment with guideline directed medical therapy, undergoing successful CRT device implant for standard clinical indications, expected to have over 95% heart beats resynchronized by the pacing device (absence of competing arrhythmias), and have RV or LV pacing latency (stimulus to rapid QRS deflection) ≥30 msec

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to comply with the study follow-up, ≤1 year, suboptimal LV lead location (septal or apical)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ECGI-optimized VV-offset

    Other: ECGI-optimized VV-offset

  • Placebo comparator
    Zero VV-offset

    Other: Zero VV-offset

Interventions

  • OtherECGI-optimized VV-offset

    ECGI guided optimization of VV offset programming of CRT device

  • OtherZero VV-offset

    Standard-of-care nominal (zero VV-offset) programming of CRT device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. LV reverse remodeling

    Echocardiographically evaluated % reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline is the primary outcome measure. A reduction in the LVESV is a validated surrogate marker of improved HF outcomes including reduced hospitalizations and increased survival.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality-of-life

    The validated standardized abbreviated Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) is a secondary outcome measure. The KCCQ-12 is a self-reported disease-specific health status measure for patients with HF. The overall summary KCCQ-12 score ranges from 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent) and represents the summation of the patient's physical limitation, symptom frequency, quality of life and social limitation. Improvement in the KCCQ-12 overall summary score as compared to the baseline will be assessed.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Functional performance

    A standard six-minute hall walk distance (meters) will be measured at baseline and at followup to assess increase in walking distance as a reproducible measure of functional performance.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Prognostic biomarker

    Serum N-terminal proBNP is a validated prognostic biomarker that is elevated with worsening HF and is associated with worse outcomes including mortality. The NT-proBNP level at followup will be compared to baseline as a marker of improvement in heart failure.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03492788
Collaborators
American College of Cardiology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Dec 28, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 5, 2018
Completion
Oct 5, 2018
Last update
May 1, 2019

Study contacts

Amit Noheria, MBBS, SM
principal investigator · Assistant Professor of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion